Interactions among ecosystem services across land uses in a floodplain agroecosystem

Ecology and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Felipe Lucia, María R ^a   Comín, Francisco A ^a   Bennett, Elena M ^b  

^a INSTITUTO PIRENAICO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Spain)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agroecosystem; Ecosystem services; Floodplain; Interactions; Land uses; Spatial scales; Trade offs

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ECOSYSTEM; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FLOODPLAIN; FOOD PRODUCTION; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RIPARIAN FOREST; SYNERGISM;

SPAIN;

EID: 84897486571     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-06249-190120     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aviron, S., H. Nitsch, P. Jeanneret, S. Buholzer, H. Luka, L. Pfiffner, S. Pozzi, B. Schüpbach, T. Walter, and F. Herzog. 2009. Ecological cross compliance promotes farmland biodiversity in Switzerland. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7 (5):247-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/070197
2. Barral, M. P., and O. N. Maceira. 2012. Land-use planning based on ecosystem service assessment: a case study in the southeast Pampas of Argentina. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 154:34-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.07.010
3. Bates, D., M. Maechler, and B. Bolker. 2012. lme4: linear mixedeffects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0. [online] URL: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
4. Bennett, E. M., and P. Balvanera. 2007. The future of production systems in a globalized world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5:191-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[191:TFOPSI]2.0.CO;2
5. Bennett, E. M., G. D. Peterson, and L. J. Gordon. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 12:1394-1404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
6. Boletín Oficial de Aragón (BOA). 2012. ORDEN de 25 de enero de 2012, del Departamento de Agricultura, Ganadería y Medio Ambiente, por la que se aprueba el Plan General de Pesca de Aragón para el año 2012. Núm. 19.
7. Cabell, J. F., and M. Oelofse. 2012. An indicator framework for assessing agroecosystem resilience. Ecology and Society 17(1): 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04666-170118
8. Carpenter, S. R., H. A. Mooney, J. Agard, D. Capistrano, R. S. DeFries, S. Díaz, T. Dietz, A. K. Duraiappah, A. Oteng-Yeboah, H. M. Pereira, C. Perrings, W. V. Reid, J. Sarukhan, R. J. Scholes, and A. Whyte. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:1305-1312. http://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas.0808772106
9. Carpenter, S. R., P. L. Pingali, E. M. Bennett, and M. B. Zurek, editors. 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment: ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios. Volume 2. Findings of the Scenarios Working Group Island, Washington, D.C., USA.
10. Carreño, L., F. C. Frank, and E. F. Viglizzo. 2012. Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 154:68-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.019
11. 2: existencias y potencialidad (estimación cuantitativa y predicciones de fijación). Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain. [online] URL: http://www.aragon.es/ estaticos/GobiernoAragon/Departamentos/MedioAmbiente/ Areas/03_Cambio_climatico/06_Proyectos_actuaciones_Emisiones_GEI/ estudio.pdf
12. Chan, K. M. A., M. R. Shaw, D. R. Cameron, E. C. Underwood, and G. C. Daily. 2006. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol 4:e379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pbio.0040379
13. Chen, N., H. Li, and L. Wang. 2009. A GIS-based approach for mapping direct use value of ecosystem services at a county scale: management implications. Ecological Economics 68:2768-2776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.001
14. Concepción, E. D., M. Díaz, D. Kleijn, A. Báldi, P. Batáry, Y. Clough, D. Gabriel, F. Herzog, A. Holzschuh, E. Knop, E. J. P. Marshall, T. Tscharntke, and J. Verhulst. 2012. Interactive effects of landscape context constrain the effectiveness of local agrienvironmental management. Journal of Applied Ecology 49:695-705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02131.x
15. Costanza, R., R. d'Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R. G. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
16. Daily, G. C. 2000. Management objectives for the protection of ecosystem services. Environmental Science and Policy 3:333-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00102-7
17. DeFries, R. S., J. A. Foley, and G. P. Asner. 2004. Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:249-257. http://dx.doi. org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0249:LCBHNA]2.0.CO;2
18. de Groot, R. S., M. A. Wilson, and R. M. J. Boumans. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41:393-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
19. de Groot, R. S., R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7(3):260-272. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
20. Eigenbrod, F., P. R. Armsworth, B. J. Anderson, A. Heinemeyer, S. Gillings, D. B. Roy, C. D. Thomas, and K. J. Gaston. 2010. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology 47:377-385. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x
