Electronic Participation Technologies and Perceived Outcomes for Local Government Managers

Public Management Review

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 815-833

  Feeney, Mary K ^a   Welch, Eric W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

E participation; interactive technology; local government; public management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866663125     PISSN: 14719037     EISSN: 14719045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2011.642628     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ahn, M. J. and Bretschneider, S. I. 2011. Politics of E-government: E-government and the Political Control of Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 71(3): 414-24.
2. Bickerstaff, K., Tolley, R. and Walker, G. 2002. Transport Planning and Participation: The Rhetoric and Realities of Public Involvement. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(1): 61-73.
3. Bryson, J. M. 2004. What to Do When Stakeholders Matter: Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1): 21-54.
4. Bryson, J. M., Bromiley, P. and Jung, Y. S. 1990. Influences of Context and Process on Project Planning Success. Journal of Planning Education, 9(3): 183-95.
5. Burby, R. 2003. Making Plans that Matter: Citizen Involvement and Government Action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1): 33-49.
6. Coursey, D. and Bozeman, B. 1990. Decision Making in Public and Private Organizations: A Test of the Alternative Concept of Publicness. Public Administration Review, 50 September/October: 535-55.
7. Goldfinch, S. 2007. Pessimism, Computer Failure, and Information Systems Development in the Public Sector. Public Administration Review, 67(5): 917-29.
8. Hiller, J. and Belanger, F. 2001. Privacy Strategies for Electronic Government E-Government Series, Arlington, VA: PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government.
9. Hickson, D., Butler, R., Gray, D., Mallory, G. and Wilson, D. 1986. Top Decisions: Strategic Decision Making in Organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Layne, K. and Lee, J. 2001. Developing Fully Functional E-government: A Four Stage Model. Government Information, Quarterly, 18(2): 122-136.
11. Levine, C. H., Backoff, R. W., Cahoon, A. R. and Siffin, W. J. 1975. Organizational Design: A Post-Minnowbrook Perspective for the "new" Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 35 July/Aug: 425-35.
12. Macintosh, A. (2004) 'Characterizing E-participation in Policy-Making, Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences' Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04) - Track 5, January 5-8, Big Island, Hawaii. p. 50117a
13. Masters, Z., Macintosh, A. and Smith, E. 2004. Young People and E-democracy: Creating a Culture of Participation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3183: 15-22.
14. Moon, M. J. 2002. The Evolution of E-government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality. Public Administration Review, 62(4): 424-33.
15. Moon, M. J. and Bretschneider, S. I. 2002. Does the Perception of Red Tape Constrain IT Innovativeness in Organizations? Unexpected Results from a Simultaneous Equation Model and Implications. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(2): 273-92.
16. Nutt, P. C. and Backoff, R. W. 1993. Organizational Publicness and its Implications for Strategic Management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3): 209-31.
17. O'Connor, R., Schwartz, M., Schaad, J. and Boyd, D. 2000. "State of the Practice: White Paper on Public Involvement". In Transportation in the New Millenium. Committee on Public Involvement in Transportation A1D04, Washington, DC: Transportation Research Record.
18. Pandey, S. K. and Bretschneider, S. I. 1997. The Impact of Red Tape's Administrative Delay on Public Organizations' Interest in New Information Technologies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7: 113-30.
19. Quan-Haase, A. W. 2004. "How does the Internet affect social capital?". In In Social Capital and Information Technology, Edited by: Wulf, M. H. V. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Rainey, H. G., Backoff, R. W. and Levine, C. H. 1976. Comparing Public and Private Organizations. Public Administration Review, 36 March/April: 233-44.
21. Robbin, A., Courtright, C. and Davis, L. 2004. ICTs and Political Life. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38(1): 410-82.
22. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. J. 2000. Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 25(1): 3-29.
23. Sanford, C. and Rose, J. 2007. Characterizing E-participation. International Journal of Information Management, 27: 406-21.
24. Scholl, H. J. 2008. "Discipline or Interdisciplinary Study Domain? Challenges and Promises in Electronic Government Research". In Digital Government, Edited by: Chen, H., Brandt, L., Gregg, V., Traunmuller, R., Dawes, S., Hovy, E., Mackintosh, A. and Larson, C. 21-41. Vol. 17, Unit I: Integrated Series in Information Systems, Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-71611-4_2
25. Simon, H. A. 1976. Administrative Behavior, 3rd ed, New York: Macmillan.
26. Welch, E. W., Pandey, S. J. and Yavuz, N. 2010. "'Modeling the Relationship between Web-site Effectiveness and Service Quality: A Study of State Level Human Services Agencies". In E-Government: Information, Technology, and Transformation, Edited by: Scholl, H. J. Vol. 17, 256-279. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
27. Wellman, B. A., Quan-Haase, A., Witte, J. and Hampton, K. 2001. Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital?: Social Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3): 437-56.
28. West, D. M. 2004. E-government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1): 15-27.