Strong stability preserving Runge–Kutta and multistep time discretizations

Strong Stability Preserving Runge-Kutta and Multistep Time Discretizations

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-176

  Gottlieb, Sigal ^a   Ketcheson, David ^b   Shu, Chi Wang ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH   (United States)

^b KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NON NEWTONIAN FLOW; RUNGE KUTTA METHODS;

DISCRETIZATIONS; ERROR COEFFICIENT; LINEAR STABILITY DOMAIN; OTHER PROPERTIES; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; STATE OF THE ART; STRONG STABILITY PRESERVING; TIME STEPPING METHOD;

NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 84995414785     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1142/7498     Document Type: Book

References (116)

1. P. Albrecht. The Runge–Kutta theory in a nutshell. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 33:1712–1735, 1996.
2. D. Balsara and C. W. Shu. Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy. Journal of Computational Physics, 160:405–452, 2000.
3. A. Bellen and Z. Jackiewicz and M. Zennaro. Contractivity of waveform relaxation Runge–Kutta iterations and related limit methods for dissipative systems in the maximum norm. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 31:499–523, 1994.
4. A. Bellen and L. Torelli. Unconditional contractivity in the maximum norm of diagonally split Runge-Kuttamethods. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 34:528–543, 1997
5. C. Bolley and M. Crouzeix. Conservation de la positivite lors de la discretisation des problemes d’evolution paraboliques. R.A.I.R.O. Anal. Numer.12:237–245, 1978.
6. J.C. Butcher. On the implementation of implicit Runge-Kutta methods. BIT, 6:237–240, 1976.
7. J. C. Butcher and S. Tracogna. Order conditions for two-step Runge–Kutta methods. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 24:351–364, 1997.
8. J.C. Butcher. Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations.Wiley, 2003.
9. W. Cai, D. Gottlieb and C. W. Shu. Essentially nonoscillatory spectral Fourier methods for shock wave calculations. Mathematics of Computation, 52:389–410, 1989.
10. M. Calvo, J.M. Franco, and L. Randez. A new minimum storage Runge- Kutta scheme for computational acoustics. Journal of Computational Physics, 201:1–12, 2004.
11. M. H. Chen, B. Cockburn and F. Reitich. High-order RKDG methods for computational electromagnetics. Journal of Scientific Computing, 22- 23:205–226, 2005.
12. B. Cockburn, S. Hou and C. W. Shu. The Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws IV: the multidimensional case. Mathematics of Computation, 54:545–581, 1990.
13. B. Cockburn and C. W. Shu. TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws II: general framework. Mathematics of Computation, 52:411–435, 1989.
14. B. Cockburn and C. W. Shu. Runge-Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin methods for convection-dominated problems. Journal of Scientific Computing, 16:173–261, 2001.
15. E. Constantinescu and A. Sandu. Optimal explicit strong-stabilitypreserving general linear methods. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 32(5):3130–3150, 2010.
16. G. Dahlquist and R. Jeltsch. Generalized disks of contractivity for explicit and implicit Runge-Kutta methods. Technical report, Department of Numerical Analysis and Computational Science, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 1979.
17. K. Dekker and J.G. Verwer. Stability of Runge-Kutta methods for stiff nonlinear differential equations, Volume 2 of CWI Monographs. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1984.
18. A. Dutt, L. Greengard and V. Rokhlin. Spectral deferred correction methods for ordinary differential equations. BIT, 40:241–266, 2000.
19. L. Ferracina and M.N. Spijker. Stepsize restrictions for the total-variationdiminishing property in general Runge-Kutta methods. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 42:1073–1093, 2004.
20. L. Ferracina and M.N. Spijker. Computing optimal monotonicity-preserving Runge-Kutta methods. Technical Report MI2005-07, Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, 2005.
21. L. Ferracina and M.N. Spijker. An extension and analysis of the Shu- Osher representation of Runge-Kutta methods. Mathematics of Computation, 249:201–219, 2005.
22. L. Ferracina and M.N. Spijker. Strong stability of singly-diagonallyimplicit Runge-Kutta methods. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2007.10.004
23. S. Gill. A process for the step-by-step integration of differential equations in an automatic digital computing machine. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 47:96–108, 1950.
24. J.B. Goodman and R.J. LeVeque. On the accuracy of stable schemes for 2D scalar conservation laws. Mathematics of Computation, 45:15–21, 1985.
