Application of ANP and DEMATEL to evaluate the decision-making of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 156, Issue 1-4, 2009, Pages 181-197

  Tseng, Ming Lang ^a  

^a MINGDAO UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Analytical network process; DEMATEL; Municipal solid waste (MSW); Municipal solid waste management (MSWM)

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; ANALYTICAL NETWORK PROCESS; BUILD-OPERATE-TRANSFER PROJECTS; CRITICAL ISSUES; DECISION MAKING TRIAL AND EVALUATION LABORATORIES; DEMATEL; EFFECTIVE SOLUTION; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; JOINT VENTURES; METRO MANILA; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING PROBLEMS; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE (MSW); MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT (MSWM); RESOURCE RECOVERY; SOLUTION SELECTION; STRUCTURAL MODELS; THERMAL PROCESS TECHNOLOGY;

COMPUTER SYSTEM RECOVERY; DECISION MAKING; MODEL STRUCTURES; SALVAGING; SOLID WASTES;

WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ANALYTICAL METHOD; DECISION MAKING; LANDFILL; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; ARTICLE; CAUSAL MODELING; DECISION MAKING; DECISION MAKING TRIAL AND EVALUATION LABORATORY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; LANDFILL; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; PHILIPPINES; PROCESS TECHNOLOGY; RECYCLING; SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE DISPOSAL;

CITIES; DECISION MAKING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHILIPPINES; REFUSE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ASIA; EURASIA; NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION; PHILIPPINES; SOUTHEAST ASIA;

