Capturing multiple values of ecosystem services shaped by environmental worldviews: A spatial analysis

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 145, Issue , 2014, Pages 374-384

  Van Riper, Carena J ^a   Kyle, Gerard T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; New ecological paradigm; Outdoor recreation; Protected areas; Public participation geographic information systems

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS; CONSERVATION; DECISION MAKING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; PARKS;

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; NEW ECOLOGICAL PARADIGM; OUTDOOR RECREATION; PROTECTED AREAS; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SURVEY DATA; TWO-LINE; VALUE OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT;

DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GIS; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER; SURVEY;

ADULT; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BIODIVERSITY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; LAND BIOME; MALE; NATIONAL PARK; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECREATION; SCIENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; CONSUMER; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES;

CALIFORNIA; CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK; CHANNEL ISLANDS [CALIFORNIA]; SANTA CRUZ ISLAND; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MALE; RECREATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84905903070     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.014     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Alessa L.N., Kliskey A.A., Brown G. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 85:27-39.
2. Amburgey J.W., Thoman D.B. Dimensionality of the new ecological paradigm: issues of factor structure and measurement. Environ. Behav. 2012, 44(2):235-256.
3. Ban N.C., Mills M., Tam J., Hicks C.C., Klain S., Stoeckl N., et al. Asocial-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2013, 11(4):194-202.
4. Battaglia M.P., Link M.W., Frankel M.R., Osborn L., Mokdad A.H. An evaluation of respondent selection methods for household mail surveys. Public Opin. Q. 2008, 72(3):459-469.
5. Beeco J.A., Brown G. Integrating space, spatial tools, and spatial analysis into the human dimensions of parks and outdoor recreation. Appl. Geogr. 2013, 38:76-85.
6. Bengston D.N., Xu Z. Changing National Forest Values: a Content Analysis 1995, USDA, Forest Service General Technical Report NC-323, 29 p.
7. Bentler P.M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 1990, 107:238-246.
8. Borrie W.T., Freimund W.A., Davenport M.A. Winter visitors to Yellowstone National Park: their value orientations and support for management action. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 2002, 9(2):41-48.
9. Bridge G., Perreault T. Environmental governance. ACompanion to Environmental Geography 2009, 475-497. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden. N. Castree, D. Demeritt, D. Liverman, B. Rhoads (Eds.).
10. Brown M. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation 2009, MIT Press.
11. Brown G. The relationship between social values for ecosystem services and global land cover: an empirical analysis. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 5:58-68.
12. Brown G., Brabyn L. An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 107(3):317-331.
13. Brown G., Montag J.M., Lyon K. Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2012, 25:633-651.
14. Brown G., Raymond C. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: toward mapping place attachment. Appl. Geogr. 2007, 27:89-111.
15. Brown G., Reed P. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. For. Sci. 2000, 46(2):240-247.
16. Brown G., Reed P., Harris C. Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: an Alaska case study. Appl. Geogr. 2002, 22(1):49-76.
17. Brown G.G., Reed P. Social landscape metrics: measures for understanding place values from Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS). Landsc. Res. 2012, 37(1):73-90.
18. Brown T.C. The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Econ. 1984, 60(3):231-246.
19. Bryan B.A., Raymond C.M., Crossman N.D., Macdonald D.H. Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what, and how?. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 97(2):111-122.
20. Callicott J.B. Non-anthropocentric value theory and environmental ethics. Am. Philos. Q. 1984, 21:299-309.
21. Carver S., Watson A., Waters T., Matt R., Gunderson K., Davis B. Developing computer-based participatory approaches to mapping landscape values for landscape and resource management. Planning Support Systems Best Practice and New Methods 2009, vol. 95:431-448. Springer, Netherlands.
22. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) Protected Areas in Today's World: their Values and Benefits for the Welfare of the Planet 2008, Technical Series no. 36, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal.
23. Chan K.M.A., Satterfield T., Goldstein J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 74:8-18.
24. Cordell H.K., Bergstrom J.C., Bowker J.M. The Multiple Values of Wilderness 2005, Venture Publishing, State College, PA.
25. Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387:253-260.
26. D'Antonio A., Monz C., Newman P., Lawson S., Taff D. Enhancing the utility of visitor impact assessment in parks and protected areas: a combined social-ecological approach. J.Environ. Manag. 2013, 124:72-81.
27. Daily G.C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems 1997, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
28. Daniel T.C., Muhar A., Arnberger A., Aznar O., Boyd J.W., Chan K.M.A., et al. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109(23):8812-8819.
