Determinants of data sharing in U.S. city governments

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 393-403

  Welch, Eric W ^a   Feeney, Mary K ^a   Park, Chul Hyun ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coercion; Data sharing; e Government; Local government; Persuasion; Technical capacity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991787674     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. AAPOR, Response rates - an overview., 2008 (Retrieved June 9, 2015, from) http://www.aapor.org/AAPORKentico/Education-Resources/For-Researchers/Poll-Survey-FAQ/Response-Rates-An-Overview.aspx.
2. Agrawal, D., Das, S., El Abbadi, A., Big data and cloud computing: Current state and future opportunities. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on extending database technology - EDBT/ICDT ‘11, 2011, ACM, Uppsala, Sweden, 530–533, 10.1145/1951365.1951432.
3. Ahn, M.J., Bretschneider, S., Politics of e-government: E-government and the political control of bureaucracy. Public Administration Review 71:3 (2011), 414–424.
4. Akbulut-Bailey, A.Y., Information sharing between local and state governments. Journal of Computer Information Systems 51:4 (2011), 53–63.
5. Azad, B., Wiggins, L.L., Dynamics of inter-organizational geographic data sharing: A conceptual framework for research. Onsrud, H.J., Rushton, G., (eds.) Sharing geographic information, 1995, New Brunswick, NJ, Center for Urban Policy Research.
6. Blau, P.M., Exchange and power in social life. 1964, Wiley, Chicago.
7. Bollier, D., Firestone, C.M., The promise and peril of big data. 2010, The Aspen Institute, Washignton DC.
8. Bozeman, B., Bretschneider, S., Public management information systems: Theory and prescription. Public Administration Review 40 (1986), 475–487.
9. Budhathoki, N.R., Nedovic-Budic, Z., Expanding the spatial data infrastructure knowledge base. Onsrud, H., (eds.) Research and theory in advancing spatial data infastructure concepts, 2007, ESRI Press, Redlands, CA.
10. Calkins, H.W., Weatherbe, R., Taxonomy of spatial data sharing. Onsrud, H.J., Rushton, G., (eds.) Sharing geographic information, 1995, Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, NJ, 65–75.
11. Campbell, H., Masser, I., GIS and organizations. How effective are GIS in practice?. 1995, Taylor & Francis, London, UK.
12. Chun, S.A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., Hovy, E., Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity, 15(1), 2010, 1.
13. Clarkson, G., Jacobsen, T.E., Batcheller, A.L., Information asymmetry and information sharing. Government Information Quarterly 24:4 (2007), 827–839.
14. Constant, D., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., What's mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research 5:4 (1994), 400–421.
15. Cook, K.S., Rice, E., Social exchange theory. Delamater, J., (eds.) Handbook of social psychology, 2003, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
16. Coursey, D., Norris, D.F., Models of e-government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Administration Review 68:3 (2008), 523–536.
17. Cropanzano, R., Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management 31:6 (2005), 874–900.
18. Dawes, S.S., Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15:3 (1996), 377–394.
19. Douglass, K., Allard, S., Tenopir, C., Wu, L., Frame, M., Managing scientific data as public assets: Data sharing practices and policies among full-time government employees. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65:2 (2014), 251–262.
20. Emerson, R.M., Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology 2 (1976), 335–362.
21. Fan, J., Zhang, P., Yen, D.C., G2G information sharing among government agencies. Information & Management 51:1 (2014), 120–128.
22. Fedorowicz, J., Sawyer, S., Williams, C., Markus M., L., Tyworth, M., Jacobson, D., Gantman, S., Dias, M., Tomasino, A., Design observations regarding public safety networks. Dg.o’11 Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 2011, 272–281, 10.1145/2037556.2037601.
23. Feeney, M.K., Welch, E.W., E-government and perceived outcomes for local government managers. Public Management Review 14:6 (2012), 815–833.
