A literature review for large-scale health information system project planning, implementation and evaluation

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 97, Issue , 2017, Pages 86-97

  Sligo, Judith ^a   Gauld, Robin ^a   Roberts, Vaughan ^b   Villa, Luis ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b Healthy Together 2020 Technology Programme   (New Zealand)

^c Health Intelligence and Informatics   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Health information systems; Implementation

Indexed keywords

HEALTH; HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; MICROARRAYS;

EVALUATION; EVALUATION STRATEGIES; HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HEALTHCARE ORGANISATIONS; IMPLEMENTATION; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL EVALUATIONS; ORGANISATIONAL;

BIOASSAY;

EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 84990866219     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.09.007     Document Type: Review

References (172)

1. [1] Hillestad, R., et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff. (Millwood) 24:5 (2005), 1103–1117.
2. [2] Ammenwerth, E., et al. Evaluation of health information systems—problems and challenges. Int. J. Med. Inf. 71:2–3 (2003), 125–135.
3. [3] Gagnon, M.-P., et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J. Med. Syst. 36 (2012), 241–277.
4. [4] Lapointe, L., Mignerat, M., Vedel, I., The IT productivity paradox in health: a stakeholder's perspective. Int. J. Med. Inf. 80:2 (2011), 102–115.
5. [5] Li, J., Talaei-Khoei, A., Seale, H., Ray, P., MacIntyre, C., Health care provider adoption of eHealth: systematic literature review. Interact. J. Med. Res., 2(1), 2013.
6. [6] Black, A.D., et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med., 8(1), 2011, e1000387.
7. [7] Jennett, P., et al. The socio-economic impact of telehealth: a systematic review. J. Telemed. Telecare 9:6 (2003), 311–320.
8. [8] Karsh, B.-T., et al. Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 17:6 (2010), 617–623.
9. [9] de Bont, A., Bal, R., Telemedicine in interdisciplinary work practices: on an IT system that met the criteria for success set out by its sponsors, yet failed to become part of every-day clinical routines. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 8, 2008, 47.
10. [10] Cresswell, K., Sheikh, A., Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review. Int. J. Med. Inf. 82:5 (2013), e73–e86.
11. [11] Jha, A.K., et al. The use of health information technology in seven nations. Int. J. Med. Inf. 77:12 (2008), 848–854.
12. [12] Wyatt, J.C., Wyatt, S.M., When and how to evaluate health information systems?. Int. J. Med. Inf. 69:2–3 (2003), 251–259.
13. [13] van Gemert-Pijnen, J.E.W.C., et al. A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies. J. Med. Internet Res., 13(4), 2011, e111.
14. [14] Anderson, C.L., Agarwal, R., The digitization of healthcare: boundary risks, emotion, and consumer willingness to disclose personal health information. Inform. Syst. Res. 22:3 (2011), 469–490.
15. [15] Barber, N., Cornford, T., Klecun, E., Qualitative evaluation of an electronic prescribing and administration system. Qual. Saf. Health Care 16:4 (2007), 271–278.
16. [16] Currie, W.L., Finnegan, D.J., The policy-practice nexus of electronic health records adoption in the UK NHS: an institutional analysis. J. Enterp. Inform. Manage. 24:2 (2013), 146–170.
17. [17] Heeks, R., Health information systems: failure, success and improvisation. Int. J. Med. Inf. 75:2 (2006), 125–137.
18. [18] Littlejohns, P., Wyatt, J.C., Garvican, L., Evaluating computerised health information systems: hard lessons still to be learnt. BMJ 326:7394 (2003), 860–863.
19. [19] Southon, G., Sauer, C., Dampney, K., Lessons from a failed information systems initiative: issues for complex organisations. Int. J. Med. Inf. 55:1 (1999), 33–46.
20. [20] Berg, M., Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int. J. Med. Inf. 64:2–3 (2001), 143–156.
21. [21] Avison, D., Young, T., Time to rethink health care and ICT?. Commun. ACM 50:6 (2007), 69–74.
