Enriching Our Understanding of Student Team Effectiveness

Journal of Marketing Education

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 114-124

  Deeter Schmelz, Dawn R ^a   Kennedy, Karen Norman ^b   Ramsey, Rosemary P ^c  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992828646     PISSN: 02734753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0273475302242004     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Alwin, Duane F., and Robert M. Hauser. 1975. The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review 40 (February): 37-47.
2. Aranda, E. K., L. Aranda, and K. Conlon. 1998. Teams: Structure, process, culture, and politics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Astin, A. W. 1977. Four critical years: Effects of college on beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Bacon, Donald R., Kim A. Stewart, and Sue Stewart-Belle. 1998. Exploring predictors of student team project performance. Journal of Marketing Education 20 (May): 63-71.
5. Baugh, S. Gayle, and George B. Graen. 1997. Effects of team gender and racial composition on perceptions of team performance in cross-functional teams. Group & Organization Management 22 (3): 366-383.
6. Berry, Leonard L. 1995. On great service: A framework for action.New York: Free Press.
7. Bettenhausen, Kenneth L. 1991. Five years of group research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management 17 (2): 345-381.
8. Billings, Robert S., and Steve P. Wroten. 1978. Use of path analysis in industrial/organizational psychology: Criticisms and suggestions. Journal of Applied Psychology 63 (6): 677-688.
9. Campion, Michael A., Gina J. Medsker, and A. Catherine Higgs. 1993. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology 46: 823-850.
10. Campion, Michael A., Ellen M. Papper, and Gina J. Medsker. 1996. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: Areplication and extension. Personnel Psychology 49: 429-452.
11. Carron, A. V. 1982. Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology 4: 123-138.
12. Cohen, S. G. 1994. Designing effective self-managing work teams. In Advancesin interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Theories of self-managed work teams, edited by M. M. Beyerlein and D. A. Johnson, 67-102. London: JAI.
13. Cossé, Thomas J., D. Neil Ashworth, and Terry M. Weisenberger. 1999. The effects of team size in a marketing simulation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 7 (summer): 98-106.
14. Cummings, Thomas G. 1981. Designing effective work groups. In Handbook of organizational design, Vol. 2, edited by Paul C. Nystrom and William H. Starbuck. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Dawe, Helen C. 1934. The influence of size of kindergarten group on performance. Child Development 5: 295-303.
16. Deeter-Schmelz, Dawn R., and Rosemary Ramsey. 1998. Student team performance: Amethod for classroom assessment. Journal of Marketing Education 20 (May): 85-93.
17. Denton, Howard G. 1994. Simulating design in the world of industry and commerce: Observations from a series of case studies in the United Kingdom. Journal of Technology Education 6 (1): 1045-1064.
18. Dillon, W. R., and M. Goldstein. 1984. Multivariate analysis: Methods and applications. New York: John Wiley.
19. Dommeyer, Curt J. 1986. Acomparison of the individual proposal and the team project in the marketing research course. Journal of Marketing Education 8 (spring): 30-38.
20. Driskell, James E., Robert Hogan, and Eduardo Salas. 1987. Personality and group performance. In Group processes and intergroup relations, edited by C. Hendrick, 91-112. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Erez, M., and I. Zidon. 1984. Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 69: 69-78.
22. Fetteroll, Eugene C., Jr., Glen D. Hoffherr, and John W. Moran Jr. 1993. Growing teams: A down to earth approach. Methuen, MA: GOAL/QPC.
23. Forman, Janis, and Patricia Katsky. 1986. The group report: Aproblem in small group or writing processes? Journal of Business Communication 23 (fall): 23-35.
24. Gist, Marilyn E., Edwin A. Locke, and M. Susan Taylor. 1987. Organizational behavior: Group structure, process, and effectiveness. Journal of Management 13 (2): 237-257.
25. Gladstein, Deborah L. 1984. Groups in context: Amodel of task group effec tiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 29: 499-517.
26. Guzzo, Richard A., and Marcus W. Dickson. 1996. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology 47: 307-339.
27. Haas, Amie L., Robert W. Haas, and Thomas R. Wotruba. 1998. The use of self-ratings and peer ratings to evaluate performances of student group members. Journal of Marketing Education 20 (December): 200-209.
