The transcriptional response to DNADouble-strand breaks in Physcomitrella patens

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2016, Pages

  Kamisugi, Yasuko ^a   Whitaker, John W ^a,b   Cuming, Andrew C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATR PROTEIN; B TYPE CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE; BLEOMYCIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; COMPLEMENTARY DNA; CTIP PROTEIN; CYCLIN D; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE; DNA HELICASE; DNA LIGASE; DNA LIGASE 1; DNA LIGASE 4; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; HUS1 PROTEIN; KU ANTIGEN; KU80 PROTEIN; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE RIBOSYLTRANSFERASE; PLANT DNA; PLANT PROTEIN; PROTEIN RAD1; PROTEIN RAD9; RAD51 PROTEIN; REPLICATION FACTOR A; TEBICHI PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; XRCC4 PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA SEQUENCE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; DOWN REGULATION; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; GENE FUNCTION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE SILENCING; GENE TARGETING; GENOME ANALYSIS; HYPERSENSITIVITY; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; PHYSCOMITRELLA PATENS; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENOME; PLANT GROWTH; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; UPREGULATION; BRYOPSIDA; DNA REPAIR; DRUG EFFECTS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE INACTIVATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY;

BLEOMYCIN; BRYOPSIDA; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE KNOCKOUT TECHNIQUES; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84984829468     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161204     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Kenrick P. Crane PR. The origin and early evolution of plants on land. Nature 1997; 389: 33-39.
2. Zimmer A, Lang D, Richardt S, Frank W, Reski R, Rensing SA. Dating the early evolution of plants: detection and molecular clock: analyses of orthologs. Mol. Genet. Genomics. 2007; 278: 393-402. PMID: 17593393
3. Rensing SA, Lang D, Zimmer A, Terry A, Salamov A, Shapiro H, et al. The Physcomitrella genome reveals insights into the conquest of land by plants. Science. 2008; 319: 64-69. PMID: 18079367
4. Kamisugi Y, von Stackelberg M, Lang D, Care M, Reski R, Rensing SA, et al. A sequence-anchored genetic linkage map for the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant J. 2008; 56: 855-866. doi: 10.1111/j. 1365-313X.2008.03637.x PMID: 18657236
5. Schaefer DG, Zryd JP. Efficient gene targeting in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant J. 1997; 11: 1195-1206. PMID: 9225463
6. Kamisugi Y, Cuming AC, Cove DJ. Parameters determining the efficiency of homologous recombination mediated gene targeting in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33: e173. PMID: 16282584
7. Kamisugi Y, Cuming AC. Gene targeting. In. Perroud P-F, Cove DJ, Knight CD, editors. The moss Physcomitrella. Annual Plant Reviews Vol. 36. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2009;pp. 76-112.
8. Terada R, Johzuka-Hisatomi Y, Saito M, Asao H, Iida S. Gene targeting by homologous recombination as a biotechnological tool for rice functional genomics. Plant Physiol. 2007; 144: 846-856. PMID: 17449652
9. Townsend JA, Wright DA, Winfrey RJ, Fu F, Maeder ML, Joung JK, et al. High frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nature. 2009; 459: 442-445. doi: 10.1038/nature07845 PMID: 19404258
10. Schiml S, Puchta H. Revolutionizing plant biology: multiple ways of genome engineering by CRISPR/Cas. Plant Methods 2016; 12: 8. doi: 10.1186/s13007-016-0103-0 PMID: 26823677
11. Britt AM, May GD. Re-engineering plant gene targeting. Trends Plant Sci. 2003; 8: 90-95. PMID: 12597876
12. Jazayeri A, Falck J, Lukas C, Bartek J, Smith GC, Lukas J, et al. ATM-and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006; 8: 37-45. PMID: 16327781
13. San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H. Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008; 77: 229-257. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.125255 PMID: 18275380
14. Sfeir A, Symington LS. Microhomology-Mediated End Joining: A back-up survival mechanism or dedicated pathway? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2015; 40, 701-714. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.08.006 PMID: 26439531
15. Orr-Weaver TL, Szostak JW, Rothstein RJ. Yeast transformation: a model system for the study of recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1981; 78: 6354-6358. PMID: 6273866
16. Schaefer DG. A new moss genetics: targeting mutagenesis in Physcomitrella patens. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002; 53: 477-501. PMID: 12221986
17. von Stackelberg M., Rensing S.A. and Reski R. Identification of genic moss SSR markers and a comparative search in twenty-four algal and plant gene indices reveal species-specific rather than groupspecific characteristics of microsatellites. BMC Plant Biology. 2006; 6: 9. PMID: 16734891
18. Knight CD, Cove DJ, Cuming AC, Quatrano RS. Moss gene technology. In: Gilmartin PM, Bowler C, editors. Molecular Plant Biology Vol. 2: Oxford University Press. 2002;pp. 285-299.
