A novel hybrid multiple criteria decision making model for material selection with target-based criteria

Materials and Design

Volumn 60, Issue , 2014, Pages 380-390

  Liu, Hu Chen ^a,b   You, Jian Xin ^a,b   Zhen, Lu ^a   Fan, Xiao Jun ^a  

^a SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Interdependency of material selection criteria; Material selection; Multiple criteria decision making; Target based criteria

Indexed keywords

JOURNAL BEARINGS; PRODUCT DESIGN;

ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS; ENGINEERING DESIGN; IMPRECISE INFORMATION; MATERIAL SELECTION; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; MULTIPLE DIMENSIONS; QUANTITATIVE FACTORS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84899701220     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: 18734197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.071     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Rao R.V. A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method. Mater Des 2008, 29(10):1949-1954.
2. Liu H.C., Liu L., Wu J. Material selection using an interval 2-tuple linguistic VIKOR method considering subjective and objective weights. Mater Des 2013, 52:158-167.
3. Jahan A., Edwards K.L. Weighting of dependent and target-based criteria for optimal decision-making in materials selection process: biomedical applications. Mater Des 2013, 49:1000-1008.
4. Prasad K., Chakraborty S. A quality function deployment-based model for materials selection. Mater Des 2013, 49:525-535.
5. Peng A.H., Xiao X.M. Material selection using PROMETHEE combined with analytic network process under hybrid environment. Mater Des 2013, 47:643-652.
6. İpek M., Selvi İ.H., Findik F., Torkul O., Cedimoǧlu I.H. An expert system based material selection approach to manufacturing. Mater Des 2013, 47:331-340.
7. Edwards K.L. Selecting materials for optimum use in engineering components. Mater Des 2005, 26(5):469-473.
8. Rao R.V., Patel B.K. A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection. Mater Des 2010, 31(10):4738-4747.
9. Matos M., Simplício M. Innovation and sustainability in mechanical design through materials selection. Mater Des 2006, 27(1):74-78.
10. Milani A.S., Shanian A., Lynam C., Scarinci T. An application of the analytic network process in multiple criteria material selection. Mater Des 2013, 44:622-632.
11. Jahan A., Mustapha F., Sapuan S.M., Ismail M., Bahraminasab M. A framework for weighting of criteria in ranking stage of material selection process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2012, 58(1-4):411-420.
12. Ou Yang Y.P., Shieh H.M., Leu J.D., Tzeng G.H. A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. Int J Oper Res 2008, 5(3):160-168.
13. Jahan A., Edwards K.L. VIKOR method for material selection problems with interval numbers and target-based criteria. Mater Des 2013, 47:759-765.
14. Karande P., Gauri S.K., Chakraborty S. Applications of utility concept and desirability function for materials selection. Mater Des 2013, 45:349-358.
15. Peças P., Ribeiro I., Silva A., Henriques E. Comprehensive approach for informed life cycle-based materials selection. Mater Des 2013, 43:220-232.
16. Maniya K., Bhatt M. A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: preference selection index method. Mater Des 2010, 31(4):1785-1789.
17. Zhou C.C., Yin G.F., Hu X.B. Multi-objective optimization of material selection for sustainable products: artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm approach. Mater Des 2009, 30(4):1209-1215.
18. Lin K.P., Ho H.P., Hung K.C., Pai P.F. Combining fuzzy weight average with fuzzy inference system for material substitution selection in electric industry. Comput Ind Eng 2012, 62(4):1034-1045.
19. Mansor M.R., Sapuan S.M., Zainudin E.S., Nuraini A.A., Hambali A. Hybrid natural and glass fibers reinforced polymer composites material selection using analytical hierarchy process for automotive brake lever design. Mater Des 2013, 51:484-492.
20. Yousefpour M., Rahimi A. Characterization and selection of optimal parameters to achieve the best tribological performance of the electrodeposited Cr nanocomposite coating. Mater Des 2014, 54:382-389.
21. Çalişkan H., Kurşuncu B., Kurbanoǧlu C., Güven Ş.Y. Material selection for the tool holder working under hard milling conditions using different multi criteria decision making methods. Mater Des 2013, 45:473-479.
