Investigating gender differences in mathematics performance and in self-regulated learning: An empirical study from Malta

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 669-693

  Bezzina, Frank H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALTA   (Malta)

Author keywords

Boys; Girls; Malta; Mathematics; Secondary schools; Self managed learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986077064     PISSN: 20407149     EISSN: 17587093     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02610151011074407     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Ablard, K.E. and Lipschultz, R.E. (1998), “Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals and gender”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90, pp. 94-101.
2. Ames, C. (1992), “Classrooms: goals, structures and student motivation”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 84, pp. 261-71.
3. Azevedo, R. and Cromley, J.G. (2004), “Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia?”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 96, pp. 523-35.
4. Bandalos, D.L., Yates, K. and Thorndike-Christ, T. (1995), “Effects of math-self-concept, perceived self-efficacy and attributions for failure and success on test anxiety”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 87, pp. 611-23.
5. Benjamin, M., McKeachie, W.J., Lin, Y.G. and Holinger, D.P. (1981), “Test anxiety: deficits in information processing”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 80, pp. 260-7.
6. Borg, M.G. (1996), “Sex differences in the scholastic attainment of grammar schools in the first three years of secondary schooling: a longitudinal study”, Research in Education, Vol. 56, pp. 1-20.
7. Borg, M.G. and Falzon, J.M. (1995), “Birth date and sex effects on the scholastic attainment of primary school children: a cross-sectional study”, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 61-74.
8. Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C. and Larouche, C. (1995), “The impact of goal orientation in self-regulation and performance among college students”, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 65, pp. 317-29.
9. Bynner, J. and Parsons, S. (1997), Does Numeracy Matter?, Basic Skills Agency, London.
10. Carr, S.C. (2002), “Assessing learning processes: useful information for teachers and students”, Intervention in School and Clinic, Vol. 37, pp. 156-62.
11. Catsambis, S. (1999), “The path to math: gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school”, in Peplau, L.A. and DeBro, S.C. (Eds), Gender, Culture, Ethnicity: Current Research about Women and Men, Mayfield, Mountainview, CA, pp. 102-20.
12. Chetcuti, D. and Ventura, F. (1999), “Maltese students and examinations: the impact of differentiated examination papers, gender and type of school on student achievement and further aspirations”, paper presented at the 25th Annual IAEA Conference “East Meets West”, Slovenia.
13. Cleary, T.A. (1992), “Gender differences in aptitude and achievement test scores”, in Pfleiderer, J. (Ed.), Sex Equity in Educational Opportunity, Achievement and Testing, Educational Testing Services, Princeton, NJ, pp. 51-90.
14. Comrey, A.L. and Lee, H.B. (1992), A First Course in Factor Analysis, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
15. De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L. and Op't Eynde, P. (2000), “Self-regulation: a characteristic and a goal of mathematics education”, in Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R. and Zeidner, M. (Eds), Handbook of Self-regulation, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 687-726.
16. Downing, K., Chan, S.W., Downing, W.K., Kwong, T. and Lam, T.F. (2008), “Measuring gender differences in cognitive functioning”, Multicultural Education amd Technology Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 4-18.
17. Eccles, J., Wigfield, A. and Schiefele, U. (1998), “Motivation to succeed”, in Damon, W. (Series Ed.) and Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Social, Emotional and Personality Development, 5th ed., Wiley, New York, NY, Vol. 3, pp. 1017-95.
18. Educational Assessment Unit (1995-2009), Junior Lyceum Entrance Examinations: 1995-2009 (Annual Reports), Department of Curriculum Development, Implementation and Review, Education Division, Ministry of Education, Malta.
19. Epstein, D. (1998), “Real boys don't work: ‘underachievement’, masculinity and the harassment of ‘sissies’”, in Epstein, D., Elwood, J., Hey, V. and Maw, J. (Eds), Failing Boys? Issues in Gender and Achievement, Open University Press, Buckingham, pp. 96-108.
20. ETC (2005), Women and Men in the IT Labour Market, Employment and Training Corporation, Malta.
21. Fisher, S.J. and Ford, J.K. (1998), “Differential effects of learner effort and goal orientation on learning outcomes”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 397-420.
22. Foster, V., Kimmel, M. and Skelton, C. (2001), “What about boys? An overview of debates”, in Martino, W. and Meyenn, B. (Eds), What about the Boys?, Open University Press, Buckingham, pp. 1-23.
