Mapping outdoor recreationists' perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia

Applied Geography

Volumn 35, Issue 1-2, 2012, Pages 164-173

  van Riper, Carena J ^a   Kyle, Gerard T ^a   Sutton, Stephen G ^b   Barnes, Melinda ^a   Sherrouse, Benson C ^c  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecosystem based management; Environmental values; Geographic information systems; Marine protected areas; Social ecological systems

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; MAPPING METHOD; MARINE PARK; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SURVEY METHOD;

AUSTRALIA; HINCHINBROOK ISLAND; QUEENSLAND;

EID: 84864074594     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Alessa L.N., Kliskey A.A., Brown G. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 85:27-39.
2. Battaglia M.P., Link M.W., Frankel M.R., Osborn L., Mokdad A.H. An evaluation of respondent selection methods for household mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 2008, 72(3):459-469.
3. Bengston D.N., Xu Z. Changing national forest values: A content analysis 1995, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. NC-323.
4. Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C. Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
5. Black A., Liljeblad A. Integrating social values in vegetation models via GIS: The missing link for the Bitterroot National Forest 2006, Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, Missoula, MT, Final Report JFSP Project No. 04-2-1-114.
6. Brown T.C. The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Economics 1984, 60(3):231-246.
7. Brown B. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: methods and applications. Society and Natural Resources 2005, 18(1):1-23.
8. Brown G., Montag J.M., Lyon K. Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services. Society and Natural Resources 2011, 1-19.
9. Brown B., Pullar D. An evaluation of the use of points versus polygons in Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) using quasi-experimental design and Monte Carlo simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2011, 1:1-16.
10. Brown G., Raymond C. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: toward mapping place attachment. Applied Geography 2007, 27:89-111.
11. Brown G., Reed P. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. Forest Science 2000, 46(2):240-247.
12. Brown G., Reed P., Harris C. Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: an Alaska case study. Applied Geography 2002, 22(1):49-76.
13. Brown G., Smith C., Alessa L., Kliskey A. A comparison of perceptions of biological value with scientific assessment of biological importance. Applied Geography 2004, 24(2):161-180.
14. Bryan B.A., Raymond C.M., Crossman N.D., King D. Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 2011, 25(1):172-181.
15. Carver S., Watson A., Waters T., Matt R., Gunderson K., Davis B. Developing computer-based participatory approaches to mapping landscape values for landscape and resource management. Planning support systems best practice and new methods 2009, Vol. 95:431-448. Springer, Netherlands.
16. Chan K.M.A., Satterfield T., Goldstein J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics 2012, 74(0):8-18.
17. Chan K.M.A., Shaw M.R., Cameron D.R., Underwood E.C., Daily G.C. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biology 2006, 4(11):2138-2152.
18. Clement J.M., Cheng A.S. Using analyses of public value orientations, attitudes and preferences to inform national forest planning in Colorado and Wyoming. Applied Geography 2011, 31(2):393-400.
19. Cogan C.B., Todd B.J., Lawton P., Noji T.T. The role of marine habitat mapping in ecosystem-based management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2009, 66:2033-2042.
20. Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387:253-260.
21. Daily G.C. Introduction: What are ecosystem services?. Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems 1997, 1-10. Island Press, Washington D.C. G.C. Daily (Ed.).
22. Dawson C.P., Hendee J.C. Wilderness management: Stewardship and protection of resources and values 2009, Fulcrum Publishing, Golden, CO.
23. Duffus D.A., Dearden P. Non-consumptive wildlife-oriented recreation: a conceptual framework. Biological Conservation 1990, 53:213-231.
24. Gowdy J.M. The value of biodiversity: markets, society, and ecosystems. Land Economics 1997, 73(1):25-41.
25. de Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M.J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 2002, 41:393-408.
26. Ittelson W.H. Environment perception and contemporary perceptual theory. Environment and cognition 1973, 2-20. Seminar, New York. W.H. Ittelson (Ed.).
27. Jones D.L., Walter J.F., Brooks E.N., Serafy J.E. Connectivity through ontogeny: fish population linkages among mangrove and coral reef habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2010, 401:245-258.
28. Kumar M., Kumar P. Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics 2008, 64(4):808-819.
29. Kyle G., Graefe A., Manning R., Bacon J. Effects of place attachment on users' perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2004, 24(2):213-225.