EID: 68649104312     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0477-1     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ananda, J., & Herath, G. (2003). Incorporating stakeholder values into regional forest planning: A value function approach. Ecological Economics, 45, 75-90. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00004-1.
2. Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2003). Metro Manila Solid Waste Management project. ADB. ADB Ave., Pasig City, Phils: ADB Headquarters.
3. Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 233-247. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9.
4. Cavallaro, F., & Ciraolo, L. (2005). A multi criteria approach to evaluate wind energy plants on an Italian island. Energy Policy, 33, 235-244. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00228-3.
5. Cheng, S., Chan, C. W., & Huang, G. H. (2002). Using multiple criteria decision analysis for supporting decisions of solid waste management. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part A, Toxic/ Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 37, 975-990. doi: 10.1081/ESE-120004517.
6. Chiu, A. S. F. (2006). Metro Manila Solid Waste Management and Circular Economy Promotion study. Technical studies under Institute for Global Environmental strategies project on Integrating global Concerns in the waste sector in Asian Cities.
7. Chiu, Y. J., Chen, H. C., & Tzeng, G. H. (2006). Marketing strategy based on customer behavior for the LCD-TV. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 7, 143-165. doi: 10.1504/ IJMDM.2006.009140.
8. Chung, S. S., & Lo, C. W. H. (2003). Evaluating sustainability in waste management: The case of construction and demolition, chemical and clinical wastes in Hong Kong. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 37, 119-145. doi: 10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00075-7.
9. Chung, S. H., Lee, A. H. I., & Pearn, W. L. (2005). Analytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator. International Journal of Production Economics, 96(1), 15-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.02.006.
10. Fontela, E., & Gabus, A. (1976). The DEMATEL Observer, DEMATEL 1976 Report. Switzerland, Geneva, Battelle Geneva Research Center.
11. Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. (1973). Perceptions of the World Problematique: Communication Procedure, Communicating With Those Bearing Collective Responsibility. DEMATEL Report No. 1, Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva, Switzerland.
12. Hernandez, M. G., & Martin-Cejas, R. R. (2005). Incentives towards sustainable management of the municipal solid waste on islands. Sustainable Development, 13, 13-24. doi: 10.1002/sd.241.
13. Hokkanen, J., & Salminen, P. (1997). Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(1), 19-36. doi: 10.1016/ 0377-2217(95)00325-8.
14. Hori, S., & Shimizu, Y. (1999). Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems. Control Engineering Practice, 7(11), 1413-1419. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0661(99)00112-4.
15. Hung, M. L., Ma, H. W., & Yang, W. F. (2007). A novel sustainable decision making model for municipal solid waste management. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 27, 209-219. doi: 10.1016/ j.wasman.2006.01.008.
16. IBRD-WB. (1999). Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook 1998, Toward Cleaner Production. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, U.S.A.
17. Karagiannidis, A., & Moussiopoulos, N. (1998). A model generating framework for regional waste management taking local peculiarities explicitly into account. Location Science, 6, 281-305. doi: 10.1016/ S0966-8349(98)00052-7.
18. Khan, S., & Faisal, M. N. (2008). An analytical network process model for municipal solid waste disposal options. Waste Management, 28(9), 1500-1509.
19. Meade, L. M., & Sarkis, J. (1998). Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytic network process. Logistics and Transportation Review, 34(2), 201-215. doi: 10.1016/ S1366-5545(98)00012-X.
20. Morrissey, A. J., & Browne, J. (2004). Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 24, 297-308. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2003.09.005.
21. National Solid Waste Management Commission (NSWMC) (2005). National Solid Waste Management Framework. Environmental Management Bureau, Department of Environmental and Natural Resources.
22. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156 (2), 445-455. doi: 10.1016/ S0377-2217(03)00020-1.
23. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Saaty, T. L. (1996). The analytic network process-decision making with dependence and feedback. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS.
25. Saaty, T. L. (1999). Fundamentals of the analytic network process. The International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Kobe, Japan.
26. Saaty, R.W. (2003). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making and the analytic network process (ANP) for decision making with dependence and feedback. Creative Decisions Foundation.
27. Sankar, N. R., & Prabhu, B. S. (2001). Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18(3), 324-335. doi: 10.1108/02656710110383737.
28. Sarkis, J. (1999). A methodological framework for evaluating environmentally conscious manufacturing programs. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 36(4), 793-810. doi: 10.1016/ S0360-8352(99)00166-7.
29. Sekitani, K., & Takahashi, I. (2001). A unified model and analysis for AHP and ANP. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 44(1), 67-89.
30. Seyed-Hosseini, S. M., Safaei, N., & Asgharpour, M. J. (2006). Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(8), 872-881. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.09.005.
31. Shee, D. Y., Tzeng, G. H., Tang, T. I. (2003). AHP, fuzzy measure and fuzzy integral approaches for the appraisal of information service providers in Taiwan. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 6(1), 8-30.
32. Skordilis, A. (2004). Modelling of integrated solid waste management systems in an island. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41, 243-254. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.10.007.
33. Su, J. P., Chiueh, P. T., Hung, M. L., & Ma, H. W. (2007). Analyzing policy impact potential for municipal solid waste management decision making: A case study of Taiwan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 51, 418-434. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.10.007.
34. Tesfamariam, D., & Lindberg, B. (2005). Aggregate analysis of manufacturing systems using system dynamics and ANP. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 49(1), 98-117. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2005.05.001.
35. Tseng, M. L., Lin, Y. H., Chiu, A. S. F., & Liao, C. H. (2008). Using FANP approach on selection of competitive priorities based on cleaner production implementation: A case study in PCB manufacturer, Taiwan. Clean Technology and Environmental Policy, 10(1), 17-29.
36. Vego, G., Kucar-Dragicevic, S., & Koporivanac, N. (2007). Application of multi-criteria decision making on strategic municipal solid waste management in Dalmatia, Croatia, Waste management, (in press).
37. Wilson, E., McDougall, F., & Willmore, J. (2001). Euro-trash searching Europe for a more sustainable approach to waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 31, 327-346. doi: 10.1016/ S0921-3449(00)00089-6.
38. World Bank (2001). Philippines Environment Monitor, Philippines.
39. Wu, W. W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828-835.