A study of Web 2.0 applications in library websites

Library and Information Science Research

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 203-211

  Chua, Alton Y K ^a   Goh, Dion H ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953617531     PISSN: 07408188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2010.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barnes S.J., Vidgen R.T. An integrative approach to the assessment of e-commerce quality. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 2002, 3(3):114-127.
2. Bawden D. After the Amazoogle: Web 2.0 and information research [Editorial]. Journal of Documentation 2007, 61(4):461-462.
3. Blooma M.J., Chua A.Y.K., Goh D.H. A predictive framework for retrieving the best answer. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (ACM SAC) 2008, 1107-1111. New York: ACM.
4. Bretz R. Media for interactive communication 1984, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
5. Chen K., Yen D.C. Improving the quality of online presence through interactivity. Information & Management 2004, 42(1):217-226.
6. Chua A.Y.K., Goh D.H., Lee C.S. The prevalence and use of Web 2.0 in libraries. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries (ICADL) 2008, 22-30. (pp. 22-30). New York: Springer (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5362). G. Buchanan, M. Masoodian, S. J. Cunningham (Eds.).
7. Clarke R. Web 2.0 as syndication. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 2008, 3(2):30-43.
8. Clausen H. User-oriented evaluation of library and information centre websites. New Library World 1999, 100(1):5-10.
9. de Kool D., van Wamelen J. Web 2.0: A new basis for e-government? In. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications (ICTTA). 2008, doi:10.1109/ICTTA.2008.4529946.
10. Delone W., McLean E. The Delone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 2003, 19(4):9-30.
11. De Rosa, C., Cantrell, J., Havens, A., Hawk, J., & Jenkins, L. (2007). Sharing, privacy and trust in our networked world. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/reports/sharing/default.htm.
12. Friedman B., Kahn P.H., Howe D.C. Trust online. Communications of the ACM 2000, 43(12):34-40.
13. Gibbons S. The academic library and the Net Gen student: Making the connections 2007, American Library Association, Chicago.
14. Goh D.H., Chua A., Luyt B., Lee C.S. Knowledge access, creation and transfer in e-government portals. Online Information Review 2008, 32:348-369.
15. Goh D.H., Chua A., Lee C.S., Razikin K. Resource discovery through social tagging: A classification and content analytic approach. Online Information Review 2009, 33:568-583.
16. Goodfellow T., Graham S. The blog as a high-impact institutional communication tool. The Electronic Library 2007, 24:395-400.
17. Halaris C., Magoutas B., Papadomichelaki X., Mentzas G. Classification and synthesis of quality approaches in e-government services. Internet Research 2007, 17:378-401.
18. Helander M.G. Theories and models of electronic commerce. In. Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress 2000, 2:770-773. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
19. Hoffman D.L., Novak T.P. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing 1996, 60:50-68.
20. Huang A.W.-C., Chuang T.-R. Culture atlas infrastructure: A participatory and collaborative perspective. Paper presented at the PNC 2006 Annual Conference and Joint Meetings. 2006, Retrieved from http://pnclink.org:8080/pnc2006/TRChuang_and_AndreaHuang.pdf.
21. Kahn B.K., Strong D.M., Wang R.Y. Information quality benchmarks: Product and service performance. Communications of the ACM 2002, 45(4):184-192.
22. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology 2003, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. (2nd ed.).
23. Lai L.S.L., Turban E. Group formation and operations in the Web 2.0 environment and social networks. Group Decision and Negotiation 2008, 17(5):387-402.
24. Lee C.S., Goh D.H., Chua A. Evaluation of hospital portals using knowledge management mechanisms. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries (ICADL 2007) 2007, 15-23. Springer, Berlin, Germany, (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4678). D.H. Goh, T.H. Cao, I. Sølvberg, E. Rasmussen (Eds.).
25. Liu S. Engaging users: The future of academic library websites. College & Research Libraries 2008, 69(1):6-27.
26. Macgregor G., McCulloch E. Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool. Library Review 2005, 55(5):291-300.
27. Maness J.M. Library 2.0: The next generation of Web-based library services. LOGOS. Journal of the World Book Community 2006, 17(3):139-145.
28. McDermott I.E. All A-Twitter about Web 2.0: What does it offer libraries. Searcher 2007, 15(9):34-39.
29. Miller P. Web 2.0: Building the new library. Ariadne 2005, 45.. Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/miller/.
30. Moraga A., Calero C., Piattini M. Comparing different quality models for portals. Online Information Review 2006, 30(5):555-568.
31. Nielsen J. Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity 2000, New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.
32. Nitecki D.A., Hernon P. Measuring service quality at Yale University's libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2000, 26:259-273.
33. O'Reilly T. What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications and Strategies 2007, 65:17-37.
34. Quinn B. Adapting service quality concepts to academic libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship 1997, 23:359-369.
35. Rosenfeld L., Morville P. Information architecture for the World Wide Web 2002, O'Reilly & Associates., CA. (2nd ed.).
36. Sessions J.A., Schenck A., Shrimplin A.K. LibQUAL+TM at Miami University: A look from outside ARL. Performance Measurement and Metrics 2002, 3(2):59-68.
37. Cao M., Zhang Q., Seydel J. B2C e-commerce web site quality: An empirical examination. Industrial Management & Data Systems 2005, 105(5):645-661.
38. Strong D.M., Lee Y.W., Wang R.Y. Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM 1997, 40(5):103-110.
39. Teo H.H., Oh L.B., Liu C.H., Wei K.K. An empirical study of the effects of interactivity on Web user attitude. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2003, 58(3):281-305.
40. Webb H.W., Webb L.A. SiteQual: An integrated measure of website quality. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2004, 17(6):430-440.
41. Zeithaml V.A., Parasuraman A., Malhotra A. Service quality delivery through websites: A critical review of extant knowledge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2002, 30(4):362-375.