Nuclear transport of yeast proteasomes

Biomolecules

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 940-955

  Enenkel, Cordula ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Nuclear transport; Proteasome; Protein degradation

Indexed keywords

KARYOPHERIN ALPHA; KARYOPHERIN BETA; POLYUBIQUITIN; PROTEASOME; FUNGAL PROTEIN;

ACTIVE TRANSPORT; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; CELL PROLIFERATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SIGNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; REVIEW; YEAST; CELL NUCLEUS; CYTOLOGY; CYTOPLASM; METABOLISM;

EUKARYOTA;

ACTIVE TRANSPORT, CELL NUCLEUS; BETA KARYOPHERINS; CELL NUCLEUS; CYTOPLASM; FUNGAL PROTEINS; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEOLYSIS; YEASTS;

EID: 84990876524     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2218273X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/biom4040940     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Glickman, M.H.; Ciechanover, A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: Destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol. Rev. 2002, 82, 373-428.
2. Kirschner, M. Intracellular proteolysis. Trends Cell Biol. 1999, 9, M42-M45.
3. Von Mikecz, A. The nuclear ubiquitin-proteasome system. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 1977-1984.
4. Vabulas, R.M.; Hartl, F.U. Protein synthesis upon acute nutrient restriction relies on proteasome function. Science 2005, 310, 1960-1963.
5. Gallagher, P.S.; Oeser, M.L.; Abraham, A.C.; Kaganovich, D.; Gardner, R.G. Cellular maintenance of nuclear protein homeostasis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2013, 71, 1865-1879.
6. Chen, L.; Madura, K. Degradation of specific nuclear proteins occurs in the cytoplasm in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2014, 197, 193-197.
7. Tsuchiya, H.; Arai, N.; Tanaka, K.; Saeki, Y. Cytoplasmic proteasomes are not indispensable for cell growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 436, 372-376.
8. Ha, S.W.; Ju, D.; Xie, Y. Nuclear import factor Srp1 and its associated protein Sts1 couple ribosome-bound nascent polypeptides to proteasomes for cotranslational degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 2701-2710.
9. Tanaka, K. The proteasome: Overview of structure and functions. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2009, 85, 12-36.
10. Enenkel, C. Proteasome dynamics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1843, 39-46.
11. Hugle, B.; Kleinschmidt, J.A.; Franke, W.W. The 22S cylinder particles of Xenopus laevis. II. Immunological characterization and localization of their proteins in tissues and cultured cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1983, 32, 157-163.
12. Kleinschmidt, J.A.; Hugle, B.; Grund, C.; Franke, W.W. The 22S cylinder particles of Xenopus laevis. I. Biochemical and electron microscopic characterization. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1983, 32, 143-156.
13. Wojcik, C.; DeMartino, G.N. Intracellular localization of proteasomes. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2003, 35, 579-589.
14. Baumeister, W.; Walz, J.; Zuhl, F.; Seemuller, E. The proteasome: Paradigm of a self-compartmentalizing protease. Cell 1998, 92, 367-380.
15. Enenkel, C. Using native gel electrophoresis and phosphofluoroimaging to analyze GFP-tagged proteasomes. In Ubiquitin Family Modifiers and the Proteasome: Reviews and Protocols; Dohmen, R.J., Scheffner, M., Eds.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 339-348.
16. Chen, P.; Hochstrasser, M. Autocatalytic subunit processing couples active site formation in the 20S proteasome to completion of assembly. Cell 1996, 86, 961-972.
17. Ramos, P.C.; Hockendorff, J.; Johnson, E.S.; Varshavsky, A.; Dohmen, R.J. Ump1p is required for proper maturation of the 20S proteasome and becomes its substrate upon completion of the assembly. Cell 1998, 92, 489-499.
18. Groll, M.; Ditzel, L.; Lowe, J.; Stock, D.; Bochtler, M.; Bartunik, H.D.; Huber, R. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 Å resolution. Nature 1997, 386, 463-471.
