Towards end-to-end government performance management: Case study of interorganizational information integration in emergency medical services (EMS)

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 755-784

  Schooley, Ben L ^a   Horan, Thomas A ^a  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35648960209     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Allen D., References, Colligan D., Finnie A., and Kern T. Trust, power, and interorganizational information systems: The case of the electronic trading community translease. Information Systems Journal 10 (2000) 21-40
2. Arens, Y., & Rosenbloom, P. (2002, March 1). Responding to the unexpected. Report of the Workshop. New York, NY.
3. Bakos J.Y. Information links and electronic marketplaces: The role of inter-organizational information systems in vertical markets. Journal of Management Information Systems 8 2 (1991) 31-52
4. Cash J.I.J., and Kosynski B.R. IS redraws competitive boundaries. Harvard Business Review 63 2 (1985) 134-147
5. Coffey D. Self-organization, complexity, and chaos: The new biology of medicine. Nature Medicine 4 8 (1998) 882-885
6. Curits B., Kellner M., and Over J. Process modeling. Communications of the ACM 35 9 (1992) 75-90
7. Dawes S. Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15 (1996) 377-394
8. Dawes S., Cressell A., and Cahan B. Learning from crisis: Lessons in human and information infrastructure from the World Trade Center response. Social Science Computer Review 22 1 (2004) 52-66
9. Dawes S., and Prefontaine L. Understanding new models of collaboration for delivering government services. Communications of the ACM 46 1 (2003) 40-43
10. Drake D., Steckler N., and Koch M. Information sharing in and across government agencies. Social Science Computer Review 22 1 (2004) 67-84
11. Fedorowicz, J., Gelinas, U., Grogan, J., Howard, M., Markus, L., Usoff, C., & Vidgen, R. (2005). Modeling physical barriers to interorganizational system implementation success. Working Paper from Bentley College Department of Information Systems.
12. Fountain J. Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change (2001), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
13. Frolich M., and Ariyachandra T. Business performance management: One truth. Information Systems Management 23 1 (2006) 41-48
14. Grossman M. The role of trust and collaboration in the Internet-enabled supply chain. Journal of American Academy of Business 5 1/2 (2004) 391-396
15. Guglar P., and Dunning J. Technology based cross-border alliances. In: Culpan R. (Ed). Multinational strategic alliances (1993), Howarth Press, Inc, Binghamton, NY
16. Health Care Financing Administration. (2000). Quality of Care-PRO Priorities. National Clinical Topics (Task 1). Online. Available at http://www.hcfa.gov/quality/11a.htm
17. Holsapple C., and Luo W. A framework for studying computer support of organizational infrastructure. Information and Management 31 1 (1996) 13-24
18. Horan, T., & Schooley, B. (2007). Time-critical information services. Communications of the ACM (Accepted and forthcoming).
