Place Mapping and the Role of Spatial Scale in Understanding Landowner Views of Fire and Fuels Management

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 453-467

  Cacciapaglia, Michael A ^a   Yung, Laurie ^a   Patterson, Michael E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

fire; place mapping; scale; special places; wildland urban interface

Indexed keywords

FOREST FIRE; FUEL; LANDOWNER; MAPPING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84859604099     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2011.580418     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Beckley, T. M. 1998. The nestedness of forest-dependence: A conceptual framework and empirical exploration. Society Nat. Resources 11: 101-120.
2. Brenner, N. 2001. The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 25 (4): 591-614.
3. Brown, G. 2003. A method for assessing highway qualities to integrate values in highway planning. J. Transport Geogr. 11 (4): 271-283.
4. Brown, G. 2005. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Society Nat. Resources 18: 1-23.
5. Brown, G. 2006. Mapping landscape values and development preferences: A method for tourism and residential planning. Int. J. Tourism Res. 8: 101-113.
6. Brown, J. C., and M. Purcell. 2005. There's nothing inherent about scale: Political ecology, the local trap, and the politics of development in the Brazilian Amazon. Geoforum 36: 607-624.
7. Carver, S., Evans, A., and S. Fritz. 2002. Wilderness attribute mapping in the United Kingdom. Int. J. Wilderness 8 (1): 24-29.
8. Carver, S. 2003. The future of participatory approaches using geographic information: Developing a research agenda for the 21st Century. URISA J. 15 (1): 61-71.
9. Carver, S., A. Watson, T. Waters, R. Matt, K. Gunderson, and B. Davis. 2009. Developing computer-based participatory approaches to mapping landscape values for landscape and resource management. In Planning support systems best practice and new methods, ed. S. Geertman and J. C. H. Stillwell, 431-448. GeoJournal Library, vol. 95. New York: Springer.
10. Dizard, J. E. 1993. Going wild: The contested terrain of nature. In In the nature of things: Language, politics, and the environment, ed. J. Bennett and W. Chaloupka, 111-135. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11. Delaney, D., and H. Leitner. 1997. The political construction of scale. Polit. Geogr. 16 (2): 93-97.
12. Douglas, M., and A. Wildavsky. 1982. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Eisenhauer, B. W., R. S. Krannich, and D. J. Blahna. 2000. Attachments to special places on public lands: An analysis of activities, reason for attachments, and community connections. Society Nat. Resources 13: 421-441.
14. Evans, A. J., R. Kingston, and S. Carver. 2004. Democratic input into the nuclear waste disposal problem: The influence of geographical data on decision making examined through a web-based GIS. J. Geogr. Systems 6: 117-132.
15. Gunderson, K., and A. Watson. 2007. Understanding place meanings on the Bitterroot National Forest. Society Nat. Resources 20: 705-721.
16. Hall, T. E., J. O. Farnum, T. C. Slider, and K. Ludlow. 2009. New approaches to forest planning: Inventorying and mapping place values in the Pacific Northwest Region. Research Note PNW-RN-562. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service.
17. Kahan, D. M., D. Bramam, P. Slovic, J. Gastil, and G. L. Cohen. 2007. The second national risk and culture study: Making sense of-and making progress in-the American culture war of fact. Yale Law School Public Law Working Paper No. 154. New Haven, CT.
18. Kemmis, D. 1990. Community and the politics of place. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
19. Kingston, R., S. Carver, A. Evans, and I. Turton. 2000. Web-based public participation geographical information systems: An aid to local environmental decision-making. Computers Environ. Urban Systems 24: 109-125.
20. Kruger, L. E., and J. P. Jakes. 2003. The importance of place: Advances in science and application. For. Sci. 49 (6): 819-821.
21. Marston, S. A. 2000. The social construction of scale. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 24 (2): 219-242.
22. Moore, A.2008. Rethinking scale as a geographical category: From analysis to practice. Prog. Hum. Geogr.32(2):203-225.
23. Moore, R. L., and D. Scott. 2003. Place attachment and context: Comparing a park and a trail within. For. Sci. 49 (6): 877-884.
24. Nelson, P. B. 2001. Rural restructuring in the American West: Land use, family, and class discourses. J. Rural Stud. 17: 395-407.
25. Nielson, E. N., and K. Simonsen. 2003. Scaling from 'below': Practices, strategies and urban spaces. Eur. Plan. Stud. 11 (8): 911-927.
26. Paasi, A. 2004. Place and region: Looking through the prism of scale. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 28 (4): 536-546.
27. Patterson, M. E., and D. R. Williams. 2002. Collecting and analyzing qualitative data: Hermeneutic principles, methods, and case examples. Champaign, IL: Sagamore.
28. Payton, M. A., Fulton, D. C., and D. H. Anderson. 2005. Influence of place attachment and trust on civic action: A study at Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge. Society Nat. Resources 18: 511-528.
29. Raymond, C., and G. Brown. 2007. A spatial method for assessing resident and visitor attitudes towards tourism growth and development. J. Sustain. Tourism 5: 1-22.
30. Raymond, C. M., B. A. Bryan, D. H. MacDonald, A. Cast, S. Starthearn, A. Grandgirard, and T. Kavilas. 2009. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 68: 1301-1315.
31. Sayre, N. F. 2005. Ecological and geographical scale: Parallels and potential for integration. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 29 (3): 276-290.
32. Schroeder, H. W. 2002. Experiencing nature in special places: Surveys in the North-Central Region. J. For. 100 (5): 8-14.
33. Schroeder, H. W. 2005. The way the world should be: Order, cleanness, and serenity in the experience of special places. In Proceedings of the 2004 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, ed. K. Bricker, 52-56. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-326. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.
34. Shuman, H., and S. Presser. 1980. Public opinion and public ignorance: The fine line between attitudes and nonattitudes. Am. J. Sociol. 85 (5): 1214-1225.
35. Swyngedouw, E. 2002. Scaled geographies: Nature, place, and the politics of scale. In Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society and method, ed. R. McMaster and E. Sheppard, 129-153. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
36. Watson, A., R. Matt, T. Waters, K. Gunderson, S. Carver, and B. Davis. 2008. Mapping trade-offs in values at risk in the interface between wilderness and non-wilderness lands. USDA Forest Service, PSW-GTR-19x. Portland, OR.
37. Williams, D. R., and S. I. Stewart. 1998. Sense of place: An elusive concept that is finding a home in ecosystem management. J. For. 96: 18-23.