Margin, ischemia, and complications system to report perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy: A European multicenter observational study (EMOS project)

Urology

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 589-595

  Lista, Giuliana ^a   Buffi, Nicolò Maria ^a   Lughezzani, Giovanni ^a   Lazzeri, Massimo ^a   Abrate, Alberto ^a   Mistretta, Alessandro ^a   Larcher, Alessandro ^a   Dell'Oglio, Paolo ^a   Fossati, Nicola ^a   Porter, James ^b   Ficarra, Vincenzo ^c   Mottrie, Alexander ^c   Guazzoni, Giorgio ^a  

^a VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b Swedish Urology Group   (United States)

^c OLV HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOMYOLIPOMA; ARTICLE; COLON PERFORATION; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; ONCOCYTOMA; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PATIENT SAFETY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; TUMOR VOLUME; URETER FISTULA; URETERAL STENTING; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLINICAL TRIAL; EUROPE; EVALUATION STUDY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEPHRECTOMY; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WARM ISCHEMIA;

EID: 84926050653     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.068     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. B. Ljungberg, N.C. Cowan, and D.C. Hanbury EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update Eur Urol 58 2010 398 406
2. H. Van Poppel, L. Da Pozzo, and W. Albrecht A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma Eur Urol 51 2007 1606 1615
3. S.B. Riggs, J.C. Larochelle, and A.S. Belldegrun Partial nephrectomy: a contemporary review regarding outcomes and different techniques Cancer J 14 2008 302 307
4. I.S. Gill, L.R. Kavoussi, and B.R. Lane Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors J Urol 178 2007 41 46
5. O.M. Aboumarzouk, R.J. Stein, and R. Eyraud Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eur Urol 62 2012 1023 1033
6. D. Dindo, N. Demartines, and P.A. Clavien Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 2004 205 210
7. N. Buffi, G. Lista, and A. Larcher Margin, ischemia, and complications (mic) score in partial nephrectomy: a new system for evaluating achievement of optimal outcomes in nephron-sparing surgery Eur Urol 62 2012 617 618
8. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, and S. Secco Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumors in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery Eur Urol 56 2009 786 789
9. J.D. Choi, J.W. Park, and J.Y. Choi Renal damage caused by warm ischaemia during laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an assessment using Tc 99m-DTPA glomerular filtration rate Eur Urol 58 2010 900 905
10. R.H. Thompson, B.R. Lane, and C.M. Lohse Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy Eur Urol 58 2010 340 345
11. F. Becker, H. Van Poppel, and O.W. Hakenberg Assessing the impact of ischaemia time during partial nephrectomy Eur Urol 56 2009 625 635
12. V. Ficarra, A. Minervini, and A. Antonelli A multicentre matched-pair analysis comparing robot-assisted versus open partial nephrectomy BJU Int 113 2014 936 941
13. F.J. Bianco Jr., P.T. Scardino, and J.A. Eastham Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("Trifecta") Urology 66 5 suppl 2005 83 94
14. A.J. Hung, J. Cai, and M.N. Simmons "Trifecta" in partial nephrectomy J Urol 189 2013 36 42
15. A. Khalifeh, R. Autorino, and S.P. Hillyer Comparative outcomes and assessment of trifecta in 500 robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cases: a single surgeon experience J Urol 189 2013 1236 1242
16. E.O. Kwon, B.S. Carver, and M.E. Snyder Impact of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumours BJU Int 99 2007 286 289
17. M. Marszalek, M. Carini, and P. Chlosta Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery Eur Urol 61 2012 757 763
18. F. Porpiglia, C. Fiori, and R. Bertolo The effects of warm ischaemia time on renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with normal contralateral kidney World J Urol 30 2012 257 263
19. F. Porpiglia, C. Fiori, and R. Bertolo Long-term functional evaluation of the treated kidney in a prospective series of patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal tumors Eur Urol 62 2012 130 135
20. F. Porpiglia, J. Renard, and M. Billia Is renal warm ischemia over 30 minutes during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy possible? One-year results of a prospective study Eur Urol 52 2007 1170 1178
21. G. Spana, G.P. Haber, and L.M. Dulabon Complications after robotic partial nephrectomy at centers of excellence: multi-institutional analysis of 450 cases J Urol 186 2011 417 421
22. F. Porpiglia, R. Bertolo, and D. Amparone Margins, ischaemia and complications rate after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: impact of learning curve and tumor anatomical characteristics BJU Int 112 2013 1125 1132