22. [22] Kaplan, B., Evaluating informatics applications—some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int. J. Med. Inf. 64:1 (2001), 39–56.
23. [23] Potts, H.W.W., et al. Towards a Better Understanding of Delivering E-Health Systems: A Systematic Review Using The Meta-Narrative Method and Two Case Studies. Final Report., 2011, NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme, London, England.
24. [24] Buntin, M.B., et al. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff. (Millwood) 30:3 (2011), 464–471.
25. [25] Chaudhry, B., et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann. Intern. Med. 144:10 (2006), 742–752.
26. [26] Goldzweig, C.L., et al. Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. Health Aff. (Millwood) 28:2 (2009), w282–w293.
27. [27] Hersh, W.R., et al. Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 1:1 (2001), 1–8.
28. [28] McLean, S., et al. The impact of telehealthcare on the quality and safety of care: a systematic overview. PLoS One, 8(8), 2013, e71238.
29. [29] Mistry, H., Systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare: changes in the economic evidence over twenty years. J. Telemed. Telecare 18:1 (2012), 1–6.
30. [30] Robert, G., et al., Organisational factors influencing technology adoption and assimilation in the NHS: a systematic literature review, in Report for the National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation programme 2009.
31. [31] Rye, C.B., Kimberly, J.R., The adoption of innovations by provider organizations in health care. Med. Care Res. Rev. 64:3 (2007), 235–278.
32. [32] Shekelle, P.G., Morton, S.C., Keeler, E.B., Costs and benefits of health information technology. Evid. Rep. Technol. Assess. 132 (2006), 1–71.
33. [33] Whitten, P.S., et al. Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. BMJ 324:7351 (2002), 1434–1437.
34. [34] Connell, N.A.D., Young, T.P., Evaluating healthcare information systems through an enterprise perspective. Inform. Manage. 44:4 (2007), 433–440.
35. [35] Kushniruk, A.W., et al. Emerging approaches to usability evaluation of health information systems: towards in-situ analysis of complex healthcare systems and environments. Studies in Health Technology and informatics, 2011.
36. [36] J. Car, et al., The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of healthcare A Systemic Overview & Synthesis of the Literature Report for the NHS Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme 2008.
37. [37] European Commission, I.a.M, eHealth in Action, Good Practice in European Countries. 2009, European Commission, Luxembourg.
38. [38] Goroll, A.H., et al. Community-wide implementation of health information technology: the Massachusetts eHealth collaborative experience. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 16:1 (2009), 132–139.
39. [39] Tsiknakis, M., Kouroubali, A., Organizational factors affecting successful adoption of innovative eHealth services: a case study employing the FITT framework. Int. J. Med. Inf. 78:1 (2009), 39–52.
40. [40] Van Velsen, L., Wentzel, J., Van Gemert-Pijnen, J.E., Designing eHealth that matters via a multidisciplinary requirements development approach. JMIR Res. Protoc., 2(1), 2013, e21.
41. [41] Pagliari, C., et al. What is eHealth (4): a scoping exercise to map the field. J. Med. Internet Res., 7(1), 2005, e9.
42. [42] Yellowlees, P.M., Successfully developing a telemedicine system. J. Telemed. Telecare 11:7 (2005), 331–335.
43. [43] Sood, S., et al. What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. Telemed. e-Health 13:5 (2007), 573–590.
44. [44] Greenhalgh, T., et al. The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis. BMJ Open, 2(4), 2012, e001574.
45. [45] McCartney, M., Show us the evidence for telehealth. BMJ, 344, 2012.
46. [46] Steventon, A., et al. Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ, 344, 2012.
47. [47] Fatehi, F., Wootton, R., Telemedicine, telehealth or e-health? A bibliometric analysis of the trends in the use of these terms. J. Telemed. Telecare 18:8 (2012), 460–464.
48. [48] Campion, T.R., Gadd, C.S., Peers, regulators, and professions: the influence of organizations in health information technology adoption. AMIA. Annual Symposium Proceedings/AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium, 2010, 2010, 86–90.
