Toward an integrated understanding of perceived biodiversity values and environmental conditions in a national park

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 72, Issue , 2017, Pages 278-287

  van Riper, Carena J ^a   Kyle, Gerard T ^b   Sherrouse, Benson C ^c   Bagstad, Kenneth J ^c   Sutton, Stephen G ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^d Atlantic Salmon Federation   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; GIS; Protected areas; Social value indicator; Social ecological system

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LANDFORMS; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; SURVEYS;

BIODIVERSITY VALUES; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; PROTECTED AREAS; SOCIAL VALUES; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; VEGETATION DENSITY;

ECOSYSTEMS;

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; GEODIVERSITY; GIS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; NATIONAL PARK; NATURAL RESOURCE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SPATIAL PLANNING; SPECIES RICHNESS; VEGETATION COVER;

CALIFORNIA; CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84983751676     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.029     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Adger, W.N., Barnett, J., Chapin, F.S. III, Ellemor, H., This must be the place: underrepresentation of identity and meaning in climate change decision-making. Global Environ. Politics 11 (2011), 1–25.
2. Alessa, L.N., Kliskey, A.A., Brown, G., Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape Urban Plann. 85 (2008), 27–39.
3. Allan, J.D., et al. Using cultural ecosystem services to inform restoration priorities in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13:8 (2015), 418–424.
4. Bagstad, K.J., Reed, J.M., Semmens, D.J., Sherrouse, B.C., Troy, A., Linking biophysical models and public preferences for ecosystem service assessments: a case study for the Southern Rocky Mountains. Reg. Environ. Change, 2015.
5. Brown, G., Brabyn, L., An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification. Landscape Urban Plann. 107 (2012), 317–331.
6. Brown, G., Fagerholm, N., Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: a review and evaluation. Ecosyst. Serv. 13 (2015), 119–133.
7. Brown, G.G., Pullar, D.V., An evaluation of the use of points versus polygons in Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) using quasi-experimental design and Monte Carlo simulation. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. 26 (2012), 231–246.
8. Brown, G., Reed, P., Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. For. Sci. 46 (2000), 240–247.
9. Brown, G., Weber, D., Public participation GIS: a new method for national park planning. Landscape Urban Plann. 102 (2011), 1–15.
10. Brown, G.G., Reed, P., Harris, C.C., Testing a place-based theory for environmental valuation: an Alaska case study. Appl. Geogr. 22 (2002), 49–76.
11. Brown, G., Smith, C., Alessa, L., Kliskey, A., A comparison of perceptions of biological value with scientific assessment of biological importance. Appl. Geogr. 24 (2004), 161–180.
12. Brown, G., Montag, J.M., Lyon, K., Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services. Soc. Nat. Resour. 25 (2012), 633–651.
13. Brown, T.C., The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Econ. 60 (1984), 231–246.
14. Brown, G., The relationship between social values for ecosystem services and global land cover: an empirical analysis. Ecosyst. Serv. 5 (2013), 58–68.
15. Brownlee, M.T.J., Hallo, J.C., Wright, B.A., Moore, D., Powell, R.B., Visiting a climate-influenced national park: the stability of climate change perceptions. Environ. Manage. 52 (2013), 1132–1148.
16. Bryan, B.A., Raymond, C.M., Crossman, N.D., King, D., Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies. Conserv. Biol. 25 (2011), 172–181.
17. Carpenter, S.R., et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106 (2009), 1305–1312.
18. Chan, K.M.A., et al. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services: a framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience 62 (2012), 744–756.
19. Chan, K.M.A., Satterfield, T., Goldstein, J., Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 74 (2012), 8–18.
20. Chan, K.M., et al. Opinion: why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113 (2016), 1462–1465.
21. Cheng, A.S., Daniels, S.E., Examining the interaction between geographic scale and ways of knowing in ecosystem management: a case study of place-based collaborative planning. For. Sci. 49 (2003), 841–854.
22. Cogan, C.B., Todd, B.J., Lawton, P., Noji, T.T., The role of marine habitat mapping in ecosystem-based management. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 66 (2009), 2033–2042.
23. Cohen, B., Cory, C., Menke, J., Hepburn, A., A spatial database of Santa Cruz Island vegetation. Damiani, C.C., Garcelon, D.K., (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th California Islands Symposium, Institute for Wildlife Studies: Arcata, CA, 2009, 229–244.
