Enterprise 2.0 post-adoption: Extending the information system continuance model based on the technology-Organization-environment framework

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 67, Issue , 2017, Pages 95-105

  Jia, Qiong ^a   Guo, Yue ^a,b   Barnes, Stuart J ^b  

^a HOHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Enterprise 2.0; IS continuance; PLSPM; Post adoption intention; Subjective norm; TOE

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

ENTERPRISE 2.0; IS CONTINUANCE; PLSPM; POST ADOPTIONS; SUBJECTIVE NORM;

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY;

ADOPTION; CHINA; INFORMATION SYSTEM; PERCEPTION; SATISFACTION; THEORETICAL MODEL; TOE;

EID: 84994218574     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Ajjan, H., Hartshorne, R., Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 Technologies: Theory & empirical tests. The Internet & Higher Education 11:2 (2008), 71–80.
2. Ajzen, I., The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 50:2 (1991), 179–211.
3. Ajzen, I., Madden, T.J., Prediction of goal-directed Behavior: Attitudes, intentions, & perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22:5 (1986), 453–474.
4. Al-Kharousi, R., Jabur, N.H., Bouazza, A., Al-Harrasi, N., Factors affecting the implementation of Web 2.0 applications in omani academic libraries. The Electronic Library 34:2 (2016), 332–351.
5. Alqahtani, F.H., Alwadainm, A.S., Strategy as a prerequisite of enterprise Web 2.0 implementation. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), 736-739. Las Vegas, 2015.
6. Alqahtani, F., Watson, J., Partridge, H., Organizational support and enterprise Web 2.0 adoption: A qualitative study. Proceedings of the 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems, savannah, USA, 2014.
7. Antonius, N., Xu, J., Gao, X., Factors influencing the adoption of enterprise social software in Australia. Knowledge-Based Systems 73 (2015), 32–43.
8. Barron, A., Schneckenberg, D., A theoretical framework for exploring the influence of national culture on Web 2.0 adoption in corporate contexts. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation 15:2 (2012), 176–186.
9. Bhattacherjee, A., Understanding information systems Continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly 25:3 (2001), 351–370.
10. Boulos, M.N., Maramba, I., Wheeler, S., Wikis, blogs & podcasts: A new generation of web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice & education. BMC Medical Education, 6(1), 2006, 41.
11. Bruno, A., Marra, P., Mangia, L., The enterprise 2.0 adoption process: A participatory design approach. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advanced communication technology (ICACT), 1457–1461. Phoenix Park, 2011.
12. Bughin, J., Chui, M., Manyika, J., Clouds, big data, and smart assets: Ten tech-enabled business trends to watch. McKinsey Quarterly 56:1 (2010), 75–86.
13. Chau, P.Y., Tam, K.Y., Factors affecting the adoption of open Systems: An exploratory study. MIS Quarterly 21:1 (1997), 1–24.
14. Chen, S.C., Yen, D.C., Hwang, M.I., Factors influencing the continuance intention to the usage of Web 2.0: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior 28:3 (2012), 933–941.
15. Cheung, C.M.K., Chiu, P.Y., Lee, M.K.O., Online social Networks: Why do students use Facebook?. Computers in Human Behavior 27:4 (2011), 1337–1343.
16. Chou, S.W., Chen, P.Y., The influence of individual differences on continuance intentions of enterprise resource planning (ERP). International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67:6 (2009), 484–496.
17. Chin, W.W., The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. Marcoulides, G.A., (eds.) Modern Methods for Business Research, 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum, London, 236–295.
18. Chua, A.Y.K., Goh, D.H., A study of Web 2.0 applications in library websites. Library Information Science Research 32:3 (2010), 203–211.
19. Cooper, R.B., Zmud, R.W., Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Management Science 36:2 (1990), 123–139.
20. Cristina, D.P., Jesús-Nicasio, G.S., Psychological profiles of older adult Web 2.0 tool users. Computers in Human Behavior 64:11 (2016), 673–681.
21. Damanpour, F., Organizational size & innovation. Organization Studies 13:3 (1992), 375–402.
22. Davis, F.D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, & user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13:3 (1989), 319–340.
23. Dawson, R., Hough, J., Hill, J., Winterford, B., Alexandrov, D., Implementing enterprise 2.0, a practical guide to creating business value with Web technologies. 2009, Advanced Human Technologies, Sydney.
24. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W., The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Vol. 17, 1991, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
25. Fan, S., Radford, J., Fabian, D., A mixed-method research to investigate the adoption of mobile devices and Web2. 0 technologies among medical students and educators. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16(1), 2016, 1.