24. Feeney, M.K., Welch, E.W., Technology–task coupling exploring social media use and managerial perceptions of E-government. The American Review of Public Administration, 2014 (0275074014547413).
25. Fung, A., Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review 66:Special Issue (2006), 66–75.
26. Gil-Garcia, J.R., Towards a smart state? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration, and beyond. Information Polity 17:3, 4 (2012), 269–280.
27. Gil-Garcia, J.R., Chengalur-Smith, I., Duchessi, P., Collaborative e-government: Impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector. European Journal of Information Systems 16:2 (2007), 121–133.
28. Gil-Garcia, J.R., Sayogo, D.S., Government inter-organizational information sharing initiatives: Understanding the main determinants of success. Government Information Quarterly 33:3 (2016), 572–582.
29. Gil-Garcia, J.R., Schneider, C.A., Pardo, T.A., Cresswell, A.M., Interorganizational information integration in the criminal justice enterprise: Preliminary lessons from state and county initiatives. Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2005, January, IEEE, 118c-118c.
30. Graves, A., Hendler, J., Visualization tools for open government data. Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 2013, June, ACM, 136–145.
31. Guo, C., Acar, M., Understanding collaboration among nonprofit organizations: Combining resource dependency, institutional, and network perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 34:3 (2005), 340–361.
32. Harvey, F., Tulloch, D.L., Local government data sharing: Evaluating the foundations of spatial data infrastructures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20:7 (2006), 743–768.
33. Ho, A.T.K., Ni, A.Y., Explaining the adoption of e-government features a case study of Iowa county treasurers' offices. The American Review of Public Administration 34:2 (2004), 164–180.
34. Howell, J.C., Kelly, M.R., Palmer, J., Mangum, R.L., Integrating child welfare, juvenile justice, and other agencies in a continuum of services. Child Welfare 83:2 (2004), 143–155.
35. Irvin, R.A., Stansbury, J., Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?. Public Administration Review 64:1 (2004), 55–65.
36. Jain, H., Ramamurthy, K., Ryu, H., Yasai-ardekani, M., Success of data resource management in distributed environments: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly 22:1 (1998), 1–29.
37. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A., Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management 29:4 (2012), 258–268.
38. Kamal, M.R., Singh, D.S.V., Ahmad, K., Factors influencing interdepartmental information sharing practice in electronic government agencies. Knowledge Management International Conference (KMICe), Johor Bahru, Malaysia, 4–6 July 2012, 2012.
39. Kathi, P.C., Cooper, T.L., Democratizing the administrative state: Connecting neighborhood councils and city agencies. Public Administration Review 65:5 (2005), 559–567.
40. Kevany, M.J., A proposed structure for observing data sharing. Onsrud, H.J., Rushton, G., (eds.) Sharing geographic information, 1995, Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, NJ, 76–100.
41. Kim, S., Kim, H.J., Lee, H., An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly 26:1 (2009), 42–50.
42. Kraemer, K., King, J.L., Computing and public organizations. Public Administration Review 46 (1986), 488–496.
43. Lathrop, D., Ruma, L., (eds.) Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice, 2010, O′Reilly Media, Sebstopol, CA.
44. Lee, G., Kwak, Y.H., An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly 29:4 (2012), 492–503.
45. Linders, D., From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly 29:4 (2012), 446–454.
46. Lohr, S. (2012, February 11). The age of big data. The New York Times. New York City, NY. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/sunday-review/big-datas-impact-in-the-world.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=BigData&st=cse.
47. Luna-Reyes, L.F., Trust and collaboration in interagency information technology projects. 2006 (Available at SSRN 2122102).
48. McDougall, K., A local-state government spatial data sharing partnership model to facilitate SDI development. 2006, The University of Melbourne.
49. McElvain, J.P., Kposowa, A.J., Gray, B.C., Testing a crime control model: Does strategic and directed deployment of police officers lead to lower crime?. Journal of Criminology 1 (2013), 1–11.
