Life cycle assessment Part 2: Current impact assessment practice

Environment International

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 721-739

  Pennington, David W ^a   Potting, J ^b   Finnveden, G ^c   Lindeijer, E ^d   Jolliet, O ^e   Rydberg, T ^a   Rebitzer, G ^e  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^d TNO   (Netherlands)

^e EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Emission; Life cycle assessment; Waster generation

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEMS; LIFE CYCLE; OZONE; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; RECYCLING; TOXIC MATERIALS;

ENERGY ACQUISITION; MATERIAL EXTRACTION; WASTE GENERATION;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

OZONE;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HUMAN ACTIVITY; INVENTORY; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; POLLUTION EFFECT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ACIDIFICATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUTROPHICATION; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MATERIALS MANAGEMENT; NOISE; PHOTOOXIDATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; RECYCLING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; REVIEW; SMOG; STRATOSPHERE; TOXICOLOGY; WASTE DISPOSAL;

EID: 1842509970     PISSN: 01604120     EISSN: 18736750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.009     Document Type: Review

References (149)

1. Alcamo J. Shaw R.W. Hordijk L. editors. The RAINS model of acidification: science and strategies in Europe 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishing Dordrecht, Netherlands 402
2. Andersson-Sköld Y. Grennfelt P. Pleijel K. Photochemical ozone creation potentials: a study of different concepts J. Air Waste Manage. 42 1992 1152-1158
3. Baitz M. Die Bedeutung der funktionsbasierten Charakterisierung von Flächen-Inanspruchnahmen in industriellen Prozesskettenanalysen-ein Beitrag zur Ganzheitlichen Bilanzierung. PhD Thesis. Umwelttechnik D 93, IKK Universität Stuttgart, Shaker Verlag; 2002.
4. Bare J.C. Udo de Haes H.A. Pennington D.W. Life cycle impact assessment sophistication international workshop Int. J. LCA 4 1999 299-306
5. Bare J.C. Hofstetter P. Pennington D.W. Udo de Haes H.A. Life cycle impact assessment workshop summary. Midpoints versus endpoints: the sacrifices and benefits Int. J. LCA 5 2002 319-326
6. Bare J.C. Udo de Haes H.A. Pennington D.W. An international workshop on life-cycle impact assessment sophistication EPA/600/R-00/023 2002 Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, OH, USA http://www.epa.gov/ORD/WebPubs/EPA600r-00023.htm.
7. Bare J.C. Norris G.A. Pennington D.W. McKone T. TRACI: the US EPA's tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts J. Ind. Ecol. 6 2003 49-78
8. Barnthouse L. Fava J. Humphreys K. Hunt R. Laibson L. Noesen S. et al. Life-cycle assessment-the state-of-the-art 1997 SETAC Press Pensacola, FL, USA
9. Bauer C. Zapp P. Generic characterisation factors for land use and water consumption In: Dubreuil A. editor. Life cycle assessment of metals-issues and research directions 2004 SETAC Press Pensacola, Fl, USA In press
10. Baumann H. Rydberg T. Life cycle assessment: a comparison of three methods for impact analysis and valuation J. Clean. Prod. 2 1994 13-20
11. Bengtsson M. Steen B. Weighting in LCA-approaches and applications Environ. Prog. 19 2000 101-109
12. Blümer M. Kyläkorpi L. MALVA, the biotope method 1998 Vattenfall Sweden
13. BUWAL (Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft). Bewertung in Ökobilanzen mit der Methode der ökologischen Knappheit-Ökofaktoren 1997, Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr. 297. BUWAL [in German]. Bern, Switzerland; 1998.
14. Cowell SJ. Environmental life cycle assessment of agricultural systems: Integration into decision-making. PhD Thesis. Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford, England; 1998.
