Modeling Ceria-Based Nanomaterials for Catalysis and Related Applications

Catalysis Letters

Volumn 146, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 2053-2080

  Bruix, Albert ^a   Neyman, Konstantin M ^b,c  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Catalysis; CeO2; DFT; Nanomaterials; Reactivity; Transition metal particles

Indexed keywords

CATALYSIS; CATALYSTS; COMPUTATION THEORY; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; METALS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OXYGEN; REACTIVITY (NUCLEAR); SINTERING; TRANSITION METALS;

CEO2; CERIA NANOPARTICLES; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; COMPUTATIONAL STUDIES; ELECTRON TRANSFER; HETEROGENEOUS CATALYST; LATTICE OXYGEN ATOMS; OXYGEN STORAGE CAPACITY;

OXYGEN VACANCIES;

EID: 84991063608     PISSN: 1011372X     EISSN: 1572879X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10562-016-1799-1     Document Type: Article

References (169)

1. Heyd J, Scuseria GE, Ernzerhof M (2003) Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J Chem Phys 118:8207–8215. doi:10.1063/1.1564060
2. Heyd J, Scuseria GE, Ernzerhof M (2006) Erratum: “Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential” [J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003)]. J Chem Phys 124:219906. doi:10.1063/1.2204597
3. Wang Y, Perdew JP (1991) Spin scaling of the electron-gas correlation energy in the high-density limit. Phys Rev B 43:8911–8916. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.43.8911
4. Sun C, Li H, Chen L (2012) Nanostructured ceria-based materials: synthesis, properties, and applications. Energy Environ Sci 5:8475. doi:10.1039/c2ee22310d
5. 2 -containing materials. Catal Rev 38:439–520. doi:10.1080/01614949608006464
6. Trovarelli A, Fornasiero P (2013) Catalysis by ceria and related materials, 2nd edn. Imperial College Press, London
7. Gandhi HS, Graham GW, McCabe RW (2003) Automotive exhaust catalysis. J Catal 216:433–442. doi:10.1016/S0021-9517(02)00067-2
8. Kašpar J, Fornasiero P, Hickey N (2003) Automotive catalytic converters: current status and some perspectives. Catal Today 77:419–449. doi:10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00384-X
9. 2 under reaction conditions, suggested reaction mechanism. J Catal 237:17–28. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2005.10.015
10. 2 under reaction conditions. J Catal 237:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2005.10.014
11. 3 catalysts: part 1. Impact of the support composition on the performance for the preferential CO oxidation reaction. Appl Catal B Environ 101:256–265. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.10.016
12. Fu Q, Saltsburg H, Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M (2003) Active nonmetallic Au and Pt species on ceria-based water–gas shift catalysts. Science 301:935–938. doi:10.1126/science.1085721
13. 3 catalysts: part 2. Impact of the support composition on the performance in the water-gas shift reaction. Appl Catal B Environ 101:266–274. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.11.021
14. x –Au(111) catalyst. J Phys Chem C 118:25057–25064. doi:10.1021/jp507966v
15. Bruix A, Lykhach Y, Matolínová I et al (2014) Maximum noble-metal efficiency in catalytic materials: atomically dispersed surface platinum. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 53:10525–10530. doi:10.1002/anie.201402342
16. Vilé G, Bridier B, Wichert J, Pérez-Ramírez J (2012) Ceria in hydrogenation catalysis: high selectivity in the conversion of alkynes to olefins. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 51:8620–8623. doi:10.1002/anie.201203675
17. 2 in hydrogenation and oxidation catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 53:12069–12072. doi:10.1002/anie.201406637
18. 2 increases the activity of Au for CO oxidation by two orders of magnitude. Angew Chemie Int Ed 43:2592–2594. doi:10.1002/anie.200353570
19. 2. J Am Chem Soc 127:3286–3287. doi:10.1021/ja043752s
20. Melchionna M, Fornasiero P (2014) The role of ceria-based nanostructured materials in energy applications. Mater Today 17:349–357. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2014.05.005