49. [49] Gabriel, M.H., et al. Progress and challenges: implementation and use of health information technology among critical-access hospitals. Health Aff. (Millwood) 33:7 (2014), 1262–1270.
50. [50] Georgiou, A., Westbrook, J.I., Braithwaite, J., An empirically-derived approach for investigating health information technology: the elementally entangled organisational communication (EEOC) framework. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 12(1), 2012.
51. [51] Lewis, D., et al. Understanding the role of technology in health information systems. Pac. Health Dialog. 18:1 (2012), 144–154.
52. [52] Restuccia, J.D., et al. Hospital implementation of health information technology and quality of care: are they related?. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 12(1), 2012, p109.
53. [53] Stokes, C.J., The electronic health revolution: how health information technology is changing medicine—and the obstacles in its way. Health Law Policy Brief, 2012 forthcoming.
54. [54] Themistocleous, M., Morabito, V., How can user-centred design affect the acceptance and adoption of service oriented healthcare information systems?. Int. J. Healthcare Technol. Manage. 13:5–6 (2012), 321–344.
55. [55] Waterson, P., Health information technology and sociotechnical systems: a progress report on recent developments within the UK National Health Service (NHS). Appl. Ergon. 45:2 PA (2014), 150–161.
56. [56] AbouZahr, C., Boerma, T., Health information systems: the foundations of public health. Bull. World Health Organ. 83:8 (2005), 578–583.
57. [57] Ellingsen, G., Monteiro, E., The organizing vision of integrated health information systems. Health Inform. J. 14:3 (2008), 223–236.
58. [58] Fichman, R.G., Kohli, R., Krishnan, R., Editorial overview-the role of information systems in healthcare: current research and future trends. Inform. Syst. Res. 22:3 (2011), 419–428.
59. [59] Haux, R., Health information systems–past, present, future. Int. J. Med. Inf. 75:3–4 (2006), 268–281.
60. [60] McCullough, J.S., The adoption of hospital information systems. Health Econ. 17:5 (2008), 649–664.
61. [61] O'Carroll, P.W., et al. Public Health Informatics and Information Systems. 2002, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York.
62. [62] Tsiknakis, M., Katehakis, D.G., Orphanoudakis, S.C., An open, component-based information infrastructure for integrated health information networks. Int. J. Med. Inf. 68:1–3 (2002), 3–26.
63. [63] Jirotka, M., et al. Collaboration and trust in healthcare innovation: the eDiaMoND case study. Comput. Support. Cooper. Work (CSCW) 14:4 (2005), 369–398.
64. [64] May, C., Agency and implementation: understanding the embedding of healthcare innovations in practice. Social Sci. Med. 78 (2013), 26–33.
65. [65] Bigus, J.P., et al. Information technology for healthcare transformation. IBM J. Res. Dev., 55(5), 2011.
66. [66] Lynch, K., et al. The health IT regional extension center program: evolution and lessons for health care transformation. Health Serv. Res. 49:1 pt 2 (2014), 421–437.
67. [67] Aggelidis, V.P., Chatzoglou, P.D., Methods for evaluating hospital information systems: a literature review. EuroMed J. Bus. 3:1 (2008), 99–118.
68. [68] Farzandipour, M., Sadoughi, F., Meidani, Z., Hospital information systems user needs analysis: a vendor survey. J. Health Inform. Dev. Countries, 5(1), 2011.
69. [69] Ford, E.W.P., et al. Hospital IT adoption strategies associated with implementation success: implications for achieving meaningful use/PRACTITIONER APPLICATION. J. Healthc. Manag. 55:3 (2010), 175–188 discussion 188–189.
70. [70] Lee, H.W., Ramayah, T., Zakaria, N., External factors in hospital information system (HIS) adoption model: a case on Malaysia. J. Med. Syst. 36:4 (2012), 2129–2140.
71. [71] Yusof, M.M., et al. Investigating evaluation frameworks for health information systems. Int. J. Med. Inf. 77:6 (2008), 377–385.
