The nature and development of student motivation

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 243-254

  Jacobs, Pamela A ^a   Newstead, S E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040291387     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000709900158119     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Biggs, J. (1987). Study Process Questionnaire manual. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
2. Conway, M. A., Cohen, G., & Stanhope, N. (1991). On the very long-term retention of knowledge acquired through formal education: Twelve years of cognitive psychology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 395-409.
3. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, A. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
4. Entwistle. N. J., & Entwistle, A. (1991). Contrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations: The student experience and its implications. Higher Education, 22, 205-227.
5. Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
6. Fazey, D., & Fazey, J. (1998). Perspectives on motivation: The implications for effective learning in higher education. In S. Brown, S. Armstrong, & G. Thomson (Eds.), Motivating students (pp. 59-72). London: Kogan Page.
7. Newstead, S. E. (1992). A study of two 'quick-and-easy' methods of measuring individual differences in student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 299-312.
8. Pintrich, P. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In M. Maehr & C. Ames (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments (Vol. 6, pp.117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9. Pintrich, P., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MLSQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
10. Radford, J., & Holdstock, L. (1993) What students want: Objectives of first year psychology students in Ireland, Norway, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom. Psychology Teaching Review, 2, 39-49.
11. Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368-383.
12. Richardson, J. T. E. (1993). Gender differences in responses to the Approaches to Studying Inventory. Studies in Higher Education, 18, 3-13.
13. Richardson, J. T. E. (1995). Mature students in higher education: II. An investigation of approaches to studying and academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 20, 5-7.
14. Sharpe, R., Baldwin, A., Newstead, S. E., & Fullerton, H. (1999). Attitudes and approaches to studying in entry level undergraudate students. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15. Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003-1017.