21. Mullins DR (2015) The surface chemistry of cerium oxide. Surf Sci Rep 70:42–85. doi:10.1016/j.surfrep.2014.12.001
22. Freund H-J, Kuhlenbeck H, Libuda J et al (2001) Bridging the pressure and materials gaps between catalysis and surface science: clean and modified oxide surfaces. Top Catal 15:201–209. doi:10.1023/A:1016686322301
23. Paier J, Penschke C, Sauer J (2013) Oxygen defects and surface chemistry of ceria: quantum chemical studies compared to experiment. Chem Rev 113:3949–3985. doi:10.1021/cr3004949
24. Ganduglia-Pirovano MV (2015) The non-innocent role of cerium oxide in heterogeneous catalysis: a theoretical perspective. Catal Today 253:20–32. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2015.01.049
25. Bromley ST, de Moreira IPR, Neyman KM, Illas F (2009) Approaching nanoscale oxides: models and theoretical methods. Chem Soc Rev 38:2657–2670. doi:10.1039/b806400h
26. Kozlov SM, Neyman KM (2013) Catalysis from first principles: towards accounting for the effects of nanostructuring. Top Catal 56:867–873. doi:10.1007/s11244-013-0050-1
27. Loschen C, Bromley ST, Neyman KM, Illas F (2007) Understanding ceria nanoparticles from first-principles calculations. J Phys Chem C 111:10142–10145. doi:10.1021/jp072787m
28. Loschen C, Migani A, Bromley ST et al (2008) Density functional studies of model cerium oxide nanoparticles. Phys Chem Chem Phys 10:5730–5738. doi:10.1039/b805904g
29. Vayssilov GN, Lykhach Y, Migani A et al (2011) Support nanostructure boosts oxygen transfer to catalytically active platinum nanoparticles. Nat Mater 10:310–315. doi:10.1038/nmat2976
30. 2(110) catalysts. J Am Chem Soc 134:8968–8974. doi:10.1021/ja302070k
31. Lykhach Y, Kozlov SM, Skála T et al (2016) Counting electrons on supported nanoparticles. Nat Mater 15:284–288. doi:10.1038/nmat4500
32. 2 novel thin film catalyst as anode for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Appl Catal B Environ. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.02.036
33. Figueroba A, Kovács G, Bruix A, Neyman KM (2016) Towards stable single-atom catalysts: strong binding of atomically dispersed transition metals on the surface of nanostructured ceria. Catal Sci Technol. doi:10.1039/C6CY00294C
34. Anisimov VI, Zaanen J, Andersen OK (1991) Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I. Phys Rev B 44:943–954. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.44.943
35. Dudarev SL, Botton GA, Savrasov SY et al (1998) Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide. Phys Rev B 57:1505–1509. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505
36. Fabris S, de Gironcoli S, Baroni S et al (2005) Taming multiple valency with density functionals: a case study of defective ceria. Phys Rev B 71:041102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.71.041102
37. Loschen C, Carrasco J, Neyman K, Illas F (2007) First-principles LDA + U and GGA + U study of cerium oxides: dependence on the effective U parameter. Phys Rev B 75:035115. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.035115
38. Pacchioni G (2014) First principles calculations on oxide-based heterogeneous catalysts and photocatalysts: problems and advances. Catal Letters 145:80–94. doi:10.1007/s10562-014-1386-2
39. Paier J (2016) Hybrid density functionals applied to complex solid catalysts: successes, limitations, and prospects. Catal Letters 146:861–885. doi:10.1007/s10562-016-1735-4
40. Migani A, Vayssilov GN, Bromley ST et al (2010) Greatly facilitated oxygen vacancy formation in ceria nanocrystallites. Chem Commun 46:5936–5938. doi:10.1039/c0cc01091j
41. Migani A, Vayssilov GN, Bromley ST et al (2010) Dramatic reduction of the oxygen vacancy formation energy in ceria particles: a possible key to their remarkable reactivity at the nanoscale. J Mater Chem 20:10535–10546. doi:10.1039/c0jm01908a
42. Migani A, Neyman KM, Bromley ST (2012) Octahedrality versus tetrahedrality in stoichiometric ceria nanoparticles. Chem Commun 48:4199–4201. doi:10.1039/c2cc18046d
43. 2 nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 107:13563–13566. doi:10.1021/jp036815m
