Comparison of Interviewer-Administered and Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recalls in 3 Diverse Integrated Health Systems

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 181, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 970-978

  Thompson, Frances E ^a   Dixit Joshi, Sujata ^a   Potischman, Nancy ^a   Dodd, Kevin W ^a   Kirkpatrick, Sharon I ^a   Kushi, Lawrence H ^a   Alexander, Gwen L ^a   Coleman, Laura A ^a   Zimmerman, Thea P ^a   Sundaram, Maria E ^a   Clancy, Heather A ^a   Groesbeck, Michelle ^a   Douglass, Deirdre ^a   George, Stephanie M ^a   Schap, Tusarebecca E ^a   Subar, Amy F ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

comparative study; diet survey; experimental design; nutritional assessment; population

Indexed keywords

FAT; SATURATED FATTY ACID; SODIUM; VITAMIN D;

ADULT; AUTOMATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIET; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHNICITY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HEALTH SURVEY; RACE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALORIC INTAKE; DIETARY INTAKE; FEMALE; FRUIT; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVIEWER ADMINISTERED AUTOMATED MULTIPLE PASS METHOD TWENTY FOUR HOUR DIETARY RECALL; MALE; MEAT; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; OBESITY; UNITED STATES; WEB BASED AUTOMATED SELF ADMINISTERED TWENTY FOUR HOUR DIETARY RECALL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; FEASIBILITY STUDY; INTERNET; INTERVIEW; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECALL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF REPORT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CALIFORNIA; DETROIT; MICHIGAN; UNITED STATES; WISCONSIN;

ADULT; AGED; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; DIET; DIET SURVEYS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF REPORT;

EID: 84931023234     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwu467     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Freedman LS, Commins JM, Moler JE, et al. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(2):172-188.
2. rd ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2012:5-46.
3. Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Mittl B, et al. The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24): a resource for researchers, clinicians, and educators from the National Cancer Institute. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(8):1134-1137.
4. Conway JM, Ingwersen LA, Vinyard BT, et al. Effectiveness of the US Department of Agriculture 5-step multiple-pass method in assessing food intake in obese and nonobese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(5):1171-1178.
5. US Department of Agriculture. USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, 4.1. http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/united-states-usda-food-and-nutrient-database-dietarystudies-fndds. Accessed December 3, 2014.
6. Bowman SA, Friday JE, Moshfegh A. MyPyramid Equivalents Database, 2.0 for USDA Survey Foods, 2003-2004. Beltsville, MD: Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture; 2008. http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/12355000/pdf/mped/mped2-doc.pdf. Accessed December 3, 2014.
7. Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, US Department of Agriculture. Healthy Eating Index support files 07 08; CNPP 03-04 fruit database. Alexandria, VA: US Department of Agriculture; 2013. http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/healthyeating-index-support-files-07-08. Accessed December 3, 2014.
8. Kirkpatrick SI, Subar AF, Douglass D, et al. Performance of the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(1):233-240.
9. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1995;57(1):289-300.
10. Prentice RL, Mossavar-Rahmani Y, Huang Y, et al. Evaluation and comparison of food records, recalls, and frequencies for energy and protein assessment by using recovery biomarkers. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(5):591-603.
11. Moshfegh AJ, Rhodes DG, Baer DJ, et al. The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88(2):324-332.
12. Schatzkin A, Subar AF, Thompson FE, et al. Design and serendipity in establishing a large cohort with wide dietary intake distributions: the National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(12):1119-1125.
13. US Census Bureau. Measuring America. Computer and Internet trends in America. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2014. http://www.census.gov/hhes/computer/files/2012/Computer-Use-Infographic-FINAL.pdf. Accessed December 3, 2014.
14. Wilson R. The fastest and slowest Internet speeds in America. The Washington Post. January 9, 2014. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/01/09/the-fastest-and-slowestinternet-speeds-in-america/. Accessed December 3, 2014.
15. Schatzkin A, Kipnis V, Carroll RJ, et al. A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(6):1054-1062.
16. Beaton GH, Milner J, Corey P, et al. Sources of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Am J Clin Nutr. 1979;32(12):2546-2559.
17. Carroll RJ, Midthune D, Subar AF, et al. Taking advantage of the strengths of 2 different dietary assessment instruments to improve intake estimates for nutritional epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175(4):340-347.