Public communication of science 2.0: Is the communication of science via the "new media" online a genuine transformation or old wine in new bottles?

EMBO Reports

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 749-753

  Peters, Hans Peter ^a   Dunwoody, Sharon ^b   Allgaier, Joachim ^c   Lo, Yin Yueh ^a   Brossard, Dominique ^b  

^a FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ACCOUNTING; ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONSUMER; EXPECTATION; FUNDING; HUMAN; INFORMATION; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE; MOTIVATION; MULTIMEDIA; NANOTECHNOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; PERCEPTION; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC RELATIONS; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; READING; RESEARCH; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCIENTIST; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIETY; UNIVERSITY; VIDEORECORDING; MASS MEDIUM;

COMMUNICATION; COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA; HUMANS; INTERNET; SCIENCE;

EID: 84903721602     PISSN: 1469221X     EISSN: 14693178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15252/embr.201438979     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Brossard D, (2013) New media landscapes and the science information consumer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 14096-14101
2. Hilgartner S, (1990) The dominant view of popularization: conceptual problems, political uses. Soc Stud Sci 20: 519-539
3. Weingart P, (2012) The lure of the mass media and its repercussions on science. In The Sciences' Media Connection-Public Communication and its Repercussions, Rödder S, Franzen M, Weingart P, (eds), pp. 17-32. Dordrecht, NL: Springer
4. Jasanoff S, (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41: 223-244 (Pubitemid 41341976)
5. Anderson AA, Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Xenos MA, Ladwig P, (2013) The "nasty effect:" online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. J Comput Mediat Commun 19: 373-387
6. Graur D, (2007) Public control could be a nightmare for researchers. Nature 450: 1156
7. Peters HP, Brossard D, De Cheveigné S, Dunwoody S, Kallfass M, Miller S, Tsuchida S, Cain A, Paquez A-S, (2009) Kontakte biomedizinischer Forscher mit Journalisten und Öffentlichkeit: internationaler Vergleich von Erfahrungen und Einstellungen in Deutschland, Frankreich, Großbritannien, Japan und den USA. In Medienorientierung biomedizinischer Forscher im internationalen Vergleich, Peters HP, (ed.), pp. 45-99. Jülich: Forschungszentrum Jülich
8. Brossard D, Shanahan J, (2003) Do citizens want to have their say? Media, agricultural biotechnology, and authoritarian views of democratic processes in science. Mass Commun Soc 6: 291-312 (Pubitemid 37298514)
9. European Commission (2013) Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), Science and Technology. Report on Special Eurobarometer 401. Brussels, http://ec.europa.eu/public-opinion/archives/ebs/ebs-401-en.pdf
10. National Science Board (2014) Science & Engineering Indicators 2014. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation
11. Eveland WP, Dunwoody S, (1998) Users and navigation patterns of a science World Wide Web site for the public. Public Underst Sci 7: 285-311 (Pubitemid 128688681)
12. Allgaier J, Dunwoody S, Brossard D, Lo Y-Y, Peters HP, (2013a) Journalism and social media as means of observing the contexts of science. Bioscience 63: 284-287
13. Friedrichsmeier A, Geils M, Kohring M, Laukötter E, Marcinkowski F, (2013) Organisation und Öffentlichkeit von Hochschulen. Research report 1/2013, Institut für Kommunikationswissenschaft, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, https://www.uni-muenster. de/imperia/md/content/kowi/forschen/ergebnisreport-organisation-oeffentlichkeit- hochschulen.pdf
14. Bentley P, Kyvik S, (2011) Academic staff and public communication: a survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries. Public Underst Sci 20: 48-63
15. Allgaier J, Dunwoody S, Brossard D, Lo Y-Y, Peters HP, (2013b) Medialized science? Neuroscientists' reflections on their role as journalistic sources. J Pract 7: 413-429