44. 2 surfaces from hybrid and GGA + U implementations of density functional theory. J Phys Chem C 3716–3721. doi:10.1021/jp111427j
45. 4+ cation ordering in reduced ceria nanoparticles using interionic-potential and density-functional calculations. J Chem Phys 131:064701. doi:10.1063/1.3195063
46. Sk MA, Kozlov SM, Lim KH et al (2014) Oxygen vacancies in self-assemblies of ceria nanoparticles. J Mater Chem A 2:18329–18338. doi:10.1039/C4TA02200A
47. Viñes F, Illas F, Neyman KM (2007) On the mechanism of formation of metal nanowires by self-assembly. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 46:7094–7097. doi:10.1002/anie.200701613
48. Branda MM, Loschen C, Neyman KM, Illas F (2008) Atomic and electronic structure of cerium oxide stepped model surfaces. J Phys Chem C 112:17643–17651. doi:10.1021/jp806066g
49. Castellani NJ, Branda MM, Neyman KM, Illas F (2009) Density functional theory study of the adsorption of Au atom on cerium oxide: effect of low-coordinated surface sites. J Phys Chem C 113:4948–4954. doi:10.1021/jp8094352
50. Fuente S, Branda MM, Illas F (2012) Role of step sites on water dissociation on stoichiometric ceria surfaces. Theor Chem Acc 131:1190. doi:10.1007/s00214-012-1190-2
51. 2(111). ACS Nano 6:1126–1133. doi:10.1021/nn2036472
52. 2(111) with changing annealing condition. Jpn J Appl Phys 50:08LB05. doi:10.1143/JJAP.50.08LB05
53. Tersoff J, Hamann DR (1985) Theory of the scanning tunneling microscope. Phys Rev B 31:805–813. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.31.805
54. Frenken JWM, Stoltze P (1999) Are vicinal metal surfaces stable? Phys Rev Lett 82:3500–3503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3500
55. Kozlov SM, Viñes F, Nilius N et al (2012) Absolute surface step energies: accurate theoretical methods applied to ceria nanoislands. J Phys Chem Lett 3:1956–1961. doi:10.1021/jz3006942
56. 3(0001) films. Chem Phys Lett 368:527–531. doi:10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01889-4
57. Matolín V, Libra J, Matolínová I et al (2007) Growth of ultra-thin cerium oxide layers on Cu(111). Appl Surf Sci 254:153–155. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.07.010
58. Flege JI, Kaemena B, Gevers S et al (2011) Silicate-free growth of high-quality ultrathin cerium oxide films on Si(111). Phys Rev B 84:235418. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.235418
59. 2 interfacial reaction. J Phys Chem Lett 4:866–871. doi:10.1021/jz400187j
60. Luches P, Pagliuca F, Valeri S (2014) Structural and morphological modifications of thermally reduced cerium oxide ultrathin epitaxial films on Pt(111). Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:18848–18857. doi:10.1039/c4cp02723j
61. Kozlov SM, Demiroglu I, Neyman KM, Bromley ST (2015) Reduced ceria nanofilms from structure prediction. Nanoscale 7:4361–4366. doi:10.1039/c4nr07458k
62. Sangthong W, Limtrakul J, Illas F, Bromley ST (2010) Persistence of magic cluster stability in ultra-thin semiconductor nanorods. Nanoscale 2:72–77. doi:10.1039/b9nr00282k
63. 2(111). Phys Rev Lett 102:026101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.026101
64. 2 (110) and (100) surfaces. Chem Phys Lett 499:126–130. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2010.09.016
65. Nolan M, Fearon J, Watson G (2006) Oxygen vacancy formation and migration in ceria. Solid State Ionics 177:3069–3074. doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2006.07.045
66. 2(111) surface. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:7823–7829. doi:10.1039/c4cp00136b
67. Xu Z, Buehler MJ (2010) Interface structure and mechanics between graphene and metal substrates: a first-principles study. J Phys: Condens Matter 22:485301. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/48/485301
68. 3+ sites. J Phys Chem C 115:5817–5822. doi:10.1021/jp111147y
69. Kullgren J, Hermansson K, Broqvist P (2013) Supercharged low-temperature oxygen storage capacity of ceria at the nanoscale. J Phys Chem Lett 4:604–608. doi:10.1021/jz3020524