19. Horan T., Marich M., and Schooley B. Time-critical information services: Analysis and workshop findings on technology, organizational, and policy dimensions to emergency response and related E-governmental services. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Digital Government Research, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Vol. 151, June, 2006 (2006)
20. Horan T., McCabe D., Burkhard R., and Schooley B. Performance information systems for emergency response: Field examination and simulation of end-to-end rural response systems. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 2 1 (2005) 4
21. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
22. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Emergency medical services: At the crossroads (2006), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
23. Johnston H.R., and Carrico S.R. Developing capabilities to use information strategically. MIS Quarterly 12 (1988) 37-47
24. Johnston H.R., and Vitale M.R. Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational information. MIS Quarterly 12 2 (1988) 153-164
25. Kapucu N. Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners in multiagency coordination. American Review of Public Administration 36 2 (2006) 207
26. Landsbergen D., and Wolken G. Realizing the promise: Government information systems and the fourth generation of information technology. Public Administration Review 61 (2001) 206-218
27. Layne K., and Lee J. Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly 18 2 (2001) 122-136
28. Mayer-Schonberger. Emergency communications: The quest for interoperability in the United States and Europe. In: Howitt A., and Pangi R. (Eds). Countering terrorism: Dimensions of preparedness (2003), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
29. McLean S., Maio R., Spaite D., and Garrison H. Emergency medical services outcomes research: Evaluating the effectiveness of prehospital care. Prehospital Emergency Care 6 2 (2002) 1720179
30. Miranda S. Beyond BI: benefiting from corporate performance management solutions. Financial (2004, March/April) 58-61
31. Monge P.R., and Contractor N. Communication networks: Measurement techniques. In: Tardy C.H. (Ed). A handbook for the study of human communication (1988), Ablex, Norwood, NJ 107-138
32. National Emergency Number Association (NENA). (2001). Report card to the Nation: The effectiveness, accessibility and future of America's 9-1-1 service. Columbus, Ohio: The RCN Commission and National Emergency Number Association. Retrieved on Sept. 15, 2005 from http://www.nena.org/Initiatives/RCN/RCN_FINAL_2-24.PDF
33. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA). Emergency medical services agenda for the future (1996), DOT, Washington, DC
34. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA). National EMS research agenda (2001), DOT, Washington, DC
35. Pardo T. Realizing the promise of digital government: It's more than building a web site. Center for technology in government (2000), University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY
36. Provan K.G., and Milward H.B. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review 61 4 (2001) 414-423
37. Rudman, W., Clarke, R., & Metzel, J. (2003, July). Emergency responders: Drastically underfunded, dangerously unprepared. Report of an Independent Task Force sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved on Sept. 15, 2005 from: http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/Responders_TF.pdf
38. Sawyer S., Reagor S., Tyworth M., and Thomas J. From response to foresight: Managing knowledge and integrated criminal justice. In: Newell S., and Galliers R. (Eds). Proceedings of the 2005 Organizational Learning and knowledge Capabilities Conference, Cambridge, MA, 17-19 March, 2005, Bentley College (2005)
39. Sawyer S., Tapia A., Pesheck L., and Davenport J. Mobility and the first responder. Communications of the ACM 47 3 (2004) 61-64
40. Sayre M., White L., Brown L., and McHenry S. National EMS research agenda: Proceedings of the implementation symposium. Academic Emergency Medicine 10 10 (2003) 1100-1108
41. Scholl, J. (2005). Interoperability in e-Government: More than just smart middleware. Paper presented at the 38th Hawaiian Conference of System Sciences (HICSS38), January 2005.
42. Shockley-Zalabak P., Ellis K., and Winograd G. Organizational trust: What it means, why it matters. Organization Development Journal 18 4 (2000) 35-48
43. Spaite D., Criss E., Valenzuela T., and Guisto J. Emergency medical service systems research: Problems of the past, challenges of the future. Annals of Emergency Medicine 26 2 (1995) 146-152
44. Stowers G.N.L. Measuring the performance of E-government (2004), IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington, DC
45. Sundberg H., and Sandberg K. Towards e-government: A survey of problems in organisational processes. Business Process Management Journal 12 2 (2006) 149-162
46. Sussman, J. (2002). Representing the transportation/environmental system in Mexico City as a CLIOS. Paper presented at the 5th Annual U.S.-Mexico Workshop on Air Quality, Ixtapan de la Sal, Mexico.
47. Turoff M., Chumer M., Van de Walle B., and Yao X. The Design of a Dynamic Emergency Response Management Information System (DERMIS). Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (2004) (accepted 12/25/03 and forthcoming)
48. West D.M. Digital government: Technology and public sector performance (2005), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
49. Wigand R.T. Communication network analysis: History and overview. In: Goldhaber G., and Barnett G. (Eds). Handbook of organizational communication (1988), Ablex, New York 319-359
50. Williams C., and Fedorowicz J. A framework for analyzing cross-boundary e-government projects: The CapWin example. DG.O 2005 (2005) 313-314
51. Zhang J., Dawes S., and Sarkis J. Exploring stakeholders' expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18 5/6 (2005) 548-567