UniCon3D: De novo protein structure prediction using united-residue conformational search via stepwise, probabilistic sampling

Bioinformatics

Volumn 32, Issue 18, 2016, Pages 2791-2799

  Bhattacharya, Debswapna ^a   Cao, Renzhi ^a   Cheng, Jianlin ^a,b  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

BENCHMARKING; BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PHYSICS; PROBABILITY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BENCHMARKING; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYSICS; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 84992217836     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw316     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Aarts, E. and Korst, J. (1988) Simulated annealing and Boltzmann machines.
2. Altschul, S.F. et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389-3402.
3. Bengio, Y. and Frasconi, P. (1996) Input-output HMMs for sequence processing. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 7, 1231-1249.
4. Bhattacharya, D. and Cheng, J. (2015) De novo protein conformational sampling using a probabilistic graphical model. Sci. Rep., 5, 1-13
5. Bhuyan, M.S. and Gao, X. (2011) A protein-dependent side-chain rotamer library. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 1.
6. Boomsma, W. et al. (2008) A generative, probabilistic model of local protein structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 105, 8932-8937.
7. Boomsma, W. et al. (2014) Equilibrium simulations of proteins using molecular fragment replacement and NMR chemical shifts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 111, 13852-13857.
8. Bradley, P. et al. (2005) Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science, 309, 1868-1871.
9. Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. (2003) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical information-Theoretic Approach. Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
10. Cao, R. and Cheng, J. (2016) Protein single-model quality assessment by feature-based probability density functions. Sci. Rep., 6, 1-8.
11. Cawley, S.L. and Pachter, L. (2003) HMM sampling and applications to gene finding and alternative splicing. Bioinformatics, 19, ii36-ii41.
12. Cheng, J. and Baldi, P. (2007) Improved residue contact prediction using support vector machines and a large feature set. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 1.
13. Dill, K.A. (1990) Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry, 29, 7133-7155.
14. Dunbrack, R.L. and Karplus, M. (1993) Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins application to side-chain prediction. J. Mol. Biol., 230, 543-574.
15. Eickholt, J. and Cheng, J. (2012) Predicting protein residue-residue contacts using deep networks and boosting. Bioinformatics, 28, 3066-3072.
16. Eickholt, J. et al. (2011) A conformation ensemble approach to protein residue-residue contact. BMC Struct. Biol., 11, 1.
17. Hamelryck, T. et al. (2006) Sampling realistic protein conformations using local structural bias. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2, e131.
18. Harder, T. et al. (2010) Beyond rotamers: a generative, probabilistic model of side chains in proteins. BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 1.
19. Heffernan, R. et al. (2015) Improving prediction of secondary structure, local backbone angles, and solvent accessible surface area of proteins by iterative deep learning. Sci. Rep., 5, 1-11.
20. Hegler, J.A. et al. (2009) Restriction versus guidance in protein structure prediction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 106, 15302-15307.
21. Hu, W. et al. (2013) Stepwise protein folding at near amino acid resolution by hydrogen exchange and mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 110, 7684-7689.
22. Jones, D.T. et al. (2012) PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics, 28, 184-190.
23. Jones, D.T. et al. (2015) MetaPSICOV: combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins. Bioinformatics, 31, 999-1006.
24. Joo, K. et al. (2014) Protein structure modeling for CASP10 by multiple layers of global optimization. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 82, 188-195.
25. Joung, I. et al. (2015) Template-free modeling by LEE and LEER in CASP11. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., doi: 10.1002/prot.24944.
26. Kabsch, W. and Sander, C. (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 22, 2577-2637.
27. Kim, D.E. et al. (2009) Sampling bottlenecks in de novo protein structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol., 393, 249-260.
28. Kinch, L.N. et al. (2015) Evaluation of free modeling targets in CASP11 and ROLL. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., doi: 10.1002/prot.24973.
29. Kinch, L.N. et al. (2016) CASP 11 target classification. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., doi: 10.1002/prot.24982.
30. Kosciolek, T. and Jones, D.T. (2014) De novo structure prediction of globular proteins aided by sequence variation-derived contacts. PloS One, 9, e92197.
31. Kosciolek, T. and Jones, D.T. (2015) Accurate contact predictions using covariation techniques and machine learning. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf, doi: 10.1002/prot.24863.
32. Levitt, M. (1976) A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. J. Mol. Biol., 104, 59-107.
33. Liwo, A. et al. (1997) A united-residue force field for off-lattice protein-structure simulations. I. Functional forms and parameters of long-range side-chain interaction potentials fromprotein crystal data. J. Comput. Chem., 18, 849-873.
34. Liwo, A. et al. (1993) Prediction of protein conformation on the basis of a search for compact structures: test on avian pancreatic polypeptide. Protein Sci., 2, 1715-1731.