29. Davis G. Science and society: marine reserve design for the California Channel Islands. Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19:1745-1751.
30. Davis S.K., Thompson J.L., Schweizer S.E. Innovations in on-site survey administration: using iPad interface at National Wildlife Refuges and National Parks. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2012, 17:282-294.
31. De Groot J.I., Steg L. Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. J.Environ. Psychol. 2010, 30(4):368-378.
32. de Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M.J. Atypology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41:393-408.
33. Dietz T., Fitzgerald A., Shwom R. Environmental values. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005, 30(1):335-372.
34. Dunlap R.E., Van Liere K.D. The "New Environmental Paradigm": a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. J.Environ. Educ. 1978, 9:10-19.
35. Dunlap R.E., Van Liere K.D., Mertig A.G., Jones R.E. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J.Soc. Issues 2000, 56:425-442.
36. Eagles P.F.J. Trends in park tourism: economics, finance and management. J.Sustain. Tour. 2002, 10(2):132-153.
37. English A.J., Lee E. Managing the intangible. George Wright Forum 2004, 21(2):23-33.
38. Fry J., Xian G., Jin S., Dewitz J., Homer C., Yang L., et al. Completion of the 2006 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. PE&RS 2011, 77:858-864.
39. Gherini J. Santa Cruz Island: a History of Conflict and Diversity 2005, Arthur H. Clark Company, Spokane, WA.
40. Guagnano G.A., Stern P.C., Dietz T. Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: a natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environ. Behav. 1995, 27(5):699-718.
41. Hair J.F., Black W.C. Cluster analysis. Reading and Understanding More Multivariate Statistics 2000, 147-206. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. L.G. Grimm, P.R. Yarnold (Eds.).
42. Hall C., Moran D. Investigating GM risk perceptions: a survey of anti-GM and environmental campaign group members. J.Rural Stud. 2006, 22(1):29-37.
43. Harmon D. Intangible values of protected areas: what are they? Why do they matter?. George Wright Forum 2004, 21(2):9-22.
44. Harmon D., Putney A.D. The full value of parks: from economics to the intangible 2003, Rowman & Littlefield.
45. Hawcroft L.J., Milfont T.L. The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: a meta-analysis. J.Environ. Psychol. 2010, 30:143-158.
46. Hu L.T., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 1999, 6(1):1-55.
47. Kaplan S. The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J.Environ. Psychol. 1995, 15(3):169-182.
48. Klain S.C., Chan K.M.A. Navigating coastal values: participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 82:104-113.
49. Kline R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling 2011, The Guilford Press, New York, NY.
50. Knight A.T., Cowling R.M., Rouget M., Balmford A., Lombard A.T., Campbell B.M. Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22(3):610-617.
51. Kumar M., Kumar P. Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 64(4):808-819.
52. LaFranchi C., Pendleton L. Private Boating and Boater Activities in the Channel Islands: a Spatial Analysis and Assessment 2008, Report prepared for The Resources Legacy Fund Foundation and The National Marine Sanctuary Program.
53. Lawson S.R., Manning R.E. Solitude versus access: a study of tradeoffs in outdoor recreation using indifference curve analysis. Leis. Sci. 2001, 23(3):179-191.
54. Manning R. Studies in Outdoor Recreation: Search and Research for Satisfaction 2011, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.
55. Manning R., Vallerie W., Minteer B. Values, ethics, and attitudes toward national forest management: an empirical study. Soc. Nat. Resour. 1999, 12(5):421-436.
56. Martín-López B., Iniesta-Arandia I., García-Llorente M., Palomo I., Casado-Arzuaga I., Amo D.G.D., et al. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e38970.
57. Mascia M.B., Pailler S. Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications. Conserv. Lett. 2011, 4(1):9-20.
58. McCauley D.J. Selling out on nature. Nature 2006, 443:27-28.
59. McCook L.J., Ayling T., Cappo M., Choat J.H., Evans R.D., De Freitas D.M., et al. Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef: a globally significant demonstration of the benefits of networks of marine reserves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107(43):18278-18285.
60. McIntyre N., Moore J., Yuan M. Aplace-based, values-centered approach to managing recreation on Canadian crown lands. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2008, 21(8):657-670.
61. Milfont T.L., Duckitt J. The structure of environmental attitudes: a first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis. J.Environ. Psychol. 2004, 24:289-303.
62. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Health Synthesis 2005, Wold Health Organization, Washington D.C.
63. Nash R.F. Wilderness and the American Mind 1995, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
64. NPS (National Park Service) ACall to Action: Preparing for a Second Century of Stewarship and Engagement 2012, National Park Service, Can be accessed:. http://www.nps.gov/calltoaction/.
65. NPS (National Park Service) Type of Use/Monthly/Annual Visits Report 2013, National Park Service, Can be accessed:. http://www.nps.gov/grca/parkmgmt/statistics.htm.
66. Naughton-Treves L., Holland M.B., Brandon K. The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005, 30(1):219-252.
67. Nielsen-Pincus M. Mapping a values typology in three counties of the interior Northwest, USA: scale, geographic associations among values, and the use of intensity weights. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2011, 24(6):535-552.
68. Norlund A.M., Garvill J. Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environ. Behav. 2002, 34:740-756.
