Mapping of ecosystem services: Missing links between purposes and procedures

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 13, Issue , 2015, Pages 162-172

  Nahuelhual, Laura ^a,b,c   Laterra, Pedro ^d,e,f   Villarino, Sebastián ^d,f   Mastrángelo, Matías ^d,f   Carmona, Alejandra ^c   Jaramillo, Amerindia ^a   Barral, Paula ^d,f   Burgos, Néstor ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b Fundacion Centro de los Bosques Nativos FORECOS   (Chile)

^c University of Concepción   (Chile)

^d UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE MAR DEL PLATA   (Argentina)

^e Fundacion Bariloche   (Argentina)

^f Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Cascade model; Decision making; Ecosystem services framework; Ecosystem services mapping

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930180911     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ambrose-Oji, B., Pagella, T., 2012. Spatial Analysis and Prioritization of Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Review of Methods. Research Report, Forest Research. 52 pp.
2. Ananda J., Herath G. A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:2535-2548.
3. Bailey N., Lee J., Thompson S. Maximizing the natural capital benefits of habitat creation: spatially targeting native woodland using GIS. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2006, 75:227-243.
4. Baerenklau K., Gonzalez-Caban A., Paez C., Chavez E. Spatial allocation of forest recreation value. J. Forest Econ. 2010, 16(2):113-126.
5. Bowker M., Miller M., Belnap J., Sisk T., Johnson N. Prioritizing conservation effort through the use of biological soil crusts as ecosystem function indicators in an arid region. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22(6):1533-1543.
6. Bryan B., King D., Ward J. Modelling and mapping agricultural opportunity costs to guide landscape planning for natural resource management. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11:199-208.
7. Burkhard B., Kroll F., Nedkov S., Müller F. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 21:17-29.
8. Busch M., La Notte A., Laporte V., Erhard M. Potentials of quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:89-103.
9. Chen N., Li H., Wang L. A GIS-based approach for mapping direct use value of ecosystem services at a county scale: management implications. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:2768-2776.
10. Costanza R, DDArge R, de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., ODNeill R., Paruelo J., Raskin R., Sutton P., van den Belt M. The value of world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387:253-260.
11. Crossman N., Burkhard B., Nedkovc S., Willemen L., Petz K., Palomo I., Drakou E.G., Martín-Lopez B., McPhearsong T., Boyanova K., Alkemade R., Egoh B., Dunbar M.B., Maes J. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 4:4-14.
12. Daily G., Matson P. Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105:9455-9456.
13. Daily G., Polasky S., Goldstein J., Kareiva P., Mooney H., Pejchar L., Ricketts T., Salzman J., Shallenberger R. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:21-28.
14. Deng S., Shi Y., Jin Y., Wang L. A GIS-based approach for quantifying and mapping carbon sink and stock values of forest ecosystem: a case study. Energy Procedia 2011, 5:1535-1545.
15. Egoh B., Reyers B., Rouget M., Richardson D.M., Le Maitre D.C., van Jaarsveld A.S. Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 127:135-140.
16. Fagerholm N., Käyhkö N., Ndumbaro F., Khamis M. Community stakeholders' knowledge in landscape assessments - mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 18:421-433.
17. Haines-Young R., Potschin M. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis. BES Ecological Reviews Series 2010, 111-139. CUP, Cambridge. D. Raffaelli, C. Frid (Eds.).
18. Hauck J., Görg C., Varjopuro R., Ratamäki O., Maes J., Wittmer H., Jax K. Maps have an air of authority: potential benefits and challenges of ecosystemservice maps at different levels of decision making. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 4:25-32.
19. Kaiser B., Roumasset J. Valuing indirect ecosystem services: the case of tropical watersheds. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2002, 7:701-714.
20. Kienast F., Bolliger J., Potschin M., de Groot R., Verburg P., Heller I., Wascher D., Haines-Young R. Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: insights gained from a prototype development for Europe. Environ. Manag. 2009, 44:1099-1120.
21. Koschke L., Fürst C., Frank S., Makeschin F. A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 24:54-66.
22. Laterra P., Jobbágy E., Paruelo J. Valoración de servicios ecosistémicos Conceptos, herramientas y aplicaciones para el ordenamiento territorial 2011, 740. Ediciones INTA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
23. Lautenbach S., Kugel C., Lausch A., Seppelt R. Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11:676-687.
24. Lavorel S., Grigulis K., Lamarque P., Colace M., Garden D., Girel J., Pellet G., Douzet R. Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. J. Ecol. 2011, 99:135-147.
25. Li J., Ren Z., Zhou Z. Ecosystem services and their values: a case study in the Qinba Mountains of China. Ecol. Res. 2006, 21:597-604.
26. Maes, J., Braat, L., Jax, K., Hutchins, M., Furman, E., Termansen, M., Luque, S., Paracchini, M., Chauvin, C., Williams, R., Volk, M., Lautenbach, S., Kopperoinen, L., Schelhaas, M., Weinert, J., Goossen, M., Dumont, E., Strauch, M., Görg, C., Dormann, C., Katwinkel, M., Zulian, G., Varjopuro, R., Ratamäki, O., Hauck, J., Forsius, M., Hengeveld, G., Perez-Soba, M., Bouraoui, F., Scholz, M., Schulz-Zunkel, C., Lepistö, A., Polishchuk, Y., Bidoglio, G., 2011. A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe: methods, case studies and policy analysis - phase 1. Partnership for European Environmental Research. PEER Report no. 3, 143 pp.
27. Maes J., Egoh B., Willemen L., Liquete C., Vihervaara P., Schägner J.P., Grizzetti B., Drakou E.G., LaNotte A., Zulian G., Bouraoui F., Paracchini M.L., Braat L., Bidoglio G. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1:31-39.
28. Martínez-Harms M., Balvanera P. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2012, 8(1-2):17-25.