72. [72] World Health Organisation, eHealth at WHO. Available from: http://www.who.int/ehealth/about/en/.
73. [73] Eysenbach, G., What is e-health?. J. Med. Internet Res., 3(2), 2001, pe20.
74. [74] Cresswell, K.M., Robertson Sheikh, A.A., Lessons learned from England's national electronic health record implementation: implications for the international community. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium, 2012 ACM.
75. [75] Morrow, E., et al. Implementing large-scale quality improvement. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 25:4 (2012), 237–253.
76. [76] Steventon, A., et al. Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ, 344, 2012.
77. [77] Abraham, C., Junglas, I., From cacophony to harmony: a case study about the IS implementation process as an opportunity for organizational transformation at Sentara Healthcare. J. Strateg. Inform. Syst. 20:2 (2011), 177–197.
78. [78] Noel, H.C., et al. Home telehealth reduces healthcare costs. Telemed. J. E-Health 10:2 (2004), 170–183.
79. [79] Hawn, C., Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Aff. (Millwood) 28:2 (2009), 361–368.
80. [80] Doherty, N.F., Ashurst, C., Peppard, J., Factors affecting the successful realisation of benefits from systems development projects: findings from three case studies. J. Inform. Technol. 27:1 (2012), 1–16.
81. [81] Gauld, R., Goldfinch, S., Dangerous Enthusiasms: E-Government, Computer Failure and Information Systems Development. 2016, Univ of Otago Pr, 2006.
82. [82] Shpilberg, D., et al. Avoiding the alignment trap in IT. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev., 49(1), 2007, 51.
83. [83] Brokel, J.M., Harrison, M.I., Redesigning care processes using an electronic health record: a system's experience. Joint Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf./Joint Comm. Resour. 35:2 (2009), 82–92.
84. [84] Doolan, D.F., Bates, D.W., James, B.C., The use of computers for clinical care: a case series of advanced US sites. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10:1 (2003), 94–107.
85. [85] Guard, J.R., et al. Integrated advanced information management systems: a twenty-year history at the University of Cincinnati. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 92:2 (2004), 171–178.
86. [86] Kenney, C., Transforming Health Care: Virginia Mason Medical Center's Pursuit of the Perfect Patient Experience. 2012, CRC Press.
87. [87] Takian, A., Envisioning electronic health record systems as change management: the experience of an English hospital joining the National Programme for Information Technology. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 180 (2012), 901–905.
88. [88] Car, J., Huckvale, K., Hermens, H., Telehealth for long term conditions. BMJ, 344, 2012, pe4201.
89. [89] Ash, J.S., Berg, M., Coiera, E., Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 11:2 (2004), 104–112.
90. [90] Caudill-Slosberg, M., Weeks, W.B., Case study: identifying potential problems at the human/technical interface in complex clinical systems. Am. J. Med. Qual. 20:6 (2005), 353–357.
91. [91] Han, Y.Y., et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 116:6 (2005), 1506–1512.
92. [92] Harrison, M.I., Koppel, R., Bar-Lev, S., Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care—an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 14:5 (2007), 542–549.
93. [93] Koppel, R., et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 293:10 (2005), 1197–1203.
94. [94] Wachter, R.M., Expected and unanticipated consequences of the quality and information technology revolutions. JAMA 295:23 (2006), 2780–2783.
95. [95] Ellingsen, G., Monteiro, E., et al. The slight surprise of integration. Sorensen, C., (eds.) Designing Ubiquitous Information Environments: Socio-Technical Issues and Challenges, 2005, Springer Science & Business Media, 261–274.
96. [96] Bloomrosen, M., et al. Anticipating and addressing the unintended consequences of health IT and policy: a report from the AMIA 2009 Health Policy Meeting. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 18:1 (2011), 82–90.
97. [97] Holden, R.J., Cognitive performance-altering effects of electronic medical records: an application of the human factors paradigm for patient safety. Cognit. Technol. Work 13:1 (2011), 11–29.
98. [98] Ash, J.S., et al. The unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry: findings from a mixed methods exploration. Int. J. Med. Inf. 78:1 (2009), 69–76.
