3Disease Browser: A Web server for integrating 3D genome and disease-associated chromosome rearrangement data

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Li, Ruifeng ^a   Liu, Yifang ^b   Li, Tingting ^a   Li, Cheng ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; DISEASES; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; GENOME; HUMAN; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOUSE; PROCEDURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; WEB BROWSER;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DISEASE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENOME; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MICE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; WEB BROWSER;

EID: 84992145747     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep34651     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Stephens, P. J. et al. Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes. Nature 462, 1005-1010, doi: 10.1038/nature08645 (2009).
2. Beunders, G. et al. Exonic deletions in AUTS2 cause a syndromic form of intellectual disability and suggest a critical role for the C terminus. American Journal of Human Genetics 92, 210-220, doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.12.011 (2013).
3. van Gent, D. C., Hoeijmakers, J. H. and Kanaar, R. Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection. Nature Reviews Genetics 2, 196-206, doi: 10.1038/35056049 (2001).
4. Shrivastav, M., De Haro, L. P. and Nickoloff, J. A. Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Cell Research 18, 134-147, doi: 10.1038/cr.2007.111 (2008).
5. Landrum, M. J. et al. ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Research 44, D862-868, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1222 (2016).
6. Kong, F. et al. dbCRID: a database of chromosomal rearrangements in human diseases. Nucleic Acids Research 39, D895-900, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1038 (2011).
7. Rowley, J. D. Letter: A new consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukaemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and Giemsa staining. Nature 243, 290-293 (1973).
8. Druker, B. J. et al. Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia. The New England Journal of Medicine 344, 1031-1037, doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104053441401 (2001).
9. Lanctot, C., Cheutin, T., Cremer, M., Cavalli, G. and Cremer, T. Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nature Reviews Genetics 8, 104-115, doi: 10.1038/nrg2041 (2007).
10. Nunez, E., Fu, X. D. and Rosenfeld, M. G. Nuclear organization in the 3D space of the nucleus - cause or consequence? Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 19, 424-436, doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2009.07.005 (2009).
11. Gibcus, J. H. and Dekker, J. The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Molecular Cell 49, 773-782, doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.011 (2013).
12. Sexton, T. and Cavalli, G. The role of chromosome domains in shaping the functional genome. Cell 160, 1049-1059, doi: 10.1016/j. cell.2015.02.040 (2015).
13. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289-293, doi: 10.1126/science.1181369 (2009).
14. Fullwood, M. J. et al. An oestrogen-receptor-alpha-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature 462, 58-64, doi: 10.1038/ nature08497 (2009).
15. Rao, S. S. et al. A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping. Cell 159, 1665-1680, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 (2014).
16. Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376-380, doi: 10.1038/nature11082 (2012).
17. Pope, B. D. et al. Topologically associating domains are stable units of replication-timing regulation. Nature 515, 402-405, doi: 10.1038/nature13986 (2014).
18. Lupianez, D. G. et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 161, 1012-1025, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.004 (2015).
19. Taberlay, P. C. et al. Three-dimensional disorganisation of the cancer genome occurs coincident with long range genetic and epigenetic alterations. Genome Research, doi: 10.1101/gr.201517.115 (2016).
20. Sofueva, S. et al. Cohesin-mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture. The EMBO Journal 32, 3119-3129, doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.237 (2013).
21. Crane, E. et al. Condensin-driven remodelling of X chromosome topology during dosage compensation. Nature 523, 240-244, doi: 10.1038/nature14450 (2015).
22. Heintzman, N. D. et al. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 459, 108-112, doi: 10.1038/nature07829 (2009).
23. Litingtung, Y., Dahn, R. D., Li, Y., Fallon, J. F. and Chiang, C. Shh and Gli3 are dispensable for limb skeleton formation but regulate digit number and identity. Nature 418, 979-983, doi: 10.1038/nature01033 (2002).
24. Miller, D. T. et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. American Journal of Human Genetics 86, 749-764, doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006 (2010).
25. Gao, Z. et al. An AUTS2-Polycomb complex activates gene expression in the CNS. Nature 516, 349-354, doi: 10.1038/nature13921 (2014).
26. Lesne, A., Riposo, J., Roger, P., Cournac, A. and Mozziconacci, J. 3D genome reconstruction from chromosomal contacts. Nature Methods 11, 1141-1143, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3104 (2014).
27. Tang, Z. et al. CTCF-Mediated Human 3D Genome Architecture Reveals Chromatin Topology for Transcription. Cell 163, 1611-1627, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.024 (2015).
28. Ji, X. et al. 3D Chromosome Regulatory Landscape of Human Pluripotent Cells. Cell Stem Cell 18, 262-275, doi: 10.1016/j. stem.2015.11.007 (2016).
29. Martin, P. et al. Capture Hi-C reveals novel candidate genes and complex long-range interactions with related autoimmune risk loci. Nature Communications 6, 10069, doi: 10.1038/ncomms10069 (2015).
30. Hnisz, D. et al. Activation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods. Science 351, 1454-1458, doi: 10.1126/ science.aad9024 (2016).
31. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Xuan, Z., Chen, M. and Zhang, M. Q. De novo deciphering three-dimensional chromatin interaction and topological domains by wavelet transformation of epigenetic profiles. Nucleic Acids Research 44, e106, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw225 (2016).
32. Xu, Z. et al. HiView: an integrative genome browser to leverage Hi-C results for the interpretation of GWAS variants. BMC Research Notes 9, 159, doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1947-0 (2016).