23. Francis, B. (1999), “Lads, Lasses and (New) Labour: 14-16-year-old students' responses to the ‘laddish behaviour and boys’ underachievement' debate”, British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 20, pp. 355-71.
24. Francis, B. (2000), “The gendered subject: students' subject preferences and discussions of gender and subject ability”, Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 20, pp. 35-48.
25. Fredricks, J.A. and Eccles, J.S. (2002), “Children's competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains”, Developmental Psychology, Vol. 38, pp. 519-33.
26. Friedman, L. (1989), “Mathematics and the gender gap: a meta-analysis of recent studies on sex differences in attainment tasks”, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 59, pp. 185-213.
27. Frosh, S., Phoenix, A. and Pattman, R. (2002), Young Masculinities: Understanding Boys in Contemporary Society, Palgrave, Basingstoke.
28. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C.L., Owen, R. and Schroeter, K. (2003), “Enhancing third-grade students' mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 95, pp. 306-15.
29. Garcia, T. and Pintrich, P.R. (1994), “Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: the role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies”, in Schunk, D.H. and Zimmerman, B.J. (Eds), Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 127-54.
30. Gorard, S., Rees, G. and Salisbury, J. (2001), “Investigating patterns of differential attainment of boys and girls at school”, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 125-40.
31. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
32. Hall, C.W., Davis, N.B., Bolen, L.M. and Chia, R. (1999), “Gender and racial differences in mathematical performance”, Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 139, pp. 677-89.
33. Hart, K.M. (Ed.) (1981), Children's Understanding of Mathematics: 11-16, John Murray, London.
34. Hearne, J. (2001), “Assessment as a tool for learning”, available at: www.newhorizons.org/strategies/assess/hearne (accessed 4 July 2009).
35. Hembree, R. (1990), “The nature, effects and relief of mathematics anxiety”, Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 21, pp. 33-46.
36. Hill, K.T. and Sarason, S.B. (1966), “The relation of test anxiety and defensiveness to test and school performance over the elementary-school years: a further longitudinal study”, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 1-76.
37. Ho, H.Z., Senturk, D., Lam, A.G., Zimmer, J.M., Chiu, S.Y., Nakazawa, Y. and Wang, C.P. (2000), “The affective and cognitive dimensions of math anxiety: a cross-nation study”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 31, pp. 362-79.
38. Hyde, J.S. (1994), “Gender differences in mathematics ability, anxiety and attitudes: what do meta-analyses tell us?”, in Penner, L.A., Batsche, G.M., Knoff, H.M. and Nelson, D.L. (Eds), The Challenge in Mathematics and Science Education: Psychology's Response, American Psychology Association, Washington, DC, pp. 237-50.
39. Hyde, J.S. (1996), “Meta-analysis and the psychology of gender differences”, in Laslett, B., Kohlstedt, S.G., Longino, H. and Hammonds, E. (Eds), Gender and Scientific Authority, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
40. Hyde, J.S. (2005), “The gender similarities hypothesis”, American Psychologist, Vol. 60, pp. 581-92.
41. Hyde, J.S. and Linn, M.C. (2006), “Gender similarities in mathematics and science”, Science, Vol. 27 No. 5799, pp. 599-600.
42. Hyde, J.S. and Mertz, J.E. (2009), “Gender, culture, and mathematics performance”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, Vol. 106, pp. 8801-7.
43. Hyde, J.S., Fennema, E. and Lamon, S.J. (1990), “Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 107, pp. 139-55.
44. Hyde, J.S., Lindberg, S.M., Linn, M.C., Ellis, A. and Williams, C. (2008), “Gender similarities characterize math performance”, Science, Vol. 321 No. 5888, pp. 494-5.
45. Jacobs, P.A. and Newstead, S.E. (2000), “The nature and development of student motivation”, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 70, pp. 243-54.
46. Joo, Y.J., Bong, M. and Choi, M.J. (2000), “Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction”, Educational Technology Research & Development, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 5-17.
47. Kenney-Benson, G., Pomerantz, E., Ryan, A. and Patrick, H. (2006), “Sex differences in math performance: the role of children's approach to schoolwork”, Developmental Psychology, Vol. 42, pp. 11-26.