99. [99] Campbell, E.M., et al. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13:5 (2006), 547–556.
100. [100] Anderson, J.G., Social, ethical and legal barriers to e-health. Int. J. Med. Inf. 76:5 (2007), 480–483.
101. [101] Fairbrother, G., et al. Cincinnati Beacon Community Program highlights challenges and opportunities on the path to care transformation. Health Affairs (Project Hope) 33:5 (2014), 871–877.
102. [102] Meadors, M., et al. Going live implementing an electronic health record system in the emergency department. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care, 2014 SAGE Publications.
103. [103] May, C., A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Serv. Res., 6(1), 2006, 1.
104. [104] Cho, S., Mathiassen, L., Nilsson, A., Contextual dynamics during health information systems implementation: an event-based actor-network approach. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. 17:6 (2008), 614–630.
105. [105] Miller, R.H., Sim, I., Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff. (Millwood) 23:2 (2004), 116–126.
106. [106] Powers, P., E-health leads nova scotia's healthcare transformation. Healthc. Q. (Toronto, Ont.) 12:4 (2009), 116–121.
107. [107] Johnson, C., Why did that happen? Exploring the proliferation of barely usable software in healthcare systems. Qual. Saf. Health Care 15:Suppl. 1 (2006), i76–i81.
108. [108] Blumenthal, D., Tavenner, M., The meaningful use regulation for electronic health records. New Engl. J. Med. 363:6 (2010), 501–504.
109. [109] Jha, A.K., Meaningful use of electronic health records: the road ahead. JAMA 304:15 (2010), 1709–1710.
110. [110] Brender, J., Handbook of Evaluation Methods for Health Informatics. 2006, Academic Press.
111. [111] Oates, B.J., Wainwright Edwards, D.W.H.M., Endless Bad Projects or Evidence-Based Practice? An Agenda for Action, in Grand Successes and Failures in IT, Public and Private Sectors. 2013, Springer, 619–624.
112. [112] Ammenwerth, E., et al. Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. Int. J. Med. Inf. 73 (2004), 479–491.
113. [113] Talmon, J., et al. The VATAM guidelines. Int. J. Med. Inf. 56:1–3 (1999), 107–115.
114. [114] Plsek, P.E., Greenhalgh, T., The challenge of complexity in health care. Br. Med. J., 323(7313), 2001, 625.
115. [115] Shiell, A., Hawe, P., Gold, L., Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ: Br. Med. J. 336:7656 (2008), 1281–1283.
116. [116] Murray, E., et al. Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study. Implement. Sci., 6(1), 2011.
117. [117] Sharma, U., Barnett, J., Clarke, M., Understanding Innovation Deployment and Evaluation in Healthcare: The Triality Framework. 2012, INTECH Open Access Publisher.
118. [118] Whitten, P., Kingsley, C., Grigsby, J., Results of a meta-analysis of cost-benefit research: is this a question worth asking?. J. Telemed. Telecare, 2000, 6.
119. [119] Kaplan, H.C., et al. The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q. 88:4 (2010), 500–559.
120. [120] Chiasson, M.W., Davidson, E., Pushing the contextual envelope: developing and diffusing IS theory for health information systems research. Inform. Org. 14:3 (2004), 155–188.
121. [121] Greenhalgh, T., et al. Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory. BMJ, 337, 2008.
122. [122] Holden, R.J., Karsh, B.-T., A theoretical model of health information technology usage behaviour with implications for patient safety. Behav. Inform. Technol. 28:1 (2009), 21–38.
123. [123] Macfarlane, F., et al. Achieving and sustaining profound institutional change in healthcare: case study using neo-institutional theory. Social Sci. Med. 80 (2013), 10–18.
124. [124] Murray, E., et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med., 8(1), 2010, 1.
125. [125] Cho, S., A Contextualist Approach to Telehealth Innovations. 2007, Georgia State University, Ann Arbor, 164.
126. [126] Craig, P., et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 337, 2008.
