Developing a green supplier selection model by using the DANP with VIKOR

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 1661-1689

  Kuo, Tsai Chi ^a   Hsu, Chia Wei ^b,c   Li, Jie Ying ^a  

^a CHUNG YUAN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TUNGNAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

DANP; EICC; Environmental performance; Supplier selection; VIKOR

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84923262225     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su7021661     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Sheu, J.B.; Chou, Y.H.; Hu, C.C. An integrated logistics operational model for green-supply chain Management. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2005, 41, 287-313.
2. Rao, P. Greening the supply chain: A new initiative in south East Asia. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2002, 22, 632-655.
3. Lamming, R.; Hampson, J. The environment as a supply chain management issue. Br. J. Manag. 1996, 7 (Suppl. S1), S45-S62.
4. Zhu, Q.; Geng, Y. Integrating environmental issues into supplier selection and management: A study of large and medium-sized state-owned enterprises in China. Greener Manag. Int. 2001, 35, 27-40.
5. Handfield, R.; Walton, S.V.; Sroufe, R.; Melnyk, S.A. Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002, 141, 70-87.
6. Humphreys, P.; Wong, R.; Chan, F. Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2003, 138, 349-356.
7. Humphreys, P.K.; McIvor, R.; Chan, F.T.S. Using case-based reasoning to evaluate supplier environmental management performance. Expert Syst. Appl. 2003, 25, 141-153.
8. Rao, P. The greening of suppliers-in the South East Asian context. J. Clean Prod. 2005, 13, 935-945.
9. Lu, L.Y.Y.; Wu, C.H.; Kuo, T.C. Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2007, 45, 4317-4331.
10. Hsu, C.W.; Hu, A.H. Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process. J. Clean Prod. 2009, 17, 255-264.
11. Lee, A.H.; Kang, H.Y.; Hsu, C.F.; Hung, H.C. A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36, 7917-7927.
12. Bai, C.; Sarkis, J. Green supplier development: Analytical evaluation using rough set theory. J. Clean Prod. 2010, 8, 1200-1210.
13. Kuo, R.J.; Wang, Y.C.; Tien, F.C. Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. J. Clean Prod. 2010, 18, 1161-1170.
14. Büyüközkan, G. An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for green supplier evaluation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2012, 50, 2892-2909.
15. Hsu, C.W.; Kuo, T.C.; Chen, S.H.; Hu, A.H. Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. J. Clean Prod. 2013, 56, 164-172.
16. Shen, L.; Olfat, L.; Govindan, K.; Khodaverdi, R.; Diabat, A. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier's performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2013, 74, 170-179.
17. Kannan, D.; Khodaverdi, R.; Olfat, L.; Jafarian, A.; Diabat, A. Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. J. Clean Prod. 2013, 47, 355-367.
18. Genovese, A.; Lenny Koh, S.C.; Bruno, G.; Esposito, E. Greener supplier selection: State of the art and some empirical evidence. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2013, 51, 2868-2886.
19. Huang, S.; Keskar, H. Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2007, 105, 510-523.
20. Liao, Z.; Rittscher, J. A multi-objective supplier selection model under stochastic demand conditions. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2007, 105, 150-159.
21. Gencer, C.; Gürpinar, D. Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm. Appl. Math. Model. 2007, 31, 2475-2486.
22. Zhu, Q.; Dou, Y.; Sarkis, Y. A portfolio-based analysis for green supplier management using the analytical network process. Supply Chain Manag. 2010, 15, 306-319.
23. Pang, B.; Bai, S. An integrated Fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for supplier selection based on analytic network process. J. Intell. Manuf. 2013, 24, 163-174.
24. Hsu, C.W.; Kuo, R.J.; Chiou, C.Y. A multi-criteria decision making approach for evaluating carbon performance of suppliers in the electronics industry. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 11, 775-784.
25. Ou Yang, Y.P.; Shieh, H.M.; Tzeng, G.H. A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. Int. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 5, 160-168.
26. Chen, L.Y.; Wang, T.C. Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2009, 120, 233-242.
27. Liou, J.J.H.; Chuang, Y.T. Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37, 3755-3761.
28. Hsu, C.H.; Wang, F.K.; Tzeng, G.H. The best vendor selection for conducting the recycling material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 66, 95-111.
29. Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G.H. Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 178, 514-529.
30. Chiu, W.Y.; Tzeng, G.H.; Li, H.L. A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business. Knowl. Based Syst. 2013, 37, 48-61.