21. Environmental Systems Resource Institute (ESRI). 2012. ArcGIS Desktop (10.0). Redlands, California, USA.
22. Felipe-Lucia, M. R. 2012. Social dimension of ecosystem services: the case of river Piedra's valley. Thesis. Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Spain.
23. Fox, J. 2003. Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. Journal of Statistical Software 8(15):1-27. [online] URL: http:// www.jstatsoft.org/v08/i15/
24. Goldstein, J. H., G. Caldarone, T. K. Duarte, D. Ennaanay, N. Hannahs, G. Mendoza, S. Polasky, S. Wolny, and G. C. Daily. 2012. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109:7565-7570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201040109
25. González del Tánago M., D. García de Jalón, F. Lara, and R. Garilleti. 2006. Índice RQI para la valoración de las riberas fluviales en el contexto de la directiva marco del agua. Ingeniería Civil 143:97-108. [online] URL: http://www2.montes.upm.es/ Dptos/DptoIngForestal/Hidrobiolog%C3%ADa/Publicaciones/ INDICE_RQI.pdf
26. Harrison P. A., M. Vandewalle, M. T. Sykes, P. M. Berry, R. Bugter, F. de Bello, C. K. Feld, U. Grandin, R. Harrington, J. R. Haslett, R. H. G. Jongman, G. W. Luck, P. M. da Silva, M. Moora, J. Settele, J. P. Sousa, and M. Zobel. 2010. Identifying and prioritizing services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Biodiversity and Conservation 19:2791-2821. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9789-x
27. Hein, L., K. van Koppen, R. S. de Groot, and E. C. van Ierland. 2006. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 57:209-228. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005
28. Helian, L., W. Shilong, J. Guanglei, and Z. Ling. 2011. Changes in land use and ecosystem service values in Jinan, China. Energy Procedia 5:1109-1115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.195
29. Hothorn, T., F. Bretz, and P. Westfall. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50 (3):346-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425
30. Hubbart, J. A. 2011. An inexpensive alternative solar radiation shield for ambient air temperature and relative humidity microsensors. Journal of Natural and Environmental Sciences 2:9-14. [online] URL: http://www.asciencejournal.net/asj/index.php/ NES/article/view/214/214
31. Hubbart, J. A., T. Link, C. Campbell, and D. Cobos. 2005. Evaluation of a low-cost temperature measurement system for environmental applications. Hydrological Processes 19:1517-1523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5861
32. Instituto Aragonés de Estadística. 2011. Padron Municipal of Inhabitants 01/01/2011. Gobierno de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain. [online] URL: http://www.aragon.es/DepartamentosOrganismosPublicos/ Organismos/InstitutoAragonesEstadistica/AreasTematicas/02_Demografia_ Y_Poblacion/01_CifrasPoblacion_Y_Censos/01_Padron/ ci.01_Cifras_oficiales_poblacion.detalleDepartamento?channelSelected= cb5ca856c66de310VgnVCM2000002f551bacRCRD
33. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. 2008. Municipal surface. 01/01/2008. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Madrid, Spain. [online] URL: http://www.ine.es
34. Kleijn, D., R. A. Baquero, Y. Clough, M. Díaz, J. De Esteban, F. Fernández, D. Gabriel, F. Herzog, A. Holzschuh, R. Jöhl, E. Knop, A. Kruess, E. J. P. Marshall, I. Steffan-Dewenter, T. Tscharntke, J. Verhulst, T. M. West, and J. L. Yela. 2006. Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecology Letters 9:243-254. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00869.x
35. Konarska, K. M., P. C. Sutton, and M. Castellon. 2002. Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets. Ecological Economics 41: 491-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0921-8009(02)00096-4
36. Kreuter, U. P., H. G. Harris, M. D. Matlock, and R. E. Lacey. 2001. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecological Economics 39:333-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0921-8009(01)00250-6
37. Laterra, P., M. E. Orúe, and G. C. Booman. 2012. Spatial complexity and ecosystem services in rural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 154:56-67. http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.013
38. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Island, Washington, D.C., USA.
39. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente Y Medio Rural y Marino. 2009. Mapa de cultivos y aprovechamientos, actualización 2000-2009. Escala 1:50000. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente Y Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid, Spain.
40. Martín-López, B., I. Iniesta-Arandia, M. García-Llorente, I. Palomo, I. Casado-Arzuaga, D. G. Del Amo, E. Gómez-Baggethun, E. Oteros-Rozas, I. Palacios-Agundez, B. Willaarts, J. A. González, F. Santos-Martín, M. Onaindia, C. López-Santiago, and C. Montes. 2012. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE 7. http://dx.doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038970
41. Metzger, M. J., M. D. A. Rounsevell, L. Acosta-Michlik, R. Leemans, and D. Schröter. 2006. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114:69-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.025
42. Mitchell, M. G. E., E. M. Bennett, and A. Gonzalez. 2013. Linking landscape connectivity and ecosystem service provision: current knowledge and research gaps. Ecosystems 16:894-908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9647-2
43. 2 por los bosques españoles. Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaría (INIA), Madrid, Spain.
44. Moss, T., and J. Monstadt. 2008. Institutional dimensions of floodplain restoration in Europe: an introduction. Pages 3-15 in T. Moss and J. Monstadt, editors. Restoring floodplains in Europe. International Water Association (IWA), London, UK.
45. Murrell, P. 2005. R graphics. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
46. Nelson, E., G. Mendoza, J. Regetz, S. Polasky, H. Tallis, D. R. Cameron, K. M. A. Chan, G. C. Daily, J. Goldstein, P. M. Kareiva, E. Lonsdorf, R. Naidoo, T. H. Ricketts, and M. R. Shaw. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7:4-11. http://dx.doi. org/10.1890/080023
47. Nicholson, E., G. M. Mace, P. R. Armsworth, G. Atkinson, S. Buckle, T. Clements, R. M. Ewers, J. E. Fa, T. A. Gardner, J. Gibbons, R. Grenyer, R. Metcalfe, S. Mourato, M. Muûls, D. Osborn, D. C. Reuman, C. Watson, and E. J. Milner-Gulland. 2009. Priority research areas for ecosystem services in a changing world. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:1139-1144. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01716.x
48. Pereira, H. M., B. Reyers, M. Watanabe, E. Bohensky, S. Foale, C. Palm, M. V. Espaldon, D. Armenteras, M. Tapia, A. Rincón, M. J. Lee, A. Patwardhan, and I. Gomes. 2005. Condition and trends of ecosystem services and biodiversity. Pages 171-203 in D. Capistrano, C. Samper, M. J. Lee, and C. Raudsepp-Hearne, editors. Millenium ecosystems assessment: ecosystems and human well-being: multiscale assessments. Volume 4. Findings of the Subglobal Assessments Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island, Washington, D.C., USA.
