Monotonicity for Runge-Kutta methods: Inner product norms

Journal of Scientific Computing

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 665-685

  Higueras, Inmaculada ^a  

^a PUBLIC UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Coercive problems; Monotonicity; Runge Kutta methods; SSP; Strong stability

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PROBLEM SOLVING; SYSTEM STABILITY;

COERCIVE PROBLEMS; MONOTONICITY; SSP; STRONG STABILITY;

RUNGE KUTTA METHODS;

EID: 23244435121     PISSN: 08857474     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-004-4789-1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cavagna, C. (1998). Stability analysis in the numerical solution of convection-diffusion equations. Report May 2002, University of Leiden.
2. Dekker, K., and Verwer, J. G. (1984). Stability of Runge-kutta methods for stiff nonlinear differential equations, CWI Monographs, Amsterdam.
3. Ferracina, L., and Spijker, M. N. (2005). Stepsize restrictions for the total-variation-diminishing property in general Runge-Kutta methods. Math. Comp. 74, 201-219.
4. Gottlieb, S., Shu, C. W., and Tadmor, E. (2001). Strong stability-preserving high order time discretization methods. SIAM Rev. 43, 89-112.
5. Gottlieb, S., and Shu, C. W. (1998). Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes. Math. Comp. 67, 73-85.
6. Gottlieb, S., and Gottlieb, L. J. (2003). Strong stability preserving properties of Runge-Kutta time discretization methods for linear constant coefficient operators. J. Sci. Comput. 18, 83-109.
7. Gustafsson, B., Kreiss H. O., and Oliger, J. (1995). Time Dependent Problems and Difference Methods, John Willey, New York.
8. Higueras, I. (2004). On strong stability preserving time discretization methods. To appear in J. Sci. Comput. 21, 193-223.
9. Levy, D., and Tadmor, E. (1998). From semidiscrete to fully discrete:stability of Runge-Kutta schemes by the energy method. SIAM Rev. 40, 40-73.
10. Kraaijevanger, J. F. B. M. (1991). Contractivity of Runge-Kutta methods. BIT 31, 482-528.
11. Riesz, F., and Sz-Nagy, B. (1990). Functional Analysis, Dover, New York.
12. Ruuth, S. J., and Spiteri, R. J. (2002). Two barriers on strong stability preserving time discretization methods. J. Sci. Comput. 17, 211-220.
13. Shu, C. W., and Osher, S. (1988). Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77, 439-471.
14. Shu, C. W. (2002). A survey of strong stability preserving high order time discretizations, In: D. Estep and S. Tavener, (eds). Proceedings in Applied Mathematics 109, SIAM, pp. 51-65
15. Spijker, M. N. (1983). Contractivity in the numerical solution of initial value problems. Numer. Math. 42, 271-290.
16. Spijker, M. N. (1985). Stepsize restrictions for stability of one-step methods in the numerical solution of initial value problems. Math. Comp. 45, 377-392.
17. Spiteri, R. J., and Ruuth, S. J. (2002). A new class of optimal high order strong stability preserving time discretization methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 40, 469-491.
18. Tadmor, E. (2002). From semidiscrete to fully discrete: stability of Runge-kutta schemes by the energy method II, Collected lectures on the preservation of stability under discretization. In: Estep, D. and Tavener, S. (eds). Proceedings in Applied Mathematics Vol. 109, SIAM, pp. 25-49
19. Van der Marel, R. P. (1990). Stability radius of polynomials occurring in the numerical solution of initial value problems. BIT 30, 516-528.