Lessons learned from England's national electronic health record implementation: Implications for the international community

IHI'12 - Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 685-689

  Cresswell, Kathrin M ^a   Robertson, Ann ^a   Sheikh, Aziz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electronic health records; National implementation; Sociotechnical evaluation

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; DATA SOURCE; EHR SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; ENGLAND; FIELD NOTES; INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY; INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS; NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION; NATIONAL PROGRAM; NATIONAL STRATEGIES; PLANNING AND EXECUTION; RELATIONSHIP BUILDING; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; SOCIOTECHNICAL; SOFTWARE CHARACTERISTIC; TOPDOWN; USER INVOLVEMENT;

DATA PROCESSING; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE; HOSPITALS;

RECORDS MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84857750927     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2110363.2110441     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Catwell L, Sheikh A. Information technology system users must be allowed to decide on the future direction of major national IT initiatives. Inform Prim Care 2009; 17(1):1-4.
2. Protti D. Comparison of information technology in general practice in 10 countries. Healthcare Quarterly 2007; 10(2):107-115.
3. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144:742-752. (Pubitemid 46780634)
4. Cresswell K, Sheikh A. The NHS Care Record Service: recommendations from the literature on successful implementation and adoption. Inform Prim Care 2009; 17(3):153-160.
5. Friedman C, Abbas U. Is medical informatics a mature science? A review of measurement practice in outcome studies of clinical systems. Int J Med Inform 2003; 69(2-3):261-272. (Pubitemid 38373284)
6. Greenhalgh T, Potts H, Wong G, Bark P, Swinglehurst D. Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the metanarrative method. Milbank Q 2009; 87(4):729-788.
7. Black A, Car J, Pagliari C, Anandan C, Cresswell K. The Impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med 2011; 8(1).
8. Shekelle P, Goldzweig C. Costs and benefits of health information technology: an updated systematic review. 2009. London, RAND Corporation.
9. Lorenzi N, Novak L, Weiss J, Gadd C, Unertl K. Crossing the implementation chasm: a proposal for bold action. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15(3):290-296. (Pubitemid 351626626)
10. Coiera E. Building a National Health IT system from the middle out. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16(3):271-273.
11. Brennan S. The biggest computer programme in the world ever! How's it going? JITE 2007; 22:201-211.
12. Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, Byrne E, Russell J, Hinder S et al. The devil's in the detail: final report of the independent evaluation of the Summary Care Record and Health Space programmes. 2010. University College London.
13. Hendy J, Fulop N, Reeves B, Hutchings A, Collin S. Implementing the NHS information technology programme: qualitative study of progress in acute trusts. BMJ 2007; 334(7608):1360.
14. Public Accounts Committee. The National Programme for IT in the NHS: progress since 2006. 2009.
15. Cornford T, Doukidis G, Forster D. Experience with a structure, process and outcome framework for evaluating and information system. Omega 1994; 22(5):491-504. (Pubitemid 124016169)
16. Cresswell K, Worth A, Sheikh A. Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Med Inf Dec Mak 2010; 10(1):67.
17. Cresswell K, Ali M, Avery A, Barber N, Cornford T, Crowe S et al. The long and winding road...an independent evaluation of the implementation and adoption of the NHS Care Records Service in secondary care in England. http://www.haps.bham.ac.uk/publichealth/cfhep/005.shtml. 2011.
18. George A, Bennett A. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. London, England: MIT Press Cambridge, 2005.
19. Stake R. The art of case study research. London: Sage, 1995.
20. Yin R. Case study research, design and methods. London: Sage, 2009.
21. Patton M. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. London: Sage, 2002.
22. Silverman D. Doing qualitative research, a practical handbook. London: Sage, 2000.
23. Peters T, Waterman R. In search of excellence: lessons from America's best run companies. New York: Harper and Row, 1982.
24. Becker H. Sociological work. London: Allen Lane, 1971.
25. Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage, 1984.
26. Corbin J, Strauss A. Strategies for qualitative data analysis. CA: Sage, 2008.
27. Mays N, Pope C. Quality in qualitative health research. London: BMJ Publication Group, 1999.
28. Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int J Med Inform 2001; 64:143-156. (Pubitemid 33089342)
29. Beynon-Davies P, Lloyd-Williams P. When health information systems fail. Top Health Inf Manage 1999; 19(4):66-79.
30. Bingi P, Sharma M, Godla JK. Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation. ISM 2001; 16(3):7-14.
31. Brender J, Ammenwerth E, Nykänen P, Talmon J. Factors influencing success and failure of health informatics systems - a pilot Delphi study. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45(1):125-136. (Pubitemid 44044721)
32. Glaser J. More on management's role in IT project failure. Healthc Financ Manage 2005; 59:82-89.
33. Goldfinch S. Pessimism, computer failure, and information systems development in the public sector. Pub Adm Rev 2007; 67:917-929.
34. Heeks R. Health information systems: Failure, success and improvisation. Int J Med Inf 2006; 75:125-137. (Pubitemid 43162397)
35. McManus J, Wood-Harper T. Understanding the sources of information systems project failure. Manag Serv 2007;38-43.
36. Pare G, Sicotte C, Jaana M, Girouard D. Prioritizing the risk factors influencing the success of clinical information system projects. A Delphi study in Canada. Meth Inf Med 2008; 47(3):251-259. (Pubitemid 351723970)
37. Wears R, Cook R, Perry S. Automation, interaction, complexity, and failure: A case study. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2006; 91.
38. Wing L. Investigating success factors in enterprise application integration: a case-driven analysis. EJIS 2005; 14(2):175-187.
39. Department of Health. Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS. 2010.
40. Cabinet Office. Government ICT Strategy. http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/ content/government-ictstrategy. 2011.
41. Craig D. Plundering the Public Sector. London: Constable, 200