28. Hackman, J. Richard. 1987. The design of work teams. In Handbook of organizational behavior, edited by Jay W. Lorsch. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29. Hackman, J. Richard. 1990. Groups that work (and those that don't). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Hackman, J. Richard, and Charles G. Morris. 1975. Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 8, edited by Leonard Berkowitz, 45-99. New York: Academic Press.
31. Holzbach, Robert L. 1978. Rater bias in performance ratings: Supervisor, self, and peer ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 63 (October): 579-588.
32. Hutson-Comeaux, Sarah L., and Janice R. Kelly. 1996. Sex differences in interaction style and group task performance: The process-performance relationship. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality 11 (5): 255-275.
33. Johnson, David W., and Frank P. Johnson. 1994. Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
34. Katzell, R. A., C. E. Miller, N. G. Rotter, and T. G. Venet. 1970. Effects of leadership and other inputs on group processes and outputs. Journal of Social Psychology 80: 157-169.
35. Katzenbach, Jon R., and Douglas K. Smith. 1993. The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
36. Kerlinger, Fred N. 1986. Foundationsof behavioral research. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
37. Kerlinger, Fred N., and Elazar J. Pedhazur. 1973. Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
38. Kerr, N. L. 1989. Illusions of efficacy: The effects of group size on perceived efficacy in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 25: 287-313.
39. Klein, E. E., and D. G. Dologite. 2000. The role of computer support tools and gender composition in innovative information system idea generation by small groups. Computers in Human Behavior 16: 111-139.
40. Kunz, Russell. 1994. Total quality education: Aconcept in reality. Paper pre sented at the annual convention of the American Association of Community Colleges, summer 1994, Washington, DC.
41. Lafferty, J. Clayton, Patrick M. Eady, and Alonzo W. Pond. 1973. The desert survival problem: A group decision making experience for examining and increasing individual and team effectiveness. Experiential Learning Methods. Plymouth, MI: Experiential Learning Methods.
42. Larson, Carl E., and Frank M.J. LaFasto. 1989. Teamwork: What must go right, what can go wrong. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Leana, Carrie R. 1985. A partial test of Janis’ groupthink model: Effects of group cohesiveness and leader behavior on defective decision making. Journal of Management 11 (1): 5-17.
44. Lee, V. E., and A. S. Bryk. 1986. Effects of single-sex secondary schools on student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology 78 (5): 381-395.
45. Littlepage, Glenn E., Louis Cowart, and Bernadette Kerr. 1989. Relationships between group environment scales and group performance and cohesion. Small Group Behavior 20 (1): 50-61.
46. Locke, E. A., and G. P. Latham. 1990. Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. American Psychological Society 1 (4): 240-246.
47. Longenecker, Clinton O., Joseph A. Scazzero, and Timothy T. Stansfield. 1994. Quality improvement through team goal setting, feedback, and problem solving. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 11 (4): 45-52.
48. Longley, J., and D. G. Pruitt. 1980. Groupthink: Acritique of Janis'theory. In Review of personality and social psychology, edited by L. Wheeler, 74-93. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
49. Lott, Albert J., and Bernice E. Lott. 1961. Group cohesiveness, communication level, and conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62 (2): 408-412.
50. Maginn, Michael D. 1994. Effective teamwork. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
51. McCorkle, Denny E., James Reardon, Joe F. Alexander, Nathan D. Kling, Robert C. Harris, and R. Vishwanathan Iyer. 1999. Undergraduate marketing students, group projects, and teamwork: The good, the bad and the ugly? Journal of Marketing Education 21 (August): 106-117.
52. McGrath, Joseph E. 1964. Social psychology: A brief introduction.New York: Holt.
53. McGrath, Joseph E. 1984. Groups: Interaction and performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
54. McGrath, Joseph E. 1986. Studying groups at work: Ten critical needs for theory and practice. In Designing effective work groups, edited by Paul S. Goodman and Associates, 362-391. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55. Mendenhall, W., and Terry Sincich. 1996. A second course in statistics: Regression analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56. Meyer, John. 1994. Teaching through teams in communication courses: Letting structuration happen. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
57. Miesing, Paul, and John F. Preble. 1985. Group processes and performance in a complex business simulation. Small Group Behavior 16 (August): 325-338.
