Weighting across safeguard subjects for LCIA through the application of conjoint analysis

International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 196-205

  Itsubo, Norihiro ^a   Sakagami, Masaji ^b   Washida, Toyoaki ^c   Kokubu, Katsuhiko ^d   Inaba, Atsushi ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^b NIHON FUKUSHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c TOYOHASHI SOZO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Conjoint analysis; Damage assessment; LCA National Project; Life cycle impact assessment; LIME (Life cycle Impact assessment Method based on Endpoint modeling); Safeguard subjects; Weighting

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; BIODIVERSITY; CALCULATION; COMPREHENSION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; JAPAN; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MALE; MARKETING; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZATION; RELIABILITY; RESEARCH; SIMULATION; SOCIAL ASPECT; WEIGHT;

EID: 2942627361     PISSN: 09483349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02994194     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Ben-Akiva M, Lerman SR (1985): Discrete Choice Analysis. MIT Press
2. Cattin P, Wittink DR (1982): Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey. Journal of Marketing 46, 44-53
3. European Commission (1998): ExternE: Externalities of Energy, Vol. 7, Methodology, 1998 update
4. Fukuda Y, Hasegawa T, Hachiya H, Tabata K (1999): Diseases and Disability Adjusted Life Years in Japan. Indicator for Welfare 46, 4 (in Japanese)
5. Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (1999): The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Methodology Report
6. Goldberg SM, Green PE, Wind Y (1982): Conjoint Analysis of Price Premiums for Hotel Amenities. J Business 57 (1) S111-S132
7. Green PE, Srinivasan V (1990): Conjoint Analysis in Marketing, New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice. J Marketing Research 54, 3-19
8. Green PE, Krieger AM, Agarwal MK (1991): Adaptive Conjoint Analysis, Some Caveats and Suggestions. J Marketing Research 28, 215-222
9. Hofstetter P (1998): Perspectives in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Kluwer Academic Publishers
10. International Organization for Standardization (2000): ISO 14042, Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Life cycle impact assessment
11. Itsubo N, Inaba A, Matsuno Y, Yasui I, Yamamoto R (2000a): Current Status of Weighting Methodologies in Japan. Int J LCA 5 (1) 5-11
12. Itsubo N, Inaba A (2000b): Definition of Safeguard Subjects for Damage Oriented Methodology in Japan. Proc. 4th Int. EcoBalance, 217-220
13. Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry (2003): The Annual Report of Development of Assessment Technology of Life Cycle Environment Impacts of Products
14. Kuriyama K, Washida T, Takeuchi K (1999): Workshop of Environmental Assessment, Tsukiji-syokan
15. Kuriyama K (2000): Environmental assessment and Environmental Accounting (in Japanese)
16. Lieth H, Whittaker RH (1975): Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, Springer-Verlag
17. Louviere JJ, Woodworth G (1983): Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments, An Approach Based on Aggregate Data. J Marketing Research 20, 350-367
18. McFadden D (1974): Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In: Zarembka P (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, 105-142
19. Miller GA (1956): The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. The Psychological Review
20. Ministry of the Environment (2002): The report of Pollutant Release and Transfer Register
21. Murray CJL, Lopez AD (1996): The Global Burden of Disease. Vol. 1, WHO/ Harvard School of Public Health/ World Bank, Harvard University Press, Boston
22. Seino H, Uchijima Z (1985): Agroclimatic Evaluation of Net Primary Productivity of Natural Vegetation. J. Agr. Met. 41 (2) 139-144
23. Steen B (1999): A Systematic Approach to Environmental Priority Strategies in Product Development (EPS). Version 2000-Models and Data of the Default Method, Chalmers University of Technology
24. Washida T (1999): Introduction of Environmental assessment, Keisou shobou (in Japanese)