25. D. Gottlieb and E. Tadmor. The CFL condition for spectral approximations to hyperbolic initial-boundary value problems. Mathematics of Computation, 56:565–588, 1991.
26. S. Gottlieb and C. W. Shu. Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes. Mathematics of Computation, 67:73–85, 1998.
27. S. Gottlieb, C. W. Shu and E. Tadmor. Strong stability preserving highorder time discretization methods. SIAM Review, 43:89–112, 2001.
28. S. Gottlieb and L.J. Gottlieb. Strong stability preserving properties of Runge-Kutta time discretization methods for linear constant coefficient operators. Journal of Scientific Computing, 18:83–109, 2003.
29. S. Gottlieb. On high order strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta and multi step time discretizations. Journal of Scientific Computing, 25:105–127, 2005.
30. S. Gottlieb and S.J. Ruuth. Optimal strong-stability-preserving timestepping schemes with fast downwind spatial discretizations. Journal of Scientific Computing, 27:289–303, 2006.
31. S. Gottlieb, D.I. Ketcheson and C.-W. Shu. High order strong stability preserving time discretizations. Journal of Scientific Computing, 38:251–289, 2009.
32. E. Hairer and G. Wanner. Solving ordinary differential equations II: Stiff and differential-algebraic problems, Volume 14 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.
33. E. Hairer and G. Wanner. Order conditions for general two-step Runge- Kutta methods. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 34(6):2087–2089, 1997.
34. A. Harten. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics, 49:357–393, 1983.
35. I. Higueras. On strong stability preserving time discretization methods. Journal of Scientific Computing, 21:193–223, 2004.
36. I. Higueras. Monotonicity for Runge-Kutta methods: inner-product norms. Journal of Scientific Computing, 24:97–117, 2005.
37. I. Higueras. Representations of Runge-Kutta methods and strong stability preserving methods. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 43:924–948, 2005.
38. I. Higueras. Strong stability for additive Runge-Kutta methods. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 44:1735–1758, 2006.
39. I. Higueras. Characterizing Strong Stability Preserving Additive Runge- Kutta Methods. Journal of Scientific Computing, 39:115–128, 2009.
40. Z. Horvath. Positivity of Runge-Kutta and Diagonally Split Runge-Kutta Methods Applied Numerical Mathematics, 28:309-326, 1998.
41. Z. Horvath. On the positivity of matrix-vector products. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 393:253–258, 2004.
42. Z. Horvath. On the positivity step size threshold of Runge-Kutta methods. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 53:341–356, 2005.
43. K.J.I. Hout. A note on unconditional maximum norm contractivity of diagonally split Runge-Kutta methods. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 33:1125–1134, 1996.
44. C. Hu and C. W. Shu. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes on triangular meshes. Journal of Computational Physics, 150:97–127, 1999.
45. F.Q. Hu, M.Y. Hussaini, and J.L. Manthey. Low-dissipation and lowdispersion Runge-Kutta schemes for computational acoustics. Journal of Computational Physics, 124:177–191, 1996.
46. C. Huang. Strong stability preserving hybrid methods. Applied Numerical Mathematics, doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2008.03.030, 2008.
47. C. Huang. Strong stability preserving hybrid methods. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 59(5):891–904, 2009.
48. W. Hundsdorfer and S.J. Ruuth. On monotonicity and boundedness proper ties of linear multistep methods. Mathematics of Computation, 75(254):655–672, 2005.
49. W. Hundsdorfer, S.J. Ruuth and R.J. Spiteri. Monotonicity-preserving linear multistep methods. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 41:605–623, 2003.
50. Z. Jackiewicz and S. Tracogna. A general class of two-step Runge-Kutta methods for ordinary differential equations. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 32:1390–1427, 1995.
51. G.-S. Jiang and C.-W. Shu. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 126:202–228, 1996.
52. C.A. Kennedy, M.H. Carpenter and R.M. Lewis. Low-storage, explicit Runge-Kutta schemes for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 35:177–219, 2000.
53. D.I. Ketcheson and A.C. Robinson. On the practical importance of the SSP property for Runge-Kutta time integrators for some common Godunov-type schemes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 48:271–303, 2005.
54. D.I. Ketcheson, C.B. Macdonald and S. Gottlieb. Optimal implicit strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta methods. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 52(2): 373–392, 2009.
