Assessment of changes in cardiac index and fluid responsiveness: A comparison of Nexfin and transpulmonary thermodilution

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 57, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 704-712

  Fischer, M O ^a,b   Coucoravas, J ^a   Truong, J ^a   Zhu, L ^a   Gerard J L ^a   Hanouz, J L ^a,b   Fellahi, J L ^a,b  

^a CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b France   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; HEART INDEX; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; LUNG HEMODYNAMICS; MALE; PHOTOELECTRIC PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROVOCATION TEST; PULSE PRESSURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RESPIRATORY TRACT PARAMETERS; THERMODILUTION; TRANSPULMONARY THERMODILUTION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AREA UNDER CURVE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY SURFACE AREA; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STROKE VOLUME; THERMODILUTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84878847569     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: 13996576     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aas.12108     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Hamilton M, Cecconi M, Rhodes A,. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive haemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 1392-1402.
2. Powell-Tuck J, Gosling P, Lobo DN, Allisson LP, Carlson GL, Gore M, Lewington AJ, Pearse RM, Mythen MJ,. British consensus guidelines on intravenous fluid therapy for adult surgical patients GIFTASUP, 2009.
3. Peyton PJ, Chong SW,. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 1220-1235.
4. Truijen J, van Lieshout JJ, Wesselink WA, Westerhof BE,. Noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput 2012; 26: 267-278.
5. Martina JR, Westerhof BE, van, Goudoever J, de, Beaumont EM, Truijen J, Kim YS, Immink RV, Jöbsis DA, Hollmann MW, Lahpor JR, de, Mol BA, van, Lieshout JJ,. Noninvasive continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring with Nexfin®. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 1092-1103.
6. Fischer MO, Avram R, Cârjaliu I, Massetti M, Gérard JL, Hanouz JL, Fellahi JL,. Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure and cardiac index monitoring with Nexfin after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 514-521.
7. Chen G, Meng L, Alexander B, Tran NP, Kain ZN, Cannesson M,. Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output measurements using the Nexfin monitoring device and the esophageal Doppler. J Clin Anesth 2012; 24: 275-283.
8. Broch O, Renner J, Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Schöttler J, Caliebe A, Steinfath M, Malbrain M, Bein B,. A comparison of the Nexfin and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 377-383.
9. Lansdorp B, Ouweneel D, de, Keijzer A, van der, Hoeven JG, Lemson J, Pickkers P,. Non-invasive measurement of pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation using a finger cuff corresponds with intra-arterial measurement. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 540-545.
10. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Moher D, Rennie D, de, Vet HC, Lijmer JG,. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: W1-12.
11. Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R,. Controlled sedation with Alphaxalone-Alphadolone. Br Med J 1974; 2: 656-659.
12. Gardner RM,. Direct blood pressure measurement-Dynamic response requirements. Anesthesiology 1981; 54: 227-236.
13. Monnet X, Persichini R, Ktari M, Jozwiak M, Richard C, Teboul JL,. Precision of the transpulmonary thermodilution measurements. Crit Care 2011; 15: R204.
14. Westerhof N, Lankhaar JW, Westerhof BE,. The arterial Windkessel. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009; 47: 131-141.
15. Hofhuizen CM, Lemson J, Hemelaar AE, Settels JJ, Schraa O, Singh SK, van der, Hoeven JG, Scheffer GJ,. Continuous non-invasive finger arterial pressure monitoring reflects intra-arterial pressure changes in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 493-500.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG,. Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
17. Critchley LA, Critchley JA,. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15: 85-91.
18. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL,. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837-845.
19. Roques F, Nashef NA, Michel P, Gauducheau E, de, Vincentiis C, Baudet E, Cortina J, David M, Faichney A, Gabrielle F, Gams E, Harjula A, Jones MT, Pintor PP, Salamon R, Thulin L,. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15: 816-822.
20. Sander M, von Heymann C, Foer A, van, Dossow V, Grosse J, Dushe S, Konertz WF, Spies CD,. Pulse contour analysis after normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care 2005; 9: R729-734.
21. Muller L, Candela D, Nyonzyma L, Mattatia L, Suehs C, Fabbro-Peray P, Louard G, Coussaye JE, Jaber S, Leone M, Lefrant JY, AzuRéa Group. Disagreement between pulse contour analysis and transpulmonary thermodilution for cardiac output monitoring after routine therapeutic interventions in ICU patients with acute circulatory failure. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 664-669.
22. Feldman JM,. Is it a bird? Is it a plane? The role of patient monitors in medical decision making. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 707-710.
23. Monnet X, Picard F, Lidzborski E, Mesnil M, Duranteau J, Richard C, Teboul JL,. The estimation of cardiac output by the Nexfin device is of poor reliability for tracking the effects of a fluid challenge. Crit Care 2012; 16: R212.
24. Hadian M, Kook Kim H, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR,. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care 2010; 14: R212.
25. Muller L, Louart G, Bousquet PJ, Candela D, Zoric L, de, La Coussaye JE, Jaber S, Lefrant JY,. The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 496-503.
26. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL,. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517-523.
27. Monnet X, Bleibtreu A, Ferre A, Dres M, Gharbi R, Richard C, Teboul JL,. Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance. Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 152-157.
28. De Backer D, Taccone FS, Holsten R, Ibrahimi F, Vincent JL,. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 1092-1097.
29. Mahjoub Y, Touzeau J, Airapetian N, Lorne E, Hijazi M, Zogheib E, Tinturier F, Slama M, Dupont H,. The passive leg-raising maneuver cannot accurately predict fluid responsiveness in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 1824-1829.
30. Price LC, Wort SJ, Finney SJ, Marino PS, Brett SJ,. Pulmonary vascular and right ventricular dysfunction in adult critical care: current and emerging options for management: a systematic literature review. Crit Care 2010; 14: R169.