70. Huang M, Fabris S (2007) Role of surface peroxo and superoxo species in the low-temperature oxygen buffering of ceria: density functional theory calculations. Phys Rev B 75:081404. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.081404
71. Huang X, Wang B, Grulke EA, Beck MJ (2014) Toward tuning the surface functionalization of small ceria nanoparticles. J Chem Phys 140:074703. doi:10.1063/1.4864378
72. Tschöpe A, Schaadt D, Birringer R, Ying JY (1997) Catalytic properties of nanostructured metal oxides synthesized by inert gas condensation. Nanostructured Mater 9:423–432. doi:10.1016/S0965-9773(97)00095-0
73. Xu J, Harmer J, Li G et al (2010) Size dependent oxygen buffering capacity of ceria nanocrystals. Chem Commun (Camb) 46:1887–1889. doi:10.1039/b923780a
74. 2 adsorption. Langmuir 26:16595–16606. doi:10.1021/la101723w
75. 3+ sites in chemically active colloidal ceria nanoparticles. ACS Nano 7:10726–10732. doi:10.1021/nn403542p
76. Renuka NK, Harsha N, Divya T (2015) Supercharged ceria quantum dots with exceptionally high oxygen buffer action. RSC Adv 5:38837–38841. doi:10.1039/C5RA01161B
77. Huang X, Beck MJ (2014) Surface structure of catalytically-active ceria nanoparticles. Comput Mater Sci 91:122–133. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.04.037
78. Huang X, Beck MJ (2015) Determining the oxidation state of small, hydroxylated metal-oxide nanoparticles with infrared absorption spectroscopy. Chem Mater 27:2965–2972. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00259
79. Migani A, Loschen C, Illas F, Neyman KM (2008) Towards size-converged properties of model ceria nanoparticles: monitoring by adsorbed CO using DFT + U approach. Chem Phys Lett 465:106–109. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2008.09.060
80. Vayssilov GN, Mihaylov M, St Petkov P et al (2011) Reassignment of the vibrational spectra of carbonates, formates, and related surface species on ceria: a combined density functional and infrared spectroscopy investigation. J Phys Chem C 115:23435–23454. doi:10.1021/jp208050a
81. Boronat M, López-Ausens T, Corma A (2016) The acid-base and redox reactivity of CeO2 nanoparticles. Influence of the Hubbard U term in DFT + U studies. Surf Sci 648:212–219. doi:10.1016/j.susc.2015.10.047
82. Huang X, Beck MJ (2015) Metal-free low-temperature water–gas shift catalysis over small, hydroxylated ceria nanoparticles. ACS Catal 6362–6369. doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b01227
83. Trovarelli A, de Leitenburg C, Boaro M, Dolcetti G (1999) The utilization of ceria in industrial catalysis. Catal Today 50:353–367. doi:10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00515-X
84. Crucq A, Diwell AF, Rajaram RR et al (1991) The role of ceria in three-way catalysts. Stud Surf Sci Catal 71:139–152. doi:10.1016/S0167-2991(08)62975-4
85. 2-based oxides in the three-way catalysis. Catal T 50:285–298. doi:10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00510-0
86. 2 (NM: noble metal) catalysts. Catal Today 50:175–206. doi:10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00503-3
87. Kim G (1982) Ceria-promoted three-way catalysts for auto exhaust emission control. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 21:267–274. doi:10.1021/i300006a014
88. Ratnasamy C, Wagner JP (2009) Water gas shift catalysis. Catal Rev 51:325–440. doi:10.1080/01614940903048661
89. Bunluesin T, Gorte RJ, Graham GW et al (1998) Studies of the water-gas-shift reaction on ceria-supported Pt, Pd, and Rh: implications for oxygen-storage properties. Appl Catal B Environ 15:107–114. doi:10.1016/S0926-3373(97)00040-4
90. 2-based catalyst stabilized by a Pt–O–Ce bond. Appl Catal B Environ 99:336–342. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.07.003
91. 2 water-gas shift catalysts due to shutdown/startup modes for fuel cell applications. Appl Catal B Environ 56:69–75. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.04.026
92. 2. Catal Today 149:372–379. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2009.07.100
93. Deng W, Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M (2006) On the issue of the deactivation of Au-ceria and Pt-ceria water-gas shift catalysts in practical fuel-cell applications. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 45:2285–2289. doi:10.1002/anie.200503220