49. Pringle, R. M., D. F. Doak, A. K. Brody, R. Jocqué, and T. M. Palmer. 2010. Spatial pattern enhances ecosystem functioning in an African savanna. PLoS Biol 8(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pbio.1000377
50. Power, A. G. 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences 365:2959-2971. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/ rstb.2010.0143
51. Quantum GIS Development Team. 2012. Quantum GIS Desktop (1.8.0). Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project, Beaverton, Oregon, USA. http://qgis.osgeo.org
52. R Development Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
53. Rathwell, K. J., and G. D. Peterson. 2012. Connecting social networks with ecosystem services for watershed governance: a social-ecological network perspective highlights the critical role of bridging organizations. Ecology and Society 17(2):24. http:// dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04810-170224
54. Raudsepp-Hearne, C., G. D. Peterson, and E. M. Bennett. 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:5242-5247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907284107
55. Rodríguez, J. P., T. D. Beard, Jr., J. R. B. Agard, E. Bennett, S. Cork, G. Cumming, D. Deane, A. P. Dobson, D. M. Lodge, M. Mutale, G. C. Nelson, G. D. Peterson, and T. Ribeiro. 2005. Interactions among ecosystem services. Pages 431-448 in S. R. Carpenter, P. L. Pingali, E. M. Bennett, and M. B. Zurek, editors. Ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios. Volume 2. Findings of the Scenarios Working Group. Island, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.unep.org/maweb/documents/ document.336.aspx.pdf
56. Rodríguez, J. P., T. D. Beard, Jr., E. M. Bennett, G. S. Cumming, S. J. Cork, J. R. B. Agard, A. P. Dobson, and G. D. Peterson. 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society 11(1): 28. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol11/iss1/art28/
57. Rose, S. K., and D. Chapman. 2003. Timber harvest adjacency economies, hunting, species protection, and old growth value: seeking the dynamic optimum. Ecological Economics 44:325-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00268-9
58. Scheitlin, K. N., and P. G. Dixon. 2010. Diurnal temperature range variability due to land cover and air mass types in the Southeast. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 49:879-888. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2322.1
59. Simoncini, R. 2009. Developing an integrated approach to enhance the delivering of environmental goods and services by agro-ecosystems. Regional Environmental Change 9:153-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0052-x
60. Swift, M. J., A.-M. N. Izac, and M. van Noordwijk. 2004. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes-are we asking the right questions? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 104:113-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.013
61. Tallis, H., and S. Polasky. 2009. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1162:265-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152. x
62. Tianhong, L., L. Wenkai, and Q. Zhenghan. 2010. Variations in ecosystem service value in response to land use changes in Shenzhen. Ecological economics 69:1427-1435. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.018
63. Tilman, D., K. G. Cassman, P. A. Matson, R. Naylor, and S. Polasky. 2002. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671-677. http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nature01014
64. Tockner K., and J. A. Stanford. 2002. Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Environmental Conservation 29 (3):308-330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S037689290200022X
65. Trabucchi, M. 2012. La evaluación de los servicios de los ecosistemas como herramienta para planificar la restauración ecológica de cuencas hidrográficas. Dissertation. Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. [online] URL http://zaguan.unizar. es/record/9910/files/TESIS-2012-144.pdf
66. Trabucchi, M., F. A. Comín, and P. J. O'Farrell. 2013. Hierarchical priority setting for restoration in a watershed in NE Spain, based on assessments of soil erosion and ecosystem services. Regional Environmental Change. 13(4):911-926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10113-012-0392-4
67. Trabucchi, M., P. Ntshotsho, P. O'Farrell, and F. A. Comín. 2012. Ecosystem service trends in basin-scale restoration initiatives: a review. Journal of Environmental Management 111:18-23. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.040
68. Viglizzo, E. F., and F. C. Frank. 2006. Land-use options for Del Plata Basin in South America: tradeoffs analysis based on ecosystem service provision. Ecological Economics 57:140-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.025
69. Zhang, W., T. H. Ricketts, C. Kremen, K. Carney, and S. M. Swinton. 2007. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics 64:253-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2007.02.024
70. Zhao, B., U. Kreuter, B. Li, Z. Ma, J. Chen, and N. Nakagoshi. 2004. An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island, China. Land Use Policy 21:139-148. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.003
71. Zuur, A. F., E. N. Ieno, N. J. Walker, A. A. Saveliev, and G. M. Smith. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6