55. D. I. Ketcheson. Highly efficient strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta methods with low-storage implementations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 30(4):2113–2136, 2008.
56. D.I. Ketcheson. Computation of optimal monotonicity preserving general linear methods. Mathematics of Computation, 78: 1497–1513, 2009.
57. D.I. Ketcheson. High order strong stability preserving time integrators and numerical wave propagation methods for hyperbolic PDEs. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington, 2009.
58. D.I. Ketcheson, S. Gottlieb, and C.B. Macdonald. Strong stability preserving two-step Runge-Kutta methods. Submitted manuscript.
59. D. I. Ketcheson. Runge-Kutta methods with minimum storage implementations. Journal of Computational Physics, 229(5):1763–1773, 2010.
60. J. F. B. M. Kraaijevanger. Absolute monotonicity of polynomials occurring in the numerical solution of initial value problems. Numerische Mathematik, 48:303–322, 1986.
61. J. F. B. M. Kraaijevanger and M. N. Spijker. Algebraic stability and error propagation in Runge-Kutta methods. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 5:71–87, 1989.
62. J. F. B. M. Kraaijevanger. Contractivity of Runge-Kutta methods. BIT, 31:482–528, 1991.
63. A. Kurganov and E. Tadmor. New high-resolution schemes for nonlinear conservation laws and convection-diffusion equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 160:241–282, 2000.
64. J.D. Lambert, Computational Methods in Ordinary Differential Equations, John Wiley, New York, 1973.
65. P.D. Lax and B. Wendroff. Systems of conservation laws. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13:217–237, 1960.
66. H.W.J. Lenferink. Contractivity-preserving explicit linear multistep methods. Numerische Mathematik, 55:213–223, 1989.
67. H.W.J. Lenferink. Contractivity-preserving implicit linear multistep methods. Mathematics of Computation, 56:177–199, 1991.
68. R.J. LeVeque, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws, Birkh¨auser Verlag, Basel, 1990.
69. D. Levy and E. Tadmor. From semi-discrete to fully discrete: stability of Runge-Kutta schemes by the energy method. SIAM Review, 40:40–73, 1998.
70. X. D. Liu, S. Osher and T. Chan. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 115(1):200–212, 1994.
71. Y. Liu, C. W. Shu and M. Zhang. Strong stability preserving property of the deferred correction time discretization. Journal of Computational Mathematics. To appear
72. C.B. Macdonald. Constructing high-order Runge-Kutta methods with embedded strong-stability-preserving pairs. Master’s thesis, Simon Fraser University, August 2003.
73. C.B. Macdonald, S. Gottlieb, and S. Ruuth. A numerical study of diagonally split Runge-Kutta methods for PDEs with discontinuities. Journal of Scientific Computing, 36 (1): 89-112, 2008.
74. M.L. Minion. Semi-implicit spectral deferred correction methods for ordinary differential equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 41:605–623, 2003.
75. H. Nessyahu and E. Tadmor. Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics, 87:408–463, 1990.
76. S. Osher. Convergence of generalized MUSCL schemes. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 22:947–961, 1985.
77. S. Osher and S. Chakravarthy. High resolution schemes and the entropy condition. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 21:955–984, 1984.
78. S. Osher and S. Chakravarthy. Very high order accurate TVD schemes. in IMA Volumes in Mathematics and Its Applications, 2:229–274, 1986, Springer-Verlag
79. S. Osher and J. Sethian. Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 79:12–49, 1988.
80. S. Osher and C.-W. Shu. High-order essentially nonoscillatory schemes for Hamilton-Jacobi equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 28:907– 922, 1991.
81. S. Osher and E. Tadmor. On the convergence of difference approximations to scalar conservation laws. Mathematics of Computation, 50:19–51, 1988.
82. J. Qiu and C.-W. Shu. Finite difference WENO schemes with Lax-Wendrofftype time discretizations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 24:2185– 2198, 2003.
83. A. Ralston, A First Course in Numerical Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965.
84. S.J. Ruuth. Global optimization of explicit strong-stability-preserving Runge-Kutta methods. Mathematics of Computation, 75:183–207, 2006.
85. S.J. Ruuth and W. Hundsdorfer. High-order linear multistep methods with general monotonicity and boundedness properties. Journal of Computational Physics, 209:226–248, 2005.
86. S.J. Ruuth and R.J. Spiteri. Two barriers on strong-stability-preserving time discretization methods. Journal of Scientific Computation, 17:211–220, 2002.
87. S.J. Ruuth and R.J. Spiteri. High-order strong-stability-preserving Runge- Kutta methods with downwind-biased spatial discretizations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 42:974–996, 2004.