30. Laegdsgaard P., Johnson C.R. Mangrove habitats as nurseries: unique assemblages of juvenile fish in subtropical mangroves in eastern Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 1995, 126:67-81.
31. Lawson S.R., Roggenbuck J.W., Hall T.E., Moldovanyi A. A conjoint analysis of preference heterogeneity among day and overnight visitors to the Okefenokee Wilderness. Journal of Leisure Research 2006, 38(4):575-600.
32. Liu J., Dietz T., Carpenter S.R., Folke C., Alberti M., Redman C.L., et al. Coupled human and natural systems. Ambio 2007, 36(8):639-649.
33. McIntyre N., Moore J., Yuan M. A place-based, values-centered approach to managing recreation on Canadian crown lands. Society and Natural Resources 2008, 21(8):657-670.
34. McLeod K., Leslie H. Ecosystem-based management for the oceans 2009, Island Press, Washington D.C.
35. Manning R. Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction 2011, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.
36. Mayer C.C., Wallace G.N. Appropriate levels of restoration and development at Copán Archaeological Park: setting attributes affecting the visitor experience. Journal of Ecotourism 2007, 6(2):91-110.
37. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis 2005, Island Press, Washington D.C.
38. Needham M.D. Value orientations toward coral reefs in recreation and tourism settings: a conceptual and measurement approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2010, 18(6):757-772.
39. Nelson E., Mendoza G., Regetz J., Polasky S., Tallis H., Cameron D.R., et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2009, 7:4-11.
40. Nielson-Pincus M. Mapping a values typology in three counties of the Interior Northwest, USA: scale, geographic associations among values, and the use of intensity weights. Society and Natural Resources 2011, 24(6):535-552.
41. Norse E.A. Ecosystem-based spatial planning and management of marine fisheries: why and how?. Bulletin of Marine Science 2010, 86(2):179-195.
42. Osmond M., Airame S., Caldwell M., Day J. Lessons for marine conservation planning: a comparison of three marine protected area planning processes. Ocean & Coastal Management 2010, 53(2):41-51.
43. Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 2009, 325:419-422.
44. Powell R.B., Ham S.H. Can ecotourism interpretation really lead to pro-conservation knowledge, attitudes, and behavior? Evidence from the Galapagos Islands. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2008, 16(4):467-489.
45. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service (QPWS). Hinchinbrook area island and marine management plan, in press. Brisbane, Queensland: Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service and Department of Environment and Resource Management, pp. 1-155.
46. Raymond C., Brown G., Bryan B., McDonald H., Cast D., Strathearn A., et al. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:1301-1315.
47. van Riper C.J., Manning R.E., Monz C., Goonan K.A. Tradeoffs among resource, social, and managerial conditions on mountain summits of the Northern Forest. Leisure Sciences 2011, 33(3):228-249.
48. Roff J.C., Taylor M.E. National frameworks for marine conservation: a hierarchical geophysical approach. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 2000, 10:209-223.
49. Rolston H.I., Coufal J. A forest ethic and multivalue forest management: the integrity of forests and of foresters are bound together. Journal of Forestry 1991, 89(1):35-40.
50. Sawicki D.S., Peterman D.R. Surveying the extent of PPGIS practice in the United States. Community participation and geographic information systems 2002, 17-36. Taylor and Francis, London. W.J. Craig, T.M. Harris, D.M. Weiner (Eds.).
51. Sherrouse B.C., Clement J.M., Semmens D.J. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography 2011, 31(2):748-760.
52. Sieber R. Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2006, 96(3):491-507.
53. Silverman B.W. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis 1986, Chapman and Hall, New York.
54. St.Martin K., Hall-Arber M. The missing layer: geo-technologies, communities, and implications for marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 2008, 32:779-786.
55. Stern P.C. Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. American Psychologist 2000, 55(5):523-530.
56. Tyrväinen L., Mäkinen K., Schipperijn J. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 79(1):5-19.
57. White D.D., Virden R.J., van Riper C.J. Effect of place identity, place dependence, and experience-use-history on perceptions of recreation impacts in a natural setting. Environmental Management 2008, 42(4):647-657.
58. Williams D.R., Patterson M.E., Roggenbuck J.W., Watson A.E. Beyond the commodity metaphor: examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences 1992, 14:29-46.
59. Young, N. G. R. (2006). Biophysical impacts and psychosocial experiences associated with use of selected long-distance walking tracks within the wet tropics region of North Queensland, Australia. Ph.D. thesis, James Cook University, pp. 1-346.
60. Yung L., Freimund W.A., Belsky J.M. The politics of place: understanding meaning, common ground, and political difference on the Rocky Mountain front. Forest Science 2003, 49(6):855-866.
61. Zube E.H. Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landscape Ecology 1987, 1(1):37-45.