26. Fiegenbaum, A., Karnani, A., Advantage for small firms. Strategic Management Journal 12:2 (1991), 101–114.
27. Fornell, C., Larcker, F.D., Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables & measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18:1 (1981), 39–50.
28. Galliers, R.D., Organizational dynamics of technology-based innovation. McMaster, T., Wastell, D., Ferneley, E., DeGross, J., (eds.) Organizational dynamics of technology-based Innovation: Diversifying the research Agenda, 2007, Springer/IFIP, New York, 15–18.
29. Galunic, D.C., Rodan, S., Resource recombination in the Firm: Knowledge structures & the potential for schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal 19:12 (1998), 1193–1201.
30. Gatignon, H., Robertson, T.S., Technology Diffusion: An empirical test of competitive effects. Journal of Marketing 53:1 (1989), 35–49.
31. Gibbs, J.L., Kraemer, K.L., A cross-country investigation of the determinants of scope of e-commerce Use: An institutional approach. Electronic Markets 14:2 (2004), 124–137.
32. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.M.T., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 2014, Sage, Thous& Oaks.
33. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43:1 (2015), 115–135.
34. Hsu, P.F., Kraemer, K.L., Dunkle, D., Determinants of e-business use in US firms. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 10:4 (2006), 9–45.
35. Husin, M.H., Evans, N., Deegan, G., Achieving adoption and effective usage of Web 2.0 among employees within Australian government organizations. Journal of Systems and Information Technology 18:1 (2016), 41–63.
36. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., The psychological origins of perceived usefulness & ease-of-use. Information & Management 35:4 (1999), 237–250.
37. Kolb, D., Thach, L., Analyzing german winery adoption of Web 2.0 and social media. Journal of Wine Research 27:3 (2016), 226–241.
38. Kuan, K.K., Chau, P.Y., A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology–organization–environment framework. Information & Management 38:8 (2001), 507–521.
39. Kuettner, T., Diehl, R., Schubert, P., Change factors in enterprise 2.0 Initiatives: Can we learn from ERP?. Electronic Markets 23:4 (2013), 329–340.
40. Kurz, M., Fleischmann, A., BPM 2.0: Business process management meets empowerment. Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Singer, R., Seese, D., 54-83, (eds.) Subject-oriented business process management, 2011, Springer, Heidelberg.
41. Lai, H.J., Examining civil servants' decisions to use Web 2.0 tools for learning, based on the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 2016, 1–11.
42. Lee, O.K.D., Wang, M.W., Lim, K.H., Peng, Z.J., Knowledge management systems diffusion in chinese enterprises: A multistage approach using the technology-organization-environment framework. Journal of Global Information Management, 17(1), 2009, 70.
43. Leonardi, P.M., Huysman, M., Steinfield, C., Enterprise social Media: Definition, history, & prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19:1 (2013), 1–19.
44. Levy, M., WEB 2.0 implications on knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management 13:1 (2009), 120–134.
45. Liao, C., Chen, J.L., Yen, D.C., Theory of planning behavior (TPB) & customer satisfaction in the continued use of e-service. An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior 23:6 (2007), 2804–2822.
46. Lin, W.S., Perceived fit & satisfaction on Web learning performance: IS continuance intention & task-technology fit perspectives. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70:7 (2012), 498–507.
47. Lin, H.F., Contextual factors affecting knowledge management diffusion in SMEs. Industrial Management Data Systems 114:9 (2014), 1415–1437.
48. Lin, H.F., Understanding the determinants of electronic supply chain management system Adoption: Using the technology–organization–environment framework. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 86 (2014), 80–92.
49. Lin, T.C., Lee, C.K., Lin, J.C.C., Determinants of enterprise 2.0 adoption: A value-based adoption model approach. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Information society (i-Society), 12–18. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2010.
50. Louw, R., Mtsweni, J., Guiding principles for adopting & promoting enterprise 2.0 collaboration technologies. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on adaptive science & technology (ICAST), 1–6. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2013.
51. Mangiuc, D.M., Enterprise 2.0: Is the market ready?. Journal of Accounting & Management Information Systems 10:4 (2011), 516–534.
52. McAfee, A.P., Enterprise 2.0: The Dawn of Emergent Collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review 47:3 (2006), 21–28.
53. McAfee, A., Enterprise 2.0: New collaborative tools for your Organization's toughest challenges. 2009, Harvard Business Press, Boston.
54. Miles, D., Collaboration & enterprise 2.0: Work-Meets-Play or the future of business. 2009, AIIM Industry Watch Report. AIIM, MD: Silver Spring.