94. Vecchietti J, Bonivardi A, Xu W et al (2014) Understanding the role of oxygen vacancies in the water gas shift reaction on ceria-supported platinum catalysts. ACS Catal 2088–2096. doi:10.1021/cs500323u
95. Lim D-H, Lee W-D, Choi D-H, Lee H-I (2010) Effect of ceria nanoparticles into the Pt/C catalyst as cathode material on the electrocatalytic activity and durability for low-temperature fuel cell. Appl Catal B Environ 94:85–96. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.10.024
96. 2 rf-sputtered thin films. Surf Interface Anal 42:882–885. doi:10.1002/sia.3327
97. 2 electrodes for fuel cell applications. Fuel Cells 10:139–144. doi:10.1002/fuce.200900036
98. Ertl G, Knözinger H, Schüth F, Weitkamp J (2008) Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis. Wiley, Weinheim
99. Yamamoto K, Imaoka T, Chun W-J et al (2009) Size-specific catalytic activity of platinum clusters enhances oxygen reduction reactions. Nat Chem 1:397–402. doi:10.1038/nchem.288
100. Somorjai GA, Blakely DW (1975) Mechanism of catalysis of hydrocarbon reactions by platinum surfaces. Nature 258:580–583. doi:10.1038/258580a0
101. Gillard RD (1968) Platinum and catalysts. Nature 218:502–503. doi:10.1038/218502b0
102. Yam VWW (2010) Behind platinum’s sparkle. Nat Chem 2:790. doi:10.1038/nchem.818
103. Tollefson J (2007) Worth its weight in platinum. Nature 450:334–335. doi:10.1038/450334a
104. Chung HT, Won JH, Zelenay P (2013) Active and stable carbon nanotube/nanoparticle composite electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction. Nat Commun 4:1922. doi:10.1038/ncomms2944
105. Yang W, Fellinger T-P, Antonietti M (2011) Efficient metal-free oxygen reduction in alkaline medium on high-surface-area mesoporous nitrogen-doped carbons made from ionic liquids and nucleobases. J Am Chem Soc 133:206–209. doi:10.1021/ja108039j
106. 2 production and uptake. Science 326:1384–1387. doi:10.1126/science.1179773
107. Farmer JA, Campbell CT (2010) Ceria maintains smaller metal catalyst particles by strong metal-support bonding. Science 329:933–936. doi:10.1126/science.1191778
108. Zhou Y, Perket JM, Zhou J (2010) Growth of Pt nanoparticles on reducible CeO2(111) thin films: effect of nanostructures and redox properties of ceria. J Phys Chem C 2:11853–11860. doi:10.1021/jp1007279
109. Campbell CT (2013) The energetics of supported metal nanoparticles: relationships to sintering rates and catalytic activity. Acc Chem Res 46:1712–1719. doi:10.1021/ar3003514
110. Yang X-F, Wang A, Qiao B et al (2013) Single-atom catalysts: a new frontier in heterogeneous catalysis. Acc Chem Res 46:1740–1748. doi:10.1021/ar300361m
111. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M (2014) Gold atoms stabilized on various supports catalyze the water-gas shift reaction. Acc Chem Res 47:783–792. doi:10.1021/ar4001845
112. Vilé G, Albani D, Nachtegaal M et al (2015) A stable single-site palladium catalyst for hydrogenations. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 54:11265–11269. doi:10.1002/anie.201505073
113. Campbell CT, Sellers JRV (2013) Anchored metal nanoparticles: effects of support and size on their energy, sintering resistance and reactivity. Faraday Discuss 162:9–30. doi:10.1039/c3fd00094j
114. James TE, Hemmingson SL, Campbell CT (2015) Energy of supported metal catalysts: from single atoms to large metal nanoparticles. ACS Catal 5673–5678. doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b01372
115. Aleksandrov HA, Neyman KM, Vayssilov GN (2015) Structure and stability of reduced and oxidized mononuclear platinum species on nanostructured ceria from density functional modeling. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:14551–14560. doi:10.1039/C5CP01685A
116. 2 fuel cell catalyst. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:7672–7679. doi:10.1039/c6cp00627b
117. Hu A, Neyman KM, Staufer M et al (1999) A surface site as polydentate ligand of a metal complex: density functional studies of rhenium subcarbonyls supported on magnesium oxide. J Am Chem Soc 3:4522–4523. doi:10.1021/ja990083n