15. Cowell S.J. Fairman R. Lofstedt R.E. Use of risk assessment and life cycle assessment in decision making: a common policy research agenda Risk Anal. 21 2002 877-892
16. Crettaz P. Pennington D. Brand K. Rhomberg L. Jolliet O. Assessing human health response in life cycle assessment using ED10s and DALYs: Part 1. Cancer effects Risk Anal. 22 2002 929-944
17. Derwent R.G. Jenkin M.E. Hydrocarbons and the long range transport of ozone and PAN across Europe Atmos. Environ., A Gen. Topics 25 1991 1661-1678
18. Derwent R.G. Jenkin M.E. Saunders S.M. Photochemical ozone creation potentials for a large number of reactive hydrocarbons under European conditions Atmos. Environ. 30 1996 181-199
19. Derwent R.G. Jenkin M.E. Saunders S.M. Piling M.J. Photochemical ozone creation potentials for organic compounds in north-west Europe calculated with a master chemical mechanism Atmos. Environ. 32 1998 2429-2444
20. Doka G. Synopsis of variations of the BUWAL Ecopoints LCIA method, on behalf of BUWAL Switzerland, http://www.doka.ch/ECOSCARCITYsurveyDOKA.pdf Zürich, Switzerland; 2002 December.
21. Dreyer L.C. Niemann A.L. Hauschild M. Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99 Int. J. LCA 8 2003 191-200
22. Escher B. Hermens J.L.M. Modes of action in ecotoxicology: their role in body burdens, species sensitivity QSARs, and mixture effects Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 2002 4201-4217
23. Felten P, Glod S. Weiterentwicklung ökologischer Indikatoren für die Flächenbeanpruchung und für Lärmwirkungen und Aufwendung auf Logistik-Konzepte einer Firma. Semesterarbeit, ETH, Zürich, Switzerland; 1995.
24. Finlayson-Pitts B.J. Pitts J.N. Jr. Atmospheric chemistry of tropospheric ozone formation: scientific and regulatory implications Air Waste 43 1993 1091-1100
25. Finnveden G. Valuation methods within LCA-where are the values? Int. J. LCA 2 1997 163-169
26. Finnveden G. Östlund P. Exergies of natural resources in life-cycle assessment and other applications Energy 22 1997 923-931
27. Finnveden G. Potting J. Eutrophication as an impact category Int. J. LCA 4 1999 311-314
28. Finnveden G. Andersson-Sköld Y. Samuelsson M-O. Zetterberg L. Lindfors L-G. Classification (impact analysis) in connection with life-cycle assessment: a preliminary study Product life-cycle assessment: principles and methodology 1992 172-231 Nordic Council of Ministers Copenhagen, Denmark
29. Finnveden G, Hofstetter P, Bare J, Basson L, Ciroth A, Mettier T, et al. Normalization, grouping and weighting in life cycle impact assessment. In: Udo de Haes et al. (2002); 2002.
30. Frischknecht R. Braunschweig A. Hofstetter P. Suter P. Human health damages due to ionising radiation in LCIA Environ. Impact. Asses. Rev. 20 2000 159-189
31. Giegrich J. Schmitz S. Valuation as a step in impact assessment: methods and case study In: Curran M.A. editor Environmental life-cycle assessment 1996 13.1-13.14 McGraw-Hill New York
32. Giegrich J, Sturm K. Methodenvorschlag Operationalisierung der Wirkungskategorie Naturraumbeanspruchung. IFEU/Büro für angewandte Waldökologie, Heidelberg/Duvensee, Germany; 1996.
33. Goedkoop M. Spriensma R. The Eco-indicator 99. A damage oriented method for life cycle assessment. Methodology report 1999 PRé Consultants Amersfoort, Netherlands
34. Grouzet P. Leonard J. Nixon S. Rees Y. Parr W. Laffon L. Bogestrand J. Kristensen P. Lallana C. Izzo G. Bokn T. Bak J. Lack T.J. Thyssen N. editors Nutrients in European ecosystems Environmental assessment report vol. 4 1999 European Environment Agency Copenhagen, DK
35. Guinée J. editor Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standard 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishing Dordrecht, Netherlands
36. Guinée JB, Heijungs R, van Oers L, Van de Meent D, Vermeire, T, Rikken, M. LCA impact assessment of toxic releases: Generic modelling of fate, exposure and effect for ecosystems and human beings with data for about 100 chemicals. Centre of Environmental Science, Leiden University (CML), Leiden, The Netherlands, and National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands; 1996.