55. Mukkamala, A.M., Razmerita, L., Which factors influence the adoption of social Software? An exploratory study of indian information technology consultancy firms. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 17:3 (2014), 188–212.
56. Nord, W.R., Tucker, S., Implementing routine & radical innovations. 1987, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
57. Nunnally, J.C., Psychometric theory. 2nd ed., 1978, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
58. O'Reilly, T., What is Web 2.0?. 2006 Accessed 5th Sep 2015 http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
59. Oliveira, T., Martins, M.F., Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation 14:1 (2011), 110–121.
60. Oliver, R.L., A cognitive model of the antecedents & consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research 17:4 (1980), 460–469.
61. Pan, M., Jang, W., Determinants of the adoption of enterprise resource planning within the technology-organization-environment Framework: Taiwan's communications. Journal of Computer Information Systems 48:3 (2008), 94–102.
62. Panorama Consulting Group, ERP report., 2010, 2010 http://panoramaconsulting.com/resource-center/2010-erp-report/.
63. Paroutis, S., Saleh, A.A., Determinants of knowledge sharing using Web 2.0 technologies. Journal of Knowledge Management 13:4 (2009), 52–63.
64. Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W., Self-reports in organizational Research: Problems & prospects. Journal of Management 12:4 (1986), 531–544.
65. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, N.P., Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88:5 (2003), 879–903.
66. Prof Research Global & Chinese Enterprise 2.0 Industry, Market research report., 2015, 2009–2019 http://www.psresearchreports.com/research/enterprise-2.0-industry.
67. Research & Markets, Enterprise 2.0 market 2012-2016. 2013 http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20130118005667/en/Research-Markets-Global-Enterprise-2.0-Market-2012-2016.
68. Roca, C.J., Chiu, C.M., Martínez, F.J., Understanding e-learning continuance Intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64:8 (2006), 683–696.
69. Rowley, T.J., Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review 22:4 (1997), 887–910.
70. Shin, D.H., Analysis of online social networks: A cross-national study. Online Information Review 34:3 (2010), 473–495.
71. Soares-Aguiar, A., Palma-dos-Reis, A., Why do firms adopt e-procurement Systems? Using logistic regression to empirically test a conceptual model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 55:1 (2008), 120–133.
72. Teo, T.S., Ranganathan, C., Dhaliwal, J., Key dimensions of inhibitors for the deployment of web-based business-to-business electronic commerce. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 53:3 (2006), 395–411.
73. Thong, J.Y., An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems 15:4 (1999), 187–214.
74. Thong, J.Y.L., Hong, S.J., Tam, K.Y., The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64:9 (2006), 799–810.
75. Tornatzky, L.G., Fleischer, M., Chakrabarti, A.K., Processes of technological innovation. 1990, Lexington Books, Lexington.
76. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D., User acceptance of information Technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27:3 (2003), 425–478.
77. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., Xu, X., Consumer acceptance & use of information Technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance & use of technology. MIS Quarterly 36:1 (2012), 157–178.
78. Wang, T., Jung, C.H., Kang, M.H., Chung, Y.S., Exploring determinants of adoption intentions towards enterprise 2.0 Applications: An empirical study. Behavior & Information Technology 33:10 (2014), 1048–1064.
79. Yang, Z.J., Sun, J., Zhang, Y.L., Wang, Y., Understanding SaaS adoption from the perspective of organizational users: A tripod readiness model. Computers in Human Behavior 45 (2015), 254–264.
80. Yoon, C., Rolland, E., Understanding continuance use in social networking services. Journal of Computer Information Systems 55:2 (2015), 1–8.
81. Zhao, R.Y., Chen, B.K., Study on enterprise knowledge sharing in ESN perspective: A chinese case study. Journal of Knowledge Management 17:3 (2013), 416–434.
82. Zhu, K., Dong, S., Xu, S.X., Kraemer, K.L., Innovation diffusion in global Contexts: Determinants of post-adoption digital transformation of european companies. European journal of information systems 15:6 (2006), 601–616.
83. Zhu, K., Kraemer, K.L., Post-adoption variations in usage & value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research 16:1 (2005), 61–84.
84. Zhu, K., Kraemer, K., Xu, S., Electronic business adoption by european firms: A cross-country assessment of the facilitators & inhibitors. European Journal of Information Systems 12:4 (2003), 251–268.
85. Zhu, K., Kraemer, K.L., Xu, S., The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Management Science 52:10 (2006), 1557–1576.