Enhancing Learning Outcomes: The Effects of Instructional Technology, Learning Styles, Instructional Methods, and Student Behavior

Journal of Marketing Education

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 130-142

  Young, Mark R ^a   Klemz, Bruce R ^a   Murphy, J William ^a  

^a WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

instructional technology; learning outcomes; learning styles; pedagogy; student behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992810076     PISSN: 02734753     EISSN: 15526550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0273475303254004     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adrian, C. Mitchell, and G. Dean Palmer. 1999. Toward enhancing the quality and quantity of marketing majors. Journal of Marketing Education 21(1): 25-33.
2. Bandura, Albert. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A socialcognitive view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Bransford, John D., Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, eds. 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Bridges, Eileen. 1999. Experiential learning and customer needs in the undergraduate marketing researchcourse. Journal of Marketing Education 21 (1): 51-59.
5. Brokaw, Alan J., and Thomas E. Merz. 2000. The effects of student behavior and preferred learning style on performance. Journal of Business Education 1 (spring): 44-53.
6. Chickering, Arthur W., and Zelda F. Gamson. 1987. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Wingspread Journal 9 (2): 1-16.
7. Clarke, Irvine III, Theresa B. Flaherty, and Sandra Mottner. 2001. Student perceptions of educational technology tools. Journal of Marketing Education 23 (3): 169-177.
8. Compeau, Deborah, and Christopher Higgins. 1995. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly 19 (2): 189-211.
9. Compeau, Deborah, and D. B. Meister. 1997. Measurement of perceived characteristics of innovating: A reconsideration based on three empirical studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Diffusion Interest Group on Information Technology, 15 December, Atlanta, GA.
10. Davis, Richard, Shekhar Misra, and Stuart Van Auken. 2000. Relating pedagogical preference of marketing seniors and alumni to attitude toward the major. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (2): 147-154.
11. Deeter-Schmelz, Dawn R., Karen Norman Kennedy, and Rosemary P. Ramsey. 2002. Enriching our understanding of student effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education 24 (2): 114-124.
12. Devadoss, S., and J. Foltz. 1996. Evaluating factors influencing student class attendance and performance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 (August): 499-507.
13. Dillion, William R., and Matthew Goldstein. 1984. Multivariate analysis: Methods and applications. New York: John Wiley.
14. Dunn, Rita, Mary C. Giannitti, John B. Murray, and Ino Rossi. 1990. Grouping students for instruction: Effects of learning style on achievement and attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology 130: 485-494.
15. Erekson, O. H. 1992. Joint determination of college student achievement and effort: Implications for college teaching. Research in Higher Education 33 (4): 433-446.
16. Fornell, C. R. 1982. A second generation of multivariate analysis. Volumes 1-2, Methods. New York: Praeger.
17. Frontczak, Nancy T. 1998. A paradigm for the selection, use and development of experiential learning activities in marketing education. Marketing Education Review 8 (3): 25-34.
18. Goodwin, Donna. 1996. Effects of matching student and instructor learning style preferences on academic achievement in english. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arkansas.
19. Grasha, Anthony F., and Natalia Yangarber-Hicks. 2000. Integrating teaching styles and learning styles within structional technology. College Teaching 48 (1): 2-10.
20. Hamer, Lawrence O. 2000. The additive effects of semistructured classroom activities on student learning: An application of classroom-based experiential learning techniques. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (1): 25-34.
21. Hill, T., N. D. Smith, and M. F. Mann. 1987. Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (2): 307-313.
22. Holley, J. H., and E. K. Jenkins. 1993. The relationship between student learning style and performance on various test question formats. Journal of Education for Business 68 (5): 301-308.
23. Honey, Peter, and Alan Mumford. 1992. The manual of learning styles. Berkshire, UK: Maidenhead.
24. Jaju, Anupam, Hyokjin Kwak, and George M. Zinkhan. 2002. Learning styles of undergraduate business students: A cross-cultural comparison between the US, India, and Korea. Marketing Education Review 12 (2): 49-62.
