Towards a smart State? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration, and beyond

Information Polity

Volumn 17, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 269-280

  Gil Garcia, J Ramon ^a  

^a CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y DOCENCIA ECONÓMICAS   (Mexico)

Author keywords

collaboration; electronic government; Government 2.0; Government 3.0; information integration; information sharing; service integration; smart city; smart government; Smart State; virtual state

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876236343     PISSN: 15701255     EISSN: 18758754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/IP-2012-000287     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. J.L. Ambite et al., Data integration and access, in Advances in Digital Government. Technology, Human Factors, and Policy, W.J. McIver and A.K. Elmagarmid, Editors. 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwell, MA.
2. D.F. Andersen and S.S.Dawes, Government Information Management. A primer and Casebook. 1991, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. D.P. Ballou and G.K. Tayi, Enhancing data quality in data warehouse environments, Communications of the ACM 42(1) (1999), 73-79.
4. K. Barret and R. Greene, Powering Up: How Public Managers can take control of Information Technology. 2001, Washington, DC: CQ Press.
5. J.C. Bertot, P.T. Jaeger and J.M. Grimes, Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: Egovernment and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies, Government Information Quarterly 27(3) (2010), 264-271.
6. D. Bradshaw-Lynn, Technology launch in government: The human factor., in Handbook of Public Information Systems, D. Garson, Editor. 2000, Marcel Dekker: New York.
7. L. Caffrey, Information Sharing Between and Within Governments, 1998, London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
8. L. Carter and F. Belanger, The Utilization of E-Government Services: Citizen Trust, Innovation, and Acceptance Factors, Information Systems Journal 15 (2005), 5-25.
9. D. Chen, G. Doumeingts and F. Vernadat, Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: Past, present, and future, Computers in Industry 59(7) (2008), 647-659.
10. T. Christensen and P. Lægreid, The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform, Public Administration Review 67(6) (2007), 1059-1066.
11. S.A. Chun et al., Government 2.0: Making Connections between citizens, data and government, Information Polity 15(1-2) (2010), 1-173.
12. T.H. Davenport and L. Prusak, Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment, New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
13. J. Davies, The limits of joined-up government: Towards a political analysis, Public Administration 87(1) (2009), 80-96.
14. S.S. Dawes, Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15(3) (1996), 377-394.
15. S.S. Dawes and M.R. Nelson, Pool the risks, share the benefits: partnership in IT innovation, in Technology trendlines, technology success stories from today's visionaries, K.J., Editor. 1995, Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York.
16. S.S. Dawes and T.A. Pardo, Building Collaborative Digital Government Systems. Systematic Constraints and Effective Practices, in Advances in Digital Government. Technology, Human Factors, and Policy, W.J. McIver and A.K. Elmagarmid, eds, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwell, MA, 2002.
17. F. De Br'i and F. Bannister, Whole-of-government: The continuing problem of eliminating silos, in European Conference on e-Government, D. Remenyi, Editor. 2010, Academic Conferences: London.
18. N. Du Plooy, Information systems as social systems, in Critical Reflections on Information Systems: A Systemic Approach, J.J. Cano, Editor. 2003, Idea Group Publishing: Hershey, PA.
19. R. Eynon and H. Margetts, Organizational solutions for overcoming barriers to eGovernment, European Journal of ePractice 1 (2007), 73-86.
20. J. Fedorowicz et al., Strategic alignment of participant motivations in e-government collaborations: the internet payment platform pilot, Government Information Quarterly 26(1) (2009), 51-59.
21. E. Ferro and M. Sorrentino, Can intermunicipal collaboration help the diffusion of e-government in peripheral areas? Evidence from Italy, Government Information Quarterly 27(1) (2010), 17-25.
22. A.E. Fierro and J.R. Gil-Garcia, Másallá del acceso a la informaci'on. El uso de tecnolog'ias de informaci'on para fomentar la transparencia, la participaci'on y la colaboraci'on en el sector p'ublico. 2011, Mexico, DF: Centro de Investigaci'on y Docencia Econ'omicas.
23. J.E. Fountain, Building the Virtual State. Information Technology and Institutional Change, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.
24. J.E. Fountain, Bureaucratic reform and e-government in the United States: An institutional perspective, in: Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, A. Chadwick and P.N. Howard, eds, Taylor & Francis Group: New York, 2009.
