Intraoperative Computed Tomography Imaging for Navigated Laparoscopic Renal Surgery: First Clinical Experience

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 1105-1111

  Simpfendörfer, Tobias ^a   Gasch, Claudia ^a   Hatiboglu, Gencay ^a   Müller, Michael ^b   Maier Hein, Lena ^c   Hohenfellner, Markus ^a   Teber, Dogu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b mbits imaging GmbH   (Germany)

^c GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

cone beam computed tomography; fluoroscopy; image guided surgery; laparoscopy; nephrectomy

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KIDNEY ARTERY; KIDNEY TUMOR; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; ANIMAL; INTRAOPERATIVE MONITORING; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PATIENT SAFETY; PIG; PROCEDURES; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; ANIMALS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; NEPHRECTOMY; PATIENT SAFETY; RENAL ARTERY; SWINE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84990862430     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0385     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Choi JE, You JH, Kim DK, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2015;67:891-901.
2. Gill IS, Colombo JR, Frank I, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors. J Urol 2005;174:850-854.
3. Ukimura O, Haber GP, Remer EM, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for incidental stage pT2 or worse tumors. Urology 2006;68:976-982.
4. Klatte T, Ficarra V, Gratzke C, et al. A literature review of renal surgical anatomy and surgical strategies for partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2015;68:980-920.
5. Rassweiler J, Rassweiler MC, Müller M, et al. Surgical navigation in urology: European perspective. Curr Opin Urol 2014;24:81-97.
6. Herrell SD, Galloway RL, Su LM. Image-guided robotic surgery: Update on research and potential applications in urologic surgery. Curr Opin Urol 2012;22:47-54.
7. Baumhauer M, Simpfendörfer T, Schwarz R, et al. Soft tissue navigation for laparoscopic prostatectomy: Evaluation of camera pose estimation for enhanced visualization. SPIE Medical Imaging 2007: Visualization and Image-Guided Procedures, 6509:650911-650923.
8. Nolden M, Zelzer S, Seitel A, et al. The medical imaging interaction toolkit: Challenges and advances: 10 years of open-source development. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2013;8:607-620.
9. Teber D, Guven S, Simpfendörfer T, et al. Augmented reality: A new tool to improve surgical accuracy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? preliminary in vitro and in vivo results. Eur Urol 2009;56:332-338.
10. Simpfendörfer T, Baumhauer M, Müller M, et al. Augmented reality visualization during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2011;25:1841-1845.
11. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: A comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009;182:844-853.
12. Haber GP, Gill IS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Contemporary technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 2006;49: 660-665.
13. Lattouf JB, Beri A, D'Ambros OFJ, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: Technique and results. Eur Urol 2008;54:409-416.
14. Geisbüsch P, Leszczynsky M, Kotelis D, et al. Open versus endovascular repair of acute aortic transections-A nonrandomized single-center analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2009;394:1101-1107.
15. Azzalini L, Sharma UC, Ghoshhajra BB, et al. Feasibility of C-arm computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2014; 8:33-43.
16. Kempfert J, Noettling A, John M, et al. Automatically segmented Dyna-CT: Enhanced imaging during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58: e211.
17. Su LM, Vagvolgyi BP, Agarwal R, et al. Augmented reality during robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Toward real-time 3D-CT to stereoscopic video registration. Urology 2009;73:896-900.
18. Schneider C, Nguan C, Longpre M, et al. Motion of the kidney between preoperative and intraoperative positioning. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2013;60:1619-1627.
19. Shekhar R, Dandekar O, Bhat V, et al. Live augmented reality: A new visualization method for laparoscopic surgery using continuous volumetric computed tomography. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1976-1985.
20. Kenngott HG, Wagner M, Gondan M, et al. Real-time image guidance in laparoscopic liver surgery: First clinical experience with a guidance system based on intraoperative CT imaging. Surg Endosc 2014;28:933-940.
21. Okhunov Z, Rais-Bahrami S, George AK, et al. The comparison of three renal tumor scoring systems: C-index, P.A.D.U.A., and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores. J Endourol 2011;25:1921-1924.
22. Leslie S, Gill I, de Castro Abreu AL, et al. Renal tumor contact surface area: A novel parameter for predicting complexity and outcomes of partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2014;66:884-893.
23. RassweilerMC, Banckwitz R, KoehlerC, et al. New developed urological protocols for the Uro Dyna-CT reduce radiation exposure of endourological patients below the levels of the low dose standard CT scans. World J Urol 2014;32:1213-1218.
24. Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2016;69:468-474.
25. Lipkin ME, Mancini JG, Toncheva G, et al. Organ-specific radiation dose rates and effective dose rates during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2012;26:439-443.
26. Lista G, Buffi GM, Lughezzani G, et al. Margin, ischemia, and complications system to report perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy: A european multicenter observational study (emos project). Urology 2015;85:589-595.
27. Tabayoyong W, Abouassaly R, Kiechle JE, et al. Variation in surgical margin status by surgical approach among patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for small renal masses. J Urol 2015;194:1548-1553.