Factors influencing the adoption of Enterprise Social Software in Australia

Knowledge-Based Systems

Volumn 73, Issue , 2015, Pages 32-43

  Antonius, Nicky ^a   Xu, Jun ^a   Gao, Xiangzhu ^a  

^a SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Information management; Knowledge management; Social computing; Technology Acceptance Model; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE; ORGANISATIONAL FACTORS; SOCIAL COMPUTING; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; WEB 2.0;

ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE;

EID: 84915751220     PISSN: 09507051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Aiim Collaboration and enterprise 2.0: work-meets-play or the future of business? AIIM Mark. Intell. 2009 10 < http://www.aiim.org/PDFDocuments/36789.pdf > (accessed 25.08.12)
2. M. Alavi, and D.E. Leidner Knowledge management systems: issues, challenges and benefits Commun. AIS 1 7 1999
3. A. Amin, and J. Roberts Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice Res. Policy 37 2008 353 369
4. J. Arbuckle Amos 21 User's Guide 2012 IBM
5. R.P. Bagozzi, and Y. Yi Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 40 2012 8 34
6. P. Barrett Structural equation modeling: adjusting model fit Personality Individ. Differ. 42 2007 815 824
7. P.R. Berthon, L.F. Pitt, K. Plangger, and D. Shapiro Marketing meets Web 2.0, social media, and creative consumers: implications for international marketing strategy Bus. Horiz. 55 2012 261 271
8. E.W. Black Wikipedia and academic peer review: Wikipedia as a recognised medium for scholarly publication? Online Inform. Rev. 32 1 2008 73 88
9. A. Boomsma Reporting analyses of covariance structures Struct. Equ. Model. 7 3 2000 461 483
10. S.J. Breckler Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: cause for concern? Psychol. Bull. 107 1990 260 273
11. J.S. Brown, and P. Duguid Organizational learning and communities of practice. Towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation Organ. Sci. 2 1991 40 57
12. J.S. Brown, and P. Duguid Organizing knowledge Calif. Manage. Rev. 40 3 1998 90 111
13. B.M. Byrne Structural Equation Modeling With Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming 2001 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
14. N.D. Çakar, and A. Ertürk Comparing innovation capability of small and medium-sized enterprises: examining the effects of organizational culture and empowerment J. Small Bus. Manage. 48 3 2010 325 359
15. P.R. Carlile A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development Organ. Sci. 13 4 2002 442 455
16. E.G. Carmines, and J.P. Mciver Analyzing models with unobserved variables G.W. Bohrnstedt, E.F. Borgatta, Social Measurement: Current Issues 1981 Sage Publications Beverly Hills, CA
17. S. Chan, and X. Fang Mobile commerce and usability K. Siau, E. Lim, Advances in mobile commerce technologies 2003 Idea Group Hershey, PA
18. H.H. Chang, and S.-S. Chuang Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: participant involvement as a moderator Inform. Manage. 48 1 2011 9 18
19. C.C. Chen, X.P. Chen, and J.R. Meindl How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism Acad. Manag. Rev. 23 2 1998 285 304
20. M. Chui, J. Manyika, J. Bughin, R. Dobbs, C. Roxburgh, H. Sarrazin, G. Sands, and M. Westergren The Social Economy: Unlocking Value and Productivity Through Social Technologies 2012 McKinsey Global Institute, McKinsey & Company
21. M.Y. Chuttur, Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions, Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, vol. 9 (37), 2009.
22. D.R. Cooper, and P.S. Schindler Business Research Methods 2006 UK, McGraw Hill Publishing Company London
23. J.W. Creswell Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches 2003 Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA
24. K. Dalkir Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice 2013 Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann Burlington, MA
25. F. Davis, A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results, Doctor of Philosophy, MIT, 1985.
26. F. Davis Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology MIS Quart. 13 3 1989 319 340
27. F. Davis User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioural impacts Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 38 1993 475 487
28. F. Davis, R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of the two Manage. Sci. 35 8 1989 982 1003
29. F. Davis, and V. Venkatesh A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 45 1 1996 19 45
30. F.D. Davis, R.P. Bagozzi, P.R. Warshaw, Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 22(14) (1992) 1111-1132.