29. Maynard S., James D., Davidson A. The development of an ecosystem services framework for South East Queensland. Environ. Manag. 2010, 45:881-895.
30. Metzger M., Rounsevell M., Acosta-Michlik L., Leemans R., Schröter D. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 114:69-85.
31. Morse-Jones S., Luisetti T., Turner R.K., Fisher B. Ecosystem valuation: some principles and a partial application. Environmetrics 2011, 22:675-685.
32. Nahuelhual L., Laterra P., Carmona A., Burgos N., Jaramillo A., Barral P., Mastrángelo M., Villarino S. Evaluación y mapeo de servicios ecosistémicos: Una revisión y análisis de enfoques metodológicos. Servicios ecosistémicos hídricos: estudios de caso en América Latina y el Caribe. Valdivia, Chile 2013, Red ProAgua CYTED, Imprenta América, 312 p. A. Lara, P. Laterra, R. Manson, G. Barrantes (Eds.).
33. Nahuelhual L., Carmona A., Lozada P., Jaramillo A., Aguayo M. Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural ecosystem service: an application at the local level in Southern Chile. Appl. Geogr. 2013, 40:71-82.
34. Naidoo R., Balmford A., Costanza R., Fisher B., Green R., Lehner B., Malcolm T., Ricketts T. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105(28):9495-9500.
35. Nelson E., Mendoza G., Regetz J., Polasky S., Tallis H., Cameron D., Chan K., Daily G., Goldstein J., Kareiva P., Lonsdorf E., Naidoo R., Ricketts T., Shaw M. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:4-11.
36. Newton A., Hodder K., Cantarello E., Perrella L., Birch J., Robins J., Douglas S., Moody C., Cordingley J. Cost-benefit analysis of ecological networks assessed through spatial analysis of ecosystem services. J. Appl. Ecol. 2012, 49:571-580.
37. Pert P., Butler J., Brodie J., Bruce C., HonzaDk M., Kroon F., Metcalfe D., Mitchell M., Wong G. A catchment-based approach to mapping hydrological ecosystem services using riparian habitat: a case study from the Wet Tropics, Australia. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7:378-388.
38. Plieninger T., Dijks S., Oteros-Rozas L., Bieling C. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 2013, 33:118-129.
39. R.Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2013, URL, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
40. Randolph J. Environmental Land Use Planning and Management 2004, Island Press, Washington DC, United States, 630 pp.
41. Raymond C., Bryan B., MacDonald D., Cast A., Strathearn S., Grandgirard A., Kalivas T. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:1301-1315.
42. Reed M.S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:2417-2431.
43. Reyers B., O'Farrell P., Cowling R., Egoh B., Le Maitre D., Vlok J. Ecosystem services, land-cover change, and stakeholders: finding a sustainable foothold for a semiarid biodiversity hotspot. Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14(1):38.
44. Ricketts T., Daily G G., Ehrlich P., Michener C. Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:12579-12582.
45. Seppelt R., Dormann C., Eppink F., Lautenbach S., Schmidt S. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 4:630-636.
46. Sherrouse, B.C., Semmens, D.J., 2012. Social Values For Ecosystem Services (SolVES): Documentation and User Manual, Version 2.0: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012-1023. Available at: . http://solves.cr.usgs.gov/.
47. Sherrouse B., Clement J., Semmens D. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl. Geogr. 2011, 31:748-760.
48. Swetnam R, Fisher B., Mbilinyi B., Munishi P., Willcock S., Ricketts T., Mwakalila S., Balmford A., Burgess N., Marshall A., Lewis S. Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92:563-574.
49. Tallis H., Polasky S. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1162:265-283.
50. TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity)) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming The Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB 2010, 39. Progress Press, Malta.
51. Troy A., Wilson M. Mapping ecosystem services: practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 60:435-449.
52. Turner R.K., Daily G.C. The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2008, 39:25-35.
53. Turner W., Brandon T., Brooks M., Gascon C., Gibbs H., Lawrence K., Mittermeier R., Selig E. Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. BioScience 2007, 57:868-873.
54. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) Africa: Atlas of Our Changing Environment.) 2008, 182-187. Division of Early Warning and Assessment (DEWA), (UNEP), Nairobi, Kenya.
55. Urgenson L., Prozesky H., Esler K. Stakeholder perceptions of an ecosystem services approach to clearing invasive alien plants on private land. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18(1):26.
56. Van Jaarsveld A., Biggs R., Scholes R., Bohensky E., Reyers B, Lynam T., Musvoto C., Fabricius C. Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2012, 360:425-441.
57. Viglizzo E., Frank F. Land-use options for Del Plata Basin in South America: Tradeoffs analysis based on ecosystem service provision. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 57:140-151.
58. Viglizzo E., Paruelo J., Laterra P., Jobbágy E. Ecosystem service evaluation to support land-use policy. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 154:78-84.
59. Villa, F., Ceroni, M., Bagstad, K., Johnson, G., Krivov, S., 2009. ARIES (Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services): A New Tool for Ecosystem Services Assessment, Planning, and Valuation: 11th International BIOECON Conference on Economic Instruments to Enhance the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity, Venice, Italy, September 2009. Available: . http://www.ucl.ac.uk/bioecon/11th_2009/Villa.pdf.
60. Villamagna A., Angermeier P., Bennett E. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecol. Complex. 2013, 15:114-121.
61. Willemen L., Verburg P., Hein L., van Mensvoort M. Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 88:34-43.
62. Zhenghua, C., Qingyuan, M., Jian, W., Zhen, Y., 2007. Assessing value of grassland ecosystem services in gansu province, northwest of China. In: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, pp. 1782-1785.