37. Hamers T. Aldenberg T. van de Meent D. Indicator effects toxic substances (Itox). Definition report Report# 607128 001 1996 RIVM, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu Bilthoven, Netherlands
38. Hansen O.J. Status of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) activities in the Nordic region Int. J. LCA 4 1999 315-320
39. Hauschild M, Potting J, editors. Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment: the EDIP 2003 methodology. Guidelines from the Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen. In press.
40. Hauschild M. Wenzel H. editors. Environmental assessment of products vol. 2 1998 Chapman & Hall London, UK
41. Hauschild M, Bastrup-Bir A, Hertel O, Schöpp W, Potting J. Photochemical ozone formation. Potting and Hauschild (2003); 2003.
42. Hayashi K. Itsubo N. Inaba A. Development of damage function for stratospheric ozone layer depletion: a tool towards the improvement of the quality of life cycle impact assessment Int. J. LCA 5 2000 265-272
43. Hayashi K. Itsubo N. Okazaki M. Inaba A. Damage function of acidification for life cycle impact assessment Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on EcoBalance 2000 253-256 Society of Non-Traditional Technology Tsukuba, Japan
44. Hayashi K. Nakagawa A. Itsubo N. Inaba A. Assessment of impacts due to additional emission of ozone depleting substances Proceedings of the 5th Ecobalance Conference Tsukuba, Japan, November 6-8 2002
45. Heijungs R. Guinee J. Huppes G. Lankreijer R.M. Udo de Haes H.A. Wegener Sleeswijk A. et al. Environmental life cycle assessment of products. Guide and background 1992 Centre of Environmental Science Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands
46. Hellweg S. Time-and site-dependent life cycle assessment of thermal waste treatment processes Int. J. LCA 6 2001 46
47. Hellweg S. Hofstetter T. Hungerbühler K. Discounting and the environment-should current impacts be weighted differently than impacts harming future generations? Int. J. LCA 8 2003 8-18
48. Hertwich E. Toxic equivalency: addressing human health effects in life cycle impact assessment. Dissertation, University of California, Berkley, USA; 1999.
49. Hertwich E.G. Hammitt J.K. A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment: Part I. LCA and decision analysis Int. J. LCA 6 2001 5-12
50. Hertwich E.G. Hammitt J.K. A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment: Part 2. Midpoints, endpoints, and criteria for method development Int. J. LCA 6 2001 265-272
51. Hertwich E. McKone T. Pease W. Parameter uncertainty and variability in evaluative fate and exposure models Risk Anal. 19 1999 1193-1204
52. Hertwich E.G. Mateles S.F. Pease W.S. McKone T.E. Human toxicity potentials for life-cycle assessment and toxics release inventory risk screening Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20 2001 928-939
53. Hettelingh J.P. de Vries B. Hordijk L. Integrated assessment In: Boersema J.J. Reijnders L. editors. Principles of environmental science 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishing Dordrecht
54. Hirosaki J. Itsubo N. Furota T. Inaba A. Estimating damage by eutrophication Ecobalance 2002 Conference Proceedings, November 6 to 8, Tsukuba, Japan 2002
55. Hofstetter P. Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment: a structured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere and valuesphere 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishing USA
56. Hofstetter P. Hammitt J.K. Selecting human health metrics for environmental decision support tools Risk Anal. 22 2002 965-983
57. Hofstetter P, Müller-Wenk R. Monetization of health damages in life cycle assessment; challenges illustrated with the example of health impacts from road noise. J. Clean. Prod. [submitted].
58. Hornung M. Ineson P. Bull K.R. Cresser M. Davison A. Fowler D. et al. editors. Impacts of nitrogen deposition in terrestrial ecosystems 1994 Department of the Environment London, UK
59. Huber F, Kuhn N, Müller-Wenk R, Peter A. Gewässerraumnutzung und Umweltschaden, Schlussbericht Juli, Seecon/WSL/IWÖ-HSG/EAWAG, Luzern, Switzerland; 2002.
