The use of valuation and weighting sets in environmental impact assessment

Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Volumn 85, Issue , 2014, Pages 34-41

  Ahlroth, Sofia ^a  

^a WORLD BANK   (United States)

Author keywords

CBA; LCA; Valuation; Weighting

Indexed keywords

CBA; LCA; VALUATION METHODS; WEIGHTING; WEIGHTING METHODS; WEIGHTING TECHNIQUES;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; PRODUCT DESIGN; RESOURCE VALUATION;

AGGREGATES;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; PLANNING METHOD; POLICY APPROACH; VALUATION;

ACIDIFICATION; ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; ECOTOXICITY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; EUTROPHICATION; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; INCINERATION; LANDFILL; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; OZONE DEPLETION; PHOTOOXIDATION; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WEIGHT;

EID: 84896735938     PISSN: 09213449     EISSN: 18790658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. A. Adriansee, S. Bringezu, A. Hammond, Y. Murigutch, E. Rodenberg, and D. Rogich et al. Resourcer flow. The material basis of industrialised economies 1997 World Resources Institute Washington, DC
2. S. Ahlroth Developing a weighting set based on monetary damage estimates. Method and case studies. TRITA-INFRA-FMS 2009:1 2009 http://www.infra.kth.se/ fms/pdf/Ahlroth-2009.pdf
3. S. Ahlroth, and G. Finnveden Ecovalue08 - a new valuation set for environmental systems analysis tools Journal of Cleaner Production 19 17-18 2011 1994 2003
4. S. Ahlroth, M. Nilsson, G. Finnveden, O. Hjelm, and E. Hochschorner Weighting and valuation in selected environmental systems analysis tools - suggestions for further developments Journal of Cleaner Production 19 2-3 2011 145 156 ISSN: 0959-6526
5. W. Ascher, and T. Steelman Valuation in the environmental policy process Policy Sciences 39 2006 73 90 (Pubitemid 43940727)
6. J.C. Bare, P. Hofstetter, D.W. Pennington, and H.A. Udo de Haes Life cycle impact assessment midpoints vs. endpoints - the sacrifices and the benefits International Journal of LCA 5 2000 319 326 (Pubitemid 32005686)
7. V. Belton, and T. Stewart Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach 2002 Dordrecht Kluwer
8. A.L. Brown, and R. Therivel Principles to guide the development of strategic environmental assessment methodology Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 18 3 2000 187 208
9. P.A. Champ, K.J. Boyle, and T.C. Brown A primer on non-market valuation: the economics of non-market goods and resources 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
10. CPM - Swedish Life Cycle Center Models/tools for assessing external costs 2012 Mimeo http://lifecyclecenter.se/
11. G. Finnveden, P. Hofstetter, J.C. Bare, L. Basson, A. Ciroth, and T. Mettier et al. Normalisation, grouping and weighting in life-cycle impact assessment H.A. Udo de Haes, Life-cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice 2002 SETAC Press Pensacola, FL 177 208
12. G. Finnveden, A. Bjorklind, M. Carlsson Reich, O. Eriksson, and A. Sorbom Flexible and robust strategies for waste management in Sweden Waste Management 27 2007 S1 S8
13. M. Goedkoop, and R. Spriensma The Eco-indicator 99 - a damage-oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. Methodology report second ed. 2000 Pré Consultants, B.V. Amersfoort the Netherlands
14. M.J. Goedkoop, R. Heijungs, M. Huijbregts, A. De Schryver, J. Struijs, and R. Van Zelm ReCiPe 2008. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. Report I: Characterisation first ed. 2009, January http://www.lcia-recipe.net
15. N. Hanley, and C. Spash Cost-benefit analysis and the environment 1993 Edward Elgar Publishing Cheltenham
16. N. Hanley, J. Shogren, and B. White Environmental economics in theory and practice 2007 Palgrave Macmillan Hampshire/New York
17. M.Z. Hauschild Assessing environmental impacts in a life cycle perspective Environmental Science & Technology 39 4 2005 81A 88A
18. N. Itsubo, and A. Inaba LIME - a comprehensive Japanese LCIA methodology based on endpoint modeling Proceedings of the 6th international conference on EcoBalance 2004
19. R.J. Kopp, A.J. Krupnick, and M.A. Toman Cost-benefit analysis and regulatory reform: an assessment of the science and the art. Congressional commission on risk assessment and risk management 1996, July
20. E. Lindeijer Normalisation and valuation H.A. Udo de Haes, Towards a methodology for life-cycle impact assessment 1996 SETAC Europé Brussels
21. J.J. Louviere, D.A. Henscher, and J.D. Swait Stated choice methods: analysis and application 2000 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
22. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment Eco-indicator 99. Manual for designers 2000, October The Hague, Netherlands
23. S.K. Mishra Valuation of environmental goods and services O.P. Singh, Environment and natural resources: ecological and economic perspectives 2006 Regency Publications New Delhi 34 54
24. R. Mitchell, and R.T. Carson Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method 1989 Resources for the Future Washington, DC
25. M. Nilsson, A. Björklund, G. Finnveden, and J. Johansson Testing an SEA methodology for the energy sector - a waste incineration tax proposal Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25 2005 1 32 (Pubitemid 39588379)
26. W. Rees, and M. Wackernagel Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: measuring the natural capital requirements of the human economy A.M. Jansson, M. Hammer, C. Folke, R. Costanza, Investing in natural capital: the ecological economic approach to sustainability 1994 Island Press Washington, DC
27. J. Seppälä W. Klöpffer, O. Hutzinger, Decision analysis as a tool for life cycle impact assessment. LCA documents vol. 4 1999 Eco-Informa Press Bayreuth
28. H.A. Udo de Haes, G. Finnveden, M. Goedkoop, M. Hauschild, E.G. Hertwich, and P. Hofstetter et al. Life-cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice 2002 SETAC-Press Pensacola, FL
29. UN Integrated environmental and economic accounting 2003 European Commission, IMF, OECD and World Bank New York, United Nations
30. B.P. Weidema Using the budget constraint to monetarize impact assessment results Ecological Economics 68 2009 2009 1591 1598
31. M. Weiss, M.K. Patel, H. Heilmeier, and S. Bringezu Applying distance-to-target weighing methodology to evaluate the environmental performance of bio-based energy, fuels and materials Resources, Conservation and Recycling 50 2007 260 281 (Pubitemid 46529174)