How well does your healthcare system perform? Tracking progress toward the triple aim using system level measures

New Zealand Medical Journal

Volumn 128, Issue 1415, 2015, Pages 44-50

  Doolan Noble, Fiona ^a   Lyndon, Mataroria ^b   Hau, Sybil ^c   Hill, Andrew ^b   Gray, Jonathan ^c   Gauld, Robin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c Counties Manukau Health ^*  (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEM; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; NEW ZEALAND; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; NEW ZEALAND; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84940980882     PISSN: 00288446     EISSN: 11758716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. World Health Organisation. The World Health Report 2000: improving health system performance. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2001.
2. Papanicolas I, Kringos D, Klazinga N, Smith P. Health system performance comparison: New directions in research and policy. Health Policy. 2013;112:1-3.
3. Mays N, Marney J, King E. Fiscal challenges and changing pattern of need for health and long term care in New Zealand. Policy Quarterly. 2013;9(4):35-46.
4. Cumming J. Integrated care in New Zealand. Int J of Integr Care. 2011;11(18th November).
5. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Towards high-performing health systems. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2004.
6. Fronger B, Anderson G, Hussey P. Multinational comparisons of health systems data, 2005. Commonwealth Fund, 2006.
7. Veillard J, McKeag A, Tipper B, et al. Methods to stimulate national and sub-national benchmarking through international health system performance comparisons: A Canadian approach. Health Policy. 2013;112:141-7.
8. Gauld R, Al-wahaibi S, Chisholm J, et al. Scorecards for health system performance assessment: the New Zealand example. Health Policy. 2011;103:200-8.
9. Expert Advisory Group. Integrated Performance and Incentive Framework. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2014.
10. Chaudhry M, Gauld R, Horsburgh S. Hospital quality-of-care performance measurement and reporting: what New Zealand can learn from the United States and the United Kingdom. NZMJ. 2012;125. 1366.
11. Counties Manukau District Health Board. About Counties Manukau District Health Board. Available from: http://www.coun-tiesmanukau.health.nz/about_cmdhb/overview/printpopulationprofile.pdf
12. Ministry of Health. Report on Maternity, 2010. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2012.
13. BC Patient Safety and Quality Council. Measurement strategies for improving the quality of care: A review of best practice. Vancouver (BC): BC Patient Safety and Quality Council, 2010.
14. Martin L, Nelson E, Lloyd R, Nolan T. Whole of System Measures: IHI Innovation Series White Paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute of Healthcare Improvement, 2007.
15. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC): 2001.
16. Foster T, Johnson J, Nelson E, Batalden P. Using a Malcolm Baldrige framework to understand high-performing clinical microsystems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(5):334-41.
17. Berwick D, Nolan T, Whittington J. The Triple Aim: Care, health and cost. Health Aff. 2008;27(3):759-69.
18. Veillard JHM. Performance management in health systems and services: Studies on its development and use at international, national/jurisdictional, and hospital levels. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam; 2012.
19. Veillard J, Kadandale S N K. International health system comparisons: from measurement challenge to management tool. In: Smith P, Mossialos E, Papanicolas I, Leatherman S, editors. Performance Measurement for Health System Improvement Experiences, Challenges and Prospects Cambridge University Press 2010.
20. Forde I, Morgan D, Klazinga N. Resolving the challenges in the international comparison of health systems: The must do’s and the trade-offs. Health Policy. 2013;112(1-2):4-8.
21. Powell A, White K, Partin M, et al. More than a score: a qualitative study of ancillary benefits of performance measurement. BMJ Qual Saf online. 2014;23:651-8.
22. Atalag K, Gu Y, Pollock M. A stocktake of New Zealand’s healthcare datasets. Health Informatics New Zealand Conference; Rotorua, 2013.
23. Groene O, Kristensen S, Arah O, et al. Feasibility of usiing administrative data to compare hospital performance in the EU. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014; 26(S1):108-15.