60. Huijbregts M.A.J. Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA: Part I. A general framework for the analysis of uncertainty and variability in life cycle assessment Int. J. LCA 3 1998 273-280
61. Huijbregts M.A.J. Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA: Part II. Dealing with parameter uncertainty and uncertainty due to choices in life cycle assessment Int. J. LCA 3 1998 343-351
62. Huijbregts MAJ. Priority assessment of toxic substances in the frame of LCA: development and application of the multi-media fate, exposure and effect model USES-LCA. PhD thesis. Uni. Amsterdam, Netherlands; 1999.
63. Huijbregts M.A.J. Seppälä J. Towards region-specific, European fate factors for airborne nitrogen compounds causing aquatic eutrophication Int. J. LCA 5 2000 65-67
64. Huijbregts M.A.J. Seppälä J. Life cycle impact assessment of pollutants causing aquatic eutrophication Int. J. LCA 6 2001 339-344
65. Huijbregts M.A.J. Thissen U. Guinée J. Jager T. Kalf D. van de Meent D. et al. Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment: Part I. Calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES-LCA Chemosphere 41 2000 541-573
66. Huijbregts M.A.J. Thissen U. Jager T. van de Meent D. Ragas A.M.J. Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment: Part II. Assessing parameter uncertainty and human variability in the calculation of toxicity potentials Chemosphere 41 2000 575-588
67. Huijbregts M.A. Schöpp W. Verkuijlen E. Heijungs R. Reijnders L. Spatially explicit characterization of acidifying and eutrophying air pollution in life-cycle assessment J. Ind. Ecol. 4 2000 75-92
68. Huijbregts M.A.J. Guinée J.B. Reijnders L. Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment: Part III. Export of potential impact over time and space Chemosphere 44 2001 59-65
69. Huijbregts M. van de Meent D. Goedkoop M. Spriensma R. Ecotoxicological impacts in life cycle assessment In: Posthuma L. Suter G.W. II Traas T.P. editors. Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology 2002 421-436 Lewis Publishers Boca Raton, FL, USA
70. ISO 14040 Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework 1997 International Standards Organisation (ISO) Geneva, Switzerland
71. ISO 14042 Environmental management-life cycle assessment-life cycle impact assessment 2000 International Standards Organisation (ISO) Geneva, Switzerland
72. Itaoka K. Uchida H. Itsubo N. Inaba A. Development of damage functions of GHG on human health Proceedings of the 5th Ecobalance Conference, Tsukuba, Japan, November 6-8 2002
73. Itsubo N. Screening life cycle impact assessment with weighting methodology based on simplified damage functions Int. J. LCA 5 2000 273-280
74. Itsubo N. Inaba A. A new LCIA method: LIME has been completed Int. J. LCA 8 2003 305
75. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) 2000 IUCN Red List of threatened species 2001 http://www.redlist.org
76. Jolliet O. Margni M. Charles R. Humbert S. Payet J. Rebitzer G. et al. IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology Int. J. LCA 8 2003 324-330
77. Klepper O. van de Meent D. Mapping the potentially affected fraction (PAF) of species as an indicator of generic toxic stress 1997 National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) Bilthoven, Netherlands
78. Knoepfel I. Indicatorensystem für die ökologische Bewertung des Transports von Energie. Dissertation ETH nr. 11146. ETH, Zürich, Switzerland; 1995.
79. Köllner TH. Land use in product life cycles and its consequences for ecosystem quality. Dissertation Phd 2519. Universität St. Gallen, Switzerland; 2001.
80. Krewitt W. Trukenmüller A. Bachmann T.M. Heck T. Country-specific damage factors for air pollutants. A step towards site dependent life cycle impact assessment Int. J. LCA 6 2001 199-210
81. Kristensen P. Hansen H.O. European rivers and lakes. Assessment of their environmental state Environmental monographs vol. 1 1994 European Environmental Agency Copenhagen, Denmark
82. Kros J. Reinds G.J. de Vries W. Latour J.B. Bollen M.J.S. Modelling of soil acidity and nitrogen availability in natural ecosystems in response to changes in acid deposition and hydrology Report 95 1995 DLO Winand Staring Centre Wageningen, Netherlands
83. Lee K.M. A weighting method for the Korean eco-indicator Int. J. LCA 4 1999 161-165
84. Lindeijer E. Review of land use impact methodologies J. Clean. Prod. 8 2000 273-281
85. Lindeijer E, van Kampen M, Fraanje P, van Dobben H, Nabuurs G-J, Schouwenberg E, Prins D, Dankert N, Leopold M. Biodiversity and life support indicators for land use impacts in LCA, RWS DWW Publication series raw materials nr. 1998/07, RWS DWW, Delft, Netherlands; 1998.
