Positive effects of task-conflict estimulation on work-team climate;Efectos positivos de la activación del conflicto de tarea sobre el clima de los equipos de trabajo

Revista de Psicologia Social

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 3-15

  Medina, Francisco J ^a   Munduate, Lourdes ^a   Martínez, Inés ^b   Dorado, Miguel A ^a   Mañas, Miguel A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Clima laboral; Climate; Conflicto de tareas; Conflicto organizacional; Conflicto relacional; Organizational conflict; Relationship conflict; Satisfacci n; Satisfaction; Task conflict

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993054934     PISSN: 02134748     EISSN: 15793680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1174/021347404322726526     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991)-Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
2. Alper, S. & Tjosvold, D. (1994). Approaches to managing conflict in self-directed work teams. Comunicacion presentada a la International Association for Conflict Management Conference, Eugene, Oregon. USA.
3. Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effect of functional and dysfUnctional conflict on strategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of ManagementJournal, 39, 123-148.
4. Amason, A. C. & Sapienza, H. (1997). The effect of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23, 495-516.
5. Argyris, C. (1962). Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness. Homewood. IL: Dorsey.
6. Baron, R. A. (1997). Positive effects of conflict: Insights from Social Cognition. En C. K. W. De Dreu & E. van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 177-191). Londres: Sage.
7. Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression!correlation analysis of the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. De Dreu, C.K.W. & van de Vliert, E. (Eds.) (1997). Using conflict in organizations. Londres: Sage.
9. De Dreu, C. K. W & van Viannen, A. E. M. (2001). Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 309-328.
10. De Dreu, C. K. W. & Weingart, L. R. (2003) Task versus relationship conflict. A meta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-749.
11. De Dreu, C. K. W. & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1191-1201.
12. De Witte, K. & De Cock, G. (1986). Organizational climate: Its relation with managerial activities or communication structures. En G. Debus & H. W. Schroiff (Eds.), The psychology of work and organization: Current trends and issues (pp. 70-96). Amsterdam: North Holland.
13. DRUCKMAN, D. (1994). Determinant of compromising behavior in negotiation. of Conflict Resolution, 38, 507-556.
14. Friedman, R. A., Tidd, S. T., Currall, S. C. & Tsai, J. C. (2000). What goes around comes around: The impact of personal conflict styles on work conflict and stress. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 32-55.
15. Janssen, O., van de Vliert, E & Veenstra, Ch. (1999). How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams. Journal of Management, 25, 117-141.
16. Jehn, K. A. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223-238.
17. Jehn, K. a. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quaterly, 40, 256-282.
18. Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530-557.
19. Jehn, K. A. & Mannix, E. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.
20. Jehn, K., Northcraft, G. & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why difference makes a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in work group. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
21. Kurtz, D. L. & Clow, K. E. (1998). Services Marketing. Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons
22. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L. & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing crossfunctional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779-783.
23. Manas, M. A., Gonzalez Rom, A. V. & Peiro, J. M. (1999) Elclima de los de trabajo. Determinantesy consecuencias [Work-group climate. Determinants and consequences]. Universidad de Almerfa: Instituto de Estudios Almerienses.
24. Medina, F. J., Munduate, L., Dorado, M. A., Martinez, I. & Cisneros, I. (2002). Types of conflict and personal and organizational consequences. Comunicacion presentada a la Internacional Associationfor Conflict Management Conference, Park City. USA.
25. Melia, J. L. & Peiro, J. M. (1989). La medida de la satisfaccion laboral en contextos organizacionales: el cuestionario de satisfaccion S 20/23 (The assesment of job satisfaction in organizational environments: The S 20/23 questionaire). Psicologerna, 3, 5-74.
26. Ostroff, C. (1993). The effects of climate and personal influences on individual behavior and attitudes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 56-90.
27. Peiro, J. M., Gonzalez Rom, A. V. & Ramos, J. (1992). The influence of work-team climate on role stress, tension, satisfaction, and leadership perceptions. European Review of Applied Psychology, 42, 49-56.
28. Pelled, L. H. (1995). Demographic diversity, conflict and work group outcomes: an intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615-631.
29. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M. & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box. An analysis o work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28
30. Priem, R. L. & Price, K. H. (1991). Process and outcome expectations for the dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus techniques of strategic decision making. Group and Organization Studies, 16, 206-225.
31. Quinn, R. E. (1988). Beyond Rational Management, Mastering the paradox of competing demands of high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Simons, T. L. & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102-111.
33. Spector, P. E. (1987). Method variance as an artefact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 438-443.
34. Surra, C. & Longstreeth, M. (1990). Similarity of outcomes, interdependence and conflict in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 501-516.
35. Turner, M. E. & Pratkanis, A. (1994). Social identity maintenance prescriptions for preventing groupthink: Reducing identity protection and enhancing intellectual conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 254-270.
36. van de Vliert, E. & De Dreu, C. (1994). Optimizing Performance by Conflict Stimulation. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 211-222.
37. van Muijen, J., Koopman, p., de Witte, K., de Cock, G., Susanj, Z., Lemoine, C., Bourantas, D., Papalexandris, N., Branyicski, I., Spaltro, E., Jesuino, J., Gonzalves das Neves, J., Pitariu, H., Konrad, E., Peiro, J. M., GonzAlez-Roma, V. & Turnipseed, D. (1999). Organizational culture: The Focus Questionnaire. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 551-568.
38. West, M. A. & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 680-693.
39. West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355-387.
40. Zander, A. (1993). Making groups effective (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.