19. Le Tallec, B.; Barrault, M.B.; Courbeyrette, R.; Guerois, R.; Marsolier-Kergoat, M.C.; Peyroche, A. 20S proteasome assembly is orchestrated by two distinct pairs of chaperones in yeast and in mammals. Mol. Cell 2007, 27, 660-674.
20. Groll, M.; Bajorek, M.; Kohler, A.; Moroder, L.; Rubin, D.M.; Huber, R.; Glickman, M.H.; Finley, D. A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2000, 7, 1062-1067.
21. Liu, C.W.; Corboy, M.J.; DeMartino, G.N.; Thomas, P.J. Endoproteolytic activity of the proteasome. Science 2003, 299, 408-411.
22. Besche, H.C.; Peth, A.; Goldberg, A.L. Getting to first base in proteasome assembly. Cell 2009, 138, 25-28.
23. Glickman, M.H.; Rubin, D.M.; Fried, V.A.; Finley, D. The regulatory particle of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteasome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 3149-3162.
24. Beck, F.; Unverdorben, P.; Bohn, S.; Schweitzer, A.; Pfeifer, G.; Sakata, E.; Nickell, S.; Plitzko, J.M.; Villa, E.; Baumeister, W., et al. Near-atomic resolution structural model of the yeast 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 14870-14875.
25. Rosenzweig, R.; Bronner, V.; Zhang, D.; Fushman, D.; Glickman, M.H. Rpn1 and Rpn2 coordinate ubiquitin processing factors at proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 14659-14671.
26. Warner, J.R. The economics of ribosome biosynthesis in yeast. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1999, 24, 437-440.
27. Nissan, T.A.; Bassler, J.; Petfalski, E.; Tollervey, D.; Hurt, E. 60S pre-ribosome formation viewed from assembly in the nucleolus until export to the cytoplasm. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 5539-5547.
28. Hulsmann, B.B.; Labokha, A.A.; Gorlich, D. The permeability of reconstituted nuclear pores provides direct evidence for the selective phase model. Cell 2012, 150, 738-751.
29. Fahrenkrog, B.; Aebi, U. The nuclear pore complex: Nucleocytoplasmic transport and beyond. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 757-766.
30. Milles, S.; Lemke, E.A. Single molecule study of the intrinsically disordered FG-repeat nucleoporin 153. Biophys. J. 2011, 101, 1710-1719.
31. Wente, S.R.; Rout, M.P. The nuclear pore complex and nuclear transport. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000562.
32. Enenkel, C.; Blobel, G.; Rexach, M. Identification of a yeast karyopherin heterodimer that targets import substrate to mammalian nuclear pore complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 16499-16502.
33. Pante, N.; Kann, M. Nuclear pore complex is able to transport macromolecules with diameters of about 39 nm. Mol. Biol. Cell 2002, 13, 425-434.
34. Wendler, P.; Lehmann, A.; Janek, K.; Baumgart, S.; Enenkel, C. The bipartite nuclear localization sequence of Rpn2 is required for nuclear import of proteasomal base complexes via karyopherin ab and proteasome functions. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 37751-37762.
35. Lehmann, A.; Janek, K.; Braun, B.; Kloetzel, P.M.; Enenkel, C. 20S proteasomes are imported as precursor complexes into the nucleus of yeast. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 317, 401-413.
36. Isono, E.; Nishihara, K.; Saeki, Y.; Yashiroda, H.; Kamata, N.; Ge, L.; Ueda, T.; Kikuchi, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Nakano, A., et al. The assembly pathway of the 19S regulatory particle of the yeast 26S proteasome. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007, 18, 569-580.
37. Savulescu, A.F.; Rotem, A.; Harel, A. Proteasomes crossing the nuclear border. Nucleus 2011, 2, 258-263.
38. Chen, L.; Romero, L.; Chuang, S.M.; Tournier, V.; Joshi, K.K.; Lee, J.A.; Kovvali, G.; Madura, K. Sts1 plays a key role in targeting proteasomes to the nucleus. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 3104-3118.
39. Wang, H.R.; Kania, M.; Baumeister, W.; Nederlof, P.M. Import of human and thermoplasma 20S proteasomes into nuclei of Hela cells requires functional NLS sequences. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 73, 105-113.
