Normalisation and weighting in life cycle assessment: quo vadis?

International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 853-866

  Pizzol, Massimo ^a   Laurent, Alexis ^b   Sala, Serenella ^c   Weidema, Bo ^a   Verones, Francesca ^d   Koffler, Christoph ^e  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^d NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^e thinkstep   (United States)

Author keywords

Indicators; Life cycle impact assessment; Multicriteria decision analysis; Review; Survey

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DECISION MAKING; DOCUMENTATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; NORMALISATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD; UNCERTAINTY; WEIGHTING;

EID: 84987620684     PISSN: 09483349     EISSN: 16147502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-016-1199-1     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Ahlroth S (2014) The use of valuation and weighting sets in environmental impact assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl 85:34–41
2. Ahlroth S, Finnveden G (2011) Ecovalue08—a new valuation set for environmental systems analysis tools. J Clean Prod 19:1994–2003
3. Ahlroth S, Nilsson M, Finnveden G, et al. (2011) Weighting and valuation in selected environmental systems analysis tools—suggestions for further developments. J Clean Prod 19:145–156
4. Alarcon B, Aguado A, Manga R, Josa A (2011) A value function for assessing sustainability: application to industrial buildings. Sustainability 3
5. Bachmann TM (2011) Optimal pollution: the welfare economic approach to correct market failures. In: Nriagu J (ed) Encyclopedia on environmental health. Elsevier, Burlington, pp. 264–274
6. Bare J, Gloria T, Norris G (2006) Development of the method and US normalization database for life cycle impact assessment and sustainability metrics. Environ Sci Technol 40:5108–5115
7. Benini L, Sala S (2016) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of normalization factors to methodological assumptions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:224–236
8. Benoit V, Rousseaux P (2003) Aid for aggregating the impacts in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:74–82
9. Bjørn A, Hauschild M (2015) Introducing carrying capacity-based normalisation in LCA: framework and development of references at midpoint level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1005–1018
10. Boardman, AE, Greenberg, DH, Vining, AR, Weimer, DL (2006) Cost-benefit analysis, concepts and practice. Pearson
11. Breedveld L, Lafleur M, Blonk H (1999) A framework for actualising normalisation data in LCA: experiences in the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:213–220
12. Castellani V, Benini L, Sala S, Pant R (2016) A distance-to-target weighting method for Europe 2020. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1159–1169
13. Cucurachi S, Sala S, Laurent A, Heijungs R (2014) Building and characterizing regional and global emission inventories of toxic pollutants. Environ Sci Technol 48:5674–5682
14. Dahlbo H, Koskela S, Pihkola H, et al. (2013) Comparison of different normalised LCIA results and their feasibility in communication. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:850–860
15. EC (2008) Directive 2008/50/EC of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe.
16. Finnveden G, Eldh P, Johansson J (2006) Weighting in LCA based on ecotaxes: development of a mid-point method and experiences from case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:81–88
17. Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, et al. (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 91:1–21
18. Fishburn PC (1967) Additive utilities with incomplete product set: applications to priorities and assignments. Operations Research Society of America (ORSA), Baltimore, MD, USA
19. Foley J, Lant P (2009) Regional normalisation figures for Australia 2005/2006-inventory and characterisation data from a production perspective. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:215–224
20. Frischknecht R, Steiner R, Jungbluth N (2009) The ecological scarcity method—eco-factors 2006. A method for impact assessment in LCA. Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), Bern
21. Goedkoop, M, Spriensma, R (2001) The Eco-indicator 99—a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. Pré Consultants B.V.
22. Goedkoop, M, Heijungs, R, Huijbregts, M, et al. (2013) ReCiPe 2008 A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, first edition (version 1.08), Report I: Characterisation. PRé Consultants, Amersfoort, CML University of Leiden, RUN Radboud University Nijmegen, RIVM Bilthoven - Netherlands, The Netherlands
23. Goedkoop M, Hofstetter P, Müller-Wenk R, Spriemsma R (1998) The ECO-indicator 98 explained. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:352–360
