Mapping social values of ecosystem services: What is behind the map?

Ecology and Society

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Nahuelhual, Laura ^a,b,c   Benra Ochoa, Felipe ^a   Rojas, Fernanda ^a   Ignacio Diaz G ^a   Carmona, Alejandra ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b Universidad Austral de Chile   (Chile)

^c University of Concepción   (Chile)

Author keywords

Cultural ecosystem services; Recreation opportunities; Social value mapping; Southern Chile

Indexed keywords

CARTOGRAPHY; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GIS; MAPPING; STAKEHOLDER;

CHILE;

EID: 84989157880     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-08676-210324     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bengston, D. N. 1994. Changing forest values and ecosystem management. Society & Natural Resources 7:515-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941929409380885
2. Benra, F. 2014. Mapeo del valor social del servicio ecosistémico oportunidades de recreación: Un caso de estudio en la comuna de Panguipulli, Región de los Ríos, Chile. Tesis Ingeniero en Conservación de Recursos Naturales. Valdivia, Chile. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Austral de Chile.
3. Brown, G. 2013. The relationship between social values for ecosystem services and global land cover: an empirical analysis. Ecosystem Services 5:58-68. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.004
4. Brown, T. C. 1984. The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Economics 60:231-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3146184
5. Bryan, B. A., C. M. Raymond, N. D. Crossman, and D. Hatton- MacDonald. 2010. Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what, and how? Landscape and Urban Planning 97:111-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.002
6. Burkhard, B., F. Kroll, F. Müller, and W. Windhorst. 2009. Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services - a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online 15:1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3097/LO.200915
7. Buzai, G. D., and C. A. Baxendale. 2006. Análisis socio-espacial con sistemas de información geográfica. Lugar Editorial, Gepama, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
8. Cacciapaglia, M. A., L. Yung, and M. E. Patterson. 2012. Place mapping and the role of spatial scale in understanding landowner views of fire and fuels management. Society & Natural Resources 25:453-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2011.580418
9. CATIE-RIABM. 2012. Estándar para el monitoreo y evaluación de Bosques Modelo. Propuesta para orientas la gestión de iniciativas de la red iberoamericana de Bosques Modelo. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica. [online] URL: http://www.bosquesmodelo.net/wpcontent/uploads/2014/08/CATIE-RIABM-2012.-Estandar-par-elmonitoreo-y-evaluaci%C3%B3n-de-los-Bosques-Modelo..pdf
10. Chan, K. M. A., J. Goldstein, T. Satterfield, N. Hannahs, K. Kikiloi, R. Naidoo, N. Vadeboncoeur, and U. Woodside. 2011. Cultural services and non-use values. Pages 206-228 in P. Kareiva, H. Tallis, T. H. Ricketts, G. C. Daily, and S. Polasky, editors. Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588992.003.0012
11. Chan, K. M. A., T. Satterfield, and J. Goldstein. 2012. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics 74:8-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
12. Christie, M., I. Fazey, R. Cooper, T. Hyde, and J. O. Kenter. 2012. An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies. Ecological Economics 83:67-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.012
13. Clement, J. M., and A. S. Cheng. 2006. Public values and preferences regarding forest uses and management on the Pike and San Isabel National Forests, Colorado. Survey Results. Department of Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
14. Corporación Nacional Forestal (CONAF). 2007. Documento base para la incorporación del territorio andino de la región de Los Lagos a la red mundial de Reservas de Biosfera. Programa MAB - UNESCO, Paris, France.
15. Corporación Nacional Forestal (CONAF). 2014. Monitoreo de Cambios, Corrección Cartográfica y Actualización del Catastro de los Recursos Vegetacionales Nativos de la región de Los Ríos. CONAF, Santiago, Chile.
16. Darvill, R., and Z. Lindo. 2015. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem service use across stakeholder groups: implications for conservation with priorities for cultural values. Ecosystem Services 13:153-161. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.004
17. Davies, K. K., K. T. Fisher, M. E. Dickson, S. F. Thrush, and R. Le Heron. 2015. Improving ecosystem service frameworks to address wicked problems. Ecology and Society 20(2):37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/es-07581-200237
18. DeWalt, K. M., and B. R. DeWalt. 2010. Participant observation: a guide for fieldworkers. Rowman Altamira, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
19. Fagerholm, N., N. Käyhkö, F. Ndumbaro, and M. Khamis. 2012. Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments— mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators 18:421-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.004