19. Kamisugi Y, Schaefer DG, Kozak J, Charlot F, Vrielynk N, Hola M, et al. MRE11 and RAD50, but not NBS1, are essential for DNA repair and gene targeting in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40: 3496-3510. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1272 PMID: 22210882
20. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International. 2004; 11: 36-42.
21. Schaefer DG, Delacote F, Charlot F, Vrielynck N, Guyon-Debast A, Le Guin S. RAD51 loss of function abolishes gene targeting and de-represses illegitimate integration in the moss Physcomitrella patens. DNA Repair 2010; 9: 526-533. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.02.001 PMID: 20189889
22. Futers TS, Onde S, Turet M, Cuming AC. Sequence analysis of 2 tandemly linked Em genes from wheat. Plant Mol. Biol. 1993; 23: 1067-1072. PMID: 8260627
23. Taylor RM, Cuming AC. Selective proteolysis of the wheat Em polypeptide-identification of an endopeptidase activity in germinating wheat embryos. FEBS Lett. 1993; 331: 71-75. PMID: 8405414
24. Trapnell C, Patcher L, Salzberg SL. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25: 1105-1111. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120 PMID: 19289445
25. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009; 10: R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 PMID: 19261174
26. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25: 2078-2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 PMID: 19505943
27. Audic S, Claverie JM. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res. 1997; 7: 986-995. PMID: 9331369
28. Benjamini Y, and Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 1995; 57: 289-300.
29. Markmann-Mulisch U, Wendeler E, Schween G, Steinbiss H-H, Reiss B. Differential requirements for RAD51 in Physcomitrella patens and Arabidopsis thaliana development and DNA damage repair. Plant Cell. 2007; 19: 3080-3089. PMID: 17921313
30. Clerici M, Mantiero D, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein promotes resection and bridging of double strand break ends. J. Biol. Chem. 2005; 280: 38631-38638. PMID: 16162495
31. Sartori AA, Lukas C, Coates J, Mistrik M, Fu S, Bartek J, et al. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 2007; 450: 509-514. PMID: 17965729
32. Yun MH, Hiom K. 2009. CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle. Nature 459;460-463. doi: 10.1038/nature07955 PMID: 19357644
33. Inagaki S, Suzuki T, Ohto M, Urawa H, Horiuchi T, Nakamura K, et al. Arabidopsis TEBICHI, with helicase and DNA polymerase domains, is required for regulated cell division and differentiation in meristems. Plant Cell. 2006; 18: 879-892. PMID: 16517762
34. Inagaki S, Nakamura K, Morikami A. A link among DNA replication, recombination and gene expression revealed by genetic and genomic analysis of TEBICHI gene of Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genetics 2009; 5: e1000613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000613 PMID: 19696887
35. Ahel D, Horejsi Z, Wiechens N, Polo S, Garcia-Wilson E, Ahel I, et al. Poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent regulation of DNA repair by the chromatin remodeling enzyme ALC1. Science. 2009; 325: 1240-1243. doi: 10.1126/science.1177321 PMID: 19661379
36. Ogas J, Kaufmann S, Henderson J, Somerville C. PICKLE is a CHD3 chromatin-remodeling factor that regulates the transition from embryonic to vegetative development in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999; 96: 13839-13844. PMID: 10570159
37. Shaked H, Avivi-Ragolsky N, Levy AA. Involvement of the Arabidopsis SWI2/SNF2 chromatin remodeling gene family in DNA damage response and recombination. Genetics. 2006; 173: 985-994. PMID: 16547115
38. Culligan KM, Robertson CE, Foreman J, Doerner P, Britt AM. ATR and ATM play both distinct and additive roles in response to ionizing radiation. Plant J. 2006; 48: 947-961. PMID: 17227549
39. Antony E, Tomko EJ, Xiao Q, Krecji L, Lohman TM, Ellenberger T. Srs2 disassembles Rad51 filaments by a protein-protein interaction triggering ATP turnover and dissociation of Rad51 from DNA. Molec. Cell. 2009; 35: 105-115. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.026 PMID: 19595720
40. Colavito S, Macris-Kiss M, Seong C, Gleeson O, Greene EC, Klein HL, et al. Functional significance of the Rad51-Srs2 complex in Rad51 presynaptic filament disruption. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37: 6754-6764. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp748 PMID: 19745052
41. Charlot F, Chelysheva L, Kamisugi Y, Vrielynk N, Guyon A, Epert A, et al. RAD51B plays an essential role during somatic and meiotic recombination in Physcomitrella. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42: 11965-11978. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku890 PMID: 25260587
42. Trouiller B, Schaefer DG, Charlot F, Nogué F. MSH2 is essential for the preservation of genome integrity and prevents homeologous recombination in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34, 232-242. PMID: 16397301
43. Krogh BO, Symington LS. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2004; 38: 233-271. PMID: 15568977
