The accuracy of noninvasive cardiac output and pressure measurements with finger cuff: A concise review

Current Opinion in Critical Care

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 232-239

  Ameloot, Koen ^a,b   Palmers, Pieter Jan ^a,b   Malbrain, Manu L N G ^a,c  

^a Department of Cardiology ^*  (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c ZiekenhuisNetwerk Antwerpen   (Belgium)

Author keywords

blood pressure; cardiac output; finger cuff; hemodynamic monitoring; noninvasive; thermodilution

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE CUFF; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; FIBEROPTIC OXIMETER CATHETER; FINGER; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; REVIEW; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DEVICES; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; VASCULARIZATION;

ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FINGERS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC;

EID: 84929991801     PISSN: 10705295     EISSN: 15317072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000198     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Michard F. Do we need to know cardiac preload? In: Vincent JL, editor. Yearbook of intensive care and emergency medicine. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2004. pp. 694-701.
2. Palmers PJ, Vidts W, Ameloot K, et al. Assessment of three minimally invasive continuous cardiac output measurement methods in critically ill patients and a review of the literature. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2012; 44:188-199.
3. Hofkens PJ, Verrijcken A, Merveille K, et al. Common pitfalls and tips and tricks to get the most out of your transpulmonary thermodilution device: results of a survey and state-of-the-art review. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
4. Belda FJ, AguilarG, Teboul JL, et al. PICS Investigators Group. Complications related to less-invasive haemodynamic monitoring. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106:482-486.
5. Ameloot K, Van De Vijver K, Broch O, et al. Nexfin noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring: validation against continuous pulse contour and intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution derived cardiac output in critically ill patients. ScientificWorldJournal 2013; 2013:519080.
6. Ameloot K, Van De Vijver K, Van Regenmortel N, et al. Validation study of Nexfin1 continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in critically ill adult patients. Minerva Anestesiol 2014; 18:1294-1301.
7. Wesseling KH, Jansen JR, Settels JJ, et al. Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74:2566-2573.
8. Hofhuizen C, Lansdorp B, van der Hoeven JG, et al. Validation of noninvasive pulse contour cardiac output using finger arterial pressure in cardiac surgery patients requiring fluid therapy. J Crit Care 2014; 29:161-165.
9. Martina JR, Westerhof BE, de Jonge N, et al. Noninvasive arterial blood pressure waveforms in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. ASAIO J 2014; 60:154-161.
10. Hohn A, Defosse JM, Becker S, et al. Noninvasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring with Nexfin does not sufficiently replace invasive measurements in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111:178-184.
11. Monnet X, Picard F, Lidzborski E, et al. The estimation of cardiac output by the Nexfin device is of poor reliability for tracking the effects of a fluid challenge. Crit Care 2012; 16:R212.
12. Fischer MO, Avram R, Câ rjaliu I, et al. Noninvasive continuous arterial pressure and cardiac index monitoring with Nexfin after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109:514-521.
13. Martina JR, Westerhof BE, van Goudoever J, et al. Noninvasive continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring with Nexfin1. Anesthesiology 2012; 116:1092-1103.
14. Broch O, Renner J, Gruenewald M, et al. A comparison of the Nexfin1 and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia 2012; 67:377-383.
15. Stover JF, Stocker R, Lenherr R, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output and blood pressure monitoring cannot replace an invasive monitoring system in critically ill patients. BMC Anesthesiol 2009; 9:6.
16. Chen G, Meng L, Alexander B, et al. Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output measurements using the Nexfin monitoring device and the esophageal Doppler. J Clin Anesth 2012; 24:275-283.
17. Bubenek-Turconi SI, Craciun M, Miclea I, Perel A. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the Nexfin before and after preload-modifying maneuvers: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2013; 117:366-372.
18. Fischer MO, Coucoravas J, Truong J, et al. Assessment of changes in cardiac index and fluid responsiveness: a comparison of Nexfin and transpulmonary thermodilution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013; 57:704-712.
19. Maass SW, Roekaerts PM, Lancé MD. Cardiac output measurement by bioimpedance and noninvasive pulse contour analysis compared with the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution technique. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2014; 28:534-539.
20. Bogert LW, Wesseling KH, Schraa O, et al. Pulse contour cardiac output derived from noninvasive arterial pressure in cardiovascular disease. Anaesthesia 2010; 65:1119-1125.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 158476:307-310.
22. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15:85-91.
23. Vos JJ, Poterman M, Mooyaart EA, et al. Comparison of continuous noninvasive finger arterial pressure monitoring with conventional intermittent automated arm arterial pressure measurement in patients under general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113:67-74.
24. Broch O, Bein B, Gruenewald M, et al. A comparison of continuous noninvasive arterial pressure with invasive radial and femoral pressure in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Minerva Anestesiol 2013; 79:248-256.
25. Garnier RP, van der Spoel AG, Sibarani-Ponsen R, et al. Level of agreement between Nexfin noninvasive arterial pressure with invasive arterial pressure measurements in children. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109:609-615.
26. Nowak RM, Sen A, Garcia AJ, et al. Noninvasive continuous or intermittent blood pressure and heart rate patient monitoring in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2011; 29:782-789.
27. ANSI/AAMI. American National Standard for Manual, Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, 2002.
28. Taton O, Fagnoul D, De Backer D, Vincent JL. Evaluation of cardiac output in intensive care using a noninvasive arterial pulse contour technique (Nexfin( 1)) compared with echocardiography. Anaesthesia 2013; 68:917-923.
29. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010; 111:1180-1192.
30. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2011; 1:1.
31. Yang X, Du B. Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2014; 18:650.
32. Lansdorp B, Ouweneel D, de Keijzer A, et al. Noninvasive measurement of pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation using a finger cuff corresponds with intra-arterial measurement. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107:540-545.
33. Nowak RM, Sen A, Garcia AJ, et al. The inability of emergency physicians to adequately clinically estimate the underlying hemodynamic profiles of acutely ill patients. Am J Emerg Med 2012; 30:954-960.
34. Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care. Anesthesiology 2010; 113:220-235.