Much Ado About Something: Violent Video Game Effects and a School of Red Herring: Reply to Ferguson and Kilburn (2010)

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 136, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 182-187

  Bushman, Brad J ^a   Rothstein, Hannah R ^b   Anderson, Craig A ^c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c Department of Statistics Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence Iowa State University 2438 Osborn Dr Ames   (United States)

Author keywords

aggression; meta analysis; violent video games

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649207776     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0018718     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. American Psychological Association. Resolution on violence in video games and interactive media (2005, August 17). http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/resolutiononvideoviolence.pdf Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/resolutiononvideoviolence.pdf
2. Anderson C.A., and Bushman B.J. Media violence and the American public revisited. American Psychologist 57 (2002) 448-450
3. Anderson C.A., Carnagey N.L., Flanagan M., Benjamin A.J., Eubanks J., and Valentine J.C. Violent video games: Specific effects of violent content on aggressive thoughts and behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 36 (2004) 199-249
4. Anderson C.A., and Ford C.M. Affect of the game player: Short-term effects of highly and mildly aggressive video games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 12 (1986) 390-402
5. Anderson C.A., Gentile D.A., and Buckley K.E. Violent video game effects on children and adolescents: Theory, research, and public policy (2007), Oxford University Press, New York, NY
6. Anderson C.A., Shibuya A., Ihori N., Swing E.L., Bushman B.J., Sakamoto A., and Saleem M. Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries. Psychological Bulletin 136 (2010) 151-173
7. Barnett, J., Coulson, M., & Foreman, N. (2008, April). The WoW! factor: Reduced levels of anger after violent on-line play. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the British Psychological Society, Dublin, Ireland.
8. Borenstein M., Hedges L.V., Higgins J.P.T., and Rothstein H.R. Introduction to meta-analysis (2009), Wiley, New York, NY
9. Bushman B.J., and Anderson C.A. Media violence and the American public: Scientific facts versus media misinformation. American Psychologist 56 (2001) 477-489
10. Bushman B.J., and Geen R.G. The role of cognitive-emotional mediators and individual differences in the effects of media violence on aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (1990) 156-163
11. Bushman B.J., and Wang M.C. A procedure for combining sample correlations and vote counts to obtain an estimate and a confidence interval for the population correlation coefficient. Psychological Bulletin 117 (1995) 530-546
12. Bushman B.J., and Wang M.C. A procedure for combining sample standardized mean differences and vote counts to estimate the population standardized mean difference in fixed effects models. Psychological Methods 1 (1996) 66-80
13. Bushman B.J., and Wang M.C. Vote counting methods in meta-analysis. In: Cooper H.M., Hedges L.V., and Valentine J.C. (Eds). Handbook of research synthesis. 2nd ed. (2009), Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY 207-220
14. Carlson M., Marcus-Newhall A., and Miller N. Evidence for a general construct of aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 15 (1989) 377-389
15. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), Academic Press, New York, NY
16. Congressional Public Health Summit. Joint statement on the impact of entertainment violence on children (2000, July 26). http://www.aap.org/advocacy/releases/jstmtevc.htm Retrieved from www.aap.org/advocacy/releases/jstmtevc.htm
17. Cooper H. Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. 4th ed. (2009), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
18. Duval S. The trim and fill method. In: Rothstein H.R., Sutton A.J., and Borenstein M. (Eds). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (2005), Wiley, Chichester, England 127-144
19. Egger M., Dickersin K., and Smith G. Problems and limitations in conducting systematic reviews. In: Egger M., Davey-Smith G., and Altman D. (Eds). Systematic reviews in health care: Meta-analysis in context (2001), BMJ Books, London, England 43-68
20. Escobar-Chaves S.L., and Anderson c.A. Media and risky behaviors. The Future of Children 18 (2008) 147-180
21. Ferguson C.J. Evidence for publication bias in video game violence effects literature: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior 12 (2007) 470-482
22. Ferguson C.J. The good, the bad and the ugly: A meta-analytic review of positive and negative effects of violent video games. Psychiatric Quarterly 78 (2007) 309-316
23. Ferguson C.J., and Kilburn J. The public health risks of media violence: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Pediatrics 154 (2009) 759-763
24. Ferguson C.J., and Kilburn J. Much ado about nothing: The misestimation and overinterpretation of violent video game effects in Eastern and Western nations: Comment on Anderson et al. (2010). Psychological Bulletin 136 (2010) 174-178
25. Ferguson, C. J., & Rueda, S. M. (in press). The Hitman study: Violent video game exposure effects on aggressive behavior, hostile feelings and depression. European Psychologist
26. Ferguson, C. J., San Miguel, C., & Hartley, R. D. (in press). A multivariate analysis of youth violence and aggression: the influence of family, peers, depression, and media violence. Journal of Pediatrics