48. Lenth, R.V. (2006-2009), Java Applets for Power and Sample Size [Computer software], available at: www.stat.uiowa.edu/∼rlenth/Power (accessed 2 June 2009).
49. Lucangeli, D., Cornoldi, C. and Tellarini, M. (1998), “Metacognition and learning disabilities in mathematics”, in Scruggs, T.E. and Mastropieri, M.A. (Eds), Advances in Learning and Behavioural Disabilities, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 219-44.
50. McDonald, A.S. (2001), “The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children”, Educational Psychology, Vol. 21, pp. 89-102.
51. McGuiness, D. (1994), “Sex differences in cognitive style: implications for mathematical performance and achievement”, in Penner, L.A., Batsche, G.M., Knoff, H.M. and Nelson, D.L. (Eds), The Challenge of Mathematics and Science Education: Psychology's Response, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 251-74.
52. Maccoby, E.E. and Jacklin, C.N. (1974), The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, CA.
53. Machin, S. and Pekkarinen, T. (2008), “Global sex differences in test score variability”, Science, Vol. 322 No. 5906, pp. 1331-2.
54. Marsh, H.W. (1989), “Sex differences in the development of verbal and mathematics constructs: the high school and beyond study”, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 191-225.
55. Marsh, H.W., Byrne, B.M. and Shavelson, R.J. (1988), “A multifaceted academic self-concept: its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 80, pp. 366-80.
56. MATSEC Examination Board (1996-2004), SEC Examination Past Papers: Mathematics, MATSEC Support Unit, University of Malta, Msida.
57. MATSEC Examinations Board (2003-2009), SEC Examinations Statistical Report (Annual Reports), MATSEC Support Unit, University of Malta, Msida.
58. Musch, J. and Broder, A. (1999), “Test anxiety versus academic skills: a comparison of two alternative models for predicting performance in a statistics exam”, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 69, pp. 105-16.
59. Naglieri, J.A. and Johnson, D. (2000), “Effectiveness of a cognitive strategy intervention to improve math calculation based on the PASS theory”, Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 33, pp. 591-7.
60. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (2001), “Results of the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 eighth graders”, available at: http://nces.ed.gov/ (accessed 15 September 2002).
61. Pajares, F. and Miller, M.D. (1994), “The role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: a path analysis”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 86, pp. 193-203.
62. Pape, S.J. (2005), “Interventions that support future mathematics learning: developing self-regulated learners in K-12 classrooms”, in Wagner, S. (Ed.), Prompt Intervention in Mathematics Education, Ohio Department of Education, pp. 77-97.
63. Penner, A.M. (2003), “International gender x item difficulty interactions in mathematics and science achievement tests”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 95, pp. 650-5.
64. Pintrich, P.R. (2000), “The role of goal orientations in self-regulated learning”, in Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R. and Zeidner, M. (Eds), Handbook of Self-regulation, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 451-520.
65. Pintrich, P.R. (2003), “A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 95, pp. 667-86.
66. Pintrich, P.R. and De Groot, E.V. (1990), “Motivational and self-regulated components of classroom academic performance”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 82, pp. 33-40.
67. Pintrich, P.R. and Schunk, D.H. (2002), Motivation in Education: Theory, Research and Applications, Merrill Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
68. Pollard, D.S. (1993), “Gender, achievement and African-American students' perceptions of their school experience”, Educational Psychologist, Vol. 28, pp. 341-56.
69. Pomerantz, E.M., Altermatt, E.R. and Saxon, J.L. (2002), “Making the grade but feeling distressed: gender differences in academic performance and internal distress”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 94, pp. 396-404.
70. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) (2003), Using Assessment to Raise Achievement in Mathematics at Key Stages 1, 2 and 3, Qualifications and Curriculam Authority, QCA Publications, London.
71. Rao, N., Moely, B.E. and Sachs, J. (2000), “Motivational beliefs, study strategies and mathematics attainment among high- and low-achieving Chinese students”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 287-316.
72. Richardson, J.T. (1990), “Reliability and replicability of the approaches to studying questionnaire”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 15, pp. 155-68.
73. Robinson, J.P., Shaver, P.R. and Wrightsman, L.S. (1991), “Criteria for scale selection and evaluation”, in Robinson, J.P., Shaver, P.R. and Wrightsman, L.S. (Eds), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 1-16.