22. Rashedi A., Sridhar I., Tseng K.J. Multi-objective material selection for wind turbine blade and tower: Ashby's approach. Mater Des 2012, 37:521-532.
23. Rao R.V. A material selection model using graph theory and matrix approach. Mater Sci Eng A 2006, 431(1):248-255.
24. Jahan A., Bahraminasab M., Edwards K.L. A target-based normalization technique for materials selection. Mater Des 2012, 35:647-654.
25. Rao R.V., Davim J.P. A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2008, 35(7):751-760.
26. Jahan A., Mustapha F., Ismail M.Y., Sapuan S.M., Bahraminasab M. A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Mater Des 2011, 32(3):1215-1221.
27. Bahraminasab M., Jahan A. Material selection for femoral component of total knee replacement using comprehensive VIKOR. Mater Des 2011, 32(8-9):4471-4477.
28. Liu H.C., Mao L.X., Zhang Z.Y., Li P. Induced aggregation operators in the VIKOR method and its application in material selection. Appl Math Model 2013, 37(9):6325-6338.
29. Shanian A., Savadogo O. A material selection model based on the concept of multiple attribute decision making. Mater Des 2006, 27(4):329-337.
30. Chan J.W.K., Tong T.K.L. Multi-criteria material selections and end-of-life product strategy: grey relational analysis approach. Mater Des 2007, 28(5):1539-1546.
31. Karande P., Chakraborty S. Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection. Mater Des 2012, 37:317-324.
32. Maity S.R., Chatterjee P., Chakraborty S. Cutting tool material selection using grey complex proportional assessment method. Mater Des 2012, 36:372-378.
33. Chatterjee P., Chakraborty S. Materials selection using COPRAS and COPRAS-G methods. Int J Mater Struct Integrity 2012, 6(2):111-133.
34. Kasaei A., Abedian A., Milani A.S. An application of quality function deployment method in engineering materials selection. Mater Des 2014, 55:912-920.
35. Jahan A., Ismail M.Y., Sapuan S.M., Mustapha F. Material screening and choosing methods - a review. Mater Des 2010, 31(2):696-705.
36. Hsu C.W., Kuo T.C., Chen S.H., Hu A.H. Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 2013, 56:164-172.
37. Cebi S. Determining importance degrees of website design parameters based on interactions and types of websites. Decis Support Syst 2013, 54(2):1030-1043.
38. Rahman S., Subramanian N. Factors for implementing end-of-life computer recycling operations in reverse supply chains. Int J Prod Econ 2012, 140(1):239-248.
39. Jeng D.J.F., Tzeng G.H. Social influence on the use of clinical decision support systems: Revisiting the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology by the fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Comput Ind Eng 2012, 62(3):819-828.
40. Büyüközkan G., Çifçi G. A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 2012, 39(3):3000-3011.
41. Liu HC, You JX, Lin QL, Li H. Risk assessment in system FMEA combining fuzzy weighted average with fuzzy decision making trial and evaluation laboratory. Int J Comp Integ M 2014; doi:10.1080/0951192X.2014.900865.
42. Saaty T.L. Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process 1996, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
43. Ou Yang Y.P., Shieh H.M., Tzeng G.H. A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment. Inf Sci 2013, 232:482-500.
44. Lu M.T., Lin S.W., Tzeng G.H. Improving RFID adoption in Taiwan's healthcare industry based on a DEMATEL technique with a hybrid MCDM model. Decis Support Syst 2013, 56:259-269.
45. Chiu W.Y., Tzeng G.H., Li H.L. A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business. Knowl-Based Syst 2013, 37:48-61.
46. Hsu C.H., Wang F.K., Tzeng G.H. The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR. Resour Conserv Recy 2012, 66:95-111.
47. Opricovic S. Multi-criteria optimization of civil engineering systems 1998, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.
48. Opricovic S., Tzeng G.H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 2004, 156(2):445-455.
49. Liu H.C., Wu J., Li P. Assessment of health-care waste disposal methods using a VIKOR-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method. Waste Manage 2013, 33(12):2744-2751.
50. Liu H.C., Liu L., Liu N., Mao L.X. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 2012, 39(17):12926-12934.