25. G.D. Garson, The promise of digital government, in Digital Government: Principles and Best Practices, A. Pavlichev and G.D. Garson, eds, Idea Group Publishing: Hershey, PA, 2004.
26. S. Gaudino and G. Moro, Evaluation of an e-government project: Which are the barriers to e-government integration? International Journal of Technology Policy and Management 10(1-2) (2010), 53-72.
27. J.R. Gil-Garcia, Enacting Electronic Government Success: An Integrative Study of Government-Wide Websites, Organizational Capabilities, and Institutions, New York: Springer, 2012.
28. J.R. Gil-Garcia et al., Interorganizational information integration in the criminal justice enterprise: preliminary lessons from state and county initiatives, in 38th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), IEEE: M?anoa, Hawai, 2005.
29. J.R. Gil-Garcia, I. Chengalur-Smith and P. Duchessi, Collaborative e-Government: Impediments and Benefits of Information Sharing Projects in the Public Sector, European Journal of Information Systems 16(2) (2007), 121-133.
30. J.R. Gil-Garcia, S.A. Chun and M. Janssen, Government Information Sharing and Integration: Combining the Social and the Technical, Information Polity 14(1-2) (2009), 1-10.
31. J.R. Gil-Garcia and N. Helbig, Exploring E-Government Benefits and Success Factors, in: Encyclopedia of Digital Government, A.-V. Anttiroiko and M. Malkia, eds, Idea Group Inc.: Hershey, PA, 2006.
32. J.R. Gil-Garcia and T.A. Pardo, E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations, Government Information Quarterly 22(2) (2005), 187-216.
33. J.R.Gil-Garcia,T.A. Pardo andG.B.Burke, Conceptualizing Inter-Organizational Information Integration inGovernment, in Electronic Government: Information, Technology, and Transformation, J. Scholl, ed., ME Sharpe: Armonk, NY, 2010.
34. S. Hunt, Whole-of-government: Does working together work? Discussion Paper 05-01. 2005, Canberra: Asia Pacific School of Economics and Government, The Australian National University.
35. P.T. Jaeger and J.C. Bertot, Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information, Government Information Quarterly 27(4) (2010), 371-376.
36. V. Jain and S. Kesar, E-government implementation challenges at local level: A comparative study of government and citizens' perspectives, Electronic Government, An International Journal 8(2-3) (2011), 208-225.
37. M. Janssen, K. George and R.W.Wagenaar, A survey of web-based business models for e-government in the Netherlands, Government Information Quarterly 25 (2008), 202-220.
38. A.D. Jhingran, N. Mattos and H. Pirahesh, Information integration: A research agenda, IBM Systems Journal 41(4) (2002), 555-562.
39. B. Klievink andM. Janssen, Realizing joined-up government - Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation, Government Information Quarterly 26 (2009), 275-284.
40. R. Klischewski, Information Integration or Process Integration? How to achieve interoperability in administration. in Third International Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV 2004). 2004: Springer.
41. R. Klischewski and H.J. Scholl, Information quality as capstone in negotiating e-government integration, interoperation and information sharing, Electronic Government, An International Journal 5(2) (2008), 203-225.
42. K.E. Kolekofski and A.R. Heminger, Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to share information in an organizational setting, Information & Management 40 (2003), 521-532.
43. K.L. Kraemer and J.L. King, Information Technology and Administrative Reform: Will the Time After E-Government Be Different?, in Heinrich Reinermann Schrift fest, Post Graduate School of Administration, Speyer, Germany, 2003.
44. D. Landsbergen and G. Wolken, Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology, Public Administration Review 61(2) (1998), 206-220.
45. E. Loukis and Y. Charalabidis, Why do eGovernment projects fail? Risk factors of large information systems projects in the Greek public sector: An international comparison, International Journal of Electronic Government Research 7(2) (2011), 59-77.
46. L.F. Luna-Reyes, J.R. Gil-Garcia and C.B. Cruz, Collaborative Digital Government in Mexico: Some Lessons from Federal Web-Based Interorganizational Information Integration Initiatives, Government Information Quarterly 24(4) (2007), 808-826.
47. L.F. Luna-Reyes et al., Digital government in North America: A comparative analysis of policy and program priorities in Canada, Mexico and the United States in Comparative e-government, C.G. Reddick, ed., Springer: New York, 2010.
48. L.F. Luna-Reyes et al., Information systems developments as emergent socio-technical change: A practice approach, European Journal of Information Systems 14 (2005), 93-105.
49. A.Meijer and S. Zouridis, E-government is an Institutional Innovation in Information and Communication technology and Public Innovation. Assessing the ICT-Driven Modernization of Public Administration, V. Bekkers, H. van Duivenboden and M. Thaens, eds, IOS Press: Amsterdam, 2006.
