"Leave Your Comment Below": Can Biased Online Comments Influence Our Own Prejudicial Attitudes and Behaviors?

Human Communication Research

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 557-576

  Hsueh, Mark ^a   Yogeeswaran, Kumar ^a   Malinen, Sanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Computer Mediated Communication; Explicit Prejudice; Implicit Prejudice; Online Comments; Social Norms

Indexed keywords

EID: 84941738947     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hcre.12059     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2013). The "Nasty Effect:" Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 373-387. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12009.
2. Ardelet, C., & Briar, B. (2011). Influence on the recommendations of internet users: The role of social presence and expertise. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 26, 45-67.
3. Bicchieri, C., & Lev-On, A. (2007). Computer-mediated communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: An experimental analysis. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 6, 139-168. doi:10.1177/1470594x07077267.
4. Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242-261. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0603_8.
5. Blanchard, F. A., Crandall, C. S., Brigham, J. C., & Vaughn, L. (1994). Condemning and condoning racism: A social context approach to interracial settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 993-997. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.993.
6. Blanchard, F. A., Lilly, T., & Vaughn, L. A. (1991). Reducing the expression of racial prejudice. Psychological Science, 2, 101-105. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb.00108.x.
7. Brisbane, A. S. (2010, December 11). Readers with plenty to say. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/12/opinion/12pubed.html.
8. Cabezudo, R. S. J., Izquierdo, C. C., & Pinto, J. R. (2013). The persuasion context and results in online opinion seeking: Effects of message and source-The moderating role of network managers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16, 828-835. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0647.
9. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621. doi:10.1146/annurev.55.090902.
10. Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O'Brien, L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359-378. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359.
11. Dasgupta, N. (2004). Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestation. Social Justice Research, 17, 143-169. doi:10.1023/B:SORE.0000027407.70241.15.
12. Dasgupta, N. (2009). Mechanisms underlying the malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes: The role of automaticity versus cognitive control. In T. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 267-284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800-814.
14. De Koster, W., & Houtmann, D. (2008). "Stormfront is like a second home to me": On virtual community formation by right-wing extremists. Information, Communication & Society, 11, 1155-1176. doi:10.1080/13691180802266665.
15. DeAndrea, D. C. (2012). Participatory social media and the evaluation of online behavior. Human Communication Research, 38, 510-528. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01435.x.
16. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636. doi:10.1037/h0046408.
17. Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2007). Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equality. Psychological Science, 18(10), 867-872.
18. Dylko, I., & McCluskey, M. (2012). Media effects in an era of rapid technological transformation: A case of user-generated content and political participation. Communication Theory, 22, 250-278. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01409.x.
19. Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Qing, Q., & Wahl, S. T. (2007). The influence of computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on student perceptions of instructors and attitudes toward learning course content. Communication Education, 56, 255-277. doi:10.1080/03634520701236866.
20. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225.
21. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, England: Sage.
22. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 692-731. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692.
23. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.
24. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.
25. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.
26. Greenwald, A. G., Poehlmann, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17-41. doi:10.1037/a0015575.
27. Hewstone, M., Islam, M. R., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Models of crossed categorization and intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 779-793. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.779.
28. Ho, C., & Jackson, J. W. (2001). Attitudes toward Asian Americans: Theory and measurement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1553-1581. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02742.x.
29. Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16, 7-30. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x.
30. Houston, J. B., Hansen, G. J., & Nisbett, G. S. (2011). Influence of user comments on perceptions of media bias and third-person effect in online news. Electronic News, 5, 79-92. doi:10.1177/1931243111407618.
31. Hughes, M. G., Griffith, J. A., Zeni, T. A., Arsenault, M. L., Cooper, O. D., Johnson, G., † Mumford, M. D. (2014). Discrediting in a message board forum: The effects of social support and attacks on expertise and trustworthiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 325-341. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12077.