58. Miller, N. E., Jr. 1951. The effect of group size on decision-making discussions. Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
59. Montgomery, D., and E. Peck. 1982. Introduction to linear regression analysis. New York: John Wiley.
60. Newstrom, John, and Edward Scannell. 1998. The big book of team building games. New York: McGraw-Hill.
61. Nichols, Joe D., and Jeff Hall. 1995. The effects of cooperative learning on student achievement and motivation in a high school geometry class. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, San Francisco.
62. Northcraft, G. B., M. A. Neale, and T. Griffith. 1994. Organizational behavior: A management challenge. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden.
63. Nunnally, Jum C. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
64. O’Leary-Kelly, Anne M., Joseph J. Martocchio, and Dwight D. Frink. 1996. A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal 37 (5): 1285-1301.
65. Parker, Glenn M. 1996. Team playersand teamwork: The new competitive business strategy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
66. Pelled, Lisa Hope. 1996. Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance: A field investigation. International Journal of Conflict Management 7 (3): 230-246.
67. Peterson, Robert A. 1994. A meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research 21 (September): 381-391.
68. Pfeiffer, J. William. 1991. The encyclopedia of team development activities. San Diego, CA: University Associates.
69. Phillips, Lynn W. 1981. Assessing measurement error in key informant reports: A methodological note on organizational analysis in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (November): 395-415.
70. Price, James L., and Charles W. Mueller. 1986. Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
71. Rodelberg, Steven G., and Steven M. Rumery. 1996. Gender diversity, team decision quality, time on task, and interpersonal cohesion. Small Group Research 27 (1): 79-90.
72. Saavedra, Richard, and Seog K. Kwun. 1993. Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (June): 450-462.
73. Salas, E., T. L. Dickinson, S. A. Converse, and S. I. Tannenbaum. 1992. Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In Teams: Their training and performance, edited by R.W. Swezey and E. Salas, 3-30. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
74. Scott, K. Dow, and Anthony Townsend. 1994. Teams: Why some succeed and others fail. HR Magazine 39 (8): 62-67.
75. Senge, Peter M. 1990. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
76. Sethi, Rajesh. 2000. Superordinate identity in cross-functional product development teams: Its antecedents and effect on new product performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (3): 330-344.
77. Sharan, S. 1980. Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research 50: 241-272.
78. Shaw, Marvin E. 1981. Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
79. Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Charles Brody. 1989. Interruptions in group discussions: The effects of gender and group composition. American Sociological Review 54 (June): 424-435.
80. Steiner, I. D. 1972. Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
81. Strong, J. T., and R. E. Anderson. 1990. Free-riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education 12: 61-67.
82. Summers, I., T. Coffelt, and R. E. Horton. 1988. Work-group cohesion. Psychological Reports 63: 627-636.
83. Sundstrom, Eric, Kenneth P. De Meuse, and David Futrell. 1990. Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist 45 (February): 120-133.
84. Tannenbaum, S. I., R. L. Beard, and E. Salas. 1992. Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. In Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology, edited by K. Kelly, 117-153. New York: Elsevier Science.
85. Thomas, Edwin J., and Clinton F. Fink. 1963. Effects of group size. Psychological Bulletin 60 (4): 371-384.
86. Thompson, Leigh. 2000. Making the team. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
87. Thornton, George C., III. 1980. Psychometric properties of self-appraisals of job performance. Personnel Psychology 33 (summer): 263-271.
88. Ukens, Lorraine L. 1997. Working together. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
89. Wolfe, Joseph, and Thomas M. Box. 1988. Team cohesion effects on business game performance. Simulation & Games 19 (1): 82-98.
90. Wood, Wendy, Darlene Polek, and Cheryl Aiken. 1985. Sex differences in group task performance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 48 (1): 63-71.
91. Yeatts, Dale E., and Cloyd Hyten. 1998. High-performing self-managed work teams: A comparison of theory to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
92. Zander, Alvin. 1982. Making groupseffective. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.