31. Liu, C.H.; Tzeng, G.H.; Lee, M.H. Improving tourism policy implementation-The use of Hybrid MCDM Models. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 413-426.
32. Shen, K.Y.; Yan, M.R.; Tzeng, G.H. Combining VIKOR-DANP model for glamor stock selection and stock performance improvement. Knowl. Based Syst. 2014, 58, 86-97.
33. Lu, M.T.; Lin, S.W.; Tzeng, G.H. Improving RFID adoption in Taiwan's healthcare industry based on a DEMATEL technique with a hybrid MCDM model. Decis. Support Syst. 2013, 56, 259-269.
34. Wang, Y.L.; Tzeng, G.H. Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM Model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR Methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 5600-5615.
35. Ho, W.; Xu, X.; Dey, P.K. Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 202, 16-24.
36. Govindan, K.; Rajendran, S.; Sarkis, J.; Murugesan, P. Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. J. Clean Prod. 2013, in press.
37. Chiou, C.Y.; Hsu, C.W.; Hwang, W.Y. Comparative investigation on green supplier selection of the American, Japanese and Taiwanese electronics industry in China. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on IE&EM, Singapore, Singapore, 8-11 December 2008; pp. 1909-1914.
38. Thongchattu, C.; Siripokapirom, S. Green supplier selection consensus by neural network. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on ICMEE, Kyoto, Japan, 1-3 August 2010; pp. 313-316.
39. Yan, G. Research on green suppliers' evaluation based on AHP & Genetic Algorithm. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on SPS, Singapore, Singapore, 15-17 May 2009; pp. 615-619.
40. Wen, U.P.; Chi, J.M. Developing green supplier selection procedure: A DEA approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on IE&EM, Xiamen, China, 29-31 October 2010; pp. 79-74.
41. Li, X.; Zhao, C. Selection of suppliers of vehicle components based on green supply chain. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on IE&EM, Beijing, China, 21-23 October 2009; pp. 1588-1591.
42. Shaw, K.; Shankar, R.; Yadav, S.S.; Thakur, L.S. Supplier selection using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 8182-8192.
43. Büyüközkan, G.; çifçi, G. A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Comput. Ind. 2011, 62, 164-174.
44. Kuo, R.J.; Lin, Y.J. Supplier selection using analytic network process and data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2012, 50, 2852-2863.
45. Tuzkaya, G.; Ozgen, A.; Ozgen, D.; Tuzkaya, U.R. Environmental performance evaluation of Suppliers: A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 6, 477-490.
46. Chen, C.C.; Tseng, M.L.; Lin, Y.H.; Lin, Z.S. Implementation of green supply chain management in uncertainty. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on IEEM, Macao, China, 7-10 December 2010; pp. 260-264.
47. Grisi, R.M.; Guerra, L.; Naviglio, G. Supplier performance evaluation for green supply chain management. In Business Performance Measurement and Management; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010; pp. 149-163.
48. Humphreys, P.; McCloskey, A.; McIvor, R.; Maguire, L.; Glackin, C. Employing dynamic fuzzy membership functions to assess environmental performance in the supplier selection process. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2006, 44, 2379-2419.
49. Zhang, H.C.; Li, J.; Merchant, M.E. Using fuzzy multi-agent decision-making in environmentally conscious supplier management. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 2003, 52, 385-388.
50. Yang, Y.; Wu, L. Extension method for green supplier selection. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on WiCom, Dalian, China, 12-14 October 2008; pp. 1-4.
51. Yeh, W.C.; Chuang, M.C. Using multi-objective genetic algorithm for partner selection in green supply chain problems. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 4244-4253.
52. Bala, A.; Paco Muñoz, P.; Rieradevall, J.; Ysern, P. Experiences with greening suppliers. The Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. J. Clean Prod. 2008, 16, 1610-1619.
53. Awasthi, A.; Chauhan, S.S.; Goyal, S.K. A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2010, 126, 370-378.
54. Chiou, T.Y.; Chan, H.K.; Lettice, F.; Chung, S.H. The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2011, 47, 822-836.
55. Feyzioglu, O.; Büyüközkan, G. Evaluation of green suppliers considering decision criteria dependencies. In Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Energy and Transportation Systems; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010; pp. 145-154.
56. Large, R.O.; Thomsen, C.G. Drivers of green supply management performance: Evidence from Germany. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2011, 17, 176-184.
57. Krueger, D.A. The ethics of global supply chains in China-Convergences of east and west. J. Bus. Ethics 2008, 79, 113-120.
58. Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition. Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition® Code of Conduct Version 4.0; Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2012.
59. Hewlett-Packard Company (HP). HP 2012 Global Citizenship Summary Report. Available online: http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/c03742928.pdf (accessed on 3 February 2015).
60. Chiu, Y.J.; Chen, H.C.; Tzeng, G.H.; Shyu, J.Z. Marketing strategy based on customer behavior for the LCD-TV. Int. J. Manag. Decis. Mak. 2006, 7, 143-165.
61. Rahman, S.; Subramanian, N. Factors for implementing end-of-life computer recycling Operations in reverse supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 140, 239-248.
62. Wu, W.W.; Lan, L.W.; Lee, Y.T. Exploring decisive factors affecting an organization's SaaS adoption: A case study. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2011, 31, 556-563.
63. Hsu, Y.L.; Li, W.C.; Chen, K.W. Structuring critical success factors of airline safety management system using a Hybrid Model. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2010, 46, 222-235.
64. Chen, F.H.; Hsu, T.S.; Tzeng, G.H. A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model Combining DEMATEL and ANP. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2011, 30, 908-932.
65. Gabus, A.; Fontela, E. World Problems, an Invitation to Further thought within the Framework of DEMATEL; Batelle Geneva Research Center: Geneva, Switzerland, 1972.
66. Lin, C.W.; Chen, S.H.; Tzeng, G.H. Constructing a cognition map of alternative fuel vehicles using the DEMATEL method. J. Multi Criteria Decis. Anal. 2009, 16, 5-19.
67. Liou, J.J.H.; Tzeng, G.H.; Chang, H.C. Airline safety measurement using a Novel Hybrid Model. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2007, 13, 243-249.
68. Tzeng, G.H.; Chiang, C.H.; Li, C.W. Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst. Appl. 2007, 32, 1028-1044.
69. Yang, J.L.; Tzeng, G.H. An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for A Novel cluster-weighted with ANP Method. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 1417-1424.
70. Huang, J.J.; Tzeng, G.H.; Ong, C.S. Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2005, 26, 755-767.
71. Hung, Y.H.; Huang, T.L.; Hsieh, J.C.; Tsuei, H.J.; Cheng, C.C.; Tzeng, G.H. Online reputation management for improving marketing by using a Hybrid MCDM model. Knowl. Based Syst. 2012, 35, 87-93.
72. Tsai, W.H.; Chou, W.C.; Lai, C.W. An effective evaluation model and improvement analysis for national park websites: A case study of Taiwan. Tourism Manag. 2010, 31, 936-952.
73. Opricovic, S. Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems; Faculty of Civil Engineering: Belgrade, Serbia, 1998.
74. Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G.H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 156, 445-455.
75. Tzeng, G.H.; Teng, M.H.; Chen, J.J.; Opricovic, S. Multicriteria selection for a restaurant Location in Taipei. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2002, 21, 171-187.
76. Morose, G.; Shina, S.; Farrell, R. Supply chain collaboration to achieve toxics use reduction. J. Clean Prod. 2011, 19, 397-407.
77. Oehmen, J.; de Nardo, M.; Schönsleben, P.; Boutellier, R. Supplier code of conduct-state-of-the-art and customisation in the electronics industry. Prod. Plan. Control 2010, 21, 664-679.
78. Ekener-Petersen, E.; Finnveden, G. Potential hotspots identified by social LCA-part 1: A case study of a laptop computer. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2013, 18, 127-143.
79. Krause, D.R.; Ellram, L.M. Success factors in supplier development. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 1997, 27, 39-52.
80. Govindan, K.; Kannan, D.; Haq, A.N. Analyzing supplier development criteria for an automobile industry. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2010, 110, 43-62.
81. Li, W.; Humphreys, P.K.; Yeung, A.C.; Cheng, T.C.E. The impact of supplier development on buyer competitive advantage: A path analytic model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 135, 353-366.
82. Modi, S.B.; Mabert, V.A. Supplier development: Improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer. J. Oper. Manag. 2007, 25, 42-64.
83. Dou, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J. Evaluating green supplier development programs with a grey-analytical network process-based methodology. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2014, 233, 420-431.
84. Fu, X.; Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J. Evaluating green supplier development programs at a telecommunications systems provider. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 38, 13505-13517.
85. Tate, W.L.; Ellram, L.M.; Dooley, K.J. Environmental purchasing and supplier management (EPSM): Theory and practice. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2012, 18, 173-188.