127. [127] Nykänen, P., et al. Guideline for good evaluation practice in health informatics (GEP-HI). Int. J. Med. Inf. 80:12 (2011), 815–827.
128. [128] Yusof, M.M., et al. An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). Int. J. Med. Inf. 77:6 (2008), 386–398.
129. [129] Ammenwerth, E., Iller, C., Mahler, C., IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 6, 2006, p3.
130. [130] Degeling, P., Carr, A., Leadership for the systemization of health care: the unaddressed issue in health care reform. J. Health Organ Manag. 18:6 (2004), 399–414.
131. [131] Dickson, G., Transformations in Canadian health systems leadership: an analytical perspective. Leadersh. Health Serv. 22:4 (2013), 292–305.
132. [132] Erskine, J., et al. Leadership and transformational change in healthcare organisations: a qualitative analysis of the North East Transformation System. Health Serv. Manage. Res. 26:1 (2013), 29–37.
133. [133] White, M., Wells, J., Butterworth, T., Leadership, a key element of quality improvement in healthcare. Results from a literature review of Lean Healthcare and the Productive Ward: releasing time to care initiative. Int. J. Leadersh. Public Serv. 9:3/4 (2011), 90–108.
134. [134] Bernstein, M.L., McCreless, T., Côté, M.J., Five constants of information technology adoption in healthcare. Hosp. Top. 85:1 (2007), 17–25.
135. [135] Harrison, M.I., Kimani, J., Building capacity for a transformation initiative: system redesign at Denver Health. Health Care Manage. Rev. 34:1 (2009), 42–53.
136. [136] Szydlowski, S., Smith, C., Perspectives from nurse leaders and chief information officers on health information technology implementation. Hosp. Top. 87:1 (2009), 3–9.
137. [137] Thomson, F., et al. Understanding the impact of information technology on interactions between patients and healthcare professionals: the INTERACT-IT study. Health Serv. J., 2012(Suppl), 2016, P46.
138. [138] Anderson, L.K., Stafford, C.J., The big bang implementation: not for the faint of heart. Comput. Nurs. 20:1 (2002), 14–20 quiz 20–22.
139. [139] Hunter, D.J., et al. Doing transformational change in the English NHS in the context of big bang redisorganisation: findings from the North East transformation system. J. Health Organ Manag. 29:1 (2011), 10–24.
140. [140] Fleuren, M., Wiefferink, K., Paulussen, T., Determinants of innovation within health care organizations. Lit. Rev. Delphi study 16:2 (2004), 107–123.
141. [141] Greenhalgh, T., et al. Introducing a nationally shared electronic patient record: case study comparison of Scotland, England,Wales and Northern Ireland. Int. J. Med. Inf. 82:5 (2013), e125–e138.
142. [142] Thomas, R., et al. Information management and technology in England's large acute NHS hospitals: national strategy versus local reality. J. Manag. Med. 9:1 (1995), 40–49.
143. [143] Doolan-Noble, F., et al. How well does your healthcare system perform: tracking progress toward the triple aim using system level measures. N. Z. Med. J. 128:1415 (2014), 44–50.
144. [144] Ludwick, D.A., Doucette, J., Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int. J. Med. Inf. 78:1 (2009), 22–31.
145. [145] Waterson, P., Hoonakker, P.L.T., Carayon, P., Special issue on human factors and the implementation of health information technology (HIT): comparing approaches across nations. Int. J. Med. Inf. 82:5 (2013), 277–280.
146. [146] Geissbuhler, A., Lessons learned implementing a regional health information exchange in Geneva as a pilot for the Swiss national eHealth strategy. Int. J. Med. Inf. 82:5 (2013), e118–e124.
147. [147] Udechukwu, O., et al. Softer perspectives on enhancing the patient experience using IS/IT. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 23:2 (2010), 187–208.
148. [148] Pare, G., et al. Prioritizing the risk factors influencing the success of clinical information system projects. Methods Inf. Med. 47:3 (2008), 251–259.