25. Johnson, Rayneld R. 1996. An analysis of learner variables related to achievement in an introductory graduate statistics course. Ph.D. dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
26. Karns, Gary L. 1993. Marketing student perceptions of learning activities: Structure, preferences, and effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education 15 (1): 3-10.
27. Kennedy, Ellen J., Leigh Lawton, and E. Leroy Plumlee. 2002. Blissful ignorance: The problem of unrecognized incompetence and academic performance. Journal of Marketing Education 24 (3): 243-252.
28. Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29. Kolb, D. A. 1988. Learning styles and disciplinary differences. California Management Review 18 (3): 22-31.
30. Lashinger, H. K., and M. W. Boss. 1984. Learning styles in nursing students and career choices. Journal of Advanced Nursing 9: 375-380.
31. Marks, Ronald B. 2000. Determinants of student evaluations of global measures of instructor and course value. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (2): 108-119.
32. Matthews, Doris B. 1994. An investigation of students'learning styles in various disciplines in colleges and universities. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development 33 (2): 65-74.
33. McCloy, Rodney A., John P. Campbell, and Robert Cudeck. 1994. A confirmatory test of a model of performance determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology 79 (4): 493-516.
34. McCorkle, Denny E., James Reardon, Joe F. Alexander, Nathan D. King, Robert C. Harris, and R. Vishwanathan Iyer. 1999. Understanding marketing students, group projects, and teamwork: The good, the bad, and the ugly? Journal of Marketing Education 21 (2): 106-117.
35. McNeilley, Kevin M., and Frances J. Ranney. 1998. Combining writing and the electronic media in sales management courses. Journal of Marketing Education 20 (3): 226-235.
36. Mitchell, Andrew A., and Jerry C. Olsen. 1981. Are product attribute beliefs the only mediators of advertising affects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research 18: 318-332.
37. Nonis, Sarath A., and Cathy Owens Swift. 1998. Deterring cheating behavior in the marketing classroom: An analysis of the effects of demographics, attitudes, and in-class deterrent strategies. Journal of Marketing Education 20 (3): 188-199.
38. Nulty, Duncan D., and Mary A. Barrett. 1996. Transitions in students'learning styles. Studies in Higher Education 21: 333-345.
39. Nunnally, Jum C. 1978. Psychometric theory. 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Okebukola, Peter Akinsola. 1986. The influence of preferred learning styles on cooperative learning in science. Science Education 70: 509-517.
41. Petkus, Ed, Jr. 2000. A theoretical and practical framework for service-learning in marketing: Kolb's experiential learning cycle. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (1): 64-70.
42. Ritchie, Donn, and Chris Volkl. 2000. Effectiveness of two generative learning strategies in the science classroom. School Science and Mathematics 100 (2): 83-89.
43. Roach, S. S., M. W. Johnston, and J. F. Hair Jr. 1993. An exploratory examination of teaching styles currently employed in marketing education: Developing a typology and its implications for marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education 18 (3): 32-38.
44. Romer, D. 1993. Do students go to class? Should they? Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (3): 167-174.
45. Schacter, John. 1999. The impact of education technology on student achievement. Milken Exchange on Education Technology. Retrieved from http://www.milkenexchange.org/
46. Stewart, Karen L., and Linda A. Felicetti. 1992. Learning styles of marketing majors. Educational Research Quarterly 15 (2): 15-23.
47. Stöttinger, Barbara, and Bodo B. Schlegelmilch. 2002. Information and communication technologies in tertiary education: A “customer” perspective. Marketing Education Review 12 (2): 63-72.
48. Strauss, Denise T., and Raymond D. Frost. 1999. Selecting instructional technology media for the marketing classroom. Marketing Education Review 9 (1): 11-20.
49. Tull, Donald S., and Del I. Hawkins. 1990. Marketing research: Measurement and method. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan.
50. Webster, J., and J. Martocchio. 1992. Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure withworkplace implications. MIS Quarterly 16 (2): 201-226.
51. Williams, Tim. 1992. Validating a degree: Subject relevance and assessment issues in the development of a new degree. Education and Training 34 (3): 31-33.
52. Wood, Robert, and Albert Bandura. 1989. Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review 14 (3): 361-384.
53. Young, Mark R. 2001. Windowed, wired and webbed—Now what? Journal of Marketing Education 23 (1): 45-54.
54. Young, Mark R. 2002. Experiential learning = hands-on + minds-on. Marketing Education Review 12 (1): 43-52.