Redesigning care processes using an electronic health record: A system's experience

Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 82-92

  Brokel, Jane M ^a,b   Harrison, Michael I ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b TRINITY HEALTH   (United States)

^c AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HOSPITAL SERVICE; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MEDICAL RECORD; NEWBORN; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PREGNANCY;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; FEMALE; HOSPITAL SHARED SERVICES; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PREGNANCY;

EID: 61349127749     PISSN: 15537250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1553-7250(09)35011-4     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Stead W.W., Kelly B.J., Kolodner J.M.: Achievable steps toward building a national health information infrastructure in the United States. J Am Med Inform Assoc 12:113-120, Mar.-Apr. 2005. Epub Nov. 23, 2004.
2. Balas M.C., Scott L.D., Rogers A.E.: The prevalence and nature of errors and near errors reported by hospital staff nurses. Appl Nurs Res 17:224-230, Nov. 2004.
3. Bates D.W., Gawande A.A.: Patient safety: Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med 348:2526-2534, Jun. 19, 2003.
4. Institute of Medicine: Fostering Rapid Advances in Health Care: Learning from System Demonstrations. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002.
5. Kawamoto K., et al.: Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: A systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 330:765-768, Apr. 2, 2005. Epub Mar. 14, 2005.
6. Ash J.S., Berg M., Coiera E.: Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11:104-112, Mar.-Apr. 2004. Epub Nov. 21, 2003.
7. Ash J.S., et al.: Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Inform 76:S21-S27, Jun. 2007. Epub Jun. 21, 2006.
8. Campbell E., et al.: Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 13:547-556, Sep.-Oct. 2006. Epub Jun. 23, 2006.
9. Schneider J.E., Schneider K.H.: Report on Electronic Health Record - Associated Errors and Near Miss Reporting Systems. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Jun. 30, 2006.
10. Silverstein S.: Sociotechnologic Issues in Clinical Computing: Common Examples of Healthcare IT Failures. http://www.ischool.drexel.edu/faculty/ ssilverstein/failurecases/ (last accessed Dec. 10, 2008)
11. Linder J.A., et al.: Electronic health record use and the quality of the ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med 167:1400-1405, Jul. 9, 2007.
12. Han Y.Y., et al.: Unexpected increase in mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 116:1506-1512, Dec. 2005.
13. Garg A.X., et al.: Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. JAMA 293:1223-1238, Mar. 9, 2005.
14. Koppel R., et al.: Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 293:1197-1203, Mar. 9, 2005.
15. Thompson C, et al.: Barriers to evidence-based practice in primary care nursing: Viewing decision-making as context is helpful. J Adv Nurs 52:432-444, Nov. 2005.
16. Institute of Medicine: Preventing Medication Errors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006.
17. Chaudhry B., et al.: Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 144:742-752, May 16, 2006. Epub Apr. 11, 2006.
18. Middleton B., et al.: Accelerating U.S. EHR adoption: How to get there from here. Recommendations based on the 2004 ACMI retreat. J Am Med Inform Assoc 12:13-19, Jan.-Feb. 2005. Epub Oct. 18, 2004.
19. Gans D., et al.: Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Health Aff (Millwood) 24:1323-1333, Sep.-Oct. 2005.
20. Ash J.S., Bates D.W.: Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: Report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J Am Med Inform Assoc 12:8-12, Jan.-Feb. 2005. Epub Oct. 18, 2004.
21. Sidorov J.: It ain't necessarily so: The electronic health record and the unlikely prospect of reducing health care costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 25:1079-1085, Jul.-Aug. 2006.
22. Poon E.G., et al.: Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood) 23:184-190, Jul.-Aug. 2004.
23. Wears R.L., Berg M.: Computer technology and clinical work: Still waiting for Godot. JAMA 293:1261-1263, Mar. 9, 2005.
24. Institute of Medicine: The 1st Annual Crossing the Quality Chasm Summit: A Focus on Communities, National Academies Press, 2004. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record-id=l 1085 (last accessed Dec. 9, 2008).
25. Bar Lev S., Harrison M.I.: Negotiating time scripts during implementation of an electronic medical record. Health Care Manage Rev 31:11-17, Jan.-Mar. 2006.
26. Harrison M., et al.: Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care: An interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14:542-547, Sep.-Oct. 2007. Epub Jun. 28, 2007.
27. Carayon P., Gurses A.P.: A human factors engineering conceptual framework of nursing workload and patient safety in intensive care units. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 21:284-301, Oct. 2005. Epub Feb. 24, 2005.
28. Cornford T.: Information systems and new technologies: Taking shape in use. In Avgerou C, La Rovere R. (eds.): Information Systems and the Economics of Innovation. London: Edward Elgar, 2003, pp. 1-16.
29. Hertzler B.: Informatics leadership: What chief nurse executives need to know. In Weaver C.A., et al. (eds.): Nursing and Informatics for the 21st Century: An International Look at Practice. Chicago: Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, 2006, pp. 67-74.
30. Institute of Healthcare Improvement: 5 Million Lives Campaign. http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Programs/Campaign/ (last accessed Dec. 9, 2008).
31. The Joint Commission: Sentinel Event. http://www.jointcommission. org/SentinelEvents/ (last accessed Dec. 9, 2008).
32. Titler M.G., Everett L.Q.: Translating research into practice. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 13:587-604, Dec. 2001.
33. Crandall D., et al.: Redesigning care delivery through health IT implementation: Trinity Health's approach. J Healthc Inf Manag 21:41-48, Fall 2007.
34. Conlon P.: Trinity Health-Project Genesis 2007. For Michigan Health and Hospital Association. http://www.iom.edu/File.aspx?ID=54123 (last accessed Dec. 10, 2008).
35. DeCola K., Tingwall C: Community Benefit Ministry Trinity Health 2007 Annual Report. http://www.trinity-health.org/contentportal/groups/public/ @wcmthho/documents/publicationsanddocuments/trinity-health-annualreport-07.pdf (last accessed Dec. 10, 2008).
36. Greenhalgh T., et al.: Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 82:581-629, Dec. 2004.
37. van der Meijden M.J., et al.: Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: A literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 10:235-243, May-Jun. 2003.
38. Cheng C.G., et al.: The effects of CPOE on ICU work flow: An observational study. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003, pp. 150-154.
39. Kaushal R., Shojania K.G., Bates D.W.: Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: A systematic review. Arch Intern Med 163:1409-1416, Jun. 23, 2003.