31. S. De Hertogh, S. Viaene, and G. Dedene Governing Web 2.0 Commun. ACM 54 3 2011 124 130
32. M.T. Dishaw, and D.M. Strong Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs Inform. Manage. 36 1 1999 9 21
33. M. Fishbein, and I. Ajzen Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research 1975 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
34. S. Gao, P.L. Mokhtarian, and R.A. Johnston Nonnormality of data in structural equation models Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2082 1 2008 116 124
35. B. Gardner Making sense of enterprise 2.0 VINE 43 2 2013 149 160
36. D.G. Garson Structural Equation Modeling 2012 Statistical Associates Publishing North Carolina
37. H. Goldstein, G. Bonnet, and T. Rocher Multilevel structural equation models for the analysis of comparative data on educational performance J. Education. Behav. Statist. 32 2007 252 286
38. P.H. Gray The effects of knowledge management systems on emergent teams: towards a research model J. Strat. Inform. Syst. 9 2-3 2000 175 191
39. R.J. Gregory Psychological Testing: History, Principles, and Applications 2007 Pearson/Allyn and Bacon
40. J.F. Hair, W. Black, B. Babin, and R. Anderson Multivariate Data Analysis 2010 Prentice Hall Inc Upper Saddle River, NJ
41. J.F. Hair, R. Bush, and D. Ortinau Marketing Research 2008 McGraw-Hill Companies Incorporated
42. M. Hardt, and A. Negri Multitude 2008 Penguin London, UK
43. Healthmap, HealthMap Website, 2013 < http://healthmap.org > (accessed 25.01.13).
44. G. Hofstede Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values 1980 Sage Publications Inc. Newbury Park, CA
45. D. Hooper, J. Coughlan, and M.R. Mullen Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit Electron. J. Bus. Res. Meth. 6 1 2008 53 60
46. J.J. Hox, and T.M. Bechger An introduction to structural equation modeling Family Sci. Rev. 11 1998 354 373
47. C.-L. Hsu, and J.C.-C. Lin Acceptance of blog usage: the roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation Inform. Manage. 45 1 2008 65 74
48. L. Hu, and P.M. Bentler Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives Struct. Equ. Model. 6 1999 1 55
49. J. Hulland, Y.H. Chow, and S. Lam Use of causal models in marketing research: a review Int. J. Res. Mark. 13 1996 181 197
50. D.L. Jackson Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: some support for the N:q hypothesis Struct. Equ. Model. 10 2003 128 141
51. C.M. Johnson A survey of current research on online communities of practice Inter. High. Educ. 4 1 2001 45 60
52. A.M. Kaplan, and M. Haenlein Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media Bus. Horiz. 53 2010 59 68
53. D.A. Kenny, and D.B. Mccoach Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling Struct. Equ. Model. 10 2003 333 351
54. R.B. Kline Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling 2011 The Guilford Press New York, NY
55. R. Kling, and C. Courtright Group behavior and learning in electronic forums: a sociotechnical approach Inform. Soc. 19 2003 221 235
56. KPMG, Enterprise 2.0: Tales from the Trenches, KPMG Thought Leadership, 2008 < http://www.kpmg.com/CN/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/enterprise-2.0-tales-O-0811.pdf > (accessed 25.08.12).
57. N. Kripanot Using a technology acceptance model to investigate academic acceptance of the internet J. Bus. Syst., Govern. Ethics 1 2 2006 13 28
58. R. Kuhlen, Change of paradigm in knowledge management - framework for the collaborative production and exchange of knowledge, in: 69th IFLA General Conference and Council, Berlin, Germany, 2003.
59. R.-Z. Kuo, and G.-G. Lee KMS adoption: the effects of information quality Manage. Dec. 47 10 2009 1633 1651
60. J. Lave, and E. Wenger Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation 1991 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
61. G.K. Lee, and R.E. Cole From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: the case of the Linux kernel development Organ. Sci. 14 6 2003 633 649
62. M.R. Lee, and Y.-C. Lan From web 2.0 to conversational knowledge management: towards collaborative intelligence J. Entrepren. Res. 2 2 2007 47 62
63. M. Levy Web 2.0 implications on knowledge management J. Knowl. Manage. 13 1 2009 120 134
64. A. Littlejohn, C. Milligan, and A. Margaryan Charting collective knowledge: supporting self-regulated learning in the workplace J. Workp. Learn. 24 3 2012 226 238
65. M. Manning, and D. Munro The Survey Researcher's SPSS Cookbook 2007 Pearson Education Australia Sydney, NSW
66. KPMG, Enterprise 2.0: Fad or Future? KPMG Thought Leadership, 2007a < http://www.kpmg.com/CN/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/enterprise-2.0-ff-O-0706.pdf > (accessed 25.08.12).