24. Hanssen OJ (1999) Status of life cycle assessment (LCA) activities in the Nordic region. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:315–320
25. Hauschild, M, Potting, J (2005) Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment—the EDIP2003 methodology. Environmental news No. 80. Danish Ministry of Environment, Environmental Protection Agency
26. Hauschild MZ, Goedkoop M, Guinee J, et al. (2013) Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:683–697
27. Heijungs R, Guinee J, Kleijn R, Rovers V (2007) Bias in normalization: causes, consequences, detection and remedies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:211–216
28. Hertwich EG, Hammitt JK (2001) A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment part I: LCA and decision analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:5–12
29. Hertwich EG, Hammitt JK, Pease WS (2000) A theoretical foundation for life-cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 4:13–28
30. Hofstetter P, Baumgartner T, Scholz RW (2000) Modelling the valuesphere and the ecosphere: integrating the decision makers’ perspectives into LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:161–175
31. Huijbregts MAJ, Breedveld L, Huppes G, et al. (2003) Normalisation figures for environmental life-cycle assessment: the Netherlands (1997/1998), western Europe (1995) and the world (1990 and 1995. J Clean Prod 11:737–748)
32. Huppes, G, Van Oers, L (2011) Background review of existing weighting approaches in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability
33. Huppes G, Oers L, Pretato U, Pennington DW (2012) Weighting environmental effects: analytic survey with operational evaluation methods and a meta-method. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:876–891
34. ISO (2006a) ISO 14040—environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Standard Organization
35. ISO (2006b) ISO 14044—environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Standard Organization
36. ISO (2014) ISO 14046—environmental management—water footprint—principles, requirements and guidelines. 33
37. Itsubo N, Murakami K, Kuriyama K, et al. (2015) Development of weighting factors for G20 countries—explore the difference in environmental awareness between developed and emerging countries. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0881-z
38. Itsubo N, Sakagami M, Kuriyama K, Inaba A (2012) Statistical analysis for the development of national average weighting factors-visualization of the variability between each individual’s environmental thoughts. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:488–498
39. Itsubo N, Sakagami M, Washida T, et al. (2004) Weighting across safeguard subjects for LCIA through the application of conjoint analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:196–205
40. Kägi T, Dinkel F, Frischknecht R, et al. (2015) Session “midpoint, endpoint or single score for decision-making?”—SETAC Europe 25th annual meeting, may 5th, 2015. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:129–132
41. Kim J, Yang Y, Bae J, Suh S (2013) The importance of normalization references in interpreting life cycle assessment results. J Ind Ecol 17:385–395
42. Koffler C, Schebek L, Krinke S (2008) Applying voting rules to panel-based decision making in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:456–467
43. Laurent A, Hauschild MZ (2015) Normalisation. In: Hauschild MZ, Huijbregts MA (eds) Life Cycle Impact Assessment Springer Science + Business Media BV, pp 271–300
44. Laurent A, Lautier A, Rosenbaum RK, et al. (2011a) Normalization references for Europe and North America for application with USEtox{\texttrademark} characterization factors. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:728–738
45. Laurent A, Olsen SI, Hauschild MZ (2011b) Normalization in EDIP97 and EDIP2003: updated European inventory for 2004 and guidance towards a consistent use in practice. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:401–409
46. Laurent A, Olsen SI, Hauschild MZ (2012) Limitations of carbon footprint as indicator of environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Technol 46:4100–4108
47. Lautier A, Rosenbaum RK, Margni M, et al. (2010) Development of normalization factors for Canada and the United States and comparison with European factors. Sci Total Environ 409:33–42
48. Ludwig D (2000) Limitations of economic valuation of ecosystems. Ecosystems 3:31–35
49. Lundie S, Huijbregts MAJ, Rowley HV, et al. (2007) Australian characterisation factors and normalisation figures for human toxicity and ecotoxicity. J Clean Prod 15:819–832
50. Mace GM, Reyers B, Alkemade R, et al. (2014) Approaches to defining a planetary boundary for biodiversity. Glob Environ Chang 28:289–297
51. Mettier T, Scholz RW (2008) Measuring preferences on environmental damages in LCIA. Part 2: choice and allocation questions in panel methods. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:468–476