86. Lindeijer E, Müller-Wenk R, Steen B, editors. Resources and land use. In: Udo de Haes et al. (2002); 2002.
87. Lindeijer E, Kok I, Eggels P, Alfers A, van der Voet E, Groen K, et al. Improving and testing a land use methodology in LCA. TNO Industrial Technology, CML, Floron Foundation and Ark Foundation, DWW-report DWW-2002-079. Delft, Netherlands; 2002b.
88. Lindeijer E. van der Voet E. Broers J. The Delft Cluster project: improving land use in LCA J. Clean. Prod. 2002 [submitted for publication]
89. Lindfors L.-G. Christiansen K. Hoffman L. Virtanen Y. Juntilla V. Hanssen O.-J. et al. Nordic guidelines on life cycle assessment vol. 20 1995 Nordic Council of Ministers Copenhagen, Denmark
90. McCarthy J.J. Canziani O.F. Leary N.A. Dokken D.J. White K.S. Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability 2001 Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge, UK
91. Müller-Wenk R. Depletion of abiotic resources weighted on the base of "virtual" impacts of lower grade deposits used in future IWOE discussion paper no 57 1999 St. Gallen Switzerland
92. Müller-Wenk R. Biotic resources. In: Udo de Haes et al. (2002); 2002a.
93. Müller-Wenk R. Attribution to road traffic of the impact of noise on health 2002 Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape Switzerland
94. Murray C, Lopez A. The global burden of disease, a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Global burden of disease and injury series, vol. 1, Harvard School of Public Health, World Health Organization and World Bank; 1996.
95. Nagata Y. Ohara T. Itsubo N. Inaba A. Development of damage functions for air pollutants considering local conditions of Japan Ecobalance 2002 Conference Proceedings, November 6 to 8, Tsukuba, Japan 2002
96. Nakagawa A. Abe K. Ii R. Itsubo N. Inaba A. Development of life-cycle impact assessment method for land use based on endpoint damage 5th International Conference on Ecobalance, 6-8 November, Tsukuba, Japan 2002
97. Nakicenovic N. Swart R. Special report on emission scenarios. A special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2000 Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge, UK
98. Nigge K.M. Life cycle assessment of natural gas vehicles: development and application of site-dependent impact indicators 2000 Springer Germany
99. Norris G.A. Impact characterization in the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts: methods for acidification, eutrophication, and ozone formation J. Ind. Ecol. 6 2003 79-101
100. Olsen S.I. Christensen F.M. Hauschild M. Pedersen F. Larsen H.F. Tørsløv J. Life cycle assessment and risk assessment: a methodological comparison Environ. Impact. Asses. Rev. 21 2001 385-404
101. Owens J.W. Life cycle assessment in relation to risk assessment: an evolving perspective Risk Anal. 17 1997 359-365
102. Owens J.W. Chemical toxicity indicators for human health: case study for classification of chronic non-cancer chemical hazards in life cycle assessment Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 21 2002 207-225
103. Payet J. Jolliet O. Comparative assessment of the toxic impact of metals on aquatic ecosystems: the AMI method In: Dubreuil A. editor ife cycle assessment of metals: issues and research directions 2003 SETAC Press Pensacola, FL, USA
104. Pederson B. Hvad er et baeredygtigt ressourceforbrug? Tvaerfagligt center 1991 Danmarks Tekniske Hojskole (DTU) Lyngby, Denmark
105. Pennington D. Crettaz P. Brand K. Rhomberg L. Tauxe A. Jolliet O. Assessing human health response in life cycle assessment using ED10s and DALYs: Part 2. Non-cancer effects Risk Anal. 22 2002 945-961
106. Pennington D.W. Margni M. Payet J. Charles R. Jolliet O. Assessing toxicological risks and potential impacts in life cycle assessment for human health and ecosystems Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2003 [submitted for publication]
107. Pennington D.W. Bare J.C. Knodel R. Carroll G. Martin T. Evaluating pollution prevention progress (P2P) III: an environmental tool for screening in product life cycle assessment and chemical process design Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 5 2003 70-86
108. Pennington D.W. Payet J. Hauschild M. Aquatic ecotoxicological measures in life cycle assessment (LCA) Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004 [in press]