20. Felipe-Lucía, M. R., F. A. Comín, and E. M. Bennett. 2014. Interactions among ecosystem services across land uses in a floodplain agroecosystem. Ecology and Society 19(1):20. http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06249-190120
21. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Stakeholder management: framework and philosophy. Pitman, Mansfield, Massachusetts, USA.
22. Gould, R. K., S. C. Klain, N. M. Ardoin, T. Satterfield, U. Woodside, N. Hannahs, G. C. Daily, and K. M. A. Chan. 2015. A protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values through a cultural ecosystem services frame. Conservation Biology 29(2):575-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12407
23. Hall, T. E., J. O. Farnum, T. C. Slider, and K. Ludlow. 2009. New approaches to forest planning: inventorying and mapping place values in the Pacific Northwest Region. Research Note PNWRN- 562. U.S. Forest Service, Portland, Oregon, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2737/pnw-rn-562
24. Hatton-MacDonald, D., R. Bark, A. MacRae, T. Kalivas, A. Grandgirard, and S. Strathearn. 2013. An interview methodology for exploring the values that community leaders assign to multiple-use landscapes. Ecology and Society 18(1):29. http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05191-180129http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/es-05191-180129
25. Hauck, J., C. Görg, R. Varjopuro, O. Ratamäki, and K. Jax. 2013. Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: some stakeholder perspectives. Environmental Science & Policy 25:13-21. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.001
26. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE). 2002. XVII Censo Nacional de Población y VI de Vivienda 2002. INE, Santiago, Chile.
27. Ives, C. D., and D. Kendal. 2014. The role of social values in the management of ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Management 144:67-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013
28. Kellert, S. R. 1995. The biological basis for human values of nature. Pages 42-71 in S. R. Kellert and E. O. Wilson, editors. The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
29. Kenter, J. O., L. O’Brien, N. Hockley, N. Ravenscroft, I. Fazey, K. N. Irvine, M. S Reed, M. Christie, E. Brady, R. Bryce, A. Church, N. Cooper, A. Davies, A. Evely, M. Everard, R. Fish, J. A. Fisher, N. Jobstvogt, C. Molloy, J. Orchard-Webb, S. Ranger, M. Ryan, V. Watson, and S. Williams. 2015. What are shared and social values of ecosystems? Ecological Economics 111:86-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006
30. Kenter, J. O., M. S. Reed, K. N. Irvine, E. O’Brien, E. Brady, R. Bryce, M. Christie, A. Church, N. Cooper, A. Davies, N. Hockley, I. Fazey, N. Jobstvogt, C. Molloy, J. Orchard-Webb, N. Ravenscroft, M. Ryan, and V. Watson. 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment follow-on: work package report 6: shared, plural and cultural values of ecosystems. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
31. Klain, S. C., and K. M. A. Chan. 2012. Navigating coastal values: participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning. Ecological Economics 82:104-113. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.008http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.008
32. Kull, C. A., X. Arnauld de Sartre, and M. Castro-Larrañaga. 2015. The political ecology of ecosystem services. Geoforum 61:122-134. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.004
33. Laterra, P., M. E. Orúe, and G. C. Booman. 2012. Spatial complexity and ecosystem services in rural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 154:56-67. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.013http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.013
34. López-Santiago, C. A., E. Oteros-Rozas, B. Martín-López, T. Plieninger, E. G. Martín, and J. A. González. 2014. Using visual stimuli to explore the social perceptions of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes: the case of transhumance in Mediterranean Spain. Ecology and Society 19(2):27. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/es-06401-190227
35. Maass, J., P. Balvanera, A. Castillo, G. C. Daily, H. A. Mooney, P. Ehrlich, M. Quesada, A. Miranda, V. J. Jaramillo, F. García-Oliva, A. Martínez-Yrizar, H. Cotler, J. López-Blanco, A. Pérez-Jiménez, A. Búrquez, C. Tinoco, G. Ceballos, L. Barraza, R. Ayala, and J. Sarukhán. 2005. Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: insights from long-term ecological and social research on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Ecology and Society 10(1):17.
36. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf
37. Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Reconstrucción de Chile. 2005. Política Nacional de Turismo. Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Reconstrucción de Chile, Santiago, Chile Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Turismo de Chile. 2012. Decreto 172. Procedimientos para la declaración de zonas de interés turístico. Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Reconstrucción de Chile, Santiago, Chile
38. Mitchell, A. 2005. The ESRI guide to GIS analysis. Volume 2: spatial measurements and statistics. ESRI, Redlands, California, USA.
