Comparison of Dietary Intakes between a Large Online Cohort Study (Etude NutriNet-SantCrossed D sign©) and a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Study (Etude Nationale Nutrition SantCrossed D sign©) in France: Addressing the Issue of Generalizability in E-Epidemiology

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 184, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 660-669

  Andreeva, Valentina A ^a   Deschamps, Valcrossed ^b   Salanave, Benoît ^b   Castetbon, Katia ^b   Verdot, Charlotte ^b   Kesse Guyot, Emmanuelle ^a   Hercberg, Serge ^a,b,c  

^a Unité 1125/Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers ^*  (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

^c AVICENNE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

diet; dietary intake; e epidemiology; food and beverages; generalizability; nutrients; questionnaires; surveys

Indexed keywords

ALPHA TOCOPHEROL; ASCORBIC ACID; CARBOHYDRATE; CYANOCOBALAMIN; DAMINOZIDE; FOLIC ACID; IRON; MAGNESIUM; POTASSIUM; PROTEIN; PYRIDOXINE; RETINOL; VITAMIN D; YOGHURT; ZINC;

ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIETARY INTAKE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FOOD INDUSTRY; NUTRIENT USE; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TESTING METHOD;

ADULT; AGED; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIETARY FIBER; DIETARY INTAKE; ENERGY; FAST FOOD; FEMALE; FISH; FRANCE; FRUIT; HUMAN; MALE; MILK; NUTRIENT; SEA FOOD; SOFT DRINK; VEGETABLE; ADOLESCENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INTERNET; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION; PROCEDURES; SEX RATIO; YOUNG ADULT;

FRANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIET RECORDS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION SURVEYS; SEX DISTRIBUTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84994411115     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kww016     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization. A Snapshot From Across Europe. Successful Nutrition Policies-Country Examples. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2014.
2. Castetbon K, Vernay M, Malon A, et al. Dietary intake, physical activity and nutritional status in adults: the French Nutrition and Health Survey (ENNS, 2006-2007). Br J Nutr. 2009;102(5):733-743.
3. Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Mittl B, et al. The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24): a resource for researchers, clinicians, and educators from the National Cancer Institute. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(8): 1134-1137.
4. Applied Research Program, National Cancer Institute. ASA24: Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Recall. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2014.
5. Thompson FE, Dixit-Joshi S, Potischman N, et al. Comparison of interviewer-administered and automated self-administered 24-hour dietary recalls in 3 diverse integrated health systems. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(12):970-978.
6. Schatzkin A, Subar AF, Moore S, et al. Observational epidemiologic studies of nutrition and cancer: the next generation (with better observation). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(4):1026-1032.
7. Touvier M, Kesse-Guyot E, Méjean C, et al. Comparison between an interactive Web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies. Br J Nutr. 2011;105(7):1055-1064.
8. Probst YC, Faraji S, Batterham M, et al. Computerized dietary assessments compare well with interviewer administered diet histories for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the primary healthcare setting. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;72(1):49-55.
9. Apovian CM, Murphy MC, Cullum-Dugan D, et al. Validation of a Web-based dietary questionnaire designed for the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet: the DASH online questionnaire. Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13(5):615-622.
10. Arab L, Tseng CH, Ang A, et al. Validity of a multipass, Web-based, 24-hour self-administered recall for assessment of total energy intake in blacks and whites. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(11):1256-1265.
11. Hutchesson MJ, Truby H, Callister R, et al. Can a Web-based food record accurately assess energy intake in overweight and obese women? A pilot study. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013; 26(suppl 1):140-144.
12. Lassale C, Castetbon K, Laporte F, et al. Validation of a Web-based, self-administered, non-consecutive-day dietary record tool against urinary biomarkers. Br J Nutr. 2015; 113(6):953-962.
13. Lassale C, Castetbon K, Laporte F, et al. Correlations between fruit, vegetables, fish, vitamins, and fatty acids estimated by Web-based nonconsecutive dietary records and respective biomarkers of nutritional status. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(3):427-438.e5.
14. van Gelder MM, Bretveld RW, Roeleveld N. Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology? Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(11):1292-1298.
15. Andreeva VA, Salanave B, Castetbon K, et al. Comparison of the sociodemographic characteristics of the large NutriNet-Santé e-cohort with French Census data: the issue of volunteer bias revisited. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(9):893-898.
16. Mishra GD, Hockey R, Powers J, et al. Recruitment via the Internet and social networking sites: the 1989-1995 cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(12):e279.
17. Hercberg S, Castetbon K, Czernichow S, et al. The NutriNet-Santé Study: a Web-based prospective study on the relationship between nutrition and health and determinants of dietary patterns and nutritional status. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:242.
18. Kesse-Guyot E, Andreeva V, Castetbon K, et al. Participant profiles according to recruitment source in a large Web-based prospective study: experience from the Nutrinet-Santé study. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(9):e205.
19. Hercberg S, Deheeger M, Preziosi P. SU.VI.MAX Portions Alimentaires Manuel-Photos pour l'Estimation des Quantités. (SU.VI.MAX Photograph Book for the Estimation of Portion Sizes). Paris, France: Editions Polytechnica; 2002.
20. Le Moullec N, Deheeger M, Preziosi P, et al. Validation du manuel photos utilisé pour l'enquête alimentaire de l'étude SU.VI.MAX. Cah Nutr Diet. 1996;31(3):158-164.
21. Kirkpatrick SI, Midthune D, Dodd KW, et al. Reactivity and its association with body mass index across days on food checklists. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(1):110-118.
22. Thompson FE, Subar AF. Dietary assessment methodology. In: Coulston AM, Boushey CJ, Ferruzzi MG, eds. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease. 3rd ed. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Inc.; 2013:5-46.
23. Black AE. Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24(9):1119-1130.
24. Schofield WN. Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1985; 39(suppl 1):5-41.
25. Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques. La macro SAS CALMAR. http://www.insee.fr/fr/methodes/ default.asp?page=outils/calmar/accueil-calmar.htm. Published May 2006. Accessed January 12, 2016.
26. Méjean C, Deglaire A, Kesse-Guyot E, et al. Association between intake of nutrients and food groups and liking for fat (the Nutrinet-Santé Study). Appetite. 2014;78: 147-155.
27. Peretti-Watel P, Constance J, Seror V, et al. Cigarettes and social differentiation in France: is tobacco use increasingly concentrated among the poor? Addiction. 2009;104(10): 1718-1728.
28. Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(9):643-653.
29. Fong GT, Craig LV, Guignard R, et al. Evaluation of the smoking ban in public places in France one year and five years after its implementation: findings from the ITC France survey. Bull Epidemiol Hebd (Paris). 2013;20(21): 217-223.
30. World Health Organization. Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. Promoting Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Around the World. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014.
31. Hebert JR, Clemow L, Pbert L, et al. Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24(2):389-398.
32. Méjean C, Szabo de Edelenyi F, Touvier M, et al. Motives for participating in a Web-based nutrition cohort according to sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health characteristics: the NutriNet-Santé cohort study. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(8): e189.
33. Perrin AE, Simon C, Hedelin G, et al. Ten-year trends of dietary intake in a middle-aged French population: relationship with educational level. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56(5):393-401.
34. Escalon H, Bossard C, Beck F. Baromètre Santé Nutrition 2008. Saint-Denis, France: Institut National de Prévention et d'Education pour la Santé; 2009.
35. Subar AF, Freedman LS, Tooze JA, et al. Addressing current criticism regarding the value of self-report dietary data. J Nutr. 2015;145(12):2639-2645.
36. Kirkpatrick SI, Subar AF, Douglass D, et al. Performance of the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(1):233-240.