149. [149] Caccia-Bava, M.d.C., Guimaraes, V.C.K., Guimaraes, T., Testing some major determinants for hospital innovation success. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 22:5 (2013), 454–470.
150. [150] Takian, A., Envisioning electronic health record systems as change management: the experience of an English hospital joining the National Programme for Information Technology. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 180 (2012), 901–905.
151. [151] Keshavjee, K., et al. A complex adaptive systems perspective of health information technology implementation. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 183 (2013), 209–213.
152. [152] Sherer, S.A., et al. Integrating commercial ambulatory electronic health records with hospital systems: an evolutionary process. Int. J. Med. Inf. 84:9 (2015), 683–693.
153. [153] Kushniruk, A., et al. Integrating technology-centric and user-centric system testing methods: ensuring healthcare system usability and safety. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2010.
154. [154] Politi, L., et al. Use patterns of health information exchange systems and admission decisions: reductionistic and configurational approaches. Int. J. Med. Inf. 84:12 (2016), 1029–1038.
155. [155] Brailer, D.J., Interoperability: the key to the future health care system. Health affairs, 24, 2005, W5.
156. [156] Park, H., et al. Can a health information exchange save healthcare costs? Evidence from a pilot program in South Korea. Int. J. Med. Inf. 84:9 (2015), 658–666.
157. [157] Walker, J., et al. The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health affairs, 24, 2005, pW5.
158. [158] Eden, K.B., et al. Barriers and facilitators to exchanging health information: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inf. 88 (2016), 44–51.
159. [159] Hersh, W., Health care information technology: progress and barriers. JAMA 292:18 (2004), 2273–2274.
160. [160] Holden, R.J., Karsh, B.-T., The Technology Acceptance Model: its past and its future in health care. J. Biomed. Inform. 43:1 (2010), 159–172.
161. [161] Zainuddin, E., Bassellier, G., Benbasat, I., Outsourcing projects success: the role of competence and leadership of the vendors and clients project managers. Proceedings of the 2010 Special Interest Group on Management Information System's 48th Annual Conference on Computer Personnel Research on Computer Personnel Research, 2010 ACM.
162. [162] Lorenzi, N.M., Riley, R.T., Organizational issues=change. Int. J. Med. Inf. 69:2–3 (2003), 197–203.
163. [163] Kaplan, B., Harris-Salamone, K.D., Health IT success and failure: recommendations from literature and an AMIA workshop. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 16:3 (2009), 291–299.
164. [164] Gagnon, M.P., et al. Telehealth adoption in hospitals: an organisational perspective. J. Health Organ Manag. 19:1 (2005), 32–56.
165. [165] Ancker, J.S., et al. The Triangle Model for evaluating the effect of health information technology on healthcare quality and safety. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 19(1), 2012, 61.
166. [166] Powell-Cope, G., Nelson, A.L., Patterson, E.S., Patient care technology and safety. Hughes, R., (eds.) Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-based Handbook for Nurses, 2008, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville MD.
167. [167] Morrison, Z., Understanding the implementation and adoption of the NHS Care Records Service (CRS) in english secondary care, in looking back, moving forward: capturing lessons and building the evidence base for health informatics. The Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme, 2012, University of Birmingham.
168. [168] Takian, A., Sheikh, A., Barber, N., We are bitter, but we are better off: case study of the implementation of an electronic health record system into a mental health hospital in England. BMC Health Serv. Res., 12, 2012, 484.
169. [169] Hendy, J., et al. Challenges to implementing the national programme for information technology (NPfIT): a qualitative study. BMJ 331:7512 (2005), 331–336.
170. [170] Rivard, S., Lapointe, L., Information technology implementers' responses to user resistance: nature and effects. MIS Q. 36:3 (2012), 897–920.
171. [171] Waterson, P., A critical review of the systems approach within patient safety research. Ergonomics 52:10 (2009), 1185–1195.
172. [172] Ammenwerth, E., Rigby, M., Evidence-Based Health Informatics: Promoting Safety and Efficiency Through Scientific Methods and Ethical Policy, vol. 222, 2016, IOS Press.