GIS database development and exchange: Interaction mechanisms and motivations

URISA Journal

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 15-27

  Nedović Budić, Zorica ^b   Pinto, Jeffrey K ^b   Warnecke, Lisa ^a  

^a GeoManagement Associates   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24644433232     PISSN: 10458077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Azad, B., and L. L. Wiggins. 1995. Dynamics of inter-organizational geographic data sharing: a conceptual framework for research. In H. J. Onsrud and G. Rushton, eds., Sharing geographic information. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research: 22-43.
2. Calkins, H. W., and R. Weatherbe. 1995. Taxonomy of spatial data sharing. In H. J. Onsrud and G. Rushton, eds., Sharing geographic information. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research: 65-75.
3. Campbell, H. J., and I. Masser. 1991. The impact of GIS on local government in Great Britain. Proceedings of the Association for Geographic Information Conference, London: AGI.
4. Croswell, P. L. 1991. Obstades to GIS implementation and guidelines to increase the opportunities for success. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 3, no. 1: 43-56.
5. Dedekorkut, A. 2002. What makes collaborations work?: An empirical assessment of determinants of success in interorganizational collaboration. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Conference of ACSP, Baltimore, Maryland, November 21-24, 2002.
6. Dilman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
7. Dueker, K. J. 1987. Multipurpose land information systems: Technical, economic, and institutional issues. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 53, no. 10: 1361-65.
8. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC). 1994. Development of a National Digital Geospatial Data Framework Status Report from the Framework Working Group.
9. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC). 2002. NSGIC/FGDC Framework Survey, http://www.fgdc.gov/framework/framework.html.
10. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC). 2003. Geospatial One-Stop, http://www.geo-one-stop.gov/
11. Haithcoat, T., L. Warnecke, and Z. Nedovic-Budic. 2001. Geographic information technology in local government: Experience and issues. The Municipal Year Book 2001. Washington, D.C.: International City/County Management Association.
12. Harvey, F. 2001a. Constructing GIS: Actor networks of collaboration. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 13, no. 1: 29-37.
13. Harvey, F. 2001b. NSDI from the trenches - Local government perspective. Geospatial Solutions 11, no. 5: 2-4.
14. Knaap, G., and Z. Nedovic-Budic. 2003. Assessment of regional GIS capacity for transportation and land use planning. Project report to the Lincoln Institute for Land Policy, U.S. HUD, and U.S. DOT. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, National Center for Smart Growth and Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, www.urban.uiuc.edu/faculty/ budic/W-metroGIS.htm.
15. Kumar, K., and H. G. van Dissel. 1996. Sustainable collaboration: Managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems. MIS Quarterly 20, no. 3: 279-300.
16. Masser, I., and H. J. Campbell. 1995. Information sharing: The effects of GIS on British local government. In H. J. Onsrud and G. Rushton, eds., Sharing geographic information. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research: 230-249.
17. Nedović-Budić, Z., and J. K. Pinto, 1999a, Understanding interorganizational GIS activities: A conceptual framework. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information System Association 11, no. 1: 53-64.
18. Nedović-Budić, Z., and J. K. Pinto, 1999b, Interorganizational GIS: Issues and prospects. Annals of Regional Science 33: 183-195.
19. Nedović-Budić, Z., and J. K. Pinto. 2000. Information sharing in an interorganizational GIS environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27, 455-474.
20. Nedović-Budić, Z., and J. K. Pinto. 2001. Organizational (soft) GIS interoperability: Lessons from the U.S. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 3, no. 3: 290-298.
21. Obermeyer, N. J., 1995, Reducing Inter-Organizational Conflict to Facilitate Sharing Geographic Information. In H. J. Onsrud and G. Rushton, eds., Sharing geographic information. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research: 138-148.
22. O'Toole, L. J. Jr., and R. S. Montjoy. 1984. Interorganizational policy implementation: A theoretical perspective. Public Administration Review, Nov/Dec: 491-505.
23. Pinto, J. K., and B. Azad. 1994. The role of organizational politics in GIS implementation. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 6, no. 2: 35-61.
24. Pinto, J. K., and H. J. Onsrud. 1995. Sharing geographic information across organizational boundaries: A research framework. In H. J. Onsrud and G. Rushton, eds., Sharing geographic information. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research: 44-64.
25. Pinto, M. B., J. K. Pinto, and J. E. Prescott. 1993. Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Science 39: 1281-1297.
26. Roche, S., and J. B. Humeau. 1999. GIS development and planning collaboration: A few examples from France. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 11, no. 1: 5-14.
27. Sperling, J. 1995. Development and maintenance of the TIGER database: Experiences in spatial data sharing at the U.S. Bureau of the Census. In H. J. Onsrud and G. Rushton, eds., Sharing geographic information. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research: 377-396.
28. Thompson, J. 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Tulloch, D., and J. Fuld. 2001. Exploring county-level production of framework data: Analysis of the National Framework Data Survey. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 13, no.2: 11-21.
30. United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2002. The National Map, http://www.nationalmap.usgs.gov/index.html.
31. Warnecke, L. 1999. Geographic information technology institutionalization in the nation's states and localities. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 65 (11): 1257-1268.
32. Warnecke, L., J. Beattie, K. Cheryl, W. Lyday, and S. French. 1998. Geographic information technology in cities and counties: A nationwide assessment. Washington, D.C.: American Forests.