118. 2(111) surface. J Phys Chem C 114:14202–14207. doi:10.1021/jp104490k
119. 2 nanoparticles via an incorporation-segregation mechanism and study of segregation kinetics. ACS Catal 6:3688–3699. doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b00934
120. 2 by the combustion method: structural investigation by XRD, TEM, XPS, and EXAFS. Chem Mater 15:2049–2060. doi:10.1021/cm0204775
121. 2 coated CNTs. Appl Surf Sci 258:2161–2164. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.02.119
122. 2 thin film catalysts prepared by magnetron sputtering. Langmuir 26:12824–12831. doi:10.1021/la100399t
123. Hatanaka M, Takahashi N, Takahashi N et al (2009) Reversible changes in the Pt oxidation state and nanostructure on a ceria-based supported Pt. J Catal 266:182–190. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2009.06.005
124. Nagai Y, Hirabayashi T, Dohmae K et al (2006) Sintering inhibition mechanism of platinum supported on ceria-based oxide and Pt-oxide–support interaction. J Catal 242:103–109. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2006.06.002
125. 2. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:4279–4284. doi:10.1039/c0cp01635g
126. Hegde MS, Madras G, Patil KC (2009) Noble metal ionic catalysts. Acc Chem Res 42:704–712. doi:10.1021/ar800209s
127. Colussi S, Gayen A, Farnesi Camellone M et al (2009) Nanofaceted Pd–O sites in Pd–Ce surface superstructures: enhanced activity in catalytic combustion of methane. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48:8481–8484. doi:10.1002/anie.200903581
128. 2-y oxides: structural characterization and catalytic activity for the water gas shift reaction. J Phys Chem C 114:12689–12697. doi:10.1021/jp103958u
129. Neitzel A, Figueroba A, Lykhach Y et al (2016) Atomically dispersed Pd, Ni, and Pt species in ceria-based catalysts: principal differences in stability and reactivity. J Phys Chem C 120:9852–9862. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02264
130. Belton DN, Sun YM, White JM (1984) Metal-support interactions on rhodium and platinum/titanium dioxide model catalysts. J Phys Chem 88:5172–5176. doi:10.1021/j150666a011
131. Tauster SJ (1987) Strong metal-support interactions. Acc Chem Res 20:389–394. doi:10.1021/ar00143a001
132. Eley DD, Pines H, Weisz PB et al (1989) Metal-support interaction: group VIII metals and reducible oxides. Adv Catal 36:173–235. doi:10.1016/S0360-0564(08)60018-8
133. Stakheev AY, Kustov L (1999) Effects of the support on the morphology and electronic properties of supported metal clusters: modern concepts and progress in 1990s. Appl Catal A Gen 188:3–35. doi:10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00232-X
134. Zhou Y, Perket JM, Crooks AB, Zhou J (2010) Effect of ceria support on the structure of Ni nanoparticles. J Phys Chem Lett 1:1447–1453. doi:10.1021/jz1003044
135. Li L, Wang L-L, Johnson DD et al (2013) Noncrystalline-to-crystalline transformations in Pt nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 135:13062–13072. doi:10.1021/ja405497p
136. Senanayake SD, Rodriguez JA, Stacchiola D (2013) Electronic metal-support interactions and the production of hydrogen through the water-gas shift reaction and ethanol steam reforming: fundamental studies with well-defined model catalysts. Top Catal 56:1488–1498. doi:10.1007/s11244-013-0148-5
137. Blasco T, Nieto JML (1997) Oxidative dyhydrogenation of short chain alkanes on supported vanadium oxide catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen 157:117–142. doi:10.1016/S0926-860X(97)00029-X
138. 2(110) surfaces: high water-gas shift activity and the nature of the mixed-metal oxide at the nanometer level. J Am Chem Soc 132:356–363. doi:10.1021/ja9087677
139. 2 catalysts: a cooperative effect between gold and the support. J Am Chem Soc 129:16230–16237. doi:10.1021/ja076721g
140. Cargnello M, Doan-Nguyen VVT, Gordon TR et al (2013) Control of metal nanocrystal size reveals metal-support interface role for ceria catalysts. Science 341:771–773. doi:10.1126/science.1240148
141. 2. J Catal 150:400–406. doi:10.1006/jcat.1994.1358
142. 2(111). Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:11384–11392. doi:10.1039/c1cp20950g
143. 2 nanoparticles of different size. J Phys Chem C 115:16081–16086. doi:10.1021/jp204222k
144. 2(111) surface. J Chem Phys 135:244708. doi:10.1063/1.3672102
145. 2. Phys Rev B 50:11340–11346. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.50.11340
146. 2 catalysts. Surf Interface Anal 40:225–230. doi:10.1002/sia.2625
147. Aranifard S, Ammal SC, Heyden A (2012) Nature of Ptn/CeO2(111) surface under water-gas shift reaction conditions: a constrained ab initio thermodynamics study. J Phys Chem C 116:9029–9042. doi:10.1021/jp300515b
148. Negreiros FR, Fabris S (2014) Role of cluster morphology in the dynamics and reactivity of subnanometer Pt clusters supported on ceria surfaces. J Phys Chem C 118:21014–21020. doi:10.1021/jp506404z
149. Campbell CT (2012) Catalyst-support interactions: electronic perturbations. Nat Chem 4:597–598. doi:10.1038/nchem.1412
150. Tauster SJ, Fung SC, Garten RL (1978) Strong metal-support interactions. Group 8 noble metals supported on titanium dioxide. J Am Chem Soc 100:170–175. doi:10.1021/ja00469a029
151. 2(111) surface using density-functional and statistical calculations. Phys Rev Lett 110:246101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.246101
152. 2(111): a case. Phys Rev Lett 112:156102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.156102
153. 2(111): critical role of hydroxyls. Phys Rev Lett 116:086102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.086102
154. 2 as a catalyst for partial alkyne hydrogenation. J Phys Chem C 118:5352–5360. doi:10.1021/jp410478c
155. Y (M = Zr or Al) mixed oxides. Catal Today 138:266–271. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2008.06.031
156. Jalowieckiduhamel L, Carpentier J, Ponchel A (2007) Catalytic hydrogen storage in cerium nickel and zirconium (or aluminium) mixed oxides. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32:2439–2444. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.10.056
157. Aleksandrov HA, Kozlov SM, Schauermann S et al (2014) How absorbed hydrogen affects the catalytic activity of transition metals. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 53:13371–13375. doi:10.1002/anie.201405738
158. x/Cu(111) catalyst: unique role of ceria nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48:8047–8050. doi:10.1002/anie.200903918
159. Senanayake SD, Stacchiola D, Rodriguez JA (2013) Unique properties of ceria nanoparticles supported on metals: novel inverse ceria/copper catalysts for CO oxidation and the water-gas shift reaction. Acc Chem Res 46:1702–1711. doi:10.1021/ar300231p
160. 2. Science 345:546–550. doi:10.1126/science.1253057
161. 2(111): guidelines for selectivity tuning. ACS Catal 5:6473–6480. doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b01427
162. Capdevila-Cortada M, Vilé G, Teschner D et al (2016) Reactivity descriptors for ceria in catalysis. Appl Catal B Environ. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.02.035
163. Farra R, García-Melchor M, Eichelbaum M et al (2013) Promoted ceria: a structural, catalytic, and computational study. ACS Catal 3:2256–2268. doi:10.1021/cs4005002
164. Reuter K (2016) Ab initio thermodynamics and first-principles microkinetics for surface catalysis. Catal Lett 146:541–563. doi:10.1007/s10562-015-1684-3
165. 2 nanorods via ex situ and in situ annealing. Nanoscale 7:5169–5177. doi:10.1039/c4nr07308h
166. Sayle TXT, Molinari M, Das S et al (2013) Environment-mediated structure, surface redox activity and reactivity of ceria nanoparticles. Nanoscale 5:6063–6073. doi:10.1039/c3nr00917c
167. Möbus G, Saghi Z, Sayle DC et al (2011) Dynamics of polar surfaces on ceria nanoparticles observed in situ with single-atom resolution. Adv Funct Mater 21:1971–1976. doi:10.1002/adfm.201002135
168. Feng X, Sayle DC, Wang ZL et al (2006) Converting ceria polyhedral nanoparticles into single-crystal nanospheres. Science 312:1504–1508. doi:10.1126/science.1125767
169. 2(111) by their electric potential. Appl Phys Lett 101:051601. doi:10.1063/1.4739944