109. Posthuma L, Suter II GW, Traas TP. Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA; 2002.
110. Potting J. Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment. PhD thesis, Utrecht University, Netherlands; 2000.
111. Potting J, editor. Human toxicity. Potting and Hauschild; 2003. In press.
112. Potting J. Acidification and terrestrial eutrophication. Comparison of different levels of sophistication Int. J. LCA 2004 [in press]
113. Potting J. Blok K. Spatial aspects of life-cycle impact assessment In: Udo de Haes H.A. Jensen A.A. Klöpffer W. Lindfors L.G. editors Integrating impact assessment into LCA 1994 91 98 Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Belgium
114. Potting J. Hauschild M. Predicted environmental impact and expected occurrence of actual impact: Part 2. Spatial differentiation in life cycle assessment via the site-dependent charactersiation of environmental impact from emissions Int. J. LCA 2 1997 209-216
115. Potting J. Hauschild M. editors Background for spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment the EDIP 2003 methodology 2003 Danish EPA Copenhagen, Denmark In press
116. Potting J. Klöpffer W. editors Best available practice in life cycle impact assessment of climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, photo-oxidant formation, acidification, and eutrophication. General issues. Report 550015002 2001 69 National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) Bilthoven, Netherlands
117. Potting J. Schöpp W. Blok K. Hauschild M. Comparison of the acidifying impact from emissions with different regional origin in life-cycle assessment J. Hazard. Mater. 61 1998 155-162
118. Potting J. Schöpp W. Blok K. Hauschild M. Life cycle impact assessment of acidification J. Ind. Ecol. 2 1998 63-87
119. Potting J, Beusen AHW, Øllgaard H, Hansen OC, de Haan B, Hauschild M. Aquatic eutrophication. Potting and Hauschild; 2003. In press.
120. Potting J, Schöpp W, Hauschild M. Terrestrial eutrophication. Potting and Hauschild; 2003 In press.
121. Powell J.C. Pearce D.W. Craighill A.L. Approaches to valuation in LCA impact assessment Int. J. LCA 2 1997 11-15
122. Rebitzer G. Ekvall T. Frischknecht R. Hunkeler D. Norris G. Schmidt W.-P. et al. Life cycle assessment: goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications: Part 1 Environ. Int. 2004 doi:10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005
123. Redfield A.C. Ketchum B.H. Richards F.A. The influence of organisms on the composition of seawater Proceedings of the 2nd International Water Pollution Conference, Tokyo, Japan 1963 215-243 Pergamon Oxford, UK
124. Sakao T. Itsubo N. Pennington D.W. Tanaka Y. Yoshida K. Inaba A. Development of damage functions for emissions of toxic substances in Japan Ecobalance 2002 Conference Proceedings, November 6 to 8, Tsukuba, Japan 2002
125. Samuelsson M.-O. Life cycle assessment and eutrophication. A concept for calculation of the potential effects of nitrogen and phosphorus 1993 Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL) Stockholm, Sweden IVL report B1119
126. Sas H, van der Voet E, Heijungs R. Extraction of biotic resources: development of a methodology for incorporation in LCA's, with case studies on timber and fish. CE/CML, Publication series Product Policy, VROM nr. 1997/30, Netherlands; 1997.