88. N.V. Sahinidis and M. Tawarmalani. BARON 7.2: Global Optimization of Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programs. Users Manual (2004). Available at http://www.gams.com/dd/docs/solvers/baron.pdf
89. J. Sand. Circle contractive linear multistep methods. BIT 26:114–122, 1986.
90. R. Sanders. A third-order accurate variation nonexpansive difference scheme for single nonlinear conservation law. Mathematics of Computation, 51:535– 558, 1988.
91. C. W. Shu. Total-variation diminishing time discretizations. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 9:1073–1084, 1988.
92. C. W. Shu and S. Osher. Efficient implementation of essentially nonoscillatory shock-capturing schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 77:439–471, 1988.
93. C. W. Shu and S. Osher. Efficient implementation of essentially nonoscillatory shock capturing schemes II. Journal of Computational Physics, 83:32–78, 1989.
94. J. Smoller, ShockWaves and Reaction-Diffusion Equations. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.
95. M.N. Spijker. Contractivity in the numerical solution of initial value problems. Numerische Mathematik, 42:271–290, 1983.
96. M.N. Spijker. Stepsize conditions for general monotonicity in numerical initial value problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 45:1226–1245, 2007.
97. R. J. Spiteri and S. J. Ruuth. A new class of optimal high-order strongstability- preserving time discretization methods. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 40:469–491, 2002.
98. R. J. Spiteri and S. J. Ruuth. Nonlinear evolution using optimal fourthorder strong-stability-preserving Runge-Kutta methods. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 62:125–135, 2003.
99. G. Strang. Accurate partial difference methods ii: nonlinear problems. Numerische Mathematik, 6:37–46, 1964.
100. J.C. Strikwerda. Finite Difference Schemes and Partial Differential Equations. Cole Mathematics Series. Wadsworth and Brooks, California, 1989.
101. P.K. Sweby. High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 21:995–1011, 1984.
102. E. Tadmor. “Advanced Numerical Approximation of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations,” Lectures Notes from CIME Course Cetraro, Italy, 1997, chapter on Approximate solutions of nonlinear conservation laws, pages 1–150. Number 1697 in Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
103. K. Tselios and T.E. Simos. Optimized Runge-Kutta methods with minimal dispersion and dissipation for problems arising from computational acoustics. Physics Letters A, 363:38–47, 2007.
104. J.A. van de Griend and J.F.B.M. Kraaijevanger. Absolute monotonicity of rational functions occurring in the numerical solution of initial value problems. Numerische Mathematik, 49:413–424, 1986.
105. P.J. van der Houwen. Explicit Runge-Kutta formulas with increased stability boundaries. Numerische Mathematik, 20:149–164, 1972.
106. B. van Leer. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second order sequel to Godunov’s method. Journal of Computational Physics, 32:101–136, 1979.
107. J. H. Verner. High-order explicit RungeKutta pairs with low stage order. Applied Numerical Methods, 22, 345-357, 1996.
108. J. H. Verner. Improved starting methods for two-step Runge–Kutta methods of stage-order p-3. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 56(3-4):388–396, 2006.
109. J. H. Verner. Starting methods for two-step Runge–Kutta methods of stageorder 3 and order 6. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 185:292–307, 2006.
110. J.H. Williamson. Low-storage Runge-Kutta schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 35:48–56, 1980.
111. Y. Xia, Y. Xu and C. W. Shu. Efficient time discretization for local discontinuous Galerkin methods. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems – Series B, 8:677–693, 2007.
112. Y. Xing, X. Zhang and C. W. Shu. Positivity preserving high order well balanced discontinuous Galerkin methods for the shallow water equations. Advances in Water Resources, to appear
113. X. Zhang and C. W. Shu. A genuinely high order total variation diminishing scheme for one-dimensional scalar conservation laws. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 48:772–795, 2010.
114. X. Zhang and C. -W. Shu. On maximum-principle-satisfying high order schemes for scalar conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics, 229:3091–3120, 2010.
115. X. Zhang and C. W. Shu. On positivity preserving high order discontinuous Galerkin schemes for compressible Euler equations on rectangular meshes. Journal of Computational Physics, to appear
116. X. Zhang, Y. Xia and C. W. Shu. Maximum-principle-satisfying and positivity-preserving high order discontinuous Galerkin schemes for conservation laws on triangular meshes. Journal of Scientific Computing, submitted.