40. Nederlof, P.M.; Wang, H.R.; Baumeister, W. Nuclear localization signals of human and thermoplasma proteasomal alpha subunits are functional in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 12060-12064.
41. Knuehl, C.; Seelig, A.; Brecht, B.; Henklein, P.; Kloetzel, P.M. Functional analysis of eukaryotic 20S proteasome nuclear localization signal. Exp. Cell Res. 1996, 225, 67-74.
42. Tone, Y.; Toh-e, E.A. Nob1p is required for biogenesis of the 26S proteasome and degraded upon its maturation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 3142-3157.
43. Chien, C.Y.; Chen, R.H. Cdc48 chaperone and adaptor Ubx4 distribute the proteasome in the nucleus for anaphase proteolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 37180-37191.
44. Tanaka, K.; Yoshimura, T.; Tamura, T.; Fujiwara, T.; Kumatori, A.; Ichihara, A. Possible mechanism of nuclear translocation of proteasomes. FEBS Lett. 1990, 271, 41-46.
45. Mayr, J.; Wang, H.R.; Nederlof, P.; Baumeister, W. The import pathway of human and Thermoplasma 20S proteasomes into Hela cell nuclei is different from that of classical NLS-bearing proteins. Biol. Chem. 1999, 380, 1183-1192.
46. Savulescu, A.F.; Shorer, H.; Kleifeld, O.; Cohen, I.; Gruber, R.; Glickman, M.H.; Harel, A. Nuclear import of an intact preassembled proteasome particle. Mol. Biol. Cell 2011, 22, 880-891.
47. Pack, C.G.; Yukii, H.; Toh, E.A.; Kudo, T.; Tsuchiya, H.; Kaiho, A.; Sakata, E.; Murata, S.; Yokosawa, H.; Sako, Y., et al. Quantitative live-cell imaging reveals spatio-temporal dynamics and cytoplasmic assembly of the 26S proteasome. Nat. Commun. 2014, doi:10.1038/ncomms4396.
48. Weberruss, M.H.; Savulescu, A.F.; Jando, J.; Bissinger, T.; Harel, A.; Glickman, M.H.; Enenkel, C. Blm10 facilitates nuclear import of proteasome core particles. EMBO J. 2013, 32, 2697-2707.
49. Fehlker, M.; Wendler, P.; Lehmann, A.; Enenkel, C. Blm3 is part of nascent proteasomes and is involved in a late stage of nuclear proteasome assembly. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4, 959-963.
50. Da Fonseca, P.C.; He, J.; Morris, E.P. Molecular model of the human 26S proteasome. Mol. Cell 2012, 46, 54-66.
51. Lehmann, A.; Jechow, K.; Enenkel, C. Blm10 binds to pre-activated proteasome core particles with open gate conformation. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9, 1237-1243.
52. Sadre-Bazzaz, K.; Whitby, F.G.; Robinson, H.; Formosa, T.; Hill, C.P. Structure of a Blm10 complex reveals common mechanisms for proteasome binding and gate opening. Mol. Cell 2010, 37, 728-735.
53. Li, X.; Kusmierczyk, A.R.; Wong, P.; Emili, A.; Hochstrasser, M. Beta-subunit appendages promote 20S proteasome assembly by overcoming an Ump1-dependent checkpoint. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 2339-2349.
54. Lehmann, A.; Niewienda, A.; Jechow, K.; Janek, K.; Enenkel, C. Ecm29 fulfils quality control functions in proteasome assembly. Mol. Cell 2010, 38, 879-888.
55. Tabb, M.M.; Tongaonkar, P.; Vu, L.; Nomura, M. Evidence for separable functions of Srp1p, the yeast homolog of importin alpha (karyopherin alpha): Role for Srp1p and Sts1p in protein degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 6062-6073.
56. Tatebe, H.; Yanagida, M. Cut8, essential for anaphase, controls localization of 26S proteasome, facilitating destruction of cyclin and Cut2. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10, 1329-1338.
57. Takeda, K.; Tonthat, N.K.; Glover, T.; Xu, W.; Koonin, E.V.; Yanagida, M.; Schumacher, M.A. Implications for proteasome nuclear localization revealed by the structure of the nuclear proteasome tether protein cut8. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 16950-16955.
58. Amsterdam, A.; Pitzer, F.; Baumeister, W. Changes in intracellular localization of proteasomes in immortalized ovarian granulosa cells during mitosis associated with a role in cell cycle control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 99-103.
