A conformation ensemble approach to protein residue-residue contact

BMC Structural Biology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Eickholt, Jesse ^a   Wang, Zheng ^a   Cheng, Jianlin ^a,b  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLICE INHIBITORY PROTEIN; CASPASE 8; CASPASE 9;

ARTICLE; HUMAN; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SCORING SYSTEM; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

CASPASE 8; CASPASE 9; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 80053904530     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6807-11-38     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ben-David M, Noivirt-Brik O, Paz A, Prilusky J, Sussman JL, Levy Y: Assessment of CASP8 structure predictions for template free targets. Proteins 2009, 77(Suppl 9):50-65.
2. Bradley P, Misura KMS, Baker D: Toward High-Resolution de Novo Structure Prediction for Small Proteins. Science 2005, 309:1868-1871. (Pubitemid 41325099)
3. Zhang Y: Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2008, 18:342-348.
4. Li W, Zhang Y, Skolnick J: Application of sparse NMR restraints to large-scale protein structure prediction. Biophys J 2004, 87:1241-1248. (Pubitemid 39095100)
5. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz AR: MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J Mol Biol 1997, 265:217-241. (Pubitemid 27110659)
6. Miller CS, Eisenberg D: Using inferred residue contacts to distinguish between correct and incorrect protein models. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:1575-1582. (Pubitemid 351966155)
7. Wang Z, Tegge AN, Cheng J: Evaluating the absolute quality of a single protein model using structural features and support vector machines. Proteins 2009, 75:638-647.
8. Tress ML, Valencia A: Predicted residue-residue contacts can help the scoring of 3D models. Proteins 2010, 78:1980-1991.
9. Kliger Y, Levy O, Oren A, Ashkenazy H, Tiran Z, Novik A, Rosenberg A, Amir A, Wool A, Toporik A, et al.: Peptides modulating conformational changes in secreted chaperones: from in silico design to preclinical proof of concept. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:13797-13801.
10. Bjorkholm P, Daniluk P, Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Andersson R, Hvidsten TR: Using multi-data hidden Markov models trained on local neighborhoods of protein structure to predict residue-residue contacts. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1264-1270.
11. Pollastri G, Baldi P: Prediction of contact maps by GIOHMMs and recurrent neural networks using lateral propagation from all four cardinal corners. Bioinformatics 2002, 18(Suppl 1):S62-70. (Pubitemid 41185638)
12. Xue B, Faraggi E, Zhou Y: Predicting residue-residue contact maps by a two-layer, integrated neural-network method. Proteins 2009, 76:176-183.
13. Tegge AN, Wang Z, Eickholt J, Cheng J: NNcon: improved protein contact map prediction using 2D-recursive neural networks. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:W515-518.
14. Cheng J, Baldi P: Improved residue contact prediction using support vector machines and a large feature set. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:113.
15. Vullo A, Walsh I, Pollastri G: A two-stage approach for improved prediction of residue contact maps. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:180.
16. Wu S, Zhang Y: A comprehensive assessment of sequence-based and template-based methods for protein contact prediction. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:924-931. (Pubitemid 351448026)
17. Misura KM, Chivian D, Rohl CA, Kim DE, Baker D: Physically realistic homology models built with ROSETTA can be more accurate than their templates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:5361-5366.
18. Skolnick J, Kihara D, Zhang Y: Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR-3 threading algorithm. Proteins 2004, 56:502-518. (Pubitemid 38924963)
19. Ashkenazy H, Unger R, Kliger Y: Hidden conformations in protein structures. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:1941-1947.
20. Fodor AA, Aldrich RW: Influence of conservation on calculations of amino acid covariance in multiple sequence alignments. Proteins 2004, 56:211-221. (Pubitemid 38850156)
21. Gobel U, Sander C, Schneider R, Valencia A: Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 1994, 18:309-317. (Pubitemid 24111530)
22. Kundrotas PJ, Alexov EG: Predicting residue contacts using pragmatic correlated mutations method: reducing the false positives. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:503.
23. Olmea O, Valencia A: Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Fold Des 1997, 2:S25-32. (Pubitemid 127740476)
24. Vicatos S, Reddy BV, Kaznessis Y: Prediction of distant residue contacts with the use of evolutionary information. Proteins 2005, 58:935-949. (Pubitemid 40271258)
25. Ezkurdia I, Grana O, Izarzugaza JM, Tress ML: Assessment of domain boundary predictions and the prediction of intramolecular contacts in CASP8. Proteins 2009, 77(Suppl 9):196-209.
26. Izarzugaza JM, Grana O, Tress ML, Valencia A, Clarke ND: Assessment of intramolecular contact predictions for CASP7. Proteins 2007, 69(Suppl 8):152-158. (Pubitemid 350210122)
27. Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K, Tramontano A, Kryshtafovych A: Evaluation of residue-residue contact predictions in CASP9. Proteins 2011.
28. Tress ML, Ezkurdia I, Richardson JS: Target domain definition and classification in CASP8. Proteins 2009, 77(Suppl 9):10-17.
29. Grana O, Baker D, MacCallum RM, Meiler J, Punta M, Rost B, Tress ML, Valencia A: CASP6 assessment of contact prediction. Proteins 2005, 61(Suppl 7):214-224. (Pubitemid 43069976)
30. Zemla A, Venclovas, Moult J, Fidelis K: Processing and evaluation of predictions in CASP4. Proteins 2001, Suppl 5: 13-21. (Pubitemid 34113164)
31. Zhang Y, Skolnick J: Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004, 57:702-710. (Pubitemid 39626992)
32. Zemla A: LGA: A method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:3370-3374.
33. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Moult J, Fidelis K: Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins 1999, Suppl 3: 22-29. (Pubitemid 29463512)
34. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Tramontano A: Evaluation of CASP8 model quality predictions. Proteins 2009, 77(Suppl 9):157-166.
35. Xu D, Zhang J, Roy A, Zhang Y: Automated protein structure modeling in CASP9 by I-TASSER pipeline combined with QUARK-based ab initio folding and FG-MD-based structure refinement. Proteins 2011.