Who's right: The author or the audience? Effects of user comments and ratings on the perception of online science articles

Communications

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 339-360

  Winter, Stephan ^a   Krämer, Nicole C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

argument quality; attitudes; blogs; comments; Science communication; user generated content

Indexed keywords

EID: 84987761992     PISSN: 03412059     EISSN: 16134087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/commun-2016-0008     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., Ladwig, P. 2014. The 'nasty effect': Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(3). 373-387.
3. Bless, H., Wänke, M., Bohner, G., Fellhauer, R. F., Schwarz, N. 1994. Need for cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 25. 147-154.
4. Bode, L., Vraga, E. K. 2015. In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication 65(4). 619-638.
5. Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N. 2015. Counteracting the politicization of science. Journal of Communication 65(5). 745-769.
6. Bromme, R., Goldman, S. 2014. The public's bounded understanding of science. Educational Psychologist 49(2). 59-69.
7. Bushman, B. J., Rothstein, H. R., Anderson, C. A. 2010. Much ado about something: Violent video game effects and a school of red herring ? Reply to Ferguson and Kilburn (2010). Psychological Bulletin 136(2). 182-187.
8. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E. 1982. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42(1). 116-131.
9. Chaiken, S. 1987. The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. Zanna, J. Olson & C. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Chaiken, S., Maheswaran, D. 1994. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(3). 460-473.
11. Ferguson, C. J., Kilburn, J. 2010. Much ado about nothing: The misestimation and overinterpretation of violent video game effects in Eastern and Western nations: Comment on Anderson et al. 2010. Psychological Bulletin 136(2). 151-173.
12. Gervais, B. T. 2014. Following the news? Reception of uncivil partisan media and the use of incivility in political expression. Political Communication 31(4). 564-583.
13. Gunther, A. C. 1998. The persuasive press inference: Effects of mass media on perceived public opinion. Communication Research 25(5). 486-504.
14. Gunther, A., Storey, D. 2003. The influence of presumed media influence. Journal of Communication 53. 199-219.
15. Houston, J. B., Hansen, G. J., Nisbett, G. S. 2011. Influence of user comments on perceptions of media bias and third-person effect in online news. Electronic News 5(2). 79-92.
16. Hsueh, M., Yogeeswaran, K., Malinen, S. 2015. "Leave your comment below": Can biased online comments influence our own prejudicial attitudes and behaviors? Human Communication Research 41(4). 557-576.
17. Lee, E.-J. 2012. That's not the way it is: How user-generated comments on the news affect perceived media bias. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18(1). 32-45.
18. Lee, E.-J., Jang, Y. J. 2010. What do others' reactions to news on internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers' need for cognition on reality perception. Communication Research 37(6). 825-846.
19. Len-Rios, M. E., Bhandari, M., Medvedeva, Y. S. 2014. Deliberation of the scientific evidence for breastfeeding: Online comments as social representations. Science Communication 36(6). 778-801.
20. Maurer, M. 2011. Wie Journalisten mit Ungewissheit umgehen. Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel der Berichterstattung über die Folgen des Klimawandels [How journalists cope with uncertainty. A study on the effects of climate change]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 59(1). 60-74.
21. Nauroth, P., Gollwitzer, M., Bender, J., Rothmund, T. 2014. Gamers against science: The case of the violent video games debate. European Journal of Social Psychology 44(2). 104-116.
22. Noelle-Neumann, E. 1974. The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication 24(2). 43-51.
23. Peters, H. P., Dunwoody, S., Allgaier, J., Lo, Y.-Y., Brossard, D. 2014. Public communication of science 2.0: Is the communication of science via the 'new media' online a genuine transformation or old wine in new bottles? EMBO Reports 15(7). 749-753.
24. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. 1986. Communication and persuasion. Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer.
25. Popper, K. R. 1968. The logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
26. Shi, R., Messaris, P., Cappella, J. N. 2014. Effects of online comments on smokers' perception of antismoking public service announcements. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(4). 975-990.
27. Stadtler, M., Bromme, R. 2014. The content-source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379-402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Stocking, S. H. 1999. How journalists deal with scientific uncertainty. In S. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, & C. Rogers (Eds.), Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (pp. 23-42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Su, L., Akin, H., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A. 2015. Science news consumption patterns and their implications for public understanding of science. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 92(3). 597-616.
30. Walther, J. B., DeAndrea, D., Kim, J., Anthony, J. 2010. The influence of online comments on perceptions of anti-marijuana public service announcements on Youtube. Human Communication Research 36(4). 469-492.
31. Walther, J. B., Jang, J.-W. 2012. Communication processes in participatory web sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18(1). 2-15.
32. Winter, S. 2013. Lost in Information?-Sozialpsychologische Aspekte der Selektion und Rezeption von journalistischen Online-Angeboten [Lost in information? Socialpsychological aspects of the selection and reception of journalistic online news sites]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
33. Winter, S., Krämer, N. C. 2014. A question of credibility-Effects of source cues and recommendations on information selection on news sites and blogs. Communications-The European Journal of Communication Research 39(4). 435-456.
34. Winter, S., Krämer, N. C., Rösner, L., Neubaum, G. 2015. Don't keep it (too) simple: How textual representations of scientific uncertainty affect laypersons' attitudes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 34(3). 251-272.
35. Zerback, T., Fawzi, N. 2016. Can online exemplars trigger a spiral of silence? Examining the effects of exemplar opinions on perceptions of public opinion and speaking out. New Media & Society.
36. Ziegele, M., Quiring, O. 2013. Conceptualizing online discussion value: A multidimensional framework for analyzing user comments on mass-media websites. Communication Yearbook 37(1). 125-154.
37. Ziegele, M., Weber, M. 2015. Example, please! Comparing the effects of single customer reviews and aggregate review scores on online shoppers' product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Behavior 14(2). 103-114.
38. Zillmann, D., Brosius, H.-B. 2000. Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.