50. M.J. Moon and D.F. Norris, Does Managerial Orientation Matter? The adoption of reinventing government and egovernment at the municipal level, Information Systems Journal 15 (2005), 43-60.
51. T. Nam, Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0, Government Information Quarterly 29(1) (2012), 12-20.
52. NASCIO, Concept for operations for integrated justice information sharing, National Association of State Information Officers: Lexington, KY, 2003.
53. C. Navarrete et al., Information Sharing at National Borders: Extending the Utility of Border Theory, in 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). 2009, IEEE: Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii, USA.
54. B.S. Noveck, Wiki Government. How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2009.
55. OECD, The e-government imperative. 2003, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris.
56. T.A. Pardo, J.R. Gil-Garcia and G.B. Burke, Building Response Capacity through Cross-boundary information sharing: The critical role of trust, in eChallenges conference, Barcelona, Spain, 2006.
57. T.A. Pardo, J.R. Gil-Garcia and G.B. Burke, Sustainable Cross-Boundary Information Sharing, in Digital Government: E-Government Research, Case Studies, and Implementation, H. Chen et al., eds, Springer: New York, 2007.
58. T.A. Pardo, J.R. Gil-Garcia and G.B. Burke, Information Sharing and Public Health: A Case-Based Look at the ICT Expectations-Reality Gap, in ICTs, Citizens and Governance: After the Hype, A. Meijer, K. Boersma and P. Wagenaar, eds, IOS Press: Amsterdam, 2009.
59. T.A. Pardo et al., Factor Influencing Government Cross-Boundary Information Sharing: Preliminary Analysis of a National Survey, Center for Technology in Government: Albany, NY, 2009.
60. T.A. Pardo, J.R. Gil-Garcia and L.F. Luna-Reyes, Collaborative Governance and Cross-Boundary Information Sharing: Envisioning a Networked and IT-Enabled Public Administration, in The Future of Public Administration, Public Management and Public Service around the World: The Minnowbrook Perspective, R. O'Leary, D. Van Slyke and S. Kim, eds, Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC, 2010.
61. T.A. Pardo, T. Nam and G.B. Burke, E-government interoperability: interaction of policy, management, and technology dimensions, Social Science Computer Review 30(1) (2012), 7-23.
62. T.A. Pardo and G.K. Tayi, Interorganizational Information Integration: Akey enabler for digital government, Government Information Quarterly 24(4) (2007), 691-715.
63. C. Pollit, Joined-up government: A survey, Political Studies Review 1 (2003), 34-49.
64. H. Rahman, Framework of e-governance at the local government level, in Comparative E-government, C.G. Reddick, ed., Springer: New York, 2010.
65. C.G. Reddick, The adoption of centralized customer service systems: A survey of local governments, Government Information Quarterly 26(1) (2009), 219-226.
66. S.Richardson and S.Asthana, Inter-agency information sharing in health and social care services: The role of professional culture, British Journal of Social Work 657-669 (2006), 657-669.
67. D.J. Roberts, Integration in the context of justice information systems: A common understanding, SEARCH, the National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics: Sacramento, CA, 2004.
68. J.L. Roldan and A. Leal, A Validation Test of an Adaptation of the DeLone andMcLean's Model in the Spanish EIS Field, in Critical Reflections on Information Systems: A Systemic Approach, J.J. Cano, ed., Idea Group Publishing: Hershey, PA, 2003.
69. A. Rorissa, D.D. Potnis and D. Demissie, A comparative study of contents of e-government service websites of Middle East and North African (MENA) countries, in Comparative e-government, C.G. Reddick, ed., Springer: New York, 2010.
70. R. Sandoval-Almazan and J.R. Gil-Garcia, Are Government Internet Portals Evolving towards more Interaction, Participation, and Collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities, Government Information Quarterly 29(S1) (2012), S72-S81.
71. C.W. Tan and S.L. Pan, Managing e-transformation in the public sector: An e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS), European Journal of Information Systems 12 (2003), 269-281.
72. M. Themistocleous and Z. Irani, Benchmarking the benefits and barriers of application integration, Benchmarking: An International Journal 8(4) (2002), 317-331.
73. B.C. Ubaldi and J. Roy, E-government and federalism in Italy and Canada - a comparative assessment, in Comparative e-government, C.G. Reddick, ed., Springer: New York, 2010.
74. T.-M. Yang and T.A. Maxwell, Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intraorganizational and inter-organizational success factors, Government Information Quarterly 28(2) (2011), 164-175.
75. J. Zhang, S.S. Dawes and J. Sarkis, Exploring stakeholders' expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing, Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18(5) (2005), 548-567.