24. Costanza, R., et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387 (1997), 253–260.
25. Cutts, B.B., White, D.D., Kinzig, A.P., Participatory geographic information systems for the co-production of science and policy in an emerging boundary organization. Environ. Scie. Policy 14 (2011), 977–985.
26. Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J.R., Arico, S., Báldi, A., The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14 (2015), 1–16.
27. D'Antonio, A., Monz, C., Newman, P., Lawson, S., Taff, D., Enhancing the utility of visitor impact assessment in parks and protected areas: a combined social–ecological approach. J. Environ. Manage. 124 (2013), 72–81.
28. Daily, G.C., Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. 1997, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
29. Dallimer, M., Irvine, K.N., Skinner, A.M.J., Davies, Z.G., Rouquette, J.R., Maltby, L.L., Warren, P.H., Armsworth, P.R., Gaston, K.J., Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience 62 (2012), 47–55.
30. Dallimer, M., Tinch, D., Hanley, N., Irvine, K.N., Rouquette, J.R., Warren, P.H., Maltby, L., Gaston, K.J., Armsworth, P.R., Quantifying preferences for the natural world using monetary and nonmonetary assessments of value. Conserv. Biol. 28 (2014), 404–413.
31. Daniel, T.C., et al. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109 (2012), 8812–8819.
32. Davis, G., Science and society: marine reserve design for the California Channel Islands. Conserv. Biol. 19 (2005), 1745–1751.
33. Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D., Christian, L.M., Internet Phone, Mail, and Mixed-mode Surveys: the Tailored Design Method. 2014, John Wiley & Sons.
34. Fagerholm, N., Käyhkö, N., Ndumbaro, F., Khamis, M., Community stakeholdersä knowledge in landscape assessments – mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecol. Indic. 18 (2012), 421–433.
35. Faulkner, K.R., Kessler, C.C., Live capture and removal of feral sheep from eastern Santa Cruz Island, California. Veitch, C.R., Clout, M.N., Towns, D.R., (eds.) Island Invasives: Eradication and Management, 2011, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
36. Fielding, A.H., Bell, J.F., A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 24 (1997), 38–49.
37. Flint, C.G., Kunze, I., Muhar, A., Yoshida, Y., Penker, M., Exploring empirical typologies of human-nature relationships and linkages to the ecosystem services concept. Landscape Urban Plann. 120 (2013), 208–217.
38. Fry, J., et al. Completion of the 2006 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. PE&RS 77 (2011), 858–864.
39. Fuller, R.A., Irvine, K.N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P.H., Gaston, K.J., Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol. Lett. 3 (2007), 390–394.
40. Gould, R.K., Klain, S.C., Ardoin, N.M., Satterfield, T., Woodside, U., Hannahs, N., Daily, G., Chan, K.M., A protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values through a cultural ecosystem services frame. Conserv. Biol. 29 (2015), 575–586.
41. Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R., van Ierland, E., Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 57 (2006), 209–228.
42. Holl, K.D., Daily, G.C., Ehrlich, P.R., Knowledge and perceptions in Costa Rica regarding environment, population, and biodiversity issues. Conserv. Biol. 9 (1995), 1548–1558.
43. Hunter, L.M., Rinner, L., The association between environmental perspective and knowledge and concern with species diversity. Soc. Nat. Resour. 17 (2004), 517–532.
44. Ives, C.D., Kendal, D., The role of social values in the management of ecological systems. J. Environ. Manage. 144 (2014), 67–72.
45. Kenter, J.O., et al. What are shared and social values of ecosystems?. Ecol. Econ. 111 (2015), 86–99.
46. Klain, S.C., Chan, K.M.A., Navigating coastal values: participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning. Ecol. Econ. 82 (2012), 104–113.
47. Kollmuss, A., Agyeman, J., Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior. Environ. Educat. Res. 8 (2002), 239–260.
48. Kyttä, M., Broberg, A., Tzoulas, T., Snabb, K., Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality. Landscape Urban Plann. 113 (2013), 30–46.
49. LaFranchi, C., and Pendleton, L. (2008). Private boating and boater activities in the Channel Islands: A spatial analysis and assessment. Final report prepared for The Resources Legacy Fund Foundation and The National Marine.
50. Lindemann-Matthies, P., Bose, E., How many species are there? Public understanding and awareness of biodiversity in Switzerland. Hum. Ecol. 36 (2008), 731–742.
51. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. 2005, Washington, D.C., Island Press.
52. Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Lomas, P.L., Montes, C., Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation. J. Environ. Manage. 90 (2009), 1050–1059.
53. Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., García-Llorente, M., Montes, C., Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecol. Indic. 37 (2014), 220–228.
54. Mascia, M.B., et al. Conservation and the social sciences. Conserv. Biol. 17 (2003), 649–650.
55. Veitch, C.R., Clout, M.N., (eds.) Ecosystem-Based Management for the Oceans, 2009, Island Press, Washington, DC.
56. Milcu, A.I., Hanspach, J., Abson, D., Fischer, J., Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol. Soc., 18(3), 2013.
57. National Park Service (NPS), Mediterranean Coast Network – Vital Signs Monitoring Plan. Natural Resources Technical Report NPS/MEDN/NRTR——2007/001., 2009, National Park Service, Thousand Oaks, CA.
58. Olli, E., Grendstad, G., Wollebaek, D., Correlates of environmental behaviors: bringing back social context. Environ. Behav. 33 (2001), 181–208.
59. Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., McNamara, D.S., Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learn. Instr. 19 (2009), 228–242.
60. Palomo, I., Martín-López, B., Zorrilla-Miras, P., García Del Amo, D., Montes, C., Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. Reg. Environ. Change 14 (2014), 237–251.
61. Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P., Schapire, R.E., Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Modell. 190 (2006), 231–259.
62. Plieninger, T., et al. The role of cultural ecosystem services in landscape management and planning. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14 (2015), 28–33.
63. Pollnac, R., Christie, P., Cinner, J.E., Dalton, T., Daw, T.M., Forester, G.E., Graham, N.A.J., McClanahan, T.R., Marine reserves as linked social-ecological systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 (2010), 18262–18265.
64. Purvis, A., Hector, A., Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature 405 (2000), 212–219.
65. Raymond, C., Bryan, B.A., Hatton McDonald, D., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grangirard, A., Kalivas, T., Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 1301–1315.
66. Raymond, C.M., Fazey, I., Reed, M.S., Stringer, L.C., Robinson, G.M., Evely, A.C., Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. J. Environ. Manage. 91 (2010), 1766–1777.
67. Raymond, C.M., Singh, G.G., Benessaiah, K., Bernhardt, J.R., Levine, J., Nelson, H., Turner, N.J., Norton, B., Tam, J., Chan, K.M.A., Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships. Bioscience 63 (2013), 536–546.
68. Schröter, M., Zanden, E.H., Oudenhoven, A.P.E., Remme, R.P., Serna-Chavez, H.M., de Groot, R.S., Opdam, P., Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conserv. Lett. 7 (2014), 514–523.
69. Sherrouse, B.C., Semmens, D.J., Validating a method for transferring social values of ecosystem services between public lands in the Rocky Mountain region. Ecosyst. Serv. 8 (2014), 166–177.
70. Sherrouse, B.C., Clement, J.M., Semmens, D.J., A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl. Geogr. 31 (2011), 748–760.
71. Sherrouse, B.C., Semmens, D.J., Clement, J.M., An application of social values for ecosystem services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecol. Indic. 36 (2014), 68–79.
72. Sieber, R., Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 96 (2006), 491–507.
73. St. Martin, K., Hall-Arber, M., The missing layer: geo-technologies, communities, and implications for marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 32 (2008), 779–786.
74. Swets, J.A., Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240 (1988), 1285–1293.
75. Tratalos, J.A., Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., Fish, R., Church, A., Cultural ecosystem services in the UK: lessons on designing indicators to inform management and policy. Ecol. Indic. 61 (2016), 63–73.
76. Villa, F., Bagstad, K.J., Voigt, B., Johnson, G.W., Portela, R., Honzák, M., Batker, D., A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e91001.
77. White, D.D., Virden, R.J., van Riper, C.J., Effect of place identity, place dependence, and experience-use-history on perceptions of recreation impacts in a natural setting. Environ. Manage. 42 (2008), 647–657.
78. Whitehead, A.L., Kujala, H., Ives, C.D., Gordon, A., Lentini, P.E., Wintle, B.A., Nicholson, E., Raymond, C.M., Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 28 (2014), 992–1003.
79. de Groot, R.S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., Willemen, L., Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complexity 7 (2010), 260–272.
80. van Riper, C.J., Kyle, G.T., Capturing multiple values of ecosystem services shaped by environmental worldview: a spatial analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 145 (2014), 374–384.
81. van Riper, C.J., Kyle, G.T., Sutton, S.G., Barnes, M., Sherrouse, B.C., Mapping outdoor recreationists’ perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia. Appl. Geogr. 35 (2012), 164–173.