69. Nooney J.G., Woodrum E., Hoban T.J., Clifford W.B. Environmental worldview and behavior: consequences of dimensionality in a survey of North Carolinians. Environ. Behav. 2003, 35(6):763-783.
70. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric Theory 1978, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
71. Oskamp S., Schultz P.W. Attitudes and Opinions 2005, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
72. Ostrom E. Adiagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2007, 104:15181-15187.
73. Palomo I., Martín-López B., Zorrilla-Miras P., García Del Amo D., Montes C. Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. Reg. Environ. Change 2014, 14:237-251.
74. Phillips S.J., Anderson R.P., Schapire R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006, 190:231-259.
75. Plieninger T., Dijks S., Oteros-Rozas E., Bieling C. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 2013, 33:118-129.
76. Pressman J.L., Wildavsky A.B. Implementation 1984, University of California Press.
77. Raymond C.M., Bryan B.A., Hatton McDonald D., Cast A., Strathearn S., Grangirard A., Kalivas T. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:1301-1315.
78. Robbins P., McSweeney K., Chhangani A.K., Rice J.L. Conservation as it is: illicit resource use in a wildlife reserve in India. Hum. Ecol. 2009, 37:559-575.
79. Rokeach M. The Nature of Human Values 1973, Free Press, New York, NY.
80. Rolston H. Human values and natural systems. Soc. Nat. Resour. 1988, 1:271-283.
81. Rolston H., Coufal J. Aforest ethic and multivalue forest management: the integrity of forests and of foresters are bound together. J.For. 1991, 89(1):35-40.
82. Runte A. National Parks: the American Experience 1997, University of Nebraska Press. third ed.
83. Sabatier P. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci. 1988, 21:129-168.
84. Sabatier P.A. Theories of the Policy Process 2007, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
85. Satterfield T., Gregory R., Klain S., Roberts M., Chan K.M. Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. J.Environ. Manag. 2013, 117:103-114.
86. Schroeder H. Sensing value in place. Place-based Conservation: Perspectives from the Social Sciences 2013, 131-155. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. W. Stewart, D. William, L. Kruger (Eds.).
87. Schultz P.W., Zelezny L. Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: evidence for consistency across 14 countries. J.Environ. Psychol. 1999, 19:255-265.
88. Schwartz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1992, 1-65. Academic Press, New York. M. Zanna (Ed.).
89. Schwartz S.H. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?. J.Soc. Issues 1994, 50(4):19-45.
90. Seymour E., Curtis A., Pannell D., Allan C., Roberts A. Understanding the role of assigned values in natural resource management. Australas. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 17:142-153.
91. Sherrouse B.C., Clement J.M., Semmens D.J. AGIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl. Geogr. 2011, 31(2):748-760.
92. Sherrouse B.C., Semmens D.J., Clement J.M. An application of Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 36:68-79.
93. Sieber R. Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2006, 96(3):491-507.
94. Silverman B.W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis 1986, Chapman and Hall, New York.
95. Spence M.D. Dispossessing the Wilderness: Indian Removal and the Making of the National Parks 1999, Oxford University Press, New York.
96. St Martin K., Hall-Arber M. The missing layer: geo-technologies, communities, and implications for marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 2008, 32:779-786.
97. Steel B.S., List P., Shindler B. Conflicting values about federal forests: a comparison of national and Oregon publics. Soc. Nat. Resour. 1994, 7:137-153.
98. Steiger J.H. Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 2007, 42(5):893-898.
99. Stern P.C. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J.Soc. Issues 2000, 56(3):407-424.
100. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Abel T., Guagnano G.A., Kalof L. Avalue-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 1999, 6(2):81-97.
101. Sutton S.G., Tobin R.C. Recreational fishers' attitudes towards the 2004 rezoning of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Environ. Conserv. 2009, 36(3):245-252.
102. Tanner R.J., Freimund W.A., Borrie W.T., Moisey R.N. Ameta-study of the values of visitors to four protected areas in the western United States. Leis. Sci. 2008, 30(5):377-390.
103. Tarrant M.A., Cordell H.K., Green G.T. PVF: a scale to measure public values of forests. J.For. 2003, 101:24-30.
104. Turaga R.M.R., Howarth R.B., Borsuk M.E. Pro-environmental behavior: rational choice meets moral motivation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1185(1):211-224.
105. Van Riper C.J., Manning R.E., Monz C., Goonan K.A. Tradeoffs among resource, social, and managerial conditions on mountain summits of the Northern Forest. Leis. Sci. 2011, 33(3):228-249.
106. Van Riper C.J., Kyle G.T. Understanding the internal processes of behavioral engagement: a latent variable path analysis of the value-belief-norm theory. J.Environ. Psychol. 2014, 38:288-297.
107. Van Riper C.J., Kyle G.T., Sutton S.G., Barnes M., Sherrouse B.C. Mapping outdoor recreationists' perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 35:164-173.
108. Vaske J.J., Donnelly M.P. Avalue-attitude-behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Soc. Nat. Resour. 1999, 12(6):523-537.
109. Wynveen C.J., Kyle G.T., Sutton S.G. Environmental worldview, place attachment, and awareness of environmental impacts in a marine environment. Environ. Behav. 2014, in press.
110. Zube E.H. Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landsc. Ecol. 1987, 1(1):37-45.