127. Schmitz S, Paulini I. Bewertung in Ökobilanzen. Methode des Umweltbundesamtes zur Normierung von Wirkungsindikatoren, Ordnung (Rangbildung) von Wirkungskategorien und zur Auswertung nach ISO 14042 und 14043. Version '99. UBA-Texte 92/99. Umweltbundesamt, Berlin, Germany; 1999.
128. Schweinle J. Methoden zur Integration des Aspectes der Flächennutzung in der Ökobilanzierung, BFH Mitteilung nr. 202 2001 BFH Hamburg, Germany
129. Seppälä J. Basson L. Norris G. Decision analysis frameworks for life cycle impact assessment J. Ind. Ecol. 5 2002 45-68
130. Seppälä J. Knuuttila S. Silvo K. A method for calculation of the potential contributions of nitrogen and phosphorous to eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems Int. J. LCA 2003 [in press]
131. Solberg-Johansen B. Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle. PhD thesis, Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guilford (UK); 1998.
132. Steen B. A systematic approach to Environmental Priority Strategies in product development (EPS). Version 2000-general system characteristics. CPM report 1999 4 Chalmers University Göteborg, Sweden
133. Steen B. A systematic approach to Environmental Priority Strategies in product development (EPS), Version 2000-models and data of the default method, CPM report 1999 5 Chalmers University Göteborg, Sweden
134. Stumm W. Morgan J.J. Aquatic chemistry-introduction emphasizing chemical equilibria in natural waters 1981 Wiley New York, USA
135. Thissen U.M.J. Uncertainty assessment of the toxicity potentials of nine toxic substances for LCA purposes with multi-media modelling Report nr. 173 1999 Dept. of Environmental Studies, University of Nijmegen Netherlands
136. Trusty W.B. Paehlke R. The ecological effects of resource extraction in Ontario 1997 Forintek Canada Ottawa, Canada
137. Uchida H. Takahashi K. Harasawa H. Itaoka K. Itsubo N. Inaba A. Development of damage function relating the loss of crop and plant productivity with the emission of GHGs Ecobalance 2002 Conference Proceedings, November 6 to 8, Tsukuba, Japan 2002
138. Udo de Haes H.A. editors Towards a methodology for life cycle impact assessment 1996 98 SETAC Europe Press Brussels, Belgium
139. Udo de Haes HA, Lindeijer E. The conceptual structure of life-cycle impact assessment. In: Udo de Haes et al. (2002); 2002.
140. Udo de Haes H.A. Jolliet O. Finnveden G. Hauschild M. Krewitt W. Mueller-Wenk R. Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment: Part 1 Int. J. LCA 4 1999 66-74
141. Udo de Haes H. Jolliet O. Finnveden G. Goedkoop M. Hauschild M. Hertwich E. et al. Life-cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice 2002 SETAC Press Pensacola, FL, USA
142. van den Berg N.W. Huppes G. Lindeijer E.W. van der Vaen B.L. Wrisberg M.N. Quality assessment for LCA CML Report vol. 152 1999 Centre of Environmental Science Leiden, Netherlands
143. van Ek R. Lindeijer E. van Oers L. van der Voet E. Witte J.-P.M. Towards including dessication impacts in LCA TNO Industry/CML/Kiwa, Delft Cluster research project, TNO report 42/02.002943 2002 TNO Industrial Technology Eindhoven, Netherlands
144. Volkwein S. Gihr R. Klöpffer W. The valuation step within LCA: Part II. A formalized method of prioritization by expert panels Int. J. LCA 1 1996 182-192
145. Wegener Sleeswijk A. General prevention and risk minimization in LCA. A combined approach Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 8 2001 1-9
146. Weidema B.P. Physical impacts of land use in product life cycle assessment. Final report of the Eurenviron-LCAGAPS sub-project on land use 2001 Dept. of Manufacturing, Engineering and Management, Technical University of Denmark
147. Wenzel H. Hauschild M. Alting L. editors Environmental assessment of products vol. 1 1997 Chapman & Hall London, UK
148. World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Scientific assessment of ozone depletion. Global ozone research and monitoring project Report Nr. 25 1991 WMO Geneva, Switzerland
149. World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 1998. Global ozone research and monitoring project 1999 WMO Geneva, Switzerland