39. Municipalidad de Panguipulli. 2008. Plan de Desarrollo Comunal Panguipulli 2008-2012. Panguipulli, Chile. Municipalidad de Panguipulli. 2012. Plan de Ordenamiento Territorial ZOIT. Panguipulli, Chile.
40. Nahuelhual, L., P. Laterra, S. Villarino, M. Mastrángelo, A. Carmona, A. Jaramillo, P. Barral, and N. Burgos. 2015. Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and procedures. Ecosystem Services 13:162-172. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.005http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.005
41. Nelson, E., G. Mendoza, J. Regetz, S. Polasky, H. Tallis, D. R. Cameron, K. M. A. Chan, G. C. Daily, J. Goldstein, P. M. Kareiva, E. Lonsdorf, R. Naidoo, T. H. Ricketts, and M. R. Shaw. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7:4-11 http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/080023
42. Palomo, I., B. Martín-López, P. Zorrilla-Miras, D. García del Amo, and C. Montes. 2014. Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. Regional Environmental Change 14:237-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0488-5
43. Pino-Piderit, A., P. Cardyn, Grupo de trabajo Panguipulli (GTP). 2014. La Reserva de la Biosfera de los Bosques Templados Lluviosos de los Andes Australes y las singularidades territoriales de la comuna de Panguipulli. Pages 190-206 in A. Moreira-Muñoz and A. Borsdorf, editors. Reservas de la biósfera de Chile: Laboratorios para la sustentabilidad. Austrian Academy of Science, Innsbruck, Austria, and Pontificia Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
44. Plieninger, T., S. Dijks, E. Oteros-Rozas, and C. Bieling. 2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land use Policy 33:118-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013
45. Raymond, C. M., B. A. Bryan, D. Hatton-MacDonald, A. Cast, S. Strathearn, A. Grandgirard, and T. Kalivas. 2009. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 68:1301-1315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006
46. Raymond, C. M., J. O. Kenter, T. Plieninger, N. J. Turner, and K. A. Alexander. 2014. Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 107:145-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.033
47. Reed, M. S., A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, C. Prell, C. H. Quinn, and L. C. Stringer. 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1933-1949. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
48. Schnegg, M., R. Rieprich, and M. Pröpper. 2014. Culture, nature, and the valuation of ecosystem services in Northern Namibia. Ecology and Society 19(4):26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/es-06896-190426
49. Scholte, S. S. K., A. J. A. van Teeffelen, and P. H. Verburg. 2015. Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: a review of concepts and methods. Ecological Economics 114:67-78. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007
50. Sherrouse, B. C., J. M. Clement, and D. J. Semmens. 2011. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography 31:748-760. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.002
51. Sherrouse, B. C., D. J. Semmens, and J. M. Clement. 2014. An application of social values for ecosystem services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecological Indicators 36:68-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.008
52. Spangenberg, J. H., C. von Haaren, and J. Settele. 2014. The ecosystem service cascade: further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy. Ecological Economics 104:22-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.025
53. Tapia, C. 2014. Identificación participativa de servicios ecosistémicos en la comuna de Panguipulli. Tesis de Magíster. Valdivia, Chile. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades, Universidad Austral de Chile.
54. Tsirogianni, S., and G. Gaskell. 2011. The role of plurality and context in social values. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41:441-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00470.x
55. Van Riper, C. J., G. T. Kyle, S. G. Sutton, M. Barnes, and B. C. Sherrouse. 2012. Mapping outdoor recreationists’ perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia. Applied Geography 35:164-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.008
56. Villamagna, A. M., P. L. Angermeier, and E. M. Bennett. 2013. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecological Complexity 15:114-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004
57. Villamor, G. B., I. Palomo, C. A. L. Santiago, E. Oteros-Rozas, and J. Hill. 2014. Assessing stakeholders’ perceptions and values towards social-ecological systems using participatory methods. Ecological Processes 3:1-12. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-014-0022-9
58. Wackernagel, M., and W. E. Rees. 1997. Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecological economics 20:3-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00077-8
59. Wilson, E. O. 1984. Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
60. Wong, C. P., B. Jiang, A. P. Kinzig, K. N. Lee, and Z. Ouyang. 2015. Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy. Ecology Letters 18:108-118. http://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12389