50. McGuirk, P.M., O'Neill, P.M., Mee, K.J., Effective practices for interagency data sharing: Insights from collaborative research in a regional intervention. Australian Journal of Public Administration 74:2 (2015), 199–211.
51. Monge, P.R., Contractor, N., Theories of communication networks. 2003, Oxford University Press, New York.
52. Moon, M.J., The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?. Public Administration Review 62:4 (2002), 424–433.
53. Moon, M.J., Norris, D.F., Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level*. Information Systems Journal 15:1 (2005), 43–60.
54. Morton, K., Balazinska, M., Grossman, D., Mackinlay, J., Support the data enthusiast: Challenges for next-generation data-analysis systems. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 7:6 (2014), 453–456.
55. Nedovic-Budic, Z., Pinto, J.K., Understanding interorganizational GIS activities: A conceptual framework. 11(1), 1999, Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association.
56. Nedovic-Budic, Z., Pinto, J.K., Information sharing in an interorganizational GIS environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 27:3 (2000), 455–474.
57. Nedovic-Budic, Z., Pinto, J.K., Organizational (soft) GIS interoperability: Lessons from the U.S. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 3(3), 2001.
58. Nedovic-Budic, Z., Pinto, J.K., Warnecke, L., GIS database development and exchange: Interaction mechanisms and motivations. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 16(1), 2004.
59. Oliver, C., Determinants of inter-organizational relationships: Integration and future direction. Academy of Management Review 15:2 (1990), 241–265.
60. Omran, E.-S.E., Bregt, A., Crompvoets, J., Spatial data sharing: A cross-cultural conceptual model. Onsrud, H., (eds.) Research and theory in advancing spatial data infastructure concepts, 2007, ESRI Press, Redlands, CA, 75–92.
61. Onsrud, H., Rushton, G., (eds.) Sharing geographic information, 1995, Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, NJ.
62. Ostrom, E., Rational choice theory and institutional analysis: Toward complementarity. American political science review 85:01 (1991), 237–243.
63. Otjacques, B., Hitzelberger, P., Feltz, F., Interoperability of e-government information systems: Issues of identification and data sharing.Journal of. Management Information Systems 23:4 (2007), 29–51.
64. Hart, P., Saunders, C., Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange. Organization Science 8:1 (1997), 23–42.
65. Peled, A., Coerce, consent, and coax: A review of US congressional efforts to improve Federal Counterterrorism Information Sharing. Terrorism and Political Violence, 2014, 1–18.
66. Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G.R., The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. 1978, Harper & Row, Publishers, New York.
67. Reddick, C.G., Norris, D.F., Social media adoption at the American grass roots: Web 2.0 or 1.5?. Government Information Quarterly 30:4 (2013), 498–507.
68. Roberts, N.C., Beyond smokestacks and silos: Open-source, web-enabled coordination in organizations and networks. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 2011.
69. Schooley, B.L., Horan, T.A., Towards end-to-end government performance management: Case study of interorganizational information integration in emergency medical services (EMS). Government Information Quarterly 24:4 (2007), 755–784.
70. Tolbert, C.J., Mossberger, K., McNeal, R., Institutions, policy innovation, and e-government in the American states. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 2008.
71. Tulloch, D.L., Harvey, F., When data sharing becomes institutionalized: Best practices in local government geographic information relationships. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 19(2), 2007.
72. Wehn de Montalvo, U., In search of rigorous models for policy oriented research: A behavioural approach to spatial data sharing. URISA Journal 15:1 (2003), 19–28.
73. Wehn de Montalvo, U., Mapping the determinants of spatial data sharing. 2003, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., Aldershot, UK.
74. Welch, E.W., The relationship between transparent and participative government: A study of local governments in the United States. International Review of Administrative Sciences 78:1 (2012), 93–115.
75. Wing, L., Barriers to e-government integration. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18:5 (2005), 511–530.
76. Zhang, J., Dawes, S.S., Sarkis, J., Exploring stakeholders' expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18:5 (2005), 548–567.