Feasibility of C-arm computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 33-43

  Azzalini, Lorenzo ^a,b   Sharma, Umesh C ^a   Ghoshhajra, Brian B ^a   Elmariah, Sammy ^a   Inglessis, Ignacio ^a   Palacios, Igor F ^a   Abbara, Suhny ^a,c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortic annulus; Aortic root; C arm CT; Cone beam CT; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Indexed keywords

IODIXANOL; IOPAMIDOL;

AGED; ANATOMICAL CONCEPTS; AORTA; AORTA ANNULUS; AORTA ROOT; AORTA SINUS; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; C ARM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY SINUS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT PLANNING; VERY ELDERLY;

AORTIC ANNULUS; AORTIC ROOT; C-ARM CT; CONE-BEAM CT; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84896890267     PISSN: 19345925     EISSN: 1876861X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Nkomo V.T., Gardin J.M., Skelton T.N., Gottdiener J.S., Scott C.G., Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 2006, 368:1005-1011.
2. Vahanian A., Alfieri O., Andreotti F., et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J 2012, 33:2451-2496. Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).
3. Iung B., Baron G., Butchart E.G., et al. Aprospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 2003, 24:1231-1243.
4. Leon M.B., Smith C.R., Mack M., et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. NEngl J Med 2010, 363:1597-1607. PARTNER Trial Investigators.
5. Smith C.R., Leon M.B., Mack M.J., et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. NEngl J Med 2011, 364:2187-2198. PARTNER Trial Investigators.
6. Makkar R.R., Fontana G.P., Jilaihawi H., et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. NEngl J Med 2012, 366:1696-1704. PARTNER Trial Investigators.
7. Kodali S.K., Williams M.R., Smith C.R., et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. NEngl J Med 2012, 366:1686-1695. PARTNER Trial Investigators.
8. Leipsic J., Gurvitch R., LaBounty T.M., et al. Multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011, 4:416-429.
9. Détaint D., Lepage L., Himbert D., et al. Determinants of significant paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheteraortic valve implantation: impact of device andannulus discongruence. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009, 2:821-827.
10. Hutter A., Opitz A., Bleiziffer S., et al. Aortic annulus evaluation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010, 76:1009-1019.
11. Tops L.F., Wood D.A., Delgado V., et al. noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008, 1:321-330.
12. Schultz C.J., Moelker A., Piazza N., et al. Three dimensional evaluation of the aortic annulus using multislice computer tomography: are manufacturer's guidelines for sizing for percutaneous aortic valve replacement helpful?. Eur Heart J 2010, 31:849-856.
13. Ng A.C., Delgado V., van der Kley F., et al. Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2- and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010, 3:94-102.
14. Jánosi R.A., Kahlert P., Plicht B., et al. Measurement of the aortic annulus size by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2011, 20:85-94.
15. Kempfert J., Van Linden A., Lehmkuhl L., et al. Aortic annulus sizing: echocardiographic versus computed tomography derived measurements in comparison with direct surgical sizing. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012, 42:627-633.
16. Hayashida K., Bouvier E., Lefèvre T., et al. Impact of CT-guided valve sizing on post-procedural aortic regurgitation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention 2012, 8:546-555.
17. Achenbach S., Delgado V., Hausleiter J., Schoenhagen P., Min J.K., Leipsic J.A. SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement(TAVR). JCardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012, 6:366-380.
18. Schwartz J.G., Neubauer A.M., Fagan T.E., Noordhoek N.J., Grass M., Carroll J.D. Potential role of three-dimensional rotational angiography and C-arm CT for valvular repair and implantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011, 27:1205-1222.
19. Eide K.R., Ødegård A., Myhre H.O., Haraldseth O. Initial observations of endovascular aneurysm repair using Dyna-CT. JEndovasc Ther 2007, 14:50-53.
20. Kempfert J., Falk V., Schuler G., et al. Dyna-CT during minimally invasive off-pump transapical aortic valve implantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2009, 88:2041.
21. Zheng Y., John M., Liao R., et al. Automatic aorta segmentation and valve landmark detection in C-arm CT for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2012, 31:2307-2321.
22. Binder R.K., Leipsic J., Wood D., et al. Prediction of optimal deployment projection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: angiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction of the aortic root versus multidetector computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012, 5:247-252.
23. Poon K.K., Crowhurst J., James C., et al. Impact of optimising fluoroscopic implant angles on paravalvular regurgitation in transcatheter aortic valve replacements - utility of three-dimensional rotational angiography. EuroIntervention 2012, 8:538-545.
24. Lehmkuhl L.H., von Aspern K., Foldyna B., et al. Comparison of aortic root measurements in patients undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation (TA-AVI) using three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT): differences and variability. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013, 29:417-424.
25. Piazza N., de Jaegere P., Schultz C., Becker A.E., Serruys P.W., Anderson R.H. Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2008, 1:74-81.
26. Rixe J., Schuhbaeck A., Liebetrau C., et al. Multi-detector computed tomography is equivalent to trans-oesophageal echocardiography for the assessment of the aortic annulus before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Radiol 2012, 22:2662-2669.
27. Abbott P. On the perimeter of an ellipse. Math J 2009, 11:172-185.
28. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Measuring agreement in methodcomparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999, 8:135-160.