32. Hughey, M. W., & Daniels, J. (2013). Racist comments at online news sites: A methodological dilemma for discourse analysis. Media, Culture & Society, 35, 332-347. doi:10.1177/0163443712472089.
33. Internet Live Stats. (2014). Twitter usage statistics. Retrieved September 22, 2014, from http://www.internetlivestats.com/twitter-statistics/.
34. Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 2169-2188. doi:10.1002/asi.21149.
35. Jurkowitz, M (2014, March 26). The growth in digital reporting: What it means for journalism and news consumers. Pew Research. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2014/03/26/the-growth-in-digital-reporting/.
36. Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., Moll, J., Hermsen, S., & Russin, A. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 871-888. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.871.
37. Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15, 127-147. doi:10.1093/ct/15.2.127.
38. Lee, E.-J. (2006). When and how does depersonalization increase conformity to group norms in computer-mediated communication? Communication Research, 33, 423-447. doi:10.1177/0093650206293248.
39. Lee, J. (2014, February 4). Coca-Cola Super Bowl ad: Can you believe this reaction? Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2014/02/03/coca-cola-ad-super-bowl-racism/5177463/.
40. Legault, L., Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Ironic effects of antiprejudice messages: How motivational interventions can reduce (but also increase) prejudice. Psychological Science, 22, 1472-1477. doi:10.1177/0956797611427918.
41. Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 38-55. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12030.
42. McLaughlin, C., & Vitak, J. (2011). Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14, 299-315. doi:10.1177/1461444811412712.
43. Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60, 413-439. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x.
44. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., † Banaji, M. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36-88. doi:10.1080/10463280701489053.
45. Petty, R. E., Priester, J. R., & Brinol, P. (2002). Mass media attitude change: Implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 155-198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811-832. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811.
47. Popular Science. (2013). Why we're shutting off our comments. Retrieved September 24, 2013, from http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-09/why-were-shutting-our-comments?
48. Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2002). Behavior online: Does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequality? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1073-1083. doi:10.1177/01461672022811006.
49. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer- mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26, 341-371. doi:10.1093/hcr/26.3.341.
50. Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161-198. doi:10.1080/14792779443000049.
51. Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2003). Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Communication Theory, 13(2), 184-203.
52. Sagar, H. A., & Schofield, J. W. (1980). Racial and behavioral cues in black and white children's perceptions of ambiguously aggressive acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 590-598. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.590.
53. Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429-434. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x.
54. Sinclair, S., Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., & Colangelo, A. (2005). Social tuning of automatic racial attitudes: The role of affiliative motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 583.
55. Spears, R., Lea, M., Corneliussen, R. A., Postmes, T., & Ter Harr, W. (2002). Computer-mediated communication as a chance for social resistance: The strategic side of SIDE. Small Group Research, 33, 555-574. doi:10.1177/104649602237170.
56. Stangor, C., Sechrist, G., & Jost, J. T. (2001). Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 486-496. doi:10.1177/0146167201274009.
57. Stuff. (2013, May 12). Chinese cheats rort NZ Universities with fakes. Retrieved June 1, 2013 from http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/education/8662224/Chinese-cheats-rort-NZ-universities-with-fakes12/05/2013.
58. Thorson, K., Vraga, E., & Ekdale, B. (2010). Credibility in context: How uncivil online commentary affects news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 289-313. doi:10.1080/15205430903225571.
59. Toosi, N. R., Babbitt, L. G., Ambady, N., & Sommers, S. R. (2012). Dyadic interracial interactions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1-27. doi:10.1037/a0025767.
60. Walther, J. B., DeAndrea, D., Kim, J., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research, 36, 469-492. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01384.x.
61. Walther, J. B., & Jang, J.-W. (2012). Communication processes in participatory websites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 2-15. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01592.x.
62. Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). ). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Woong-Yun, G., & Park, S. Y. (2011). Selective posting: Willingness to post a message online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 201-227. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01533.x.
64. Yanovitzky, I., & Rimal, R. N. (2006). Communication and normative influence: An introduction to the special issue. Communication Theory, 16, 1-6. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00002.x.
65. Zitek, E. M., & Hebl, M. R. (2007). The role of social norm clarity in the influenced expression of prejudice over time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 867-876. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.010.