52. Mettier T, Scholz R, Tietje O (2006) Measuring preferences on environmental damages in LCIA. Part 1: cognitive limits in panel surveys (9 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:394–402
53. Nordhaus T, Shellenberger M, Blomqvist L (2012) The planetary boundaries hypothesis. A review of the evidence. The Breakthrough Institute, Oakland
54. Norman G (2010) Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv heal Sci Educ 15:625–632
55. Norris GA (2001) The requirement for congruence in normalization. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:85–88
56. Norris GA, Marshall HE (1995) Multiattribute decision analysis method for evaluating buildings and building systems. Building and fire research laboratory. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg
57. Pennington DW, Potting J, Finnveden G, et al. (2004) Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice. Environ Int 30:721–739
58. Pizzol M, Weidema BP, Brandão M, Osset P (2015) Monetary valuation in life cycle assessment: a review. J Clean Prod 86:170–179
59. Prado-Lopez V, Seager TP, Chester M, et al. (2014) Stochastic multi-attribute analysis (SMAA) as an interpretation method for comparative life-cycle assessment (LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:405–416)
60. Pré Consultants (2016) LCA discussion list website. https://www.pre-sustainability.com/lca-discussion-list
61. R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
62. Ridoutt B, Fantke P, Pfister S, et al. (2015) Making sense of the minefield of footprint indicators. Environ Sci Technol 49:2601–2603
63. Rüdenauer I, Gensch C-OC-O, Grießhammer R, Bunke D (2005) Integrated environmental and economic assessment of products and processes. J Ind Ecol 9:105–116
64. Ryberg M, Vieira MDM, Zgola M, et al. (2014) Updated US and Canadian normalization factors for TRACI 2.1. Clean Techn Environ Policy 16:329–339
65. Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J Serv Sci 1:83
66. Sala S, Benini L, Mancini L, Pant R (2015) Integrated assessment of environmental impact of Europe in 2010: data sources and extrapolation strategies for calculating normalisation factors. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1568–1585
67. Seager TP, Linkov I (2008) Coupling multicriteria decision analysis and life cycle assessment for nanomaterials. J Ind Ecol 12:282–285
68. Seppälä J, Basson L, Norris GA (2001) Decision analysis frameworks for life-cycle impact assessment. J Ind Ecol 5:45–68
69. Sleeswijk AW, van Oers LFCM, Guinée JB, et al. (2008) Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: an LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000. Sci Total Environ 390:227–240
70. Steen B (1999a) A systematic approach to environmental strategies in product development (EPS). Version 2000—general system characteristics. Centre for Environmental Assessment of Products and Material Systems. Chalmers University of Technology, Technical Environmental Planning
71. Steen B (1999b) A systematic approach to environmental strategies in product development (EPS). Version 2000—models and data of the default methods. Centre for Environmental Assessment of Products and Material Systems. Chalmers University of Technology, Technical Environmental Planning
72. Stranddorf HK, Hoffmann L, Schmidt A (2005) LCA guideline. Update on impact categories, normalisation and weighting in LCA—selected EDIP97 data. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen
73. Strauss K, Brent AC, Hietkamp S (2006) Characterisation and normalisation factors for life cycle impact assessment mined abiotic resources categories in South Africa: the manufacturing of catalytic converter exhaust systems as a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:162–171
74. Sullivan GM, Artino AR (2013) Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ 5:541–542
75. Udo de Haes, HA, Finnveden, G, Goedkoop, M, Hauschild, M, Hertwich, EG, Hofstetter, P, Jolliet, O, Klöpffer, W, Krewitt, W, Lindeijer, EW, Müller-Wenk, R, Olsen, SI, Pennington, DW, Potting, J, Steen, B (eds) (2002) Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards best practise. SETAC- Press, Pensacola, Florida
76. Weidema BP (2009) Using the budget constraint to monetarise impact assessment results. Ecol Econ 68:1591–1598
77. Weidema B, Hauschild MZ, Jolliet O (2008) Preparing characterisation methods for endpoint impact assessment—Annex II of Eder P & Delgado L (eds) environmental improvement potentials of meat and dairy products. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Sevilla
78. Weiss M, Patel M, Heilmeier H, Bringezu S (2007) Applying distance-to-target weighing methodology to evaluate the environmental performance of bio-based energy, fuels, and materials. Resour Conserv Recycl 50:260–281
79. Wenzel H, Hauschild MZ, Alting L (1997) Environmental assessment of products. Volume 1—methodology, tools and case studies in product development. Chapman & Hall, Thomson Science, London, UK