67. KPMG, Enterprise 2.0: The Benefits and Challenges of Adoption, KPMG Thought Leadership, 2007b < http://www.kpmg.co.uk/news/docs/E2.0%20The%20Benefits%20and%20Challenges%20of%20adoption.pdf > (accessed 25.08.12).
68. A.P. Mcafee Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 47 3 2006 21 28
69. A.P. Mcafee Shattering the myths about enterprise 2.0 MIT Center Dig. Bus. Res. Brief 13 1 2011
70. G. Mckelvie, F. Dotsika, and K. Patrick Interactive business development, capturing business knowledge and practice. A case study Learn. Organ. 14 5 2007 407 422
71. S. Mcquitty Statistical power and structural equation models in business research J. Bus. Res. 57 2004 175 183
72. E. Mercier-Laurent Knowledge management: French cooking VINE 40 3 2010 301 311
73. H. Muljadi, H. Takeda, A. Shakya, S. Kawamoto, S. Kobayashi, A. Fujiyama, and K. Ando Semantic Wiki as a Lightweight Knowledge Management System R. Mizoguchi, Z. Shi, F. Giunchiglia, 1st Asian Semantic Web Conference 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Beijing, China
74. J. Nahapiet, and S. Ghoshal Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage Acad. Manag. Rev. 22 2 1998 242 266
75. D. Nevo, and Y.E. Chan A Delphi study of knowledge management systems: scope and requirements Inform. Manag. 44 2007 583 597
76. B.B. Nielsen, and S. Michailova Knowledge management systems in multinational corporations: typology and transitional dynamics Long Range Plan. 40 2007 314 340
77. I. Nonaka A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation Organ. Sci. 5 1 1994 14 37
78. I. Nonaka, and N. Konno The concept of 'Ba': building a foundation for knowledge creation Calif. Manag. Rev. 40 3 1998 40 54
79. W. Orlikowski Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations Organ. Sci. 11 4 2000 404 428
80. T. Papadopoulos, T. Stamati, and P. Nopparuch Exploring the determinants of knowledge sharing via employee weblogs Int. J. Inf. Manage. 33 1 2013 133 146
81. S. Paroutis, and A. Al Saleh Determinants of knowledge sharing using Web 2.0 technologies J. Knowl. Manag. 13 4 2009 52 63
82. M. Polanyi Personal Knowledge 1958 University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL
83. M. Polanyi Knowing and Being M. Greene, Essays by Michael Polanyi 1969 University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL
84. J.Y. Prax Le Guide du Knowledge Management 1999 Dunod Paris, France
85. E.S. Raymond The Cathedral and the Bazaar 1999 O'Reilly Press Sebastopol, CA
86. W. Reinhardt, B. Schmidt, P. Sloep, and H. Drachsler Knowledge worker roles and actions - results of two empirical studies Knowl. Process Manage. 18 3 2011 150 174
87. R.E. Schumacker, and R.G. Lomax A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling 2010 Routledge New York, NY
88. U. Sekaran, and R. Bougie Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach 2010 John Wiley & Sons
89. S. Sharma, and S. Mukherjee Applied Multivariate Techniques 1996 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Limited
90. B.G. Tabachnick, and L.S. Fidell Using Multivariate Statistics 2001 Allyn and Bacon Boston, MA
91. T.L. Thompson, and C.J. Macdonald Community building, emergent design and expecting the unexpected: creating a quality e-learning experience Inter. High. Educ. 8 3 2005 233 249
92. V. Venkatesh, M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis, and F.D. Davis User acceptance of information: toward a unified view MIS Quart. 27 3 2003 425 478
93. G. Von Krogh How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda J. Strat. Inform. Syst. 21 2012 154 164
94. V. Vuori, and J. Okkonen Refining information and knowledge by social media applications: adding value by insight VINE 42 1 2012 117 128
95. D. Wang, Z. Su, and D. Yang Organizational culture and knowledge creation capability J. Knowl. Manag. 15 3 2011 363 373
96. E. Wenger Communities of Practice, Learning, Meaning, and Identity 1998 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
97. S. Wright Correlation and causation J. Agricult. Res. 20 1921 557 585
98. J. Xu, and M. Quaddus Exploring the perceptions of knowledge management systems J. Manag. Develop. 24 4 2005 324 334
99. D. Yates, and S. Paquette Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: a case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake Int. J. Inform. Manage. 31 2011 6 13
100. T.-K. Yu, L.-C. Lu, and T.-F. Liu Exploring factors that influence knowledge sharing behavior via weblogs Comput. Hum. Behav. 26 1 2010 32 41
101. N. Antonius, and L. Rich Discovering collection and analysis techniques for social media to improve public safety ITMR 3 1 2013 42 53