27. Hedges L.V., Cooper H.M., and Bushman B.J. Testing the null hypothesis in meta-analysis. A comparison of combined probability and confidence interval procedures. Psychological Bulletin 111 (1992) 188-194
28. Hemphill J.F. Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist 58 (2003) 78-79
29. Ioannidis J.P.A., Patsopoulos N.A., and Rothstein H.R. Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots. British Medical Journal 336 (2008) 1413-1415
30. Lipsey M.W. Design sensitivity: Statistical power for experimental research (1990), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
31. Lipsey M.W., and Wilson D.B. Practical meta-analysis (2001), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
32. Littell J.H., Corcoran J., and Pillai V. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2008), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
33. McDaniel M.A., Rothstein H.R., and Whetzel D. Publication bias: A case study of four test vendor manuals. Personnel Psychology 59 (2006) 927-953
34. Olson C., Kutner L., Baer L., Beresin E., Warner D., and Nicholi A. M-rated video games and aggressive or problem behavior among young adolescents. Applied Developmental Science 13 4 (2009) 1-11
35. Peters J.L., Sutton A.J., Jones D.R., Abrams K.R., and Rushton L. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity. Statistics in Medicine 26 (2007) 4544-4562
36. Petticrew M., and Roberts H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide (2005), Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, England
37. Przybylski A., Weinstein N., Ryan R., and Rigby C. Having to versus wanting to play: Background and consequences of harmonious versus obsessive engagement in video games. CyberPsychology & Behavior 12 (2009) 485-492
38. Richard F.D., Bond Jr. C.F., and Stokes-Zoota J.J. One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology 7 (2003) 331-363
39. Rosenthal R. How are we doing in soft psychology?. American Psychologist 45 (1990) 775-777
40. Rothstein H.R. Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. Journal of Applied Psychology 75 (1990) 322-327
41. Rothstein H.R. Progress is our most important product: Contributions of validity generalization and meta-analysis to the development and communication of knowledge in I/O psychology. In: Murphy K.R. (Ed). Validity generalization: A critical review (2003), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 115-154
42. Rothstein H.R. File drawer analysis. In: Lewis-Beck M. (Ed). The encyclopedia of research methods for the social sciences (2004), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
43. Rothstein H.R. Publication bias. Wiley encyclopedia of clinical trials (2008), Wiley, Chichester, England
44. Rothstein H.R. Publication bias as a threat to the validity of meta-analytic results. Journal of Experimental Criminology 4 (2008) 61-81
45. Rothstein H.R., and Hopewell S. Grey literature. In: Cooper H.M., Hedges L.V., and Valentine J.C. (Eds). Handbook of research synthesis. 2nd ed. (2009), Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY 103-125
46. Rothstein H.R., and McDaniel M.A. Guidelines for conducting and reporting meta-analyses. Psychological Reports 65 (1989) 759-770
47. Rothstein H.R., McDaniel M.A., and Borenstein M. Meta-analysis: A review of quantitative cumulation methods. In: Schmitt N., and Drasgow F. (Eds). Advances in measurement and data analysis (2001), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 534-570
48. Rothstein H.R., Sutton A.J., and Borenstein M. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (2005), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
49. Ryan R., Rigby C.S., and Przybylski A. The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion 30 (2006) 344-360
50. Schmidt F.L., Law K., Hunter J.E., Rothstein H.R., Pearlman K., and McDaniel M. Refinements in validity generalization methods: Implications for the situational specificity hypothesis. Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (1993) 3-12
51. Sherry J.L. The effects of violent video games on aggression: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research 27 (2001) 409-431
52. Sterne J.A.C., and Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 54 (2001) 1046-1055
53. Taylor S.P. Aggressive behavior and physiological arousal as a function of provocation and the tendency to inhibit aggression. Journal of Personality 35 (1967) 297-310
54. Terrin N., Schmid C.H., Lau J., and Olkin I. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity. Statistics in Medicine 22 (2003) 2113-2126
55. Tetzlaff, J., Moher, D., Pham, B., & Altman, D (2006, October). Survey of views on including grey literature in systematic reviews. Paper presented at the 16th Cochrane Colloquium, Dublin, Ireland.
56. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Youth violence: A report of the Surgeon General (2001), U.S. Government Printing Office, Rockville, MD
57. Valentine, J. C., Pigott, T. D., & Rothstein, H. R. (in press). How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
58. Wade C.A., Turner H.M., Rothstein H.R., and Lavenberg J. Information retrieval and the role of the information specialist in producing high-quality systematic reviews in the social, behavioral, and education sciences. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 2 (2006) 89-108
59. Wang M.C., and Bushman B.J. Using normal quantile plots to explore meta-analytic data sets. Psychological Methods 3 (1998) 46-54
60. Wang M.C., and Bushman B.J. Integrating results through meta-analytic review using SAS software (1999), SAS Institute, Cary, NC