44. Huertas P, Jackson SP. Human CtIP mediates cell cycle control of DNA end resection and double strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 2009; 284: 9558-9565. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808906200 PMID: 19202191
45. Peterson SE, Li Y, Wu-Baer F, Chait BT, Baer R, Yan H, et al. Activation of DSB processing requires phosphorylation of CtIP by ATR. Molec. Cell. 2013; 49: 657-667. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.020 PMID: 23273981
46. Colaiacovo MP, Paques F, Haber JE. Removal of one nonhomologous DNA end during gene conversion by a RAD1-and MSH2-independent pathway. Genetics. 1999; 151: 1409-1423. PMID: 10101166
47. Dubest S, Gallego ME, White CI. Role of the AtRad1p endonuclease in homologous recombination in plants. EMBO Rep. 2002; 3: 1049-1054. PMID: 12393748
48. Woodhouse BC, Dianov GL. PolyADP-ribose polymerase-1: an international molecule of mystery. DNA Repair. 2008; 7: 1077-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.03.009 PMID: 18468963
49. Roerink SF, van Schendel R, Tijsterman M. Polymerase theta-mediated end joining of replication-associated DNA breaks in C. elegans. Genome Res. 2014; 24: 954-962. doi: 10.1101/gr.170431.113 PMID: 24614976
50. Kamisugi Y, Schlink K, Rensing SA, Schween G, von Stackelberg M, Cuming AC, et al. The mechanism of gene targeting in Physcomitrella patens: homologous recombination, concatenation and multiple integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34: 6205-6214. PMID: 17090599
51. Plessis A, Dujon B. 1993. Multiple tandem integrations of transforming DNA sequences in yeast chromosomes suggest a mechanism for integrative transformation by homologous recombination. Gene. 134;41-50. PMID: 8244029
52. Kai M. Role of the Checkpoint Clamp in DNA Damage Response. Biomolecules 2013; 3: 75-84. doi: 10.3390/biom3010075 PMID: 24970157
53. Cuming AC, Cho SH, Kamisugi Y, Graham H, Quatrano RS. Microarray analysis of transcriptional responses to Abscisic acid and osmotic, salt, and drought stress in the moss, Physcomitrella patens. New Phytol. 2007; 176: 275-287. PMID: 17696978
54. Frank W, Ratnadewi D, Reski R. Physcomitrella patens is highly tolerant against drought, salt and osmotic stress. Planta 2005; 220: 384-394. PMID: 15322883
55. Cosgrove DJ. Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005; 6: 850-861 PMID: 16261190
56. Thompson JE, Fry SC. Restructuring of wall-bound xyloglucan by transglycosylation in living plant cells. Plant Journal. 2001; 26: 23-34. PMID: 11359607
57. Feng JX, Liu D, Pan Y, Gong W, Ma LG, Luo JC, et al. An annotation update via cDNA sequence analysis and comprehensive profiling of developmental, hormonal or environmental responsiveness of the Arabidopsis AP2/EREBP transcription factor gene family. Plant Molec. Biol. 2005; 59: 853-868.
58. Dixon RA, Paiva NL. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 1995; 7: 1085-1097. PMID: 12242399
59. Jin H, Martin CR. Multifunctionality and diversity within the plant MYB-gene family. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999; 41: 577-585. PMID: 10645718
60. Hartmann U, Sagasser M, Mehrtens F, Stracke R, Weisshaar B. Differential combinatorial interactions of cis-acting elements recognized by R2R3-MYB, BZIP, and BHLH factors control light-responsive and tissue-specific activation of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis genes Plant Mol. Biol 2005; 57: 155-171.
61. Chen IP, Haehnel U, Altschmied L, Schubert I, Puchta H. The transcriptional response of Arabidopsis to genotoxic stress-a high-density colony array study (HDCA). Plant J. 2003; 35: 771-786. PMID: 12969430
62. Kim YS. Analysis of gene expression upon DNA damage in Arabidopsis Plant Biology 2005; 49: 298-302.
63. West CE, Waterworth WM, Bray CM. Arabidopsis DNA double-strand break repair pathways. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2004; 32: 964-966. PMID: 15506937
64. Manuss A, Dukowicz-Schulze S, Hartung F, Pacher M, Puchta H. RAD5A, RECQ4A, and MUS81 have specific functions in homologous recombination and define different pathways of DNA repair in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2010; 22: 3318-3330. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.078568 PMID: 20971895
65. Gottschalk AJ, Trivedi RD, Conaway JW, Conaway RC. Activation of the SNF2 family ATPase ALC1 by Poly(ADP-ribose) in a stable nucleosome-PARP1-ALC1 intermediate. J. Biol. Chem. 2012; 287: 43527-43532. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.401141 PMID: 23132853
66. Recker J, Knoll A, Puchta H. 2014. The Arabidopsis thaliana homolog of the helicase RTEL1 plays multiple roles in preserving genome stability. Plant Cell. 26: 4889-4902.67. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.132472 PMID: 25516598
67. Hu Z, Cools T, Kalhorzadeh P, Heyman J, De Veylder L. Deficiency of the Arabidopsis helicase RTEL1 triggers a SOG1-dependent replication checkpoint in response to DNA cross-Links. Plant Cell 2015; 27: 149-161. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.134312 PMID: 25595823