74. Robinson, N.M., Abbott, R.D., Berninger, V.W. and Busse, J. (1996), “The structure of abilities in math-precocious young children: gender similarities and differences”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 88, pp. 341-52.
75. Rosnow, R.L. and Rosenthal, R. (2002), Beginning Behavioral Research: A Conceptual Primer, 4th ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
76. Rowe, K.J. and Rowe, K.S. (2002), “What matters most: evidence-based findings on key factors affecting the educational experiences and outcomes for girls and boys throughout their primary and secondary schooling”, Student Learning Processes, available at: http://research.acer.edu.au/learning_processes/4 (accessed 16 April 2005).
77. Saeed, M. and Bushra, M.B.G. (2005), “Assessing achievement of primary grader students and factors affecting achievement in Pakistan”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 486-99.
78. Schunk, D.H. (1994), “Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings”, in Schunk, D.H. and Zimmerman, B.J. (Eds), Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, LEA, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 75-100.
79. Schunk, D.H. and Zimmerman, B.J. (1994), “Preface”, in Schunk, D.H. and Zimmerman, B.J. (Eds), Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. ix-xi.
80. Skaalvik, S. and Skaalvik, E.M. (2004), “Gender differences in math and verbal self-concept, performance expectations, and motivation”, Sex Roles, Vol. 50 Nos. 3/4, pp. 241-52.
81. Spencer, S.J., Steele, C.M. and Quinn, D.M. (1999), “Stereotype threat and women's math performance”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 35, pp. 4-28.
82. Swiatek, M.A., Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. and O'Donoghue, C. (2000), “Gender differences in above-EXPLORE scores of gifted third through sixth graders”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 92, pp. 718-23.
83. Tinklin, T. (2003), “Gender differences and high attainment”, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 307-26.
84. Tinklin, T., Croxford, L., Ducklin, A. and Frame, B. (2001), Gender and Pupil Performance in Scotland's Schools, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
85. Turner, B.G., Beidel, D.C., Hughes, S. and Turner, M.W. (1993), “Test anxiety in African American school children”, School Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 8, pp. 140-52.
86. University of Wisconsin-Madison (2009), “Culture, not biology, underpins math gender gap”, ScienceDaily, 2 June, available at: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090601182655. htm (accessed 11 July 2009).
87. Warr, P. and Downing, J. (2000), “Learning strategies, learning anxiety and knowledge acquisition”, British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 91, pp. 311-33.
88. Warrington, M., Younger, M. and Williams, J. (2000), “Student attitudes, image and gender gap”, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 393-407.
89. Watt, H.M.G., Eccles, J.S. and Durik, A.M. (2006), “The leaky mathematics pipeline for girls: a motivational analysis of high school enrolments in Australia and the USA”, Equal Opportunities International, Vol. 25 No. 8, pp. 642-59.
90. Weinstein, C.E. and Mayer, R.E. (1986), “The teaching of learning strategies”, in Wittrock, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, NY, pp. 315-27.
91. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. and Pintrich, P.R. (1996), “Development between the ages of 11 and 25”, in Berliner, D. and Calfee, R. (Eds), Handbook of Educational Psychology, Wiley, New York, NY, pp. 148-85.
92. Willingham, W.W., Cole, N.S., Lewis, C. and Leung, S.W. (1997), “Test performance”, in Willingham, W.W. and Cole, N.S. (Eds), Gender and Fair Assessment, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
93. Wolters, C.A. (1998), “Self-regulated learning and college students' regulation of motivation”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90, pp. 224-35.
94. Wolters, C.A. (2003), “Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 95, pp. 179-87.
95. Wolters, C.A. and Pintrich, P.R. (1998), “Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English and social studies classrooms”, Instructional Science, Vol. 26 Nos. 1/2, pp. 27-47.
96. Zeidner, M. (1996), “How do high school and college students cope with test situations?”, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 66, pp. 115-28.
97. Zeidner, M., Boekaerts, M. and Pintrich, P.R. (2000), “Self-regulation. Directions and challenges for future research”, in Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R. and Zeidner, M. (Eds), Handbook of Self-regulation, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 750-68.
98. Zimmerman, B.J. and Martinez-Pons, M. (1990), “Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 82, pp. 51-9.
99. Zimmerman, B.J. and Schunk, D. (2001), “Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives”, 2nd ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.