35. Lyons, J. et al. (2014) Predicting backbone Ca angles and dihedrals from protein sequences by stacked sparse auto-encoder deep neural network. J. Comput. Chem., 35, 2040-2046.
36. Mabrouk, M. et al. (2015) Analysis of free modeling predictions by RBO aleph in CASP11. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., doi: 10.1002/prot.24950.
37. Magnan, C.N. and Baldi, P. (2014) SSpro/ACCpro 5: almost perfect prediction of protein secondary structure and relative solvent accessibility using profiles, machine learning and structural similarity. Bioinformatics, 30, 2592-2597.
38. Maity, H. et al. (2005) Protein folding: the stepwise assembly of foldon units. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 4741-4746.
39. Mardia, K.V. et al. (2007) Protein bioinformatics and mixtures of bivariate von Mises distributions for angular data. Biometrics, 63, 505-512.
40. Marks, D.S. et al. (2011) Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. PloS One, 6, e28766.
41. Monastyrskyy, B. et al. (2014) Evaluation of residue-residue contact prediction in CASP10. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 82, 138-153.
42. Monastyrskyy, B. et al. (2015) New encouraging developments in contact prediction: assessment of the CASP11 results. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., doi: 10.1002/prot.24943.
43. Moult, J. et al. (2014) Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round x. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 82, 1-6.
44. Nielsen, S.F. (2000) The stochastic EM algorithm: estimation and asymptotic results. Bernoulli, 6, 457-489.
45. Oldziej, S. et al. (2004a) Optimization of the UNRES force field by hierarchical design of the potential-energy landscape. 3. Use of many proteins in optimization. J. Phys. Chem. B, 108, 16950-16959.
46. Oldziej, S. et al. (2004b) Optimization of the UNRES force field by hierarchical design of the potential-energy landscape. 2. Off-lattice tests of the method with single proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B, 108, 16934-16949.
47. Paluszewski, M. and Hamelryck, T. (2010) Mocapy++-A toolkit for inference and learning in dynamic Bayesian networks. BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 1.
48. Petrella, R.J. and Karplus, M. (2001) The energetics of off-rotamer protein side-chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol., 312, 1161-1175.
49. Pietal, M.J. et al. (2015) GDFuzz3D: a method for protein 3D structure reconstruction from contact maps, based on a non-Euclidean distance function. Bioinformatics, 31, 3499-3505.
50. Ray, A. et al. (2012) Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2. BMC Bioinformatics, 13, 1.
51. Rotkiewicz, P. and Skolnick, J. (2008) Fast procedure for reconstruction of fullatom protein models from reduced representations. J. Comput. Chem., 29, 1460-1465.
52. Rumbley, J. et al. (2001) An amino acid code for protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 98, 105-112.
53. Schrauber, H. et al. (1993) Rotamers: to be or not to be? An analysis of amino acid side-chain conformations in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 230, 592-612.
54. Seemayer, S. et al. (2014) CCMpred-fast and precise prediction of protein residue-residue contacts from correlated mutations. Bioinformatics, 30, 3128-3130.
55. Simons, K.T. et al. (1997) Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol., 268, 209-225.
56. Skwark, M.J. et al. (2013) PconsC: combination of direct information methods and alignments improves contact prediction. Bioinformatics, 29, 1815-1816.
57. Taylor, T.J. et al. (2014) Definition and classification of evaluation units for CASP10. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 82, 14-25.
58. Tegge, A.N. et al. (2009) NNcon: improved protein contact map prediction using 2D-recursive neural networks. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, W515-W518.
59. Uziela, K. and Wallner, B. (2016) ProQ2: estimation of model accuracy implemented in Rosetta. Bioinformatics, btv767.
60. Vassura, M. et al. (2008) FT-COMAR: fault tolerant three-dimensional structure reconstruction from protein contact maps. Bioinformatics, 24, 1313-1315.
61. Wang, Z. et al. (2011) APOLLO: a quality assessment service for single and multiple protein models. Bioinformatics, 27, 1715-1716.
62. Wang, Z. and Xu, J. (2013) Predicting protein contact map using evolutionary and physical constraints by integer programming. Bioinformatics, 29, i266-i273.
63. Xu, J. and Zhang, Y. (2010) How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5? Bioinformatics, 26, 889-895.
64. Xu, D. and Zhang, Y. (2012) Ab initio protein structure assembly using continuous structure fragments and optimized knowledge-based force field. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 80, 1715-1735.
65. Zhang, Y. (2014) Interplay of I-TASSER and QUARK for template-based and ab initio protein structure prediction in CASP10. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 82, 175-187.
66. Zhang, J. et al. (2010) MUFOLD: A new solution for protein 3D structure prediction. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 78, 1137-1152.
67. Zhang, Y. and Skolnick, J. (2004) Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 57, 702-710.
68. Zhang, J. and Xu, D. (2013) Fast algorithm for population-based protein structural model analysis. Proteomics, 13, 221-229.
69. Zhang, W. et al. (2015) Integration of QUARK and I-TASSER for Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction in CASP11, Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf, 1-11.
70. Zhao, F. et al. (2008) Discriminative learning for protein conformation sampling. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 73, 228-240.