59. Reits, E.A.; Benham, A.M.; Plougastel, B.; Neefjes, J.; Trowsdale, J. Dynamics of proteasome distribution in living cells. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 6087-6094.
60. Kremer, M.; Henn, A.; Kolb, C.; Basler, M.; Moebius, J.; Guillaume, B.; Leist, M.; van den Eynde, B.J.; Groettrup, M. Reduced immunoproteasome formation and accumulation of immunoproteasomal precursors in the brains of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-infected mice. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 5549-5560.
61. Hoefer, M.M.; Boneberg, E.M.; Grotegut, S.; Kusch, J.; Illges, H. Possible tetramerisation of the proteasome maturation factor Pomp/proteassemblin/hUmp1 and its subcellular localisation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2006, 38, 259-267.
62. Salomons, F.A.; Acs, K.; Dantuma, N.P. Illuminating the ubiquitin/proteasome system. Exp. Cell Res. 2010, 316, 1289-1295.
63. Fricke, B.; Heink, S.; Steffen, J.; Kloetzel, P.M.; Kruger, E. The proteasome maturation protein Pomp facilitates major steps of 20S proteasome formation at the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO Rep. 2007, 8, 1170-1175.
64. Murata, S.; Yashiroda, H.; Tanaka, K. Molecular mechanisms of proteasome assembly. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 104-115.
65. Schmidt, M.; Haas, W.; Crosas, B.; Santamaria, P.G.; Gygi, S.P.; Walz, T.; Finley, D. The heat repeat protein Blm10 regulates the yeast proteasome by capping the core particle. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005, 12, 294-303.
66. Ortega, J.; Bernard Heymann, J.; Kajava, A.V.; Ustrell, V.; Rechsteiner, M.; Steven, A.C. The axial channel of the 20S proteasome opens upon binding of the PA200 activator. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 346, 1221-1227.
67. Glickman, M.H.; Raveh, D. Proteasome plasticity. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 3214-3223.
68. Huber, E.M.; Groll, M. The 19S cap puzzle: A new jigsaw piece. Structure 2012, 20, 387-388.
69. Doherty, K.M.; Pride, L.D.; Lukose, J.; Snydsman, B.E.; Charles, R.; Pramanik, A.; Muller, E.G.; Botstein, D.; Moore, C.W. Loss of a 20S proteasome activator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae downregulates genes important for genomic integrity, increases DNA damage, and selectively sensitizes cells to agents with diverse mechanisms of action. G3 2012, 2, 943-959.
70. Marques, A.J.; Glanemann, C.; Ramos, P.C.; Dohmen, R.J. The C-terminal extension of the beta7 subunit and activator complexes stabilize nascent 20S proteasomes and promote their maturation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 34869-34876.
71. Savulescu, A.F.; Glickman, M.H. Proteasome activator 200: The heat is on. Mol Cell. Proteomics 2011, doi:10.1074/mcp.R110.006890.
72. Laporte, D.; Lebaudy, A.; Sahin, A.; Pinson, B.; Ceschin, J.; Daignan-Fornier, B.; Sagot, I. Metabolic status rather than cell cycle signals control quiescence entry and exit. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 192, 949-957.
73. Bajorek, M.; Glickman, M.H. Keepers at the final gates: Regulatory complexes and gating of the proteasome channel. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2004, 61, 1579-1588.
74. Tai, H.C.; Besche, H.; Goldberg, A.L.; Schuman, E.M. Characterization of the brain 26S proteasome and its interacting proteins. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2010, doi:10.3389/fnmol.2010.00012.
75. Kaganovich, D.; Kopito, R.; Frydman, J. Misfolded proteins partition between two distinct quality control compartments. Nature 2008, 454, 1088-1095.
76. Bingol, B.; Schuman, E.M. Activity-dependent dynamics and sequestration of proteasomes in dendritic spines. Nature 2006, 441, 1144-1148.
77. Sha, Z.; Peth, A.; Goldberg, A.L. Keeping proteasomes under control—A role for phosphorylation in the nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 18573-18574.
78. Kimura, A.; Kato, Y.; Hirano, H. N-myristoylation of the Rpt2